I posted Robert Pondiscio’s proposal this morning that a talented African-American teacher-journalist should take Peter Cunningham’s job at Education Post, and that other white leaders of the reform movement should step aside because the reform movement has too many whites (with little or no teaching experience) in leadership roles.
The woman he recommended is Marilyn Rhames. She wrote a response to Pondiscio’s proposal.
In a sharp response, she reminds reformers that the point of “reform” is supposed to be about improving the education of black and brown children, not high-paying jobs for reformers.
“I wanted very much to believe that you had moved closer to acknowledging the racist paternalism that exists in reform circles after you lauded my “stellar” resume. But in highlighting my genius, you subtly sounded the alarm: Marilyn Anderson Rhames is a major black talent who could very well take your job, Peter Cunningham (and other white ed leaders who signed the diversity pledge). What a way to endorse multiculturalism!
My Ivy League educated, teacher-journalist-mother African American self has the potential to make a seismic shift in the systemic injustice that blocks black and brown children from a quality education, so why didn’t your piece frame me in that light? Instead, you positioned me as a threat. In your piece, I was the “other” in an us-versus-them fight for limited, high-paying ed reform jobs. Your title says it all: “Reform Leaders: You’re Fired.”
Ain’t I a reformer? In light of all my brilliance, your title should have been, “Black Reform Leaders: You’re Finally Hired!”
Your piece states that my ex-boss Peter Cunningham, and the many other middle-aged, privileged, non-educator white men who manage the education reform agenda that impacts millions of black and brown children living in poverty, need to step down from their six-figure salaries and let the “foot soldiers,” like me take their place. Why stop at Cunningham? You could have offered your nice-paying job at the Fordham Institute to me. I just may be more qualified than you to do your job, too!
Oh, I forgot, that to you would be “suicide.””
Marilyn,
I hope that you know that no high-performing nation in the world allows entrepreneurs, corporate charter chains, and non-educators to get public money to run privately controlled schools. You should also know, though your friends in the reform movement won’t tell you, that the surest path to a well-paying job and the middle class is a union job, with good pay, reasonable hours, and a pension. Surely you know that the money for the reform movement comes from the anti-union Walton family and Wall Street financiers. Rightwing governor’s like Scott Walker and Rick Scott love to create charters and offer vouchers while defunding the public schools that most black and brown children attend.
I invite you to stand with us to protect public schools from privatization and to fight for the resources and transformation in every state that will make every public school a good school for every child. We don’t have any billionaires on our side, but we have millions of parents and teachers and many others who understand that public education is a pillar of democracy. Privatization always produces inequality, winners and losers. Join us. We need you.

Marilyn should also look at the history of Sweden and Chile and their attempts to privatize education. The results were less than stellar: increased segregation, regrets, failure and, in the case of Chile, strikes and riots. Both countries are now trying to dig themselves out of the gaping hole caused by privatization. No country has ever successfully privatized its educational system, and we are well on the way to massive inequity and failure.
LikeLike
Here is a link to Tilson’s latest rant today on this issue. Disgusting that this hedge fund head of the DFERs would presume to know more about what is good for children of color than the NAACP leadership.
The NAACP’s Disgrace
The civil-rights group votes to keep minorities trapped in poverty.
WSJ, Oct. 16, 2016 5:32 p.m. ET
http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-naacps-disgrace-1476653537
LikeLike
“Trapped” in the sense that Wall Street can’t make profits of 10-18% on charter school debt.
LikeLike
Isn’t she a huge advocate of forced prayer in public schools?
LikeLike
I have no problem with students that want to form prayer groups that function like clubs before or after school. As long as it is optional, I don’t think it violates anyone’s rights.
LikeLike
Only as long as these prayer groups do not meet on Public School property nor are they sanctioned by the Public School. Otherwise, it is an issue of separation of church and state. If a stident chooses to pray, they certainly can say singular silent prayers at any time, as one might do before a test, but not aloud on school property where it intrudes on the beliefs of others.
I rarely disagree with you, retired teacher, but here is a issue where I see this differently. There are so many venues that are not public schools or public buildings, where religious students can meet.
LikeLike
“the racist paternalism that exists in reform circles” ….with a financial investment from billionaire reformers who are intent on keeping that relationshiship. while appearing to generous to a fault. From the Gates Foundation database, two very large grants:
$1,525,380,950 to the United Negro College fund and
$417, 215, 300 to the Hispanic Scholarship fund.
Key word searches turned up multiple grants to groups that form the “the new majority” and are willing to promote the Gates agenda — for charter schools, the Common Core, computer-dependent learning and such.
LikeLike
If racist paternalism is endemic to so-called education reform – and it is, and intense class antagonism, as well – why does Ms. Rhames continue to want to be identified with it, let alone have anything whatsoever to do with it?
It’s a little late in the game to just now bring up the racism, paternalism and class warfare embedded in so-called reform; after all, what happened in New Orleans after Katrina, and the fact that so-called reformers continue to refer to it as one of their “successes,” provides all the proof one might need, encapsulating the racism (firing an mostly-Black workforce) and class warfare (busting the union) foundations of so-called reform.
“Education reform” is a term that has long since been hijacked by people who have little concern for education (save for its social engineering aspects), and whose concerns are profit and power. For anyone who has been teaching over the past dozen years, it should be radioactive, and no educator of any race should have anything to do with it.
Those educators who are particularly concerned about the welfare of poor Black and Brown children can best serve them by insisting on and fighting for a fully-funded, equitable system of public schools open to all, and serving all, not a private system recruiting “the talented tenth” or “strivers” to be subjected to segregated, behaviorist boot camps.
LikeLike