This post is a profile of Doris Fisher, the California billionaire who wants to privatize public schools and open corporate-run charters with no ties to the local community.
“As co-founder of the Gap, San Francisco-based business leader and philanthropist Doris Fisher boasts a net worth of $2.6 billion, making her the country’s third richest self-made woman, according to Forbes. And she’s focused much of her wealth and resources on building charter schools. She and her late husband Donald donated more than $70 million to the Knowledge is Power Program (KIPP) and helped to personally build the operation into the largest network of charter schools in the country, with 200 schools serving 80,000 students in 20 states. Doris’ son John serves as the chairman of KIPP’s board of directors, and she sits on the board herself.
“Doris’ passion for charter schools also fuels her political donations. While not as well-known as other deep-pocketed charter school advocates like Eli Broad and the Walton family (heirs to the Walmart fortune), Fisher and her family have quietly become among the largest political funders of charter school efforts in the country. Having contributed $5.6 million to state political campaigns since 2013, Fisher was recently listed as the second largest political donor in California by the Sacramento Bee – and nearly all of her money now goes to promoting pro-charter school candidates and organizations. While often labelled a Republican, she gives to Democrats and Republicans alike, just as long as they’re supportive of the charter school movement. According to campaign finance reports, so far this election cycle she’s spent more than $3.3 million on the political action committees of charter school advocacy groups EdVoice and the California Charter Schools Association (CCSA), as well as pro-charter candidates. (Christopher Nelson, managing director of the Fishers’ philanthropic organization, sits on the board of CCSA, which, along with EdVoice, declined to comment for this article.)
“Fisher’s philanthropic and political efforts are not as straightforward as simply promoting education, however. Recent investigations have found that she’s used dark-money networks to funnel funds into California campaign initiatives that many say targeted teachers and undermined public education. It’s why many education activists worry about the impact her money is having on California politics – and on California schoolchildren.”
What is less well known than her passion for privatization is that spends millions in “dark money” to harm the state’s public schools.
“Even if some of the charter schools Fisher champions have been a success, she’s secretly supported efforts that critics regard as undermining the success of the public school system and teachers. A recent investigation by California Hedge Clippers, a coalition of community groups and unions, found that Fisher was one of a number of wealthy Californians who in 2012 used a dark money network involving out-of-state organizations linked to the conservative Koch brothers to shield their donations to controversial campaign efforts that year. The money was used to oppose Proposition 30, a tax on high-income Californians to fund public schools and public safety, and support Proposition 32, which, among other things, would have severely limited the ability of organized labor, including teachers unions, to raise money for state and local races.
“At the time of the campaign, none of these donations were public. In fact, fellow charter-school advocate Eli Broad publically endorsed Proposition 30 while secretly donating $500,000 to the dark money fund dedicated to defeating it. And Fisher herself had close ties to Governor Jerry Brown, a key proponent of Proposition 30. Brown’s wife Anne Gust Brown worked as chief administrative officer at the Gap until 2005 and is credited with helping to improve the company’s labor standards, and the Fishers were major financial supporters of Brown’s 2014 campaign to pass Proposition 1, the water bond, and Proposition 2, the “rainy day budget” stabilization act.
“I would imagine that it caused some domestic strife,” says Karen Wolfe, a California parent and founder of PSconnect, a community group that advocates for traditional public schools. “[Anne likely] thought she had the Fishers’ support on her husband’s crowning achievement, a tax to finally balance California’s budget and bring the state out of functional bankruptcy. This was absolutely his highest priority.”
“In total, according to the Hedge Clippers investigation, Fisher and her sons donated more than $18 million to the dark money group. It wasn’t the only time the Fisher family has worked with political organizations known for concealing their financial supporters. In 2006, current KIPP chairman John Fisher gave $85,000 to All Children Matter, a school-privatization political action group in Ohio that was slapped with a record-setting $5.2 million fine for illegally funneling contributions through out-of-state dark money networks. Instead of paying the fine, All Children Matter shut down and one of its conservative founders launched a new group: the Alliance for School Choice, which in 2011 listed John Fisher as its secretary. And last year, Doris Fisher contributed $750,000 to California Charter School Association Advocates, which funneled such donations to a local committee. The names of individual donors wouldn’t be disclosed until after the election.”
How sad that a woman worth more than $2 billion would secretly fund campaigns to block funding of the public schools that enroll 90% of children in California. What is she thinking?

What would one expect from someone who likes to fund Kids In Prison Programs (KIPP).
LikeLike
I find it curious how two families like the Fishers and the Waltons who run businesses which pay their employees very little aggressively advocate for charter schools. I’m so glad I rarely I buy at the Gap.
In midtown Manhattan today I saw adults and children wearing shirts which said, “Charting the Path to Possible.” I wonder if this is our friend Eva at work again.
LikeLike
Hello Diane,
The answer to your question seems simple enough. Given this woman’s background and success, it is likely that she is intelligent enough to read the research and make her own decision. My guess is that she has read the abundant research that you have chosen to selectively ignore indicating that charter schools are serving many students and families well.
Parents want choices regarding their child’s education. Charter schools provide great options for parents that would not otherwise be there. The improvement of service as a result of competition is a simple concept that works well for The customer in so many areas of business. I’m not sure why you continue to see no reason to think that idea also applies to schools.
LikeLike
Public school parents are not customers, subject to the whims of policy change by unaccountable private management, but people with civil and human rights that should not be abridged.
Supporters of school privatization use the language of choice (which is bogus, since in reality it’s the charter schools, not parents, that exercise choice in selecting and discharging students) to rob people of their democratic rights to a decent public school education, in order to satisfy their greed and will to power.
LikeLike
LIke!
LikeLike
Excellent. It is always the charter school’s choice, even with “lottery assignments.
Educational choice by lottery is no choice at all.
The illusion of choice is sustained by big money and by billionaire financed belief tanks that churnout non-peer reviewed research then put dubious conclusions into PR mills.
LikeLike
As far as the value of “choice,” with selective charters it is often the schools that do the choosing, not the students. They choose the cheapest and easiest educate and leave public schools with the most expensive and challenging students. Only now they have a lot less money now that charters have siphoned off money. Also, many large public systems have far more choice to serve the diverse needs of students than any charter could possibly provide. In addition, it is highly inefficient to set up a parallel school system with its own set of fixed costs. It cost taxpayers more for meager results. About 75% of charters perform worse than public schools. It is about hype and spin, not value.
LikeLike
@jdhollowell I am a NYC public school parent, and I can tell you that there has been no improvement of service as a result of the forced introduction of charter schools into our neighborhoods. All we are getting is more advertising. That said, I don’t think these business-minded “reformers” actually know what the “customer” i.e. parents want, because if they did they would be investing in public schools.
LikeLike
Can you provide us a link to any of said research? I mean, specifically, peer-reviewed research published in academic journals? You can skip the CREDO (paid for by Walton et al) and Mathmatica (affiliated with KIPP) studies. Thanks.
LikeLike
It’s interesting that you name CREDO as part of the problem. Richard Phelps, one of the staunchest supporters of standardized testing condemned CREDO back in his 2005 pro-standardized testing book “Kill the Messenger” as being part of the anti-testing/anti-choice crowd. I guess time and a little Walton money can change things, eh! (and not necessarily for the good).
LikeLike
“Given this woman’s background and success, it is likely that she is intelligent enough to read the research and make her own decision.”
Thoroughly unlikely. Just because someone can make huge sums of money doesn’t necessarily mean she has any other skills such as the ability to “read [all] the research and make her own decision”. Make her own decision, yes, we all can, but to read all of the research needed to make that decision, I highly doubt. As a matter of fact, I’ll bet you a beverage of your choice that she hasn’t come close to reading even 1/4 of the literature.
“The improvement of service as a result of competition is a simple concept that works well for The customer in so many areas of business.”
You are correct in stating that choice “is a simple concept”. Simple concepts for simple minds does not a good concept make.
And in so many other areas of business the customer has no choice (think inner city food deserts) so that vaunted choice can’t work. What about those situations?
LikeLike
Maybe the Gap refers to what lies between the ears of obsessive-compulsive quirks like Doris Fisher.
Let go, Doris. Let go.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And maybe that ability to make money has more to do with sweatshop labor, from 2003: https://www.organicconsumers.org/old_articles/clothes/031003_sweatshop.php
LikeLike
jdhollowell: If you like choice so much, then why not allow the school district residents to vote on whether they even want a charter school in their district or not. Why are charter schools forced down the throats of a given school district without any input from the actual residents? This happens in NJ where I live. Charter schools drain funds and resources from the district schools, how is that a good thing? There is no choice about the charter school board of directors. They are self appointed by the charter school. No choice there, no competition there.
LikeLike
JD, if Doris read the research and if she read the international research, she would not be wasting her money on privatization. The charters in many states are very low performing (eg Ohio, Pennsylvania). There is no high performing nation with charters and vouchers. Chile and Sweden have free market systems and they have increased segregation and inequity without improving education, although the rich kids do benefit.
LikeLike
Businesses and public schools operate on very different principles: public service for all citizens v. maximizing profit for stockholders.
Businesses control the quality of their inputs in order to standardize their outputs/products/services. Public schools cannot control the quality of the students that walk through our door and parents have no desire for schools to standardize their children. Public education, at its best, promotes individual growth while aiming to develop the unique talents and interests for each student.
LikeLike
There’s competition and there is cooperation. Sometimes competition is the right choice and sometimes cooperation is. Public school should be a cooperative effort to educate all of our children collectively as a society to make our world better for everyone. No one should lose, therefore no one should win. The winners in a competitive school system will always be the strongest, the luckiest, the smartest and the richest. The losers are the children born into poverty, ignorance, bad luck, and the significant percentage of SPED and disabled. Charter proponents are saying , the hell with you all, I only think of my children and I don’t care what happens to my neighbor’s kid. Greed, selfishness, ignorance, a feeling of grandiose and self entitlement and generally a lack of class fuel the charter movement. Eventually your offspring will be stuck overworked, underpaid, and without sufficient health care. We should not be trying to make a profit from educating children. They do not yet earn money to pay for their education. We invest in OUR children for the good of all and therefore should bear the cost as a society. There is no room for competition and profit. What is happening with our public schools makes a lot of sense in America because we are taught to be selfish and competitive. This mentality will be the downfall of our country.
LikeLike
in the ads on cable/tv they say “charter schools have eye catching results” that is a comment you use when you want to market the latest fashions …. it is not a term used in educational evaluation.
LikeLike
Cynthia Liu’s comments at the end of this article really say it best. They explain why the understandable goal of improving schools is really all just a fight with labor unions. it isn’t about education at all.
“If you look at the industries where these people made their wealth, you can see why they have this idea that you have to squeeze labor to make your profits,” says Cynthia Liu, founder of K-12 News Network and a charter school critic. “If you have children in India making your clothing, your profit margin is very large. Similarly, if you use automation and low-cost education ‘shock troops’ to minimize the role of teachers, making them the ‘guide on the side rather than the sage on the stage,’ you minimize your education labor costs.”
The result, says Liu, isn’t just poorly trained and overworked teachers, it’s undervalued students. “When charters rely on the churn of an expendable, fungible teaching workforce using scripted curriculum instead of career and authentically-credentialed teachers, it cheapens the learning experience for students and the profession,” she says. “A child’s education isn’t a five dollar T-shirt, it’s an investment in our future collective well-being.”
LikeLike
Excellent contribution.
LikeLike
True.
LikeLike
Nothing about the reform movement is about education. It’s all about money.
LikeLike
the other ad features a Teach Plus teacher who is funded by Gates…. extolling the virtues of the charter school… this is the same group TeachPlus that came out stating that teachers approve of Parrc tests and common core. It is called “allegiance bias” where does my pay check come from? that is my allegiance and I will proclaim it on tv (in opposition to the parents and school committees that do not want to live the cap on charter schools). They have a new ad within the past two days…. a lot of people are misinformed if they only get their information from cable/tv and the ads that tell them to “vote yes”. They need to follow the advice of local mayors and school committees and city councils that know what the city budget looks like and how they are dealing with the cuts. The City of Malden had to eliminate busses this year.
LikeLike
I will not shop at the Gap ever again.
LikeLike
Gap brands include Old Navy, Banana Republic and Athleta.
LikeLike
Thank you. Never another dime to any of them.
LikeLike
Do not shop at The Gap or Old Navy. Same ownership.
LikeLike
How can we launch boycotts of these companies like #TurnOffNetflix; #ClosetheGap; #StopWalmartizationofOurNationsSchools; #HaltReturnDeleteMSGates; #TakeTheBroadLessTravelled
LikeLike
Melinda and Bill Gates and Laura and John Arnold (clones of Fisher), are similar to their fellow rich Washingtonians and Texans, in exploiting the poor and middle class. In seven states, like Washington and Texas, incomes are shielded from state taxes, which benefits the rich and off-loads the cost of factors of production, e.g. education and transportation, to citizens who spend the bulk of their incomes for taxable consumables. The takeover of public education, is a predictable plot continuation, for exploiters. Last year, the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy (non-partisan and non-profit), identified the state of Washington as the worst, in its “Terrible Ten States for unfair taxing – where taxes hit the average American hardest.” Texas was ranked 3rd worst. Their poorest residents are taxed up to seven times as much as the richest state residents. And, the middle class is taxed 3 times as much. Like Donald Trump, the rich feel too superior, to pay their fair share of the nation’s expenses, while they are the primary beneficiaries of the nation’s factors of production. A reporter at Bankrate.com, Chris Kahn, described the state of Washington’s taxing, “The richest pay just 2.8% and, the poorest residents, pay 16.9%”. ITEP’s research debunked the convenient lie that slashing income taxes, fuels economic growth. In contrast, it harms economic growth by concentrating wealth and, it exacerbates unconscionable unfairness – the Gates and Arnold legacy.
LikeLike
Great input, thanks. I googled & found the worst 3 include FL (no surprise there).
LikeLike
How to define the term “adding insult to injurt”? Harvard’s Kennedy School announced Tuesday that Jeb Bush will be a visiting fellow in the Program on Educational Policy and Governance, according to the Chicago Tribune today.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Diane Ravitch’s blog wrote:
> dianeravitch posted: ” This post is a profile of Doris Fisher, the > California billionaire who wants to privatize public schools and open > corporate-run charters with no ties to the local community. “As co-founder > of the Gap, San Francisco-based business leader and phil” >
LikeLike
IMO, harvard’s ideals were replaced with dollar signs. In 2014, the Kennedy School of Government placed interns with DFER.
More recently, they bragged about student interns at the Heritage Foundation (Koch’s). JFK is turning in his grave.
LikeLike
“Jeb Bush will be a visiting fellow in the Program on Educational Policy and Governance.”
Such a brilliant choice! Such a mighty fine fellow to be a fellow. The Jebster has so much teaching experience, experience of researching the teaching and learning process and “governance” of public school systems, eh!
How the ef does this $#!t go down?
LikeLike
I have to stop reading this blog. It just makes me nauseous.
LikeLike
¿Por qué?
What about the blog makes you nauseous?
LikeLike
One more retailer to avoid like the plague. I refuse to shop at Walmart.
LikeLike
Not only do I not shop in the stores owned by school profiteers, I lose money hand over fist refusing to invest in mutual funds that buy stock in Walmart, Gap etc., Microsoft, Netflix, and on and on. That’s every mutual fund. It’s well worth it.
LikeLike
I also enjoy flipping the bird to the Koch’s by avoiding their paper products.
LikeLike
In the new, greedy Gilded Age, this is how the super-rich carry out class warfare against the rest of us.
Whenever the super-rich seek to monetize and control what goes on in other people’s neighborhoods, where they would never want to take a walk all by themselves, let alone live in, one should never, ever assume the motive to be altruism, regardless of what they call it. They are exercising muscle over our turf, bought and paid for from corrupt politicians, ostensibly to fix the problems of the working poor, but they are the cause of many of those issues, so they are like another racketeering mafia.
Are there are no wealthy Roosevelts with empathy and political clout among them who are willing to protect the masses from their tyranny?
LikeLike