Melinda Gates told the National Conference of State Legislatures that the Gates Foundation has no intention of backing away from their agenda of Common Core, teacher evaluations that include test scores, charter schools, and digital learning.
No matter how controversial, no matter how much public pushback, they are determined to stay the course. For some reason, she thinks that the foundation is a “neutral broker,” when in fact it is an advocate for policies that many teachers and parents reject. She also assumes that the Gates Foundation has “the real facts,” when in fact it has a strong point of view reflecting the will of Bill & Melinda. There was no reference to evidence or research in this account of her position. Her point was that, no matter what the public or teachers may say, no matter how they damage the profession and public education, the multi-billion dollar foundation will not back down from its priorities. The only things that can stop them are informed voters and courts, such as the vote against charter schools in Nashville and the court decision in Washington State declaring that charter schools are not public schools.
The question that will be resolved over the next decade is whether the public will fight for democratic control of public schools or whether the world’s richest man can buy public education.
Melinda Gates said she and her husband, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, learned an important lesson from the fierce pushback against the Common Core State Standards in recent years. Not that they made the wrong bet when they poured hundreds of millions of dollars into supporting the education standards, but that such a massive initiative will not be successful unless teachers and parents believe in it.
“Community buy-in is huge,” Melinda Gates said in an interview here on Wednesday, adding that cultivating such support for big cultural shifts in education takes time. “It means that in some ways, you have to go more slowly.”
That does not mean the foundation has any plans to back off the Common Core or its other priorities, including its long-held belief that improving teacher quality is the key to transforming public education. “I would say stay the course. We’re not even close to finished,” Gates said.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has helped shape the nation’s education policies during the past decade with philanthropic donations that have supported digital learning and charter schools and helped accelerate shifts not only to the new, common academic standards, but to new teacher evaluations that incorporate student test scores.
The Obama administration shared and promoted many of the foundation’s priorities, arguing that they were necessary to push the nation’s schools forward and close yawning achievement gaps. Now that a new federal education law has returned authority over public education to the states, the foundation is following suit, seeking to become involved in the debates about the direction of public schools that are heating up in state capitals across the country.
Speaking here at a meeting of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Melinda Gates told lawmakers on Wednesday that the new federal education law, the Every Student Succeeds Act, gives them a chance to grapple with whether “we are doing everything in our power to ensure that students are truly graduating ready to go on to meaningful work or to college.”
“I want the foundation to be the neutral broker that’s able to bring up the real data of what is working and what’s not working,” Gates said in an interview afterward.
She went on to say that the foundation would continue to pursue its priorities.
“I think we know what the big elements are in education reform. It’s how do you support the things that you know work and how do you get the whole system aligned behind it,” Gates said. “I’m not telling you it’s going to be easy. There are now 50 states that have to do it, and there isn’t this federal carrot or the stick, the push or pull, to help them along.”
The agenda she described is not one that everyone considers neutral. It includes supporting the Common Core standards and developing lesson-planning materials to help teachers teach to those standards; promoting personalized learning, or digital programs meant to target students’ individual needs; and, above all, improving the quality of teachers in the nation’s classrooms, from boosting teacher preparation to rethinking on-the-job professional development.

Brokers are intermediaries between sellers and buyers; since their primary purpose is to close the sale, there is nothing neutral about them, as every action of the Gates Foundation demonstrates.
It’s interesting how, despite their deceptive reflexes, their use of language often betrays their deeper agendas.
So-called reformers, aside from some politically powerless and irrelevant naifs, are an insufferable collection of compulsive liars, greed heads, power freaks, sycophants and parasites.
Welcome to the world of Malanthropy, where “doing well by doing good” (a lie and self-deception if there ever was one) means fattening off the carcass of democracy and the public good.
LikeLike
Your description is the most accurate one possible.
LikeLike
Did anyone see the show on Viceland about a Chinese boot camp? China is the model for Gates. It is a culture of compliance with authority and obedience to family. What he admires is not how the Chinese educate, but the control. Of course, he could not make this work with his own business; however, he is sure he can convert the USA to this model of central planning.
LikeLike
If teachers are indeed professionals, their opinions should hold the most weight when educational reforms are considered. Also, how about asking students for their opinions? I have been teaching 17 years and I find most students to be insightful and savvy about their own educations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Gates Foundation pours millions of dollars into groups that purport to represent “teacher voice.” They have launched media campaigns that enlist students as promoters of their agenda. These are my notes from a 2011 paper about this.
Get Schooled: Motivating Americans to Improve Education is the result of a new “partnership” between the Gates’ Foundation, AT&T, Viacom, Comcast, Flip Video, Regal Entertainment Group, BET, Def Jam RapStar and Beta Game, the latter two offering video contests for young rappers and enlisting entertainers in the orbit of youth culture to deliver messages about the Gates agenda.
The website http://www.getschooled.com advertises the video “Waiting for Superman” in which Bill Gates appears. The Gates’ Foundation put $2 million into making the film, a sum matched by the Broad Foundation. The website provides a format for teens to write their state’s governor. It includes a five-point “Student Bill of Rights” concocted to imply that schools are not providing adequate counseling, teachers, classes, reports, and financial aid. One section also promotes two organizations devoted to alternative certification that have also received grants from the Gates’ Foundation: Teach for America ($8,655,440 from 2007-2010) and the Teaching Fellows program of The New Teacher Project formed in 1997 by Michelle Rhee ($10,579,717 from 2007-2010).
Retrieved from http://www.getschooled.com/category/get-involved See also http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/gates-spends-millions-to-sway.html
The Gates Foundation operates as a spin factory. It has to pay groups to give “voice” to policies and practices that it favors. The Foundation has poured money into getting almost every demographic group to explicitly endorseor promote policies that have nothing to recommend them other than the money to become a shill for the Foundation.
LikeLike
“That’s the biggest lesson learned in this,” [billionaire] said. “States need to listen to their teachers when they’re designing a teacher evaluation system, and they don’t all have to look alike.”
Translation: That’s the biggest lesson we’re too oblivious to learn in this. States need to listen to their teachers before ignoring what the teachers say and doing what we elitist monstrosities bribe them to do.
LikeLike
Sounds like my local admin. “After gathering your opinions and listening to your input, we have decided to ignore it and do what we were going to do anyway.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
In our district, the only reason there were “public” input meetings was to meet certain legal guidelines a few months before the implementation of what had already been decided.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why would they back down? Their side is winning.
Wildly not shocking.
LikeLike
They’re not winning. Ed reform is only kept alive by money. The problem is that there is a bottomless pool of money. They can keep losing like this for a very long time. Until the revolution, essentially.
LikeLike
The revolution may be much sooner than Buffett, Gate’s and the Walton’s think. Buffett may have thought he was hedging his bets with his crocodile tears about taxes but, he signed his vulture philanthropy dollars over to Gates. The six heirs of the Walton fortune have as much wealth as 40% of Americans combined. I hear the thunderous approach of an angry, disenfranchised and impoverished American people. This electoral primary of outsiders is a harbinger.
LikeLike
Just once, I would like to see Gates lavish millions on the REAL public schools in a city like Camden. Not to mention setting up health clinics including glasses and dental care. On second thought, there would probably be so many conditions, poison pills and strings attached to their donations that it might amount to a Trojan horse. Mark Zuckerberg’s philanthropy in Newark was a mixed blessing (curse) at best; it was a flop.
LikeLike
One of the more subtle problems here is that the Common Core isn’t very good because it was written much too quickly by too small a group. So yes going more slowly with broader input is a key lesson. However, if you’re being honest, that means you have to re-start a long, inclusive process to write new standards (like, 5 – 10 years). Instead, we’re just going to get a longer, slower process to try to re-sell Common Core.
The idea that CC has been rejected not because of rushed and shoddy marketing but because the standards themselves are rushed and shoddy cannot be contemplated.
LikeLike
I think this is a declaration of war against the majority of Americans. Bill and Melinda Gates have made it clear that they are at war with the United States and its people. The only thing that’s changing is their tactics. Instead of a massive assault, the Gates are moving to guerilla tactics to fight this war against the republic, its U.S. constitution and its participatory democracy.
In my thinking, this means they are the same as ISIS and other global terrorists that have sworn to destroy Western culture and their participatory democracies.
If we read the oath for officers in the U.S. Military, it’s clear what we the people must do to stop the Gates from achieving their agenda. If we don’t do it and the military doesn’t step in to end this assault to subvert the U.S. Constitution, who will?
“I, _____, having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.” (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)”
LikeLike
That is the right frame of reference, Lloyd. This is a war. It is not to be taken lightly.
LikeLike
I don’t know about the military. US history is rife with the military being called out to quell strikers, the Bonus Marchers and the massacre at Kent State.
LikeLike
With the era of Donald Trump, there is no telling what the military will do if he is elected. Does a banana republic like what’s been happening in Thailand come to mind?
LikeLike
David stretched his hand into the sack. He took a stone from there and slung it, and struck the Philistine in the forehead. The stone penetrated his forehead, and he fell upon his face, upon the ground. Thus David overpowered the Philistine and killed him; there was no sword in David’s hand. — I Samuel 17:49-50
LikeLike
Where are the stone throwing classes?
LikeLike
I’m not usually engaged in public name calling, but Gates is a philistine.
LikeLike
That might be an insult to philistines. I recently read of a study that discovered they were quite sophisticated and their image today is based on propaganda probably paid for by someone like Bill Gates.
LikeLike
Where are the stone slinging classes? They’re in Vermont somewhere, but I don’t know exactly where Bernie is holding them. We’d better well learn well before 2020.
LikeLike
Vermont. Too far. To cold in the winter. To humid in the summer. If you live in Vermont you have to be tough.
LikeLike
Well, it definitely seems like everyone in Vermont is enrolled in Giant Felling 101, for sure. Watching the Vermont primary I could’ve sworn I saw tough, incorruptible, young David in the crowd a few times. A leader. I believe in that, or something like that, otherwise I shrivel into fear and despondency which is no way to choose life. Trumps and Gateseses and Goliaths be damned. I want to elect someone with a slingshot. I have to believe it can be done.
LikeLike
No one needs to be elected President to use a slingshot. Bernie is still a Senator from Vermont and he still has his slingshot even if he didn’t land the nomination.
LikeLike
Regarding philistines, comparing Gates to anyone is unfair to anyone, regardless of anyone’s level of sophistication. This is a war of good versus evil, and sophistication is with the sword. Good is with the student.
LikeLike
If you kill Goliath, you will be made the King of Israel.
I just made that up. Ya like it?
LikeLike
LOL
I don’t want to be anyone’s king. Kings get assassinated, beheaded, shot, and deposed.
LikeLike
Lloyd, this is a good conversation. Thank you truly. I should add about what I wrote a comment or two ago that in my religion, a student is someone who (also) studies the commandments. It makes more sense with the double reference to schools and to the Rheephilistines’ sins of greed and deception and so on.
LikeLike
Ha! I will also not be King. But I would be happy to make the slingshot or fill the sack with stones. I could be the waterboy if we need one.
LikeLike
Me too.
LikeLike
Actually, King Left of Coast, the Teacher has a nice ring to it, don’t you think? Hmm… Maybe better keep my day job.
LikeLike
Rheephormistines.
LikeLike
Lloyd’s right, the nation’s democratic foundation and, the future of this nation, compel the destruction of plutocratic plots. But, what will incite the people, is the grinding poverty caused by the concentrated wealth of Buffett, the Gates and Walton’s.
When the people learn that the oligarchs want to profit from putting the kids of the 99%, in “human capital pipelines”, the anger will swell to uncontrollable rage.
LikeLike
Diane,
The promoters of market-driven education reform understand that evidence is not the strongest weapon in their arsenal. Instead, they use their vast wealth to buy influence, but more importantly they are very talented at using intentional, values-driven language to to shape how the public thinks about education. Those of us who value equitable, democratically-governed education do not have financial resources. We do have ideas and the ability to organize politically. We need to get better at idea framing. I wrote about this several years ago here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2014/08/20/the-strategic-campaign-public-education-supporters-need-in-nine-steps/ It still seems relevant.
LikeLike
Yes, And, But.
The rhetoric and the stories are framed as if evidence is there when it is not, and as if civil rights mattered when they are being undermined, and as if the value of consumer choice trumped all others.
Double-speak has become the norm, insinuations and accusations that educators do not care about students and parents and achievement are promulgated as if facts.
I think that this and other blogs are nurturing the alternative framing, but anyone who is well informed about propaganda and so-called public relations knows that sustained media saturation in multiple venues is also needed to win hearts and minds along with compelling messages.
LikeLike
A man who lived under Stalin, said about the innocence of Americans,
“You think that people are like you, that reason can explain everything in this world. You expect two plus two to equal four. But, it doesn’t. It equals whatever the powerful say it does. If they say it equals a hundred and eight, the mathematicians will prove it’s so.”
LikeLike
If these reforms are so wonderful, maybe she and Bill should send their kids to schools that have implemented them. Who nominated these two to be the arbiters of what is best for students?
LikeLike
The rich and powerful at it again!
LikeLike
This article and all of the reformers represent an interesting side in American thinking. The very rich feel that because they have $ billions GOD has shined on them, they should lead, they are gifted, they have God’s glory, because they have so much money,they have much to offer the “dumb
public-” they are in my opinion delusional and the people must stop them.
LikeLike
The billionaires should read what the Bible says about greed, but most if not all of them probably have never read the Bible for what it teaches the individual.
“But those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pangs.”
1 Timothy 6:9 and 6:10
LikeLike
If the rich and powerful oligarchs believed in God, or even, at least in the values of the bible, they would not do what they are doing. But they do not believe in good, for goodness’ sakes. They are secularists. They believe in money. They believe in $ucce$$. They believe in themselves.
LikeLike
Their power is exactly why the common core and charter schools are so dangerous to our democracy. But they don’t get it.
LikeLike
This is precisely the strategy Microsoft used to build its ill-gotten gains in the first place. This id hiw Eindows rose to prominence, the X-Box, etc: – they could afgord to continue losing money for as long as it took, and the company, under Gates did indeed have the book thrown at them in the form of our antitrust laws (all well documented and easily Google-able).
Microsoft can’t compete in technology the way they once did, and education is fruit that is ripe for the picking. The Gates are two of the biggest crooks the world has ever seen, and we should believe them when thry say they will continue to dump their money into this. The only thing that stopped them in the past was competitors creating legitimately more compelling alternatives and shifting the sales of their products.
Make no mistake: that’s all education is to them, a product (it wouldn’t surprise me at all if that descriptor enters the general vernacular in the future, schools will be ‘brands’) and they will do whatever is necessary to kill their competition. I don’t think even those in the field ofveducation realize how insidious all of this is, certainly not new teachers (they are too young to know any better, they blame an amorphous ‘government’).
LikeLike
Forgive the typos, folks, I was in a moving vehicle). 😉
LikeLike
“The Obama administration shared and promoted many of the foundation’s priorities”
Should read, “President Obama outsourced his entire ed policy to 3 billionaires”
Remember folks- the one and only reason the top .0001% are running the country is your elected officials are allowing it.
Bill Gates is just a wealthy person. He has no power over US public schools unless politicians hand it to him.
LikeLike
Do you remember when Arne Duncan put out a video in an attempt to deny Gates’ influence. He insists that Bill Gates “has no seat at the table.”
Here’s some nutty nostalgia from January 2014:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2FWlEzkew
Anthony Cody went ballistic at this blatant, easily-proven lie:
http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/01/duncan_bill_gates_has_no_.html
FIRST, Cody transcribed the relevant portion of the video
——————-
Lisa Clarke:
One of the particular questions we’ve heard teachers ask is if corporate-based philanthropists are playing too heavy a role in public education, and if there’s a corporate agenda at the Department.
Arne Duncan:
I think that’s a very important question of what role does philanthropy or the corporate side have, and anyone who thinks that those who are major donors to education, or those giving a lot, have a seat at the table in terms of policymaking, nothing could be further from the truth.
Lisa Clarke:
When individual philanthropists like Bill Gates or Eli Broad give donations do they earn a seat at the table making decisions with you?
Arne Duncan:
I have tremendous respect for them and am thrilled that they have given — lots of other places they could choose to put their dollars. The fact that they are trying to help education is a very positive thing. But no, it doesn’t give them a seat at the table. You guys are at the table. But again, having people who have been successful come back and give back and be part of the solution is really important.
Lisa Clarke:
I know that organizations like the Gates Foundation are funding teacher and teacher leadership, so it’s complicated. So one of the things that I’d like us to do is really engage with each other, to agree where we agree, find the places where we disagree, and move forward. I’d like to invite the viewers today to continue this conversation, and one of the ways we can do that is using the hashtag #AskArne.
———————————–
NEXT: Cody explains and documents how Duncan’s “no seat at the table” was a bald-faced lie:
—————————–
ANTHONY CODY:
As someone who has spent the past five years trying to get a straight answer from Secretary Duncan, I would have to agree with Lisa Clarke when she concludes that “it’s complicated.”
So let’s take a look at what Secretary Duncan is telling us. It actually boggles my mind that he would say that Bill Gates has no seat at the policy table. When someone says something that seems to be patently false, it invites inquiry into the truth.
In order to understand this, we must understand how education policy is actually being made, because clearly that is what is being hidden here.
Let’s take the Common Core, one of the projects that the Department of Education has been actively promoting for the past four years. How have philanthropists like Bill Gates influenced the creation and advance of this project, and worked hand in hand with the Department of Education to make sure it succeeds?
STEP ONE: Speaking to the National Council of State Legislators in 2009, Bill Gates elucidates his vision for the Common Core:
———————————————————-
BILL GATES:
In terms of standards, the state-led Common Core State Standards Initiative is developing clear, rigorous standards that will match the best in the world.
Last month 46 governors and Chief State School Officers made a public commitment to embrace those standards. This is encouraging. Identifying Common Standards is just the starting point. We’ll only know if this effort has succeeded, when the curriculum and the tests are aligned to these standards.
Secretary Arne Duncan recently announced that $350 million of the stimulus package will be used to create just these kinds of tests. This assessment align to the Common Core when the tests are aligned to the Common Standards, the curriculum will be aligned as well
It will unleash a powerful market of people providing services for better teaching. For the first time there will be a large uniform base of customers.
—————————————–
ANTHONY CODY:
STEP TWO: The Gates Foundation funds the non-profits that draft the Common Core standards, and gives money to non-profits called the National Governor’s Association and the Chief Council of State School Officers so that they will get 45 governors to agree to have their states “adopt” the Common Core in place of existing academic standards. This process, in spite of loud claims to the contrary, was not led by teachers.
STEP THREE: The Department of Education, which was forbidden by law from doing Step Two itself, uses stimulus funds to offer states Race to the Top grants, in a competitive process, in which points are awarded to states that have adopted “college and career ready standards,” the Common Core being the most readily available such standards. The Memorandum of Understanding that state school officers were asked to sign states:
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
COMMON CORE Memorandum of Understanding:
…the federal government can provide key financial support for this effort in developing a common core of state standards and in moving toward common assessments, such as through the Race to the Top Fund authorized in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Further, the federal government can incentivize this effort through a range of tiered incentives, such as providing states with greater flexibility in the use of existing federal funds, supporting a revised state accountability structure, and offering financial support for states to effectively implement the standards.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
STEP FOUR: The Gates Foundation offered assistance to states in filling out the complex Race to the Top applications, but only if the states agreed to the following:
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Has your state signed the MOA regarding the Common Core Standards currently being developed by NGA/CCSSO? [Answer must be “yes”]
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
STEP FIVE: The Gates Foundation continues to pour millions of dollars into advocacy and “think tank” organizations, including the national PTA, teacher unions, and more, purchasing their active support in waging a robust public relations campaign to convince everyone that there is widespread support for the Common Core.
Meanwhile Arne Duncan acts as if none of this has any impact. As if teachers have a larger say in education policy than Bill Gates, who is just offering a helpful hand with no strings attached. This is not just a seat at the table. The Gates Foundation has set the table, and decided on the menu. The people seated at whatever table the Department of Education produces for photo oppurtunities or interviews such as this are not the real decision-makers.
I am not sure what good it does to #AskArne anything when we get nonsense like this in response.
What do you think? Does Arne Duncan have any credibility when he says that Bill Gates has no seat at the education policy table?
LikeLike
The part that gets me is they were surprised by the pushback to the Common Core.
There’s some fundamental, profound disconnect. I would not have been “surprised” that altering every public school in the country caused a pushback.
Melinda Gates just discovered that they have to include the public in decisions on public schools.
LikeLike
Melinda Gates actually believes that Common Core standards and testing can fix what ails America’s struggling urban and rural schools. Does she also believe in UFO’s, geo-centrism, and Leprechauns?
The woman can’t possibly be that ignorant; she must be that controlling.
LikeLike
I have a conception of what Melinda means by college ready, but what is meaningful work?
LikeLike
Love the Gates. Love the Common Core standards. The standards are controversial because people like their little world and can’t see the bigger picture.Our universities are filled with an overabundants of students taking remedial classes. Why is this? Because something in the public school system is broken and no one will take a stand to fix it. Teachers are afraid of losing their jobs. Parents are afraid their children can’t compete in that way. And the world is laughing at us. We like that you teach your students to fear tests. It will be easier for our children to lead yours.
LikeLike
You can’t be serious, either that or you haven’t been paying attention.
If CC is so great, why doesn’t Bill Gates and other leaders in the reform movement send their own children to public schools which are forcibly immersed in this “curriculum” which requires teachers to teach to a poorly written and diagnostically worthless test?
Oh and here’s a little test for you. Which word in your comment was misspelled?
LikeLike
Oh and Monica, it must be nice to be one of the haves, not so nice if you are one of the have nots.
LikeLike
Monica, that’s a sad statement. Do you think the world is laughing at the USA in Rio? Where in the world is anyone laughing? We have the world’s most powerful economy, and that’s no joke. It was built by people who went to American public schools. I am one of them. I am very proud to have gone to public schools from kindergarten through 12th grade.
LikeLike
A description of Bill Gates high school experience:
LikeLike
Bill needs to heed the phrase:
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. (Or vica versa)
LikeLike
Like many of his ilk, Gates needs to hear the word “no” far more often.
LikeLike
I wonder if anyone ever said “no” to Bill
LikeLike
His father when he told Bill that he had to think like him.
LikeLike
Some people need to teach and to remind Melinda the goal in doing business.
Yes, BUSINESS is all about to manipulate and to cheat JUST FOR “PROFIT.”
Most of all, people need to observe, to listen and to acknowledge the PRACTICAL ACTIONS in all businessmen and women versus their VERBAL and PROMISES IN LIP-SERVICES.
If their children are schooling in their designed Common Cores curriculum and taking all STRENUOUS, INVALID testing schemes, then parent can evaluate their intelligence before following or succumbing to their manipulation.
We are intelligent and practical educators, parents and students. We should know that anything and anyone which is imposed on our peaceful living, IS DEFINITELY “BAD FOR OUR SURVIVAL.” Back2basic
LikeLike
I like the CC, especially the materials being developed based on the standards. I found a wonderful lesson online developed by the National Endowment for the Humanities that had students comparing and contrasting primary sources. All for free.
I don’t understand the suspicion of the Gates’ profit motive. They are basically giving away their entire fortune, which I think is around $65 billion. My understanding is that their kids will get a few million each.
Hey, if you don’t like CC, explain why. But I don’t understand this vilification of the worlds most generous couple.
LikeLike
Learn more about Gates. He doesn’t ask people what they need. He tells them what they must do if they want yo be funded.
He is a devotee of standardized testing and has used his fortune to buy support got it, even though he went to an elite school that doesn’t use standardized tests. Nor do his own children.
Through his close relationship with Arne Duncan, he got the US government to back his favorite idea: judging teacher quality by the rise or fall of their students’ scores. Most teachers don’t teach tested subjects so they get judged by the scores of students they never taught in subjects they don’t teach. Gates gave hundreds of millions to several districts to implement his pet scheme and it has worked nowhere. It became a mandatory part of the Obama administration’s Race to the Top, because Duncan wanted to please Gates.
Gates apparently has no one around him to say no.
He has ruined the lives of thousands of teachers.
And he never admits error.
LikeLike
http://www.epi.org/publication/school-privatization-milwaukee/
This article from the Economic Policy Institute tells of a chain of low budget charter schools, called the Rocketship Charter Schools (The CEO is a millionaire, but I digress). Although, this is an extreme example, not funded by Gates, this chain follows the same pattern of reforms set in action by Gates, Broad, Waltons etc. The reformers advocate for charter schools, large class sizes, online learning, test-based accountability, and rigid discipline. At Rocketship, as many as 150 children are corralled into tech labs to work on practice test problems for hours at a time, while supervised by minimum wage employees.. These children don’t have discussion groups, they aren’t exposed to music or the arts, they aren’t taught to write, they have very little exercise, enrichment, exploration. Their teachers have little to no experience. The chain saves approximately $500,000 per year per school on teachers salaries. The money goes to high administrative salaries and computers, of course. The best part is the great tax deals the philanthropist investors get for their donations to the start ups of these scam charter schools. Investors can double their investment in seven years. As one NY school board member and investor said “you’d have to be a friggin idiot not to invest in charter schools.”
Gates, Lowell Jobs, Broad, the Waltons, Zuckerberg are not generous and they are not compassionate!
LikeLike
Whether the common core state standards are more rigorous is debatable. What is not debatable is the extraordinary expense and burden the new standards have placed on schools, teachers, parents, and children during a recessionary period when schools were forced to make severe cuts. The billions of dollars wasted on new textbooks and software could have been spent on proven reforms such as small class sizes and experienced teachers.
LikeLike
Diane,
I don’t necessarily disagree with you that the Gates’ specify how they want their money used. Go figure. However, some of the replies suggesting that this is a plot for the Gates to enrich themselves are over the top.
LikeLike
I agree. To the Gates, it isn’t about more money. They already have more money than many nations. No, its about power and getting what they want. The money they already have has corrupted their thinking as it has corrupted the thinking of powerful individuals throughout history and it is now clear this is why civilizations collapse. Collapse of civilizations is not caused by the people. It’s caused by those who hold the most power.
The Bible is much more than the word of God to be blindly obeyed. It also includes the wisdom learned from six thousand years of history.
And what does the Bible say about greed?
“But those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pangs.”
The Gates covet power and use their wealth to buy that power to force others to their will.
LikeLike
So when Gates testified before Congress in 2014, calling for an expansion of H1-B Visas, all while laying off 18,000 workers, he wasn’t looking to enrich himself and his company with cheap indentured labor? The billionaires are investing in the $500 billion education market because they are making A LOT of money.
LikeLike
Lloyd,
Is that how you taught your students to reason? You throw out a vague historical reference and a Bible verse, and that is your evidence that the Gates are evil?
Raise,
How are the Gates profiting by giving away all of their money?
LikeLike
Jonk,
The Gates aren’t evil for giving away money. They are not evil. They are bad citizens and arrogant elitists who use their money to undermine public education and democracy.
LikeLike
Johnkzo,
Allow me to jump in here with a lesson on logical thinking with tried and true aphorism “Crap in crap out”. When the thinking behind the standards and testing malpractices is faulty and error filled (crap) the results of said malpractices can only be faulty and error filled (crap).
The fundamental basis for the standards and testing regime is to “measure” the “nonobservable” using a non-existing measuring device. There is no standard unit of measurement in the teaching and learning process. None has ever been legitimately developed and vetted. With no standard unit to define what is supposedly being measured (remember what the proponents contend is that what is measured is “nonobservable”) and no exemplar of that unit of measure there can be no measuring device calibrated against it and therefore no “measuring” of the teaching and learning process. There can be assessing, judging, evaluating and other means to help students ascertain their progress in learning but no “measuring”.
Since the onto-epistemological underpinnings of educational standards and standardized testing is completely bankrupt, false and error filled (crap in), the usage of the results for anything is completely invalid (crap out). See my post below for where to find the total take down of these two malpractices.
LikeLike
The Gates are exerting their power, just as you are. I like the results so far.
You said in another thread that “teachers should be free to teach what they choose,” which is the epitome of arrogant and elitist. A lot of teachers hate “authority”, while protecting their own authority as sacred.
LikeLike
Jonkzo – do I note a touch of disdain for teachers in your tone?
There is a difference between autonomy for trained professionals to use their best judgement in teaching their students and scripted lessons prepared by non educators with little to no classroom experience. As teachers we use our expertise and individualize instruction to suit the needs of our pupils. Despite your comment, we respect and encourage constructive criticism or suggestions on ways to tweak our teaching and make it better (from qualified administrators) which is reaffirmed by the fact we attend inservices and conferences to help develop our craft, even after teaching for a multitude of years. There has always been a curriculum and benchmarks to achieve, but the one size fits all policies teachers are currently forced to endure under CC, along with the make or break achievement tests designed to fail the average studen, seem unfair and cruel to us. That Bill and Melinda Gates support the very program we abhor is witnessed by the numerous comments seen on this blog as well as the thousands of student opt outs by parents who agree with our assessments.
You may like what you see, but try living it. That’s why so many teachers (and principals) are either switching careers or retiring as soon as they can.
Yet the Gates have doubled down and refuse to listen to the experts in the field, claiming previous educational research and practices recommended by child psychology experts are now flawed or irrelevant.
Even if your child thrives, what about the rest of the kids who are floundering? We are concerned for their well being as well as that of your own children.
So start listening to the essence of what we are trying to say. While I wouldn’t necessarily call reformists like Gates evil, they are definitely misguided. The fact that they are making money off this endeavor just adds fuel to the fire.
Since I’m retired I have no “skin in the game” but I do have grandchildren who I see struggling. I speak out for them and all the others without a voice.
LikeLike
Other professionals must meet strict standards, and can face career ending consequences if they fail to meet them. A doctor can be sued for malpractice. A contractor must build to code. Even a car salesman will lose his job if he fails to meet quotas. It is unreasonable for teachers to expect complete autonomy, while having no accountability.
LikeLike
See comment above and then read and understand how the concept of standards and standardized testing is onto-epistemologically bankrupt as proven by Noel Wilson in his never refuted nor rebutted 1997 dissertation “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error” found at: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/577/700
Brief outline of Wilson’s “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error” and some comments of mine.
1. A description of a quality can only be partially quantified. Quantity is almost always a very small aspect of quality. It is illogical to judge/assess a whole category only by a part of the whole. The assessment is, by definition, lacking in the sense that “assessments are always of multidimensional qualities. To quantify them as unidimensional quantities (numbers or grades) is to perpetuate a fundamental logical error” (per Wilson). The teaching and learning process falls in the logical realm of aesthetics/qualities of human interactions. In attempting to quantify educational standards and standardized testing the descriptive information about said interactions is inadequate, insufficient and inferior to the point of invalidity and unacceptability.
2. A major epistemological mistake is that we attach, with great importance, the “score” of the student, not only onto the student but also, by extension, the teacher, school and district. Any description of a testing event is only a description of an interaction, that of the student and the testing device at a given time and place. The only correct logical thing that we can attempt to do is to describe that interaction (how accurately or not is a whole other story). That description cannot, by logical thought, be “assigned/attached” to the student as it cannot be a description of the student but the interaction. And this error is probably one of the most egregious “errors” that occur with standardized testing (and even the “grading” of students by a teacher).
3. Wilson identifies four “frames of reference” each with distinct assumptions (epistemological basis) about the assessment process from which the “assessor” views the interactions of the teaching and learning process: the Judge (think college professor who “knows” the students capabilities and grades them accordingly), the General Frame-think standardized testing that claims to have a “scientific” basis, the Specific Frame-think of learning by objective like computer based learning, getting a correct answer before moving on to the next screen, and the Responsive Frame-think of an apprenticeship in a trade or a medical residency program where the learner interacts with the “teacher” with constant feedback. Each category has its own sources of error and more error in the process is caused when the assessor confuses and conflates the categories.
4. Wilson elucidates the notion of “error”: “Error is predicated on a notion of perfection; to allocate error is to imply what is without error; to know error it is necessary to determine what is true. And what is true is determined by what we define as true, theoretically by the assumptions of our epistemology, practically by the events and non-events, the discourses and silences, the world of surfaces and their interactions and interpretations; in short, the practices that permeate the field. . . Error is the uncertainty dimension of the statement; error is the band within which chaos reigns, in which anything can happen. Error comprises all of those eventful circumstances which make the assessment statement less than perfectly precise, the measure less than perfectly accurate, the rank order less than perfectly stable, the standard and its measurement less than absolute, and the communication of its truth less than impeccable.”
In other words all the logical errors involved in the process render any conclusions invalid.
5. The test makers/psychometricians, through all sorts of mathematical machinations attempt to “prove” that these tests (based on standards) are valid-errorless or supposedly at least with minimal error [they aren’t]. Wilson turns the concept of validity on its head and focuses on just how invalid the machinations and the test and results are. He is an advocate for the test taker not the test maker. In doing so he identifies thirteen sources of “error”, any one of which renders the test making/giving/disseminating of results invalid. And a basic logical premise is that once something is shown to be invalid it is just that, invalid, and no amount of “fudging” by the psychometricians/test makers can alleviate that invalidity.
6. Having shown the invalidity, and therefore the unreliability, of the whole process Wilson concludes, rightly so, that any result/information gleaned from the process is “vain and illusory”. In other words start with an invalidity, end with an invalidity (except by sheer chance every once in a while, like a blind and anosmic squirrel who finds the occasional acorn, a result may be “true”) or to put in more mundane terms crap in-crap out.
7. And so what does this all mean? I’ll let Wilson have the second to last word: “So what does a test measure in our world? It measures what the person with the power to pay for the test says it measures. And the person who sets the test will name the test what the person who pays for the test wants the test to be named.”
In other words it attempts to measure “’something’ and we can specify some of the ‘errors’ in that ‘something’ but still don’t know [precisely] what the ‘something’ is.” The whole process harms many students as the social rewards for some are not available to others who “don’t make the grade (sic)” Should American public education have the function of sorting and separating students so that some may receive greater benefits than others, especially considering that the sorting and separating devices, educational standards and standardized testing, are so flawed not only in concept but in execution?
My answer is NO!!!!!
One final note with Wilson channeling Foucault and his concept of subjectivization:
“So the mark [grade/test score] becomes part of the story about yourself and with sufficient repetitions becomes true: true because those who know, those in authority, say it is true; true because the society in which you live legitimates this authority; true because your cultural habitus makes it difficult for you to perceive, conceive and integrate those aspects of your experience that contradict the story; true because in acting out your story, which now includes the mark and its meaning, the social truth that created it is confirmed; true because if your mark is high you are consistently rewarded, so that your voice becomes a voice of authority in the power-knowledge discourses that reproduce the structure that helped to produce you; true because if your mark is low your voice becomes muted and confirms your lower position in the social hierarchy; true finally because that success or failure confirms that mark that implicitly predicted the now self-evident consequences. And so the circle is complete.”
In other words students “internalize” what those “marks” (grades/test scores) mean, and since the vast majority of the students have not developed the mental skills to counteract what the “authorities” say, they accept as “natural and normal” that “story/description” of them. Although paradoxical in a sense, the “I’m an “A” student” is almost as harmful as “I’m an ‘F’ student” in hindering students becoming independent, critical and free thinkers. And having independent, critical and free thinkers is a threat to the current socio-economic structure of society.
LikeLike
jonkzo,
“. . . while having no accountability.”
That’s 100% Grade AA Pure Bovine Excrement.
I didn’t start teaching until I was 39 and then taught for 21 years at one point being the World Language department chair. I can say without a doubt that I was held more accountable for more things as a classroom teacher than in any other job/position that I had in the work world. There has always been “accountability” for teachers and to suggest otherwise shows you have no clue as to how the evaluation process works in public education.
Are you a teacher or otherwise employed in the education sector? If so, in what capacity? Give us a little background information, like letting us know who you really are, instead of hiding behind a screen name.
LikeLike
I don’t think jonkzo has ever read the ed code in any state that governs the community based, democratic, transparent, non-profit public schools.
Public school teachers are held accountable for a host of responsibilities. Public school teachers can be sued, and I’ve known teachers that parents took to court. It’s very stressful for the teachers and all the teachers I knew won their court cases because there wasn’t enough proof/evidence to convict them. I most of the cases the parents took the teacher to court based on lies from the child and the lies were revealed in court.
Teachers can be fired easily if the district proves they did something illegal like having sex with a minor or refusing to do what an administrator tells them to do — something supported by the ed code like teach the subject they were hired to teach.
If a teacher learns a child was abused physically, mentally or sexually, in California, if the teacher doesn’t report it, that teacher can be fired.
But those laws and codes don’t apply to autocratic, opaque, often fraudulent and inferior corporate charter schools.
What jonkzo isn’t aware of is that in the community based, democratic, transparent, non profit public schools, parents can complain to the elected school board if nothing else works and that usually leads to an investigation to see if the parents allegations have any truth to them.
But in those publicly funded, private sector, autocratic, opaque, often fraudulent and inferior corporate charter schools, the word opaque means opaque and there is no community based elected school board to turn to when you think something is wrong or changed should be made.
To become a public school teacher, we have to go through an FBI criminal background check. The autocratic charter schools don’t have to do that so who is being held accountable in those schools?
LikeLike
Jonkzo, I’m not talking about complete autonomy without accountability, just the ability to taylor the curriculum to meet the child’s needs (versus a scripted lesson), to choose reading materials relevant to the child’s interests (versus from a proscribed reading list), to spend time teaching science and social studies and an appreciation for the arts (versus just reading and math), to go on field trips or put on a school play (versus more lessons which don’t allow for any diversion from the script), to allow time for recess (versus paper and pencil desk work – even for kindergarteners), to develop a love of learning (versus a fear of tests).
Of course there is accountability. Teachers in NYS must get their Master’s Degree plus pass a national exam to get certified, then to keep their certification they must prove they have participated in numerous hours of continuing education coursework. They are observed and meet with the administrator to discuss their application of teaching skills with suggestions for improvement (and hopefully kudos for exemplary work). Tenure is only given after three years of closely watched behaviors and not everyone passes the muster. Teachers without their tenure can be fired for any reason. With tenure they can only be fired for provable cause (and, contrary to common belief, tenured teachers are fired). So there is accountability.
However, let’s take the analogy of the Doctor into account. Would you expect a medical professional to get the same survival rates if he specialized in geriatrics, cancer treatment, or high risk pregnancies than if he saw patients as a podiatrist, dermatologist, or a pediatrician? Why would you expect teachers working with children with learning disabilities or refugees who speak and/or understand limited English, or students living in poverty exposed to daily violence and other trauma to have the same results as teachers in the suburbs working with students whose affluent, supportive parents play an active part in the school culture? Yet the current system treats all children the same and holds all teachers accountable to the same standards regardless of the student population. If those doctors were treated like teachers they would be penalized for the death of an octogenarian or an individual with stage four cancer. Or the used car salesman would be fired for not selling that defective car whose tires are slashed and engine won’t turn over while his colleague is promoted for selling a dozen shiny new cars.
We teach children, we don’t sell widgets. I want my child to be treated with love and respect, given a well rounded education, and taught to be an independent thinker, not to be treated as an interchangeable commodity taught to conform to the standards set by an elite group of billionaires. But that’s a subject for another time.
LikeLike
Do any of you know a tenured public school teacher who was fired for failing to educate his or her students?
LikeLike
I know several who were “pushed out” or convinced to try another career.
I also know several who were given “administrative” desk jobs.
And there were a few who just disappeared.
There were some who were fired but for cause, not for crappy teaching. However, I didn’t know too many incompetent tenured teachers.
LikeLike
To jonkzo:
Your expression belongs to a robot that is programmed by a greedy master who has soulless, mindless in civilization and no understanding of the profound meaning of the universal law of Cause and Effect.
Human brain is better than any computer. However, human emotion and feeling are the most powerful DIVERGENT FACTOR. Whenever human beings can CONTROL this powerful divergent factor, they will own the universe and they can come and go freely in the universe.
We are living on the planet of Earth where gravity plays the critical part to our survival.
In the same vein, all sentient beings (= having a state of being fearful of the unknown) have the same weakness in greed, ego and lust for power, domination of three dimensions: space, time and spirit. Our weakness controls our freedom in the universe or our true destiny as the gravity controls our survival.
In short, all rules and regulations are for the followers or the sheep. CONSCIENTIOUS educators are the true leaders who are with God- given responsibility to cultivate young learners the ability to have CIVIL DUTY to other fellow beings on Earth regardless of race, gender, and different cultural backgrounds.
Life is there for everyone to learn, to explore and to excel within their path. The learners CANNOT be forced OR PUSHED WITH PENALTY to do things AGAINST their conscience in order to survive and to please GREEDY MASTER.
Learners at all stages can be motivated with joy in learning, BUT NOT be enforced with severe penalty (= lost their basic living, their career and their livelihood in both learning and working). Back2basic
LikeLike
Our public schools in Washington state are severely underfunded. Our state Supreme Court has ruled the state legislature in contempt of court for failing to fund our public schools for years. Meanwhile, the Gates have enjoyed a one billion yearly tax break in one tax loop hole alone since the late 90s. It is disgraceful how the Gates and other extremely wealthy citizens in our state are influencing the state legislature and public education policy.
LikeLike