A group of Google expatriates decided to reinvent education. Really. They are chock-a-block with start-up funds from investors, and they have opened a few small for-profit schools. Rebecca Mead writes about AltSchool here. The founder is tech whiz Max Ventilla. He started AltSchool because he wanted something for his own children that fit with the world as he knew it and the world as he thinks it will be.
Mead visited an AltSchool in Brooklyn:
Inside, the space has been partitioned with dividers creating several classrooms. The décor evokes an ikea showroom: low-slung couches, beanbags, clusters of tables, and wooden chairs in progressively smaller sizes, like those belonging to Goldilocks’s three bears. There is no principal’s office and no principal. Like the five other AltSchools that have opened in the past three years—the rest are in the Bay Area—the school is run by teachers, one of whom serves as the head of the school. There is no school secretary: many administrative matters are handled at AltSchool’s headquarters, in the soma district of San Francisco. There aren’t even many children. Every AltSchool is a “micro-school.” In Brooklyn Heights, there are thirty-five students, ranging from pre-kindergarten to third grade. Only a few dozen more children will be added as the school matures. AltSchool’s ambition, however, is huge. Five more schools are scheduled to open by the end of 2017, in San Francisco, Manhattan, and Chicago, and the goal is to expand into other parts of the country, offering a highly tailored education that uses technology to target each student’s “needs and passions.” Tuition is about thirty thousand dollars a year.
In December, I visited a classroom for half a dozen pre-kindergartners. Several children were playing “restaurant,” and one girl sat in a chair, her arms outstretched as if holding a steering wheel: she was delivering food orders. “I’m taking a shortcut,” she announced. A teacher sitting on the floor told her, “That’s a good word—you used it correctly.” Then she took out her phone and recorded a video of the moment.
Another teacher and a student were looking at a tablet computer that displayed an image of a pink jellyfish. The girl had been drawing her own jellyfish with a violet crayon. “Let’s see if we can learn a name of a new jellyfish,” the teacher said. “Which one do you want to learn more about?” She touched the screen, and another jellyfish appeared—a feathery white one. “This is a . . . hippopodius?” the teacher read, stumbling over the name. “I wonder if this one glows in the dark.” The girl said, “Do you have another pink one?”
Students at AltSchool are issued a tablet in pre-K and switch to a laptop in later years. (For now, AltSchool ends at the equivalent of eighth grade.) When I visited a mixed classroom for second and third graders, most of the children were sunk into their laptops. All were engaged in bespoke activities that had been assigned to them through a “playlist”—software that displays a series of digital “cards” containing instructions for a task to be completed. Sometimes it was an online task. Two children were doing keyboarding drills on a typing Web site. Their results would be uploaded for a teacher’s assessment and added to the student’s online Learning Progression—software developed by AltSchool which captures, in minute detail, a student’s progress.
The curriculum is roughly aligned with the Common Core, the government standards that establish topics which students should master by the end of each grade. But AltSchool’s ethos is fundamentally opposed to the paradigm of standardization that has dominated public education in recent decades, and reflects a growing shift in emphasis among theorists toward “personalized learning.” This approach acknowledges and adapts to the differences among students: their abilities, their interests, their cultural backgrounds.
Here is another description of Ventilla’s school of the future. Ventillia is abright shining example of an entrepreneur who plans to disrupt education, to the applause of Silicon Valley.
Do you have some ideas for Max Ventilla of AltSchool? Share them here.

OMG! Hope they try this on their own young children before they foist this ridiculousness on other children. But they won’t. Follow the $$$$$.
Thanks of this, Diane.
LikeLike
Tuition is about $30,000 per year. That probably is targeting their own kids. At least, they’re not targeting my kids with that kind of tuition.
LikeLiked by 1 person
$30,000 per student, and it is mostly tech instruction. Are people with big money dumb enough to submit their children to an unproven experiment? Altschool should do some research before they try to sell their “vision.” The first thing they should research is child development.http://www.ascd.org/publications/curriculum-update/nov1993/teaching-young-children.aspx
LikeLike
The worst part of his big idea is he is starting with “his” big idea. He is operating in a vacuum. When you design curricula, you have to start with the learner. You have to ask yourself, “What is best way to convey the learner the content?” With young children, we know they learn best through their senses. That is why young children do best in an active learning environment that allows them to explore with emphasis on hands-on learning. He should read some Maria Montessori or Lilian Katz. This tech star has it backwards. You don’t start with your vision; you start with the learner.
LikeLike
They do not believe in teachers. Its that simple. Thirty years of beat downs has taken its toll.
LikeLike
Especially the vision of an adult completely detached from the diversity of children and the disparities they bring into a classroom.
These tech guys are the new Masters of the Universe. They conflate writing code (controlling inputs and outputs) with an imaginary ability to control anything they want. What they don’t get is that teaching is not about controlling children.
Just another failure in the making.
LikeLike
Apple computer always did very thorough research which 1) tried to find out what people wanted and how best to give them that 2) had people actually using their prototypes before they ever released a product.
But many of these education related tech companies seem to be following the Microsoft model: develop a product with little or no research, release crap and then let the public find the bugs.
LikeLike
Take them outside and show them a caterpillar.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No need my friend – they have tablets:
LikeLike
“What a drag it was without those” (with apologies to Mick Jagger)
“Kids are different today”, I hear ev’ Reformer say
Jenny needs something today to boost her mind
And though she’s not really bad, there’s a little Apple Pad
She goes running for the shelter of Reformer’s little helper
And it helps her on her way, gets her through her testing day
“Things are different today”, I hear ev’ry student say
Writing journals with a pencil’s just a drag
So he takes his books and letters and he throwns them in the shredder
And goes running for the shelter of Reformer’s little helper
And it helps him on his way, gets him through his testing day
School board, please, some more of these
Inside the school, the iPads rule
What a drag it was without those
“Kids just aren’t the same today”, I hear ev’ry teacher say
They just don’t appreciate when you get fired
They’re so hard to satisfy, you can tranquilize their mind
Send them running for the shelter of Reformer’s little helper
And it helps them on their way, gets them through their testing day
School board, please, some more of these
Inside the school, the iPads rule
What a drag it was without those
“Test’s just much too hard today”, I hear ev’ry student say
The pursuit of education seems a bore
But if they take more of those, they will get an overdose
No more running for the shelter of Reformer’s little helper
They won’t help them on their way, through their kindergarten day
School board, please, some more of these
Inside the school, the iPads rule
What a drag it was without those
LikeLike
You could make the same criticism of preschool books (fiction & NF) illustrating metamorphasis for urban kids. But, at least in the urban PreK where I teach, the unit also includes close-up observation of real-life caterpillars making the transition in real time. I would like to think AltSchool would do the same– when & if student strays to butterflies– but I cannot be sure from this article.
LikeLike
As usual SDP, excellent!
LikeLike
Keep it very hands on in the early years. Very, very hands on.
No data walls.
Don’t listen to corporate. Corporate doesn’t know how to run corporate, and corporate doesn’t know how corporate and other jobs will soon evolve.
Don’t just follow common core, which will ultimately be replaced or substantially reformed, lead the way.
Read the research, but take it with a grain of salt, as needed.
Develop lots of partnerships with museums, zoos, aquariums, libraries, play facilities and any other sorts of learning environments on and off-line.
Let teachers lead and grow in their own ways, as the children will and do.
LikeLike
Oh, and ignore the media/hype.
The mission is not to fix or disrupt or be the best, the realistic mission is to provide a good alternative.
LikeLike
Hopefully those parents in the market for a $30k/yr preschool dedicated to sculpting online curriculum to follow student interest recognize they need lots of hands-on tools at home plus time for multiple field trips.
But as long as AltSchool emains private, I don’t care.
LikeLike
Thoroughly concur with your last sentence bethree5!
LikeLike
This is truly a terrible idea for young children. I am curious about how early childhood experts are helping guide this project.
LikeLike
Bringing in, and actually listening to, been-there hands-on experts is not the way of any school reformer I’ve ever known.
LikeLike
I have been a teacher for thirty plus years in a Performance Standards Consortium public high school that has a waiver from high stakes, standardized testing. What’s interesting here is that several Altschools’ features seem to resemble those of my own — a democratized staff decision-making structure (though this isn’t fully clear from the description), kids pursuing their own ideas and interests, the absence of standardized testing and of teaching to the test, etc. What’s strikingly absent from the description, however, is any mention of kids talking to each other, exchanging ideas face-to-face, developing their own thinking through dialog, in conjuncture with others, etc. The small schools model was in several, significant ways copied, co-opted and sanitized by private “education” foundations and then married to high stakes testing. Perhaps realizing the failure of that strategy, folks in the corporate ed world, are retreating from the test, but retaining their adherence to privatization and their notion of student-as-creative-entrepreneur.
LikeLike
I also like the idea of teachers running the school, although you’re right, burghardt, it’s unclear whether decisions are really made at the school or at Altschool company headquarters. Knowing tech company types, I’d say headquarters. Removing the administrators is a great idea that not Max Ventilla but Albert Shanker created. Corporate with a capital ‘C’ stole Shanker’s idea and turned it into a corporate privatization scheme.
Regarding the classroom decor, couches and beanbags are not new, but who cares? It’s furniture. My public, magnet, elementary school had couches and beanbags in the early 1980’s. It had connected classrooms and computers too. It even had a class where we made stop action short films with George Lucas’ advanced, Star Wars technology. Not important. Most importantly, all importantly, it had great teachers. Many thanks to my unionized, public school teachers who got me reading classic novels and solving multi-variable algebraic equations by 5th grade. I know it wasn’t the computers. It was the teachers. It couldn’t have been due to googling pictures of stuff or the use of data analytics. I don’t think it was the beanbags.
My advice to tech entrepreneurs is to never ask for support or money from public office holders. As a matter of fact, just stay away from Democracy altogether. Stay private.
LikeLike
This is how you analyze Homer the altvis way.
http://blog.altschool.com/homer-meets-high-tech-data
It reads like Terry Pratchett’s Auditors analyzing art. Unfortunately, unlike Terry Pratchett’s humorous science fiction, this is not set in an imaginary Discworld.
LikeLike
I used to work as a software engineer and I saw this mentality all the time: the idea that you don’t need to ask any subject experts about the subject (in this case education) you are writing software for.
..because, you know, “we software engineers are much smarter than all those education people”
of course, it’s a bizarre idea, but quite common in the tech industry.
LikeLike
This sounds like a terrible school.
From the short blurb, a few things stand out to me. First, the idea of not having any “hierarchy” (no principal, no school admin) is nice in theory but never works in the workplace. Groups of people thrive when there is clear organization and each person has a clearly defined role. Inevitably, there will be power struggles among even the most egalitarian minded of workers, and hierarchies will emerge unofficially with all of the accompanying power struggles. As a teacher, this sounds like an awful place to work.
Secondly, using tech and learning about tech are not the same things at all. Using a tablet does not count as math or science in my book. Now, maybe if the kids take those tablets apart and analyze what’s going on inside and then rebuild them from scratch… well, that could be an interesting STEM lesson. Providing technological devices as modes of consuming information is not teaching anything about math and science.
LikeLike
Is there any reciprocal human interaction in this school? I think some of these tech geniuses don’t like people.
LikeLike
Re-envisioning education, is becoming, a very crowded field, Laurene Powell Jobs, the Waltons, Gates, Whitney Tilson, Ventilla, etc. Next stop, “re-envisioning public parks'”, with a reach into our pockets to fund implementation, delivered with lucrative payoffs to Wall Street and Silicon Valley. It’s not as rich a market, b/c tax revenues aren’t as great but, there’s opportunity for the first egomaniacal amateurs, to get a monopoly.
LikeLike
The rush to incorporate technology into every aspect of K-12 education is distressing, especially since programs are being adopted by school districts without any vetting process. For example, the school districts in my area approved a curriculum created by a tech startup called Newsela, for Language Arts. Newsela was founded by journalists with zero childhood development training. Not a single staff member has ever taught school or studied how children learn; although the CEO taught with TFA for two years.
Newsela is a collection of articles from the AP. The articles are poorly written and full of errors. AP news stories were never meant to be to used as educational tools. Newselas work like every technology program. Students read a news story then take a reading comprehension quiz. Read then quiz. Read then quiz, until the child thoroughly despises reading. In some of our schools, Newselas have replaced books and there are practically no writing or grammar lessons.
Our award winning “innovation” schools also use similar untested, unproven, unvetted technology programs in every subject, from science to history to math. Watch a video, take a quiz. Watch a video, take a quiz. It’s a very passive approach. I don’t see any in-depth learning going on.
LikeLike
It is evidence of plutocracy, when American communities can, neither, protect their local taxes, from outside influence, e.g. the Koch’s, nor, make decisions about education expenditures, for their children. if the elected school boards (state and local) fail to act, after learning about the education, you describe, the question about who they serve, has an answer.
National media sources, credit Bill Gates with altruism and, are mute, about the magnitude of his involvement in education, both in the US and abroad. Media’s lack of coverage of others, with vested interests in ed. reform, is certainly suspect. IMO, there is a consistency in main stream media bias for unsupportable dogma from free market economics. If we want students adequately educated to sustain a democracy and an economy, capable of growth, the information they receive must be filtered for bias, and the media’s policing of itself, is inadequate.
As economist, Thomas Picketty, recently documented in his unassailable research, concentrated wealth has a stranglehold on the world’s economy. The 6 heirs to the Walton fortune have wealth equivalent to 40% of Americans combined and, their portion is rapidly growing. It Is not a sustainable model for a vital society nor, for economic prosperity. Not surprisingly, the Waltons are heavily involved in transmuting our schools. A Gates-funded organization describes schools as “human capital pipelines”, And, both should have been reported by all main stream media, that serve as our fourth estate. Americans have no reason to believe the interests of the multinational corporations are aligned with United States interests.
LikeLike
I find it disturbing that so many people here are in such a rush to hate everything and anything that doesn’t fit their personal world view – particularly when it comes from a non-educator.
I have no affiliation with alt-school and haven’t yet fully formed an opinion on them but let’s look at a few facts:
1. It’s a private school – not a charter, so no public money. If a rich person wants to set up an experiment and other rich parents want to give it a go – let them. I don’t see any “other people’s children” here.
2. There’s no principal but rather a “head teacher” — isn’t the principal supposed to be the instructional leader? Isn’t that really a “head teacher?”
3. They hate teachers? I don’t see evidence of that — their website claims “smaller classroom student:teacher ratio” which says to me – fewer kids per class. By saying “classroom student:teacher ratio” it could be much more genuine than just dividing the number of students and adults.
4. Strip off the tech veneer and we basically have a school with small classes where teachers can do their job as they want to (at least according to their materials and nothing in the above post really says otherwise) – isn’t that what we want with our classes?
5. I have had some interactions with alt-school – I spoke with one of their upper level people a couple of years ago – just when they were starting out. We spoke for a while but didn’t dig down too deep since I’m a high school guy. The big take away he left me with was that they were trying to talk to as many top teachers as they could since they didn’t know that much about teaching and were looking to learn.
LikeLike
I agree & I’m not a hater. The general approach seems sound to me for hs age, & perhaps ms as well. & I do love to see rich silicon-valley-types trying out new ed ideas in their own mini-schools, instead of trying to find big-market ways to foist them on public schools.
My concerns with this for 3-6yo’s are below. Still & all, I had a unique kid who I would have sent to such a PreK could I have afforded it– a preschool for ‘geeks’. I did the next-best thing available, Montessori preK, which is a hands-on version of the same thing. Both allow the child to pursue & excel at what interests him.
And yet it still was not a perfect solution. Kids who have difficulty conforming with group-normed curriculum can also be kids who founder without sufficient structure, and need more guidance on social cues than they will get in an ed structure geared solely to individual progress. Montessori teachers– much like AltSchool teachers– can only observe and perhaps guide a bit, regarding social issues.
My little geek did better when he could self-organize w/a ‘desk’ (in ps), & a set of social rules. None of it was easy, but a few years in a ps system taught him how to negotiate society’s rules. & meanwhile he had an IT dad who set up a home network in those early days (late ’90’s-early ’00’s) so he could follow his own interests in off-hours.
LikeLike
I agree. Knowing what I now know, I would vote for less tech, and more “nature,” hands on learning, etc. — but I see this as a fairly benign attempt by parents to create a good learning environment for kids. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to discover that it sheds much of the “tech” gloss over time — assuming the schools continue. I had two kids (one on the AS spectrum and one gifted and fairly ideosyncratic in terms of skill sets and interests, who would both have done really well in a school like this.
It is certainly no worse (and for the most part) far better than many homeschooling schemes, or — for that matter– than households where kids come home from school and are promptly plunked in front of electronics (TV, video games, computers) for 4 to 6 hours each day — and more on vacations.
I wish them all well, and hope that as they learn more, they will shed some of the tech veneer in favor of hands on activities, nature walks, outdoor play, and the building of social skills.
LikeLike
The New Yorker article’s detail pertained to PS/K/1 age-group. Yet the description of the class-space & general MO greatly resembles our local alternative-hs school w/n the hs. Curriculum advances via project, but projects are designed & executed by each acad subj’s 15-20-member class as a whole. So there’s lots more face-to-face, teamwork, delegation, etc. Which seems a propos to founders’ mission to prepare students for a real-world future. (& not for nothing, a model which at least in my well-endowed district, can be done in-house in a public high school).
BUT… The 3-6yo cohort needs to be learning group social skills from the ground up. Not a good phase of life to devote whole days to pursuing individual whims. As it’s a private school it’s not my biz, but I would imagine that AltSchool’s market, i.e., parents, already have a houseful of learn-at-your-own-pace digital gadgets/ sw, & most likely moms & dads who are not home until dinner (or later) offering lots of post-curricular time for that.
Equally important, as has been noted, even the scantiest perusal of child-devpt basics informs the necessity of hands-on– tactical, audio, visual, etc– learning tools for PS/K/1. Frankly, the idea of putting 3yo’s on Chromebooks 6-8hrs/day during the very phase of life our bodies provide us with max ability to turn sensorial input into neural connections, is, well… A huge face-palm!!
LikeLike
To Tech entrepreneurs and parents who can afford 30,000 annually:
You forget the purpose of education = interaction among human beings, civilization, mutual understanding, and harmony between the strong will and the weak will.
If you look for greed and egoistic, please do more research in Japanese tech sector in the 1990 = lots of suicidal because of LONELINESS and empty life in material world.
I would never forget the DESPERATE face of the rich man who lost his 28 family members in the shipwreck. All were dead and all gold was in the ocean.
Parents, who work hard or loot well to have 30,000 annually to pay tuition fee, do not have time to communicate to their children. Please take look at all druggy rich children. Please watch all criminal shows that are based on true story to learn how children become murderers in society.
Leadership and being rich must be built-up from a pure heart and a logical mind that only gears to alleviate the unfortunate’s sufferance or to improve people’s happiness in emotion, physic for body, mind and spirit.
It is very simple to know in theory, but profoundly complex to practice in a reality.
We have Hugh Hefner (sexuality), Warren Buffet (global market in daily staples), Steve Jobs (iPhone), Mark Zuckerberg (Face Book), Bill Gate (Personal laptop computer), and many more fake/con-artist spiritual leaders like evangelist in all different countries (famous and rich, Google it)…
Good luck on empty delivery for 30,000 annually tuition fee. Parents, who are gullible and greedy, harm their children’s natural talent. Back2basic
LikeLike
It sounds an awful lot like the John Dewey’s Lab School – minus the tablets of course since it was around 100 years ago.
LikeLike
Yes, but these alleged ‘innovations’ are mainly architectural and furniture features that all teachers want in every classroom- small class size, comfortable furniture, adequate resources, an inviting environment for group and individual learning spaces.
What’s missing are human interactions where children learn and share from face-to-face discussions and group experiences. Teachers, not the technology, decide, mediate and guide instructional goals for children by arranging cooperative learning opportunities.
Also unsettling in this model is a lack of any mention of a research based developmental curriculum. Shouldn’t curriculum be the foundation for all schools? These are some of the same folks pushing Common Core (SBAC, Smarter Balanced, all CC) on poor kids?
LikeLike
It’s been interesting seeing the shift to digital in schools across the country over recent years. We’re a web-based supplemental math program that students all over the world access on desktop computers, tablets, and mobile devices. We’ve found that the affordability and accessibility of these devices have opened alternative educational pathways for students of all backgrounds, leveling the playing field and allowing us to help close the math achievement gap between high and low-income students. Technology, if used wisely, can be a powerful tool for good.
LikeLike
How about lots of recess and exploration of nature? Why so much emphasis on digital anything, since as consumers, that time will come for all kids these days if they have parents who are “digital natives”? The reality is that these schools sound like they’re trying to be like the lab schools a few of my friends attended in the 70s, but without the real, in-depth thought about what it means to be educated. The altschools may have the decor and the tech but not the actual goods (which are well-educated teachers who know how to experiment and help students learn).
LikeLike