Carol Burris writes in Valerie Strauss’s Answer Sheet about the growing number of charter school scandals. She concludes that what they love best–no supervision, no oversight, no regulation–will be their undoing.
She notes that John Oliver was apparently the first major media figure to react with astonishment to the fraud and graft that has become a recurring theme in the charter movement.
And she describes the major scandals that have occurred in the few days after John Oliver’s broadcast: the charter school in Detroit that abruptly closed, stranding its students; the flight of 500 students from the Livermore charter schools in California back to their public schools; the financial scandals at a Los Angeles charter school where the principal charged tens of thousands of dollars in personal expenses to his school credit card; the guilty plea by the founder of a Pennsylvania cyber charter school who admitted stealing $8 million in public funds.
How could these things happen over a long period of time with no one noticing?
Burris writes:
In January 2016, four university researchers published a paper likening the proliferation of charters to the sub-prime mortgage crisis. At the time, the paper received scant attention. How ironic that it may be a late-night comedian who might finally alert the nation to the charter crisis. As Oliver noted, “the problem with letting the free market decide when it comes to kids is that kids change faster than the market. And by the time it’s obvious the school is failing, futures may have been ruined.”
The truth is, the deregulation that the high-scoring charter schools love so much, also produces dismal charter failures, taxpayer fleecing and fraud. And that, in the end, could cause the whole charter system to collapse.

absolutely.
LikeLike
There are plenty of scandals to go around–and charters certainly don’t hold a monopoly on evil-doing and incompetence. But one thing I would suggest is that educators see “regulation” on a spectrum, running generally from market regulation to government regulation. Just because charters are not in the sights of government employees working in some distant bureaucracy does not mean that they aren’t regulated. They answer to market forces, including parents who vote with their feet. Many people would argue that such a “free market” is a much more efficient and fair regulatory mechanism than the top- down regulatory machinery of state and federal bureaucracies.
LikeLike
pbmayer,
I think you’re confusing students with customers, and customers with regulators. That many customers — individuals, businesses and nations, for example, have their life savings, economies, and survival tied up in Deutche Bank does not keep the bank from abusing them with mirror trades and other quiet crimes. I recall “voting with my feet” for Enron when my state let Enron provide energy for me. We are currently experiencing the educational version of rolling blackouts.
LikeLike
“free market” is a much more efficient and fair regulatory mechanism”
School failure is not a desirable way of regulating schools; it’s a disaster for everyone involved, particularly when it could have been avoided.
Having a fast-food establishment fail isn’t a big deal, because there are dozens within about a half-mile. Sadly, that doesn’t prevent them all from sucking in fundamental ways.
Regulating charters is also a slow means of controlling performance. By the time you can realize they aren’t performing, you’ve already lost years of students. Then you have to go through the process of finding a new charter operator, and then give them years to prove themselves.
The free market concept is a means to an end, not an end in itself, although that would be heretical to conservatives. Free market failures are well understood in economics and part of Econ 101. The rational person applies the right tool to the job.
LikeLike
I don’t recall a public school closing its doors three weeks after it opened, leaving the kids stranded.
LikeLike
Market forces don’t protect children or adults from exploitation. Fraud is a feature of deregulation, not a bug.
LikeLike
Our markets are neither free nor really pure markets. And that is by design after serious past failures of the free market systems. Unregulated markets result in corruption, massive inequality, resource exploitation, and self destruction. It is why “free markets” require adult supervision, namely the oversight of government, ideally an elected one.
Those that have embraced free market theory as a new religion see every situation as a potential application of Smith’s invisible hand. And like religion, these zealots demand we accept the plausibility of free markets based solely on faith, while ignoring the obvious flaws and failures.
I also find it somewhat hypocritical that those most enamored by free markets have no trouble imposing the ideas on others, while themselves being well-insulated from the negative, destructive effects.
LikeLike
Vale Math,
You are right, there is no free market at work. These are government subsidies directed to the private sector. That is not what the free market is about.
LikeLike
“market regulation”
There is no such thing. Please show me where I can find this vaunted “free market” that would be doing this regulation other than in the heads of economists and their ardent believers because the last time I google earthed the “free market” it pointed to somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean a couple of hundred miles south of the Azores.
LikeLike
Diane,
There has got to be a better system. The free marketers just seem to keep pushing what has obviously failed so many Americans in so many walks of life. If economists would start researching the next generation of markets rather than just tell teachers how to do their jobs, we might see some ideas and start a discussion in this country. Instead, the U.S. seems to be riding this failed, free market horse right off a cliff. We keep hearing career politicians like Ryan or Kasich, who have never held a real, “free market” job, keep telling us how great the system is, even though they will never feel the effects. Or blue bloods like Bush and Romney tell everyone else they are “takers” and just need to work harder, even though they have lived life well cushioned with a trust funded safety net. Or the Trump’s of the world actually believing they hit a home run though they started on third base, or even on home plate itself. Enough with “free markets”.
LikeLike
Diane,
If I understand American culture correctly, quite a bit of the free market is dressed up with the term “free market”, only to be corporate welfare for the rich and the ownership class wearing the frock. Bailouts are a prime example of this.
LikeLike
Those who think that one can vote with their feet have never done it from scratch nor among underfunded public schools, whether charter or public.
LikeLike
LA Times today actually had a long article by Howard Blume on the El Camino HS situation. I think we have to thank Carl Peterson for that one, along with Robert Skeels and Sari (Education) who all were very squeeky wheels. Their endless leaning in seems to have opened the inner sanctum and thank you Howard for the article…now dig even deeper…talk with the aforementioned people. Thank you Carol Burris for hearing us last week in all the heat of a very long day. It was a pleasure, a relief, and an honor to be able to regale you with our So. Cal. horror stories.
LikeLike
dianeravitch: “Fraud is a feature of deregulation, not a bug.”
What you said.
😎
LikeLike
I think the opposite is true. We don’t want charters that aren’t transparent and certainly don’t want any that are fraudulent. Getting tougher charter laws and authorizers is in our best interests as long as they are legitimately about transparency, etc, and not things like district oversight that are intended to ruin the sector, not improve it.
LikeLike
“. . . not things like district oversight that are intended to ruin the sector, not improve it.”
Hey, let the “free” market decide. You know, no public monies for the private charter sector and let’s see how they do.
LikeLike
For starters, if my tax money is funding Catholic schools, I should be able to demand they can’t discriminate against teachers with gay children or sick kids with cancer. Seems government has to tell these dioceses how to behave like Christians.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Charters have been hi-jacked by the “choice” and “run schools like a business” crowd that sees an opportunity to grow their bottom line. A better way to view schools would be as infrastructure and run these like a public utility. Of course tho$e who $ee charter$ as the next best thing in their investment portfolio won’t like that. Case in point is that Idaho’s school funding committee is headed by a card carrying member of ALEC who is pushing for enrollment base funding. We know how well that works.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let’s hope this unraveling occurs sooner rather than later. We need more than John Oliver exposing charter school waste and fraud. That is why it is important to drive more internet traffic to this site. We need informed citizens on our side, and they are unlikely to get information from mainstream media. I am noticing a more public school supportive tone on social media. Slowly, the truth is leaking out to every day people about the corporate and billionaire plan to destroy public education. That is why I will continue to cross post and battle in a war of words with conservatives. It helps to expose the average citizen to our current realities.
LikeLike
I agree on the importance of this and other blogs in reporting on the fraud, waste, abuse. I hope that someone is gathering all of the known cases into a solid database so the extent of the exploitation of public funds can be documented. The ACLU did a study on California charter violations of law, many others are available for states and districts. In the era of “big data” there seems to be a studied indifference in getting coherent information.
LikeLike
Oh, but, but, but, there is corruption, graft and malfeasance in public schools, so stop picking on charter schools, boo hoo, that is so unfair (sarcasm alert). So go the rationalizations of the charter cheerleaders; it’s called deflection, misdirection and disingenuousness. The scandals at charter schools are bigger, deeper, more prevalent and more endemic than at the real public schools.
LikeLike
Oversight and independent audits must be part of the process. Otherwise, we are squandering funds that belong to our children. Sadly, this is the current state of mismanagement in too many charters.
LikeLike
When speaking of deregulation, consider that the state court in Ohio ruled that anything bought with public funds for a charter school belongs to the charter corporation, not to the public. So when Mr. Profit closes his charter school, he owns the desks, chairs, computers, and everything else, purchased by taxpayers. Free market? No, corporate welfare.
LikeLike
“Free market? No, corporate welfare.”
Diane, you’re getting all commie socialist pinko on us with that!!
Gotta love it!!
LikeLike
Calling charters corporate welfare is a good move on our part. This phrase will stick in the minds of many people that are not that well informed, and these are the people we need to outrage with all this waste and fraud. We need them on our side, and, frankly, taxpayers should be informed and upset by all the tax money going to private corporations while they take from the poor and middle class.
LikeLike
Mr. Swacker,
“Commie” and “pinko” and “socialism” are very common elements in Europe and are not considered a negative thing to most citizens there. It pleases me that you personally are welcoming of them here. I think you night be part Norwegian.
LikeLike
Norwegian Filmmaker,
Oh, I’ve been called a whole lot worse by those on both ends of the political spectrum. I’ve always been (or at least since I figured out that the Catholic dogma which the nuns and priests tried to drill into my brain didn’t work-I was barely a teen then) a free thinking skeptic. Hell, I used to get “Soviet Life” magazine back in the mid 70s when I was in college (the first time-ha ha).
Norwegian?? No, just an American mutt whose total ancestry is not known-ha ha-too many question marks and holes to ever know. German, French, English, Dutch, Irish are just a few of the background nationalities over the years.
But I’ve always had a soft spot for the stereotypical Nordic female type, tall long legged blond blue eyed beauties. Probably in my genes from when the Vikings used to rape and pillage in Europe and the British Isles way back when.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, as with the sub-prime mortgage fiasco, nobody seemed to care until their lives started to implode. If you don’t have kids being kicked out of their school suddenly, no one seems to care. The government is also hypocritical. They want regulation now for mortgages, but are great proponents of deregulated charters. I can’t wait to retire and get out of the whole mess.
LikeLike
There is no bigger charter cheerleader in Ohio that the Columbus Dispatch.
Even they are calling for regulation. It took nearly 20 years for them to drop the charter promotion and actually look at the facts, but better late then never:
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2016/08/28/1-editorial-dont-delay-charter-reform.html#st_refDomain=t.co&st_refQuery=/9d9I4dWrNi
“Yet, Ohio’s effort to strengthen charter-school oversight — ineffectual until a reform bill took effect this year — is again mired in, depending on who is asked, Statehouse pay-to-play politics or Ohio Department of Education ineptitude.
The finger-pointing is pointless. This latest delay puts student learning in jeopardy, risks more taxpayer dollars and imperils the state from receiving a $71 million federal education grant. Sponsors oversee the quality and legal compliance of their schools. The Education Department oversees the sponsors. Why would the feds trust millions to such a disorganized oversight effort?”
The editorial is factually inaccurate, however. The Obama Administration awarded the grant to Ohio PRIOR any effort to regulate the schools. The grant isn’t dependent on Columbus regulating charters.
“The feds trusted millions” to Ohio charter school operators when they awarded the money in the first place. “The feds” don’t care if these schools are regulated. They’ve cheered on any and all expansions of charter schools in Ohio, regardless of “quality”.
LikeLike
You know what is still shocking to me? How long it takes for obvious facts to travel from states and cities to national media.
I mean for goodness sakes, why the delay? It’s as if this news is being carried on horseback. Why would it take national media TWENTY YEARS to notice that charters are poorly regulated or unregulated? Can’t they just read a local news source online?
I also can’t figure out why a state like Pennsylvania would look at the ed reform disaster in Ohio and THEN COPY IT. Pennsylvania borders Ohio! Can these lawmakers not get in their cars and actually LOOK at the results of these ed reform experiments instead of relying on lobbyists for “facts”? Leave your offices! Go see!
They make the same mistakes in state after state. It’s like dominoes falling, except it takes 20 years.
LikeLike
Yes, and the laws and reporting requirements in each state are different with absolutely no record-keeping on the slush funds for charters and charter expansions from billionaires, or for that matter, how federal dollars (about $3 billion) have added to the coffers of the charter schools. The last Walton Family Foundation 990 IRS form shows that it is functioning as bank, offering so many unsecured loans to charter operators that 19 pages are devoted just to listing them. Charter school supporters howl about being underfunded. The howling is useful in distracting attention from the fact they are double or triple dipping into a huge pot of money–a brew with unclear accounting for money that is public (e.g., federal, or federal with pass through to state, and local tax support) versus private funding. And there is too little attention to the complex arrangement on financing facilities through private funds, squatting in public schools, or rent/lease arrangements to occupy public schools or private buildings.
LikeLike
The charters like to keep this information away from the watchful public eye. That is a major reason why they resist accountability, and the out of touch policymakers keep writing checks while hoping for the best. In New Jersey some selective charters are sitting on millions of dollars in donations. The hedge fund contributors get tax write offs and credits, and they still get to drain the public schools the local poor students attend. Is this democracy or just plain crazy?
LikeLike
Here’s a story — relevant to the issue of deregulation of charters — that I’ve been sitting on for a couple months. (long post, but worth reading, trust me)
This sordid tale was going around at the California delegation at the NEA-RA convention held in D.C. in early July of this year. (and yeah, I freely concede tht there’s a possibility of the story being embellished in the re-telling, as in the “telephone game” effect. However, I was able to find some corroboration of the main facts in media reports available on the internet. SEE BELOW)
It’s about how a principal at a Summit Tahoma Charter School in San Jose:
1) heard a report that one of his teachers was having sex with a female student;
2) he conducts “an internal investigation,” where he, on his own, concluded that nothing happened, and thus, never goes to the authorities;
(This action is a total violation of California law, and a major dereliction of duty, as he is not allowed to make that call NOT to tell the police. Like all adults working in a school setting — administrators, teachers, counselors, nurses, etc. — he is a mandatory reporter. Under penalty of jail and a steep fine for failing to do so, he MUST IMMEDIATELY contact the police. In LAUSD, we have to watch a video and take a test to this effect twice a year.
This situation is similar to when the officials at St. Hope charter school failed to report what Kevin Johnson was doing.)
2) it’s rumored by some (again, I heard this from some people at the NEA-RA in early July) that during the charter principal’s so-called “internal investigation,” he found out the story was true; it’s further alleged that, instead of reporting this to authorities as he was legally required, he pressured both the student and the teacher to deny the affair if and when any police or any other oversight authority questions them as in “Do this, and it will all go away;
“You don’t want ruin Mr. So-and-so’s life and send him to prison. Do you?” … or words to that effect.
(UPSHOT: the best interests and reputation of the Summit Charter Schools are more important than the well-being of the schools students, or following the law, or removing a teacher whom the principal knows full well likes to get it on with underage girls.)
3) even though the principal allegedly tried to bury the story, the word got out anyway, and — THANK JESUS!!!! — a non-involved parent did what the principal had a mandatory legal requirement to do, but did not — she called the police;
4) the police, responding to the parent’s reporting, show up at the school site while the principal is off-campus, and the assistant principal allows the police to question the girl in question in a private room;
5) the questioning starts just as the principal arrives back at the school;
6) the principal discovers what’s going on, and frantically calls the Summit charter chain’s main headquarters, and talks his superior and the charter chain’s lawyer, who tells them the principal has a legal right (???!!!) to barge in to the room, stop the police questioning, and order the police to leave. Incredibly he attempts to do just that, invoking the legal advice he was just given over the phone to the police present;
7) the police tells the principal that their Summit Charter School chain’s lawyers or management to whom he just spoke are in error, and furthermore, the police allegedly tell the principal that if he doesn’t back off, he will be charged with obstruction of justice, and handcuffed; suitably chagrined, he backs the-hell off, and shuts the-hell up;
8) the police questioning continues, but the girl sticks to her story — the story the principal allegedly pressured her to tell — nothing happened with the teacher;
(Whew! That was a close one! … ehhh … Not so fast, Principal Kim!)
9) later, the girl is questioned again by police at her family’s house, and away from the allegedly obstructing principal, she spills the beans;
10) the teacher is arrested and is currently being prosecuted;
(He’s a goa-teed loser, from the mug shot in the media coverage BELOW… “Seriously Dude, does affecting that ‘Robin Hood look’ help you score with the girls whom you teach?” Sweet Jesus! God save us all! )
11) the principal and Summit Charter School put out a very carefully and legally vetted statement, saying that the school’s administration is happy that the evil pedophile teacher has been removed, that’s what they wanted all along if the story was true, and that, contrary to the gossip that been going around, he and the Summit Tahoma Charter school administration cooperated with authorities at all times, and they view the well-being of the victim and of all their students as paramount blah-blah-blah…
———————————————
Quite a yarn? Ayy?
Here’s the actual media coverage I was able to find corroborating the this rumor/story floating around the NEA-RA convention in D.C. this July:
http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_29568103/san-jose-house-probe-teacher-student-tryst-elicits
The police and other authorities were furious at principal’s outrageous claim that he could simply conduct his own investigation, and then conclude on his own whether or not this matter did warranted contacting the police.
William Grimm, senior attorney for the National Center for Youth Law based in Oakland was quoted in the above article link, and did not mince words:
——————————————
SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS:
” ‘The fact that he decided to take some of his time to investigate it automatically means it crosses the threshold of ‘reasonable suspicion,’ he (Grimm) said. ‘And what expertise does the principal have in identifying potential teacher-student sexual relationships?
” ‘He (the principal himself) posed a danger to the school by doing this and not having the qualifications necessary.’ ”
——————————————
When the principal of Summit Tahoma Charter, Nicholas Kim, entered the room where police were questioning the alleged victim of a teacher’s molestation, this transpired:
——————————————
SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS:
“And in the early stages of the police investigation at Summit Tahoma Public School, the same principal, Nicholas Kim, burst into a room to demand police stop interviewing the alleged victim, only to be rebuffed by a sex-crimes detective. This came a short time after the detective reminded the principal about his duty to report any potential child abuse allegation; the principal asserted he was following the direction of his management and legal team.”
——————————————
Here’s some of Summit’s legally vetted statement about this affair:
——————————————
SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS: (with my editorial NOTE’s in parentheses)
“In a statement to this newspaper, Kim (and the Summit Charter chain) wrote that …
” ‘At no point was there any intent by the school to conceal or hide any information. We acted in good faith. Under the circumstances and evidence available to us, we acted immediately and with speed to find all information. When we received information we followed up according to legal requirement.’
(NOTE: “followed up according to legal requirement” = chose not to go to the police when he heard a report alleging sexual abuse of a minor, so that, had the parent not gone on his or her own and reported it to the police himself or herself, no one would have ever been the wiser, and that goa-teed Robin-Hood-looking perv would still be on the loose preying on minors at San Jose’s Summit Tahoma Charter School.)
” ‘Once law enforcement became involved and interrogated the student, new evidence came to light that we acted on immediately.’
(NOTE: while that “new evidence did eventually “come to light” in the context of a police interview, it was no thanks to either Principal Kim, or to the Summit Management or to its legal team who gave Principal Kim the ridiculous and unlawful direction to barge in the room where police were questioning a witness, and attempt to stop this information from “coming to light”. Therefore, it’s DESPITE Principal Kim and his Summit Charter superiors, that the truth DID, in fact, “come to light,’ NOT BECAUSE of them.)
“The District Attorney’s Office said Friday that Kim’s decision not to notify police or Child Protective Services was not a violation of the mandated reporter law because the rumor alone did not create a level of ‘reasonable suspicion’ abuse had occurred, as the state penal code requires.
(NOTE: Now, this bit gets me really steamed.
I don’t know if the Summit charter folks are plugged in with, or have clout with the police in San Jose, so much so that they able to elicit such a statement and treatment from the local police, but I can say with absolute certainty:
THIS NEVER WOULD HAVE BEEN ACCEPTABLE WITH EITHER LAPD, or WITH LAUSD management. (especially in the wake of the Miramonte fiasco a few years back.)
ALL HELL WOULD HAVE RAINED DOWN ON ANY LAUSD PRINCIPAL — or teacher or administrator or other mandated reporter working in an LAUSD school — WHO ACTED THUSLY — both from the police, and from LAUSD administration. He or she would have been canned, banned from education for life, and probably prosecuted and fined, if not imprisoned.
What’s wrong you guys up in San Jose?
Once again, you see the difference between what goes on in a traditional public school setting, and in a deregulated charter setting.)
——————————————
SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS:
“The code reads, in part:
” ‘Reasonable suspicion’ does not require certainty that child abuse or neglect has occurred nor does it require a specific medical indication of child abuse or neglect; any ‘reasonable suspicion’ is sufficient.”
” ‘Where we see administrators making mistakes is when they have a victim telling them that some abuse occurred and then the administrator does their own investigation to see if it’s accurate, to see if it’s true,’ Assistant District Attorney Terry Harman said.
” ‘If you have a situation where what you’re hearing is a rumor and you’re not hearing from someone who saw something or someone who experienced something, then can you have a reasonable suspicion from what appears to be a rumor?’ ”
———————————–
Here’s more coverage of this:
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/San-Jose-teacher-arrested-for-allegedly-having-6855398.php
As I reflect on this charter school abomination, I wonder how Campbell Brown — that simultaneous privately-managed-deregulated-charter-lover, and crusader against teacher-child-abusers — and her crack team of reporters at The 74 would handle this story, had it happened …
… at a traditional public school
VS.
… at a charter school … as it most certainly did in this case.
The former would have rated a sizzling expose article on Campbell’s The74 website, proving once again how horrible traditional public schools are … “Unionized teachers are pedophiles!!! And their administrators protect them!!! We need to close ’em all down, and convert them to privately-managed charters, where these horrible things NEVER happen.”
The latter? … Ehhh … not so much… as in … “Oh no. We need to bury this one folks. We can’t make charters look bad.”
On that score, here’s a piece about how reporters at The 74 are allegedly barred from reporting anything negative on charter schools. (NOTE: since last fall, the Success Academy charter chain has faced on public relations disaster after another, and not a word from The 74 about any of them. Campbell Brown, naturally, serves of the Board of Directors of Success Academy charter schools)
———————————————-
DIANE RAVITCH:
“Jennifer Berkshire, aka EduShyster, got a tip about a journalist who applied for a job with The 74. She was told that the 74 news service needed investigative journalists but they would not cover subject of charter school scandals. She shared her story with EduShyster but insisted on anonymity as revealing her name would be “career suicide.” EduShyster repeatedly reached out to a high-level official at The 74. Eventually he responded and insisted that he could not comment based on a report from an anonymous source.
“And of course, the site will be ‘fair and balanced.’ Where have we heard THAT before?”
Here’s the Edushyster story to which Dr. Ravitch refers:
http://edushyster.com/will-the-74-investigate-charter-scandals/
———————————————-
Indeed, this whole Summit Tahoma Charter School story goes to the heart of why it’s such a danger to allow charter school operators to be so free of regulation — as they so often demand in order to … in their words … “be free to innovate” or whatever.
I’ll say it again: regarding this situation at Summit Tahoma Charter School, these same events would NEVER have played out this way in a traditional public school, at least not without serious consequences for the administrators or any adults who acted the way Principal Kim and the Summit Charter School management did.
Here’s how it works in California, in a traditional public school:
Both teachers and administrators in traditional public schools are “mandated reporters.” They have to attend “mandated reporter” training twice every school year (I’ve taken it over 20 times), in which it is made loud and clear that once you have knowledge or suspicion that abuse has taken place, a 36-hour clock starts from that very moment. If you don’t report it immediately, or within 36 hours at the latest,
1) the teacher or administrator will be fired;
2) the teacher or administrator will lose his/her credentials, and be banned from education for life;
and possibly …
3) be prosecuted as an accessory, if you collude with the perpetrator in covering up or destroying evidence.
In contrast to the way it works in LAUSD, with the adult administrators and teachers at a California charter … they apparently can get away with a lot … even if it puts children at risk of sexual predators.
LikeLike
Oh and here’s some TV news coverage of this Summit Tahoma Charter School fiasco (detailed ABOVE:
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/02/29/police-investigate-whether-sj-principal-broke-law-in-teacher-sex-case/
LikeLike
Charter schools insist that they are public schools. Well, if they are as they claim, then charter schools should (1) be under the direction of a school board that’s actually elected by the public, and, (2) be required to at least file with the state board of education the same quarterly and annual audited public domain financial reports that real public schools file so that the public can see how charter schools are actually spending the public’s tax dollars. That’s only reasonable, isn’t it? It’s certainly not an “oppressive” burden since real public schools file such reports without complaint.
Meanwhile, hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars are being diverted away from educating America’s kids and are ending up in private pockets.
LikeLike
The idea that deregulation will be the downfall of the charter movement is a bit odd, since charter schools are themselves a type of deregulation. It seems like saying that being alive will be the cause of my death. I don’t disagree in the big picture, but killing myself isn’t going to solve the problem for me.
LikeLike
FLERP,
I think you missed the point of Carol Burris article.
LikeLike
What happened to the Charter Schools proponents big argument about charter schools have MORE accountability to the public? I mean, they have the ULTIMATE accountability if they fail to perform as promised… and that includes accepting all students.
Here’s the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools’ April 2014 statement bragging about how accountable charter schools are:
Click to access Charter-Schools-are-Accountable.pdf
The first page has a checklist
This includes:
——————–
“___ Charter schools must meet the (same) federal & state standards and laws (as the traditional public schools.)
“___ Charter schools must meet charter agreement requirements.
“___ Charter schools can be closed; 11 states automatically closed low-performing charter schools.”
——————–
First of all, what about the other states?
Secondly, the phrase “low performing” also encompasses the failure to perform in the acceptance of all students, regardless of the challenges those students bring — special ed., homeless, foster care, English Language Learners, kids with disruptive behavior, etc.
When charters so fail — as the ones in New York state described here did —- is there any actual real crackdown where “charters must be closed”?
No.
In Los Angeles, charter renewals are almost never turned down.
LikeLike
Compare that (ABOVE) with the opening “overview” in the April 2014 National Alliance for Public Charter Schools’ accountability statement:
Click to access Charter-Schools-are-Accountable.pdf
————-
“Charter School Accountability
“Overview
“Charters are public schools, so they must meet the same accountability requirements as all other public schools. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), most recently reauthorized in 2001 as No Child Left Behind (NCLB) required all charter schools to follow the same content standards and take the same assessments as all other public schools in their
state.
“They are also responsible for making “adequate yearly progress” (AYP) in math and reading. Even in states that have received ESEA flexibility waivers, charter schools are still held accountable to the state’s accountability system. ESEA defers to state charter school laws, however, on exactly how these provisions are implemented for charter schools.
“Charter schools also have an extra layer of accountability from their authorizer. Public charter schools enter into an explicit agreement—or charter—that lays out expectations for performance. The entities that award charters and are responsible for monitoring charter schools’ performance against their charter agreements are called charter authorizers. The specific types of entities that can authorize charters vary from state to state, but may include local education agencies, state education agencies, higher education institutions, mayors or other municipal authorities, and independent charter boards. Nationally more than 90 percent of charter school authorizers are school districts.
“If schools do not meet the expectations set out within the charter, the authorizer may close them.”
————-
But they DON’T accept or keep all students, and they never do get closed for this failure. This is all just talk.
There’s more. This statement is loaded with such statements:
“In some cases, these performance expectations are tougher than the expectations set by the state accountability system (for the traditional public schools). ”
Yeah, right!
Oh, here’s more…
“Ultimately, ESEA applies the same standards, assessment, and accountability requirements to charter schools as it does to other public schools but defers to each state’s charter school law regarding the application of these requirements to charter schools.
“Persistently low-achieving charter schools—unlike traditional public schools—can be closed for failure to meet the expectations in their performance contracts.”
One more thing that they brag about:
“Charter schools are required to undergo financial audits.”
Tell that to New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli in New York State. Every time that DiNapoli attempts to audit Eva’s schools or the KIPP schools, he’s met with legal Terminator-type lawyers who fight tooth and nail any inspection of their finances.
(Google “DiNapoli” “charter schools” to read about this in detail.)
LikeLike
Check out this court ruling from March 2014. That’s one month prior to the release of the phony “charter-schools-are-more-accountable-than-public-schools” press release ABOVE.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/state-comptroller-audit-charter-schools-judge-article-1.1721265
—————————————–
N.Y. DAILY NEWS:
“New York charter schools won a big victory Thursday when a judge ruled the state’s top fiscal officer can’t follow the money and look at their books.
“Charter school crusader Eva Moskowitz filed suit to bar state Controller Thomas DiNapoli from auditing her 22 schools, all of which are publicly funded but also receive private donations. On Thursday, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Thomas Breslin ruled DiNapoli did not have the authority to audit any New York charter because the schools are not technically ‘units of the state.’
“We are disappointed that the court struck down the law authorizing the Comptroller’s office to audit charter schools,” said DiNapoli spokesman Matt Sweeney. He added an appeal is under consideration.
“Other cities, such as Los Angeles and Chicago, have rules allowing charters to be audited. In New York, the schools are required to hire independent auditors.
“Mayor de Blasio recently set off a firestorm when he refused to allow three of Moskowitz’s charters to co-locate in public schools. She and her well-financed supporters have launched a campaign to reverse his decision.”
—————————————–
Do you get that wording?
Charter schools are technically not “units of the state”.
In other words, they’re “private” corporations, shielded from any inspection by any government agency, and from the same oversight that traditional public schools are. Charter schools and charter school chains are as protected as Walmart or Best Buy, or any private business.
Public schools and entire public school districts can and are constantly being audited by the state, but not charters, thanks to their tenacious and expensive lawsuits in the courts to that effect.
Remember that the next time someone says, “Charter schools are public schools.”
Do you want to know why the charter leaders like Eva Moskowitz fight these audits?
Why are audits—like the one N.Y. State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli attempts—so gosh-darn important?
Check out NYC Educator’s article on the scandal where KIPP charter chain leaders used public money to fund a week-long “retreat” to the Bahamas for themselves and some select teachers. KIPP defended this by claiming the whole trip was “professional development” at a location that was “off campus.”
I’ll say it was “off campus”… A THOUSAND MILES off campus.
How did that happen? NY State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli wanted to know.
Back in 2007 when this story broke, it provoked a furor at the time. Initially, KIPP stuck by their claim that spending money on the trip was an appropriate use of public money.
Eventually, however, they bowed to public pressure, and walked this back, then promised to institute “internal controls” to prevent this from happening again.
Here’s NYC EDUCATOR’s take on the Bahamas’ fiasco:
http://nyceducator.com/2007/12/what-do-we-do-with-all-that-extra-money.html
———————————————–
NYC EDUCATOR:
“Whopee! Let’s spend five days in the Bahamas on the taxpayers’ dime! That’s what they do over at KIPP! Forget about vacationing with your family. First, you don’t have time, and second, you can’t afford it. It’s go with your slavedrivers or don’t go at all.”
– – – – – –
ARTICLE: ” ‘KIPP founder Dave Levin, who as superintendent of the academy attended the Bahamas retreat, called the trips essential to motivating teachers to work the extra Saturdays and extended hours demanded by the school.’
– – – – – –
“Yeah, Dave, when you treat teachers and kids like dogs all year, they need a break. What – the kids didn’t get one? Too bad for them. Well, if they’re gonna grow up to work 200 hours a week with few benefits and no job protection, you can’t train them too early, can you?
“Loyal KIPP teachers rationalize the trips by explaining they don’t actually have any fun while on them:
– – – – – –
ARTICLE: ” ‘Math teacher Frank Corcoran, who attended a foray this year to the Dominican Republic, said formal meetings made up about 40 percent of the trip, but informal school-related chats dominated the spare time.’
” ‘So it feels like work even though people are walking around in swim trunks,’ he said. ‘Everyone comes out feeling motivated and pumped up, whereas at the end of the school year you’re just burned out.’ ”
– – – – – –
“I can certainly understand being burned out after those six-day weeks and being on call round the clock with the KIPP cell phone that allows parents to call you all night (precluding any sort of social or family life).
“And while workaholic executives may choose this very same lifestyle, KIPP teachers don’t remotely earn executive-style money or perks.
“Of course, KIPP denies using public money anyway, as they are beyond reproach:
– – – – – –
ARTICLE: ”Although officials at the charter school told auditors the trips in 2005 and 2006 were funded by surplus funds from private and not public sources, state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said DOCUMENTATION WAS LACKING TO SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS. (CAPITALS are mine, JACK)
” ‘Having surplus funds is no excuse to spend taxpayer dollars on trips to the Caribbean,’ DiNapoli said. ‘Money intended for education should be spent on education.’ ”
– – – – – – –
“I’ll pay for my own vacation, thank you, and I’ll go with my family rather than my assistant principal (who appreciates this arrangement just as much as I do). My kid goes to a public school where they don’t need to work her or her teachers to death.
“You can kipp KIPP, thank you very much.”
LikeLike