Carol Burris, a veteran high school principal in New York state, recently retired and became executive director of the Network for Public Education. She is currently completing a four-part series on charter schools in California and will write additional reports about privatization in other states.
She writes here about an important court decision in California that was released yesterday.
Just how important was this decision? It was a Court of Appeal decision that overturned the Superior Court decision in Shasta County. So, it is binding law throughout California and overturns the trial court’s incorrect decision (essentially that out of district in county resource center are allowed since not specifically prohibited by the charter schools act).
Carol Burris writes:
Readers who have been following our NPE series on charters in California are familiar with the storefront charters and not-for profit shells of K12 that are multiplying across the Golden State. Many of these charters have terrible graduation rates–some as low as 0%. Students rarely check in–some have the requirement of going to a center only once every 20 days.
Their explosive growth was a result of small elementary districts colluding with charter chains that operate charter “learning centers” in order to get revenue, even though the charters are not in their district, and sometimes not even in the same county. The charters promise these districts that they will not open in their district but rather in other districts which, in turn, lose both revenues and students.
Although the legislature tried to rein in this predatory practice, the bill they passed was recently vetoed by Jerry Brown who opened two charter schools himself [when he was mayor of Oakland] and has an “anything goes” attitude towards charters–including for profits. Luckily, the court had more sense.
Yesterday The Court of Appeal called the practice a violation of the law. It is a stunning victory against these charters, which had the full support of the California Charter School Association (CCSA). CCSA, which is funded by billionaires such as Reed Hastings, Eli Broad, the Waltons and Doris Fisher, is now the most powerful lobby in the state. The Court of Appeal reversed a lower court decision and its decision covers the entire state.
You can read more about the decision and its implications here.
Congratulations to the Anderson Union High School District who had the guts to stand up for its taxpayers and students. Congratulations also to the San Diego law firm of Dannis, Woliver and Kelley that carefully argued a complicated law and to the California School Boards Association who lent their support.

Thank you Carol Burris for your reporting on this morass. We also had a tiny city vote yesterday for a moratorium on charters for a year — very brave given they were threatened with losing the next election. Huntington Park city is 3.1 square miles and has 22!! charters. Very few public schools.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Joan, amazing!
LikeLike
YES. Many thanks to a transparency coming, now, from investigations into the mess!
LikeLike
Diane, did you see this? http://chicago.suntimes.com/politics/chicago-could-become-first-city-to-bargain-cap-on-charter-schools/ Also, there is a glowing article in Chicago Mag about Arne Duncan. I live in Chicago and will do everything I can to prevent him from running for office. I’ve posted a blog you wrote several times on FB so keep them coming. I worked in Sec Riley’s Dept of Ed and you were the enemy then. Now you are my hero.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Regan.
I’m still waiting for Duncan to own up to the failure of Renaissance 2010 and Race to the Top.
Secretary Riley is a great man.
LikeLike
“I’m still waiting for. . . ”
Please do not hold your breath while doing so!!
LikeLike
Chicago is no longaer as naive as the reformers like to think!
LikeLike
Children attending private schools after an extensive public school search.
LikeLike
Wondering and hoping that this will shut down CAVA the CA Virtual Academy fiasco.
And K-12, Inc that both are inferior educational programs.
LikeLike
The state has to shit down CAVA and the state board does nothing about this awful “school”
LikeLike
We have some schools in my district (Escondido, CA) that are technically independent study locations that have never been approved by the local school boards. The largest is called Dehesa ( a 1 school district in San Diego County). These schools also come from a district of about 200 students — and they are all over San Diego County. Some of these schools are actually onsite schools that get around the rules by only requiring students to attend class 4 days per week (so they meet the 80 percent rule). However, they strongly stress the kids come to an optional lab on Fridays. Most of the parents do not have any idea their kids are attending an “independent study” school. They have aftercare programs, playgrounds etc — all the indicators of an onsite school. These schools should also be affected by this ruling, but I haven’t seen anything written about them, which is surprising because they have thousands of students. If I am reading the ruling correctly, these schools should also be affected. There is also a small chain of schools run by National University that are set up the same way. I am curious to see what will happen with these schools. I am not seeing anything posted on their facebook pages about the ruling.
LikeLike