As I have reported on many occasions (see here and here and here and here and here and here), a for-profit company called Bridge International Academies has been building a market for low-cost, for-profit schooling in Africa. It has been negotiating with the government of Liberia to take charge of all primary education and expanding in Uganda. Investors in BIA include Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg.
Last summer, the Ministry of Education and Sports ordered the closure of 87 for-profit academies, including the 60 or so managed by BIA, on grounds that they did not meet minimum standards or appropriate facilities for students. Teachers’ unions objected to the academies’ use of un-credentialed teachers. This month, the Uganda High Court ordered the closure of all of BIA’s schools in Uganda.
BIA has 63 campuses and 12,000 students in Uganda. They will remain open until December 8, when students take their exams.
A legal tug-of-war between Ugandan authorities and a for-profit international chain of schools has led to the education provider being ordered to shut down in a matter of weeks, leaving the lives of thousands of pupils in limbo….
Bridge International Academies said it provides the best possible education to its students and that it will do whatever it can to make sure their schools continue to operate in Uganda.
Many students, parents and teachers protested after Uganda High Court ordered the closure of the low-cost private schools, which are backed by Microsoft and Facebook founders Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg.
Bridge International Academies has suggested that the opposition against their chain of schools was because the campuses competed against local state-run and private schools.
The Director of Education Standards for the Ministry, Huzaifa Mutazindwa, told CNN that the nursery and primary schools were not licensed, the teachers weren’t qualified and that there was no record of its curriculum being approved.
“The Ministry does not know what is being taught in these schools which is a point of concern to (the) government,” Mutazindwa said…
For its part, BIA — which runs more than 400 nursery and primary schools across Africa — has continuously denied the allegations that have been made by the government.
“There’s a lot of miscommunication and a lot of very serious, unfounded allegations. We would like to be given the opportunity to explain ourselves … The Ministry has been unwilling to give us an audience to set the record straight,” Uganda’s BIA director, Andrew White, told CNN.
In a statement, BIA addressed eight allegations that have been made about its operations. It said it teaches the Ugandan curriculum, all schools have good sanitation facilities and that the majority of their teachers are certified and registered. Those who aren’t certified and registered, it said, are attending in-service training.
When asked why the allegations were made if they weren’t true, White said: “We definitely feel like a lot of pressure has been applied to have a particular view of Bridge that is a negative one….”
One educational advocacy group agrees with the Ugandan authorities’ decision to close BIA.
President of the Global Campaign for Education (GCE), Camilla Croso, told CNN that the quality of their schools is “totally inadequate and unacceptable.”
“They are profit making enormously,” she said. “It’s very indecent because they are looking at poor people as a profitable market.”
“It really is incompatible to have human rights and profit making because you are motivated and act in completely different ways.”

“It really is incompatible to have human rights and profit making because you are motivated and act in completely different ways.”
That’s it in a nutshell really. Profit making conflicts with the public good everywhere. In our country, the new normal is to kick out anything left for the public good and replace it with private profiteering. We are throwing away our collective benefits -we are lacking Uganda’s wisdom.
LikeLike
Thrilled that these schools are being shut down.
LikeLike
That’s a heartening blow to global Big Data and Big Brother, Zuckerberg and Gates.
LikeLike
The GCE has actually a whole study on “low cost” private schools.
Click to access PPPL_FINAL%20EDITION_15%20SEPT%202016_A4_WEB.pdf
This report examines the evidence behind the major claims
made in favour of increased privatisation, as well as the
potential of a public alternative to achieve quality education
for all. With the future of so many children on the line,
and the poorest lagging furthest behind, there is an urgent
need to invest wisely in education, especially in the poorest
countries. This report challenges governments and donors
to act on the evidence of what works to deliver quality,
inclusive education, given the long-term repercussions for
education systems around the world.
Not surpisingly, much of the report applies to the charter school movement in the US as well.
GCE provides a catchy statistics to highlight priorities: people spend more money (28 billion) in a month on cigarettes than would be needed to spend on adult education in the whole developing world in a year.
LikeLike
More from the GCE report I just linked to
A growing trend: low-fee private schools
Recently there has been a growth in the establishment
of for-profit, low-fee private schools in low- and middleincome
countries. As the name suggests, these schools
charge a small fee, relative to traditional private schools,
and target lower-income families.
One trend is the expansion of chains of low-fee private
schools, such as the US-business owned Bridge
International Academies which predominantly operate in
Kenya and Uganda, and are expanding to other countries,
Omega Schools in Ghana that are co-owned by a British
businessman James Tooley, and APEC Schools in the
Philippines. Omega and Bridge schools deliver a low-cost,
high-tech model, described by Bridge as ‘Academy in a
box’, that aims to serve the largest number of students at
the lowest possible cost. They make profit from fees which
range from US$6 to US$149
per month per pupil and
through continual expansion and reduction of costs. They
rely on unqualified, low-waged teachers and technology to
deliver standardised lessons; in Omega schools, teachers
earn 20 percent of the salaries of their public sector
counterparts.
There is considerable money to be made from even
relatively low fees, as well as other services such as textbook
development and ICT, which is driving corporate interest
in education in the poorest countries. Bridge International
Academies, for example, are expecting to earn a profit of
US$500 million in the next 10 years. Innova Schools,
a chain of 23 low-fee private schools in Peru owned by
Intercorp, a Peruvian conglomerate, was estimating its
2014 profits at $22 million. Education companies and
their investors are keen to tap into the lucrative education
market, currently estimated to be worth around US$4.4
trillion,13 by supporting such schools. The CEO of Pearson,
the world’s largest education company, has described
education as one of “the great growth industries of the 21st
Century”.
Pearson itself has made financial investments in a
substantial number of low-fee, for-profit private school
chains in Nigeria, South Africa, and the Philippines,16 as
well as in the Omega Chain in Ghana. In so doing, Pearson
is actively increasing its global reach, as well as its voice in
global education debates, for example through its seat on
the Board of the Global Partnership for Education.
LikeLike
One more quote from the GCE report
In terms of
training, in Ghana, half of teachers in government schools
have not been trained – but this rises to 90 percent in
low-fee private schools. The Omega and Bridge chains
provide three weeks of pre-service training in how to
deliver standardised lessons, to teachers with no previous
training. Moreover, LFPS chains (including Omega
and Bridge) rely on pre-scripted lesson plans that further
undermine quality.
LikeLike
Those pre-scripted lessons made in Massachusetts to be used in Uganda would be the equivalent of Fetullah Gulen creating pre-scripted lessons in Istanbul to be used in the United States. It is an attack on the sovereignty of a nation to impose curricula as a foreigner. It is far more than just insulting, like telling other countries to raise modified chickens.
LikeLike
We should try to spread the word about the African rejection of for profit on-line schools led by facilitators with minimal training. If the Bridge model is not adequate for Africa, why would anyone believe that “personalized learning,” or even blended learning, a variation on the same for profit theme has any value for American students?
LikeLike
Exactly!
LikeLike
I don’t have any specifics and I assume many of the others commenting don’t either. However, I find two issues of importance. Does anyone believe the government of Uganda can deliver a better education than Zuckenberg and Gates in this impoverished country and do you really think these two billionaires are in it for the money?
LikeLike
YES and YES!!!!!
LikeLike
Would you want your children to be taught from scripts coming from …. anywhere but your country? From anywhere but your State? By non-teachers? Which cost you a good portion of your income? I certainly would not. The situation in Uganda is pertinent and specific to Uganda. For sure, I do not know what needs to be learned there beyond reading, writing, math…but certainly there are cultural difference between what would be scripted by Gates and Zuckerberg… and to be completely ridiculous (?) would Gates include a course on raising chickens? Perhaps he would.
LikeLike
Tom Brown:
When do billionaires decide they don’t like money or the power it buys anymore? Does the hedge fund manager decide to stop making money over breakfast one day? Does the tech billionaire who mistreated employees and backstabbed his way to the top of a global, silicon duopoly suddenly decide telling people what to do and believe isn’t for him? Does someone who’s made a lifelong practice of dangling money before the eyes of public officials the world over to give his products an edge in the market just stop? Is that decision made while having his servants saddle his racehorses, or while they fuel his jet?
Is computerized school real learning? Have you asked that of any of the online charter students missing 180 out of 180 days of math learning a year? Have you seen the results of the study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development which showed that overuse of technology is significantly deleterious to learning? Do you realize that suggesting the use of tech known to fail as a replacement of teachers and curriculum in developing countries is suggestive of a less than respectful and tolerant attitude toward other nationalities?
And as for having specifics about this issue, we do. We get them from this blog. See some of the links above. I think Gates and Z-berg are wrong here, Tom. I’d like you to reconsider your position by questioning your thoughts about Daddy Warbucks saving little orphaned nations.
LikeLike
TOM Brown,
As a general rule, for-profit corporations are intended to make a profit. It is possible that Gates and Zuckerberg don’t want to make money since they can never spend their billions in their lifetimes. Maybe they think that vital public services are best delivered by for-profit companies. But where does that leave the many millions of families who can’t afford $1 a week, families with more than one child?
LikeLike
Uganda’s government recognizes the reality that they were invaded by a corporate state run by American oligarchs, a corporate state that calls itself BIA, and Uganda’s government is fighting back to reclaim their own country.
LikeLike
To take a cue from FaceBook, I LIKE your post~! Totally agree.
LikeLike
Billionaires, and their obsession with cheap fixes, veneers and outright illusions.
LikeLike
Maybe OUR obsession with cheap fixes, veneers and outright illusions made these folks billionaires.
LikeLike
Wow–I find it fascinating that Uganda (a country that has suffered a maniacal dictator & other assorted injustices) has the cajones to kick out the billionaire snake-oil salesmen!
Take notes, American Government…esp. POTUS, who insults the entire nation by giving B. & M. Gates the Presidential Medal of Honor in the waning days of his administration.
Again…WHAT education legacy?! Oh, right…the worst possible.
LikeLike
And–meant to add–if memory serves me correctly, didn’t the Abbott & Costello of (not) education–Arne & Paul (Vallas) visit Haiti after the devastating earthquake, to see about “helping” the schools?! (They had a name for folk like them post-Civil War– carpet-
baggers.) Something about computers & technology–funnier than a Mel Brooks movie, as, not only had the schools Haiti DID have collapse in rubble, but they didn’t even have water or…electricity!
And, of course, we all know that the American oligarchy is attempting, mightily, to make America into a third-world country. After the Earth is totally ruined, we’ll see the 1% take off to Mars, ala the film Elysium (no mistake that Matt Damon, a great spokesperson for all of us, starred in it).
LikeLike
maybe they are smarter than us…than U. S.
LikeLike