The release of campaign financial filings revealed a curious fact about Donald Trump. He may end up enriching himself, his family, and his far-flung enterprises by running for president. The New York Times reported the story with an air of amazement at Trump’s brazen self-dealing. This is no ordinary campaign.
“Donald J. Trump regularly boasts that he is self-funding his presidential bid, but new campaign finance filings show that he is also shifting plenty of money back to himself in the process.
According to documents submitted to the Federal Election Commission, Mr. Trump, whose campaign has just $1.3 million cash on hand, paid at least $1.1 million to his businesses and family members in May for expenses associated with events and travel costs. The total represents nearly a fifth of the $6 million that his campaign spent in the month.
The spending raised eyebrows among campaign finance experts and some of Mr. Trump’s critics who have questioned whether the presumptive Republican nominee, who points to his business acumen as a case for his candidacy, is trying to do what he has suggested he would in 2000 when he mulled making an independent run: “It’s very possible that I could be the first presidential candidate to run and make money on it.”
He could end up turning a profit if he repaid himself for the campaign loans,” said Paul S. Ryan, a campaign finance expert with the Campaign Legal Center. “He could get all his money back plus the profit margin for what his campaign has paid himself for goods and services.”
While most candidates list an array of vendors providing goods and services on their filings, Mr. Trump’s is packed with payments to his various clubs and buildings, his fleet of planes and his family. The self-proclaimed billionaire is required by law to account for his spending this way to prevent his companies from making illegal corporate donations to his campaign. In 2015, about $2.7 million was paid to at least seven companies Mr. Trump owns or to people who work for his real estate and branding empire, repaying them for services provided to his campaign.
In May, the biggest-ticket item was Mr. Trump’s use of the Mar-a-Lago Club, his Florida resort, which was paid $423,000. The campaign paid $350,000 to TAG Air for his private airplanes, $125,000 to Trump Restaurants and more than $170,000 to Trump Tower, the Manhattan skyscraper that houses the campaign’s headquarters.
Another article reviewed the same reports:
Timothy P. Carney writes in the “Washington Examiner” that Trump’s campaign is looking more and more like a grand con game designed to enrich Donald Trump.
Carney writes:
Donald Trump is a con man, and if you support him for president, you are his latest mark.
Commentators have been warning voters of this obvious scam for months. Trump’s latest campaign filing makes it clear. The man is unwilling or unable to do what it takes to win a general election, and a huge portion of the money he does raise flows straight into the companies he owns.
Carney learned from Trump’s required campaign disclosures that a surprising amount of the money spent by the campaign has gone to Trump businesses.
Trump’s campaign spent $6.7 million in May — more than it raised. And a lot of that money was spent on, well, Donald Trump.
As the Huffington Post’s Christina Wilkie reported Tuesday morning, Trump’s campaign spent more than $1 million of that money on Trump companies’ products and services last month, “for facilities rental, catering, monthly rents and utilities at more than a half-dozen Trump-owned companies and properties.” The amount “includes nearly $350,000 that the Trump campaign paid a Trump-owned company, TAG Air, for the use of Trump’s private jets and helicopters.”
The Associated Press found that Trump’s campaign has spent $6 million since it began at Trump businesses….
A final detail: Trump’s campaign is $45.7 million in debt (which, you may note, is a lot more than its $1.3 million cash on hand). And all of that debt is owed to … Donald J. Trump.
That means that every penny of the next $45.7 million in donations to the Trump campaign could literally go directly to Trump’s personal bank accounts before this is all over.
Trump has said he’s funding his own campaign. If he were really doing that, he would forgive his campaign’s debt to Trump, thus freeing up future campaign contributions for the actual campaign. But does that seem like something Trump would do?
Well, actually, yes. Big Republican donors have class send their wallets for fear that their gifts would go to repay Trump personally. Yesterday Trump announced that he would not require the campaign to repay the $50 million that he loaned it. This might open some of those pockets.

Republican loyalist George Will is scared of the Con man. This morning’s news said Will has opted out of the Republican party. A new opt-out movement is born?
LikeLike
Wondering if Trump is lining up decorators to 18K gold-plate every inch of the White House, buy gold dripping furnishings, per the Czar of Russia, or stay at Trump Towers & declare his digs as expenses?
Guaranteed, he is the Shark of Sharks, financially!
He may even end up on Shark Tank and make Mr. Wonderful look tame.
Un……believable!
LikeLike
Of COURSE he’s running to enrich himself. He’s certainly not running for the American people or to make the U.S. and the world a better place. He’s only concerned about himself. I wish more people would realize that.
LikeLike
Most of the members of Congress leave office with a lot more money than when they arrived. Although it has not been proven, the speculation is that insider trading and inside real estate transactions are partly the reason. Charter schools, as we know, are also about investment in real estate. Child molester and former speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, had to pay over a $1 million to victims. He didn’t acquire that type of money from working as a high school coach.
LikeLike
Very true that members of Congress also enrich themselves. We need ethics reform like yesterday, at all levels of government.
“Public service” by being a legislator at both state and federal levels is no longer a “service
LikeLike
Perfectly in line with the “thinking” of the heavyweights of corporate education reform:
Do [lotsa lotsa lotsa] good for yourself while [you pretend to be] doing good for others.
It’s just that in this case, it’s not called $tudent $ucce$$.
Go figure…
😎
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads and commented:
Once a con man, always a con man.
LikeLike
NY Times today, HE IS GOOD AT ENRICHING HIMSELF AND SUCKERING PEOPLE….
‘We’re an Easy Target’: Taken In by the Trump Brand”
“Easy target” might describe the audience for several enterprises stamped with the Trump brand that have been accused of preying upon desperation, inexperience or vanity. Some are well known. Trump University has most recently gained notice because of Mr. Trump’s attacks on the Mexican heritage of the judge overseeing a fraud lawsuit brought by former students. There was also a multilevel vitamin-selling enterprise, the Trump Network, that Mr. Trump had said would give hope to people looking to “opt out of the recession.”
But intersecting with these was another, largely unexamined, business venture, Cambridge Who’s Who, which generated hundreds of complaints that it deceptively peddled the promise of recognition in a registry, as well as branding and networking services of questionable value. Dozens of people who paid Trump-endorsed businesses were also sold products by Cambridge, which benefited from its partnership with Donald Trump Jr. through “leveraging relationships built by the Trump empire,” according to Cambridge. read more….
LikeLike
“POTUS pot-ofs”
Cashing in and cashing out
Politician’s goal, no doubt
POTUS is the short-term goal
Longer term is pot-of gold
LikeLike
We have a choice other than Trump and Hillary. Please don’t caste your vote because of fear. There are more than only 2 choices.
LikeLike
Jill not Hill!
Among other things, Jill is not after the pot of gold.
LikeLike
Trump has been reimbursing his companies for services provided to his campaign. It may be self-serving, but it really pales in comparison to the ways that the Clintons have peddled their influence to amass a large fortune. Over $120 million speaking fees for Bill and Hillary combined since he left office. Tens of millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
For example:
https://twitter.com/JeanetteJing/status/696012031690874880
LikeLike
Thanks. NO SURPRISE. Remember Whitewater, standards & Testing, 3 strikes and you’re out, Iraq …
LikeLike
The alt journalism sites are lighting up over Corporate Edu reform –
http://www.alternet.org/right-wing/carl-icahn-used-charity-profit-massive-tax-savings
http://capitalandmain.com/latest-news/issues/education/failing-the-test-searching-for-accountability-in-charter-schools-0602/
http://www.salon.com/2016/06/16/the_new_education_reform_lie_partner/
LikeLike
Another way in which Trump is so similar to The Clintons. In Clinton/Trump Bizarro World, “public servant” means the public is your servant!
LikeLike
Yes, yes, and yes. As Jill Stein noted, the things that Trump says, Hillary does.
LikeLike
List them. Trump is a liar and a narcissist who only loves himself. HRC is a liar too as almost all if not all career politicians are but she is nowhere close to the level of liar Trump is.
According to Politifact.com, Hillary Clinton’s statements are:
True 23%
Mostly true 28%
Half True 21%
TOTAL: 72% based on 156 statements
————————-
Mostly False 14%
False 11%
Pants on Fire 1%
TOTAL 26% based on 59 statements
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/
What about Trump?
True 2%
Mostly True 7%
Half True 14%
TOTAL 23% based on 40 statements
———————–
Mostly False 16%
False 41%
Pants on Fire 20%
TOTAL 77% based on 130 statements
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/
Hillary Clinton said this about Donald Trump: “Says Donald Trump called pregnant employees ‘an inconvenience'” and what she said about The Donald was TRUE”
What did Donald Trump say about Hillary Clinton to the blind and deaf fools that support him:
“We don’t know anything about Hillary in terms of religion. Now, she’s been in the public eye for years, and yet there’s no — there’s nothing out there.”
RATES PANTS ON FIRE! The only way you could believe this is if you don’t look for the facts.
How about this Donald Trump Lie: Trump said that Hillary Clintons immigration platofrm would “Create totally open borders.” FALSE
Trump was also PANTS ON FIRE FOR this whopper of a lie: Hillary Clinton has even deleted this record of total support (for the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement) from her book.”
All you have to do is stop being a fool and check what comes out of Donald and Hillary’s mouth just like Politifact.com does. Whatever these two say is there word for word and often on film where you can listen to the facts as they come out and then go to the written record to check if they are false or true.
FactCheck.org has done it and reports that Donald Trump’s speech on Hillary Clinton’s character, included numerous false and misleading statements.
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/trumps-attack-on-clintons-character/
The Washington Post fact checked Donald Trumps attack on Hillary Clinton – read it for yourself, that is if you aren’t’ a fool and have an open mind.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/06/23/fact-checking-donald-trumps-attack-on-hillary-clinton/
The New York Times also got into some fact checking with “All Politicans Lie. Some Lie More Than Others.
Donald J. Trump’s record on truth and accuracy is astonishingly poor. So far, we’ve fact-checked more than 70 Trump statements and rated fully three-quarters of them as Mostly False, False or “Pants on Fire”
Donald Trump relies on lazy, biased, racist fools to support him.
Even FOX NEWS, a bastion of conservatism says, Fox News’ Chris Wallace Fact-Checks Trump and Asks Gingrich: ‘Why Doesn’t He Stick to the Facts?’
http://crooksandliars.com/2016/06/fox-news-chris-wallace-fact-checks-trump
LikeLike
Lloyd, I thought “half truths” (which Hillary speaks over one fifth of the time, according to your data) are, at a minimum, considered deceptive, if not part and parcel of lying.
Or does a a half truth now constitute the truth, depending on what your definition of “is” is?
LikeLike
LOL
MF, You reveal yourself by not even mentioning the overhwelmeing number of lies that The Donald pumps out to his blind, deaf, foolish, ignorant, biased, racist, white supremacist followers, but only focused on HRC’s half truths. If you want to count half truths on the negative column, that means Trump’s score just gets worse, a lot worse than HRC’s score.
But I like that. Let’s only count True and Mostly true for honesty and the rest for dishonesty but we have to be fair and apply that rule to both the candidates. There will be no cherry picking and ignoring what you don’t like.
HRC
True 23%
Mostly True 28%
TOTAL 51%
Half True 21%
Mostly False 14%
False 11%
Pants on Fire 1%
TOTAL: 49 Percent
The Donald
True 2%
Mostly True 7%
TOTAL 9%
Half True 14%
Mostly False 16%
False 41%
Pants on Fire 20%
TOTAL: 91 Percent
That’s an easy decision for me. I’ll go with the candidate that’s honest 51 percent of the time over one who is only honest 9 percent of the time.
LikeLike
Politifact has Hillary Clinton about as truthful as Bernie Sanders, but we know that’s not true. It is a biased organization, and they choose which statements to review. It’s not like they review everything and these are the candidates’ truth stats. Neither Hillary nor Donald are honest people. Donald lies with open abandon and Hillary is more calculated with her lying.
LikeLike
Ed,
I respectfully disagree. To compare Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump on any scale–be it honesty or experience–shows a giant and a gnat. I shudder at the thought of electing a president who has promised to ignore climate change, who uses his candidacy to promote his businesses, who makes racist and misogynistic remarks, who is endorsed by the NRA, who has promised to appoint rightwing judges to the Supreme Court, who threatens to withdraw from NATO, and who has promised to reduce the top income tax rates from 39.5% to 25%. There is too much at stake in this election to be petulant. I hope you live in a blue state.
LikeLike
And pointing out that Hillary’s “half truths” are tantamount to deception or outright lies “reveals” me to be what, exactly?
LikeLike
MF,
I’ll let you define who you are even if you get it wrong. Individuals are complex so to define who someone is would require knowing more about them then the fact that they cherry pick facts and ignore many others just because they can.
But, you tell me what’s wrong with someone who cherry picked one fact out of twelve, 6 for HRC and 6 for The Donald, and ignores the fact that half or more of 91% of what the Donald says is a lie while only half or more of 49% of what HRC says is a lie?
Find me an honest politician that doesn’t lie, and I’ll show you a politician that probably isn’t going to get rel-elected. It seems that far too many Americans love lies when the lies say what they want to hear.
When given a choice between two liars, do you go with the one that lies 91% of the time or only 49%. This is how one might measure the lesser of two evils, that is unless one is biased and cherry picks only the facts that supports what they want to think is the truth even though they are probably fooling themselves because of their bias.
LikeLike
Diane,
You left out the fact that The Donald has been endorsed by Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un. That was one large red flag warning.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/17/politics/russia-putin-trump/
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/north-korean-state-media-endorses-donald-trump-article-1.2655453
I think that any American that supports the Donald after Putin and Kim endorsed and/or praised him is more than fool.
LikeLike
Yes Diane, we disagree. I do not see a giant and a gnat. I see two master villains. To think that Hillary does not compare to Donald, I’d have to dismiss her incredible support for unjust wars, her embodiment of corrupt and self-serving politics, and her overall solidarity with corporate neoliberalism. Also her direct blocking of a Sanders administration — I think that counts in the damage she’s done.
Until more good people get involved in politics, and we abolish the ridiculous first-past-the-post system, we’ll keep getting the “privilege” to guess which flavor of Sith Lord will hurt more people.
LikeLike
Ed,
Fight for long-range change. I will too.
LikeLike
I always find it interesting when someone blames HRC for her support of the Iraq War as if she were the only member of both houses of Congress to do so.
In the House of Reps 215 members of the GOP voted for going to war with Iraq. Only 6 voted no. 82 Democrats also voted for the war while 126 voted no.
In the Senate 48 members of the GOP voted to go to war while 1 voted no and 29 Democrats voted for the war while 21 voted no.
I’m tired of HRC being criticized for supporting the war without any mention of the other 373 members of both Houses of Congress that also voted for it.
It’s quite possible the HRC like so many other Republicans and Democrats were also fooled by G.W. Bush’s lies about Iraq having WMDs.
In addition, do not forget that polls at the time reported that 72 percent of Americans also supported going to war.
G. W. Bush and his staff ran a great misleading propaganda machine with help from the corporate media to go to war in Iraq.
Next time you bash HRC, I want you to make it clear that you also condemn the other 373 members of Congress that voted yes and, for sure, the 72 percent of the American people who supported going to war too.
Can you prove that HRC knew about G. W. Bush’s lies and went along with them anyway? Hillary was not alone and should not be crucified alone.
LikeLike
Diane, I plan on it.
Lloyd, the vote to invade Iraq was a notable mistake by all those who voted for it. Hillary happens to be running for president, which is why we’re not talking about the others. Your idea that I must simultaneously condemn the others, and the American public, is a deflection. We’re trying to figure out who should be president of the united states. That position requires good judgement, preferably above and beyond the majority who were duped by George W. and the mass media. I also think Trump has terrible judgement, but my critiques of Hillary are not invalid when I leave Trump out of the conversation.
The Iraq vote is far from the only reason Hillary is painted as a war hawk. It is not even the main reason. Iraq and Afghanistan aside, she has been a prime advocate in the destruction of Libya, Syria, and Honduras at the least. What sort of foreign policy hawk is hillary clinton, anyways? No, I don’t want anyone as commander-in-chief who sees foreign policy as their own personal game of risk.
LikeLike
ED,
The point I attempted to make is how can anyone judge HRC’s judgement when so many people were fooled by the fake evidence coming out of G.W. Bush’s White House?
Hindsight is a great weapon but it is a logically flawed weapon.
I cannot blame HRC for her vote based on what the vast majority of Americans and members of Congress thought at the time based on what they were hearing and reading in the corporate controlled media.
At least Hillary had the honesty to come out and say that her Iraq war vote was a mistake after time and facts revealed W. G. Bush’s lies.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/hillary-clinton-iraq-war-vote-mistake-iowa-118109
What is that old saying.
“Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.”
But rare indeed is an individual with the courage to admit that they were shamed twice.
We have two viable sources for president, Donald Trump vs. Hillary R. Clinton. Which one has better judgement and is more honest than the other?
When I say viable, that means the two who have the best chance to become the next president. I’d vote for the Green Party candidate for president if I thought she stood a chance, but I’m not going to throw my vote away and risk The Donald becoming president. Anyone that votes for an un-electable 3rd party candidate just to make a statement because they don’t like the two choices the major parties have handed us is, I think, fooling themselves.
It looks like we have two candidates for president that will not support traditional, community based, democratic, transparent, non-profit public education but what about other issues that HRC does support and The Donald clearly does not support at all?
I’ve read others here that think HRC and Bill Clinton have committed murder when there is no evidence to support those allegations and Snopes.com has fact checked those claims and found them false.
http://www.snopes.com/Politics/clintons/bodycount.asp
And before anyone condemns Snopes for bias, read what they have to say about such accusations. It is a fact that every fact check site has been condemned for bias by those that refuse to give up what they want to think no matter what evidence is revealed that proves them wrong, and those fools appear to be many.
http://www.snopes.com/info/notes/politics.asp
And I have not seen those same HRC critics that accuse them of murder mention anything about the rumors that The Donald has been linked to the mob, a claim that has been found to be true by Politifact.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/02/ted-cruz/yes-donald-trump-has-been-linked-mob/
LikeLike
Shame on the masses.
Even a child can see this guy is a con man narcissist.
And major investors and a host of corporate elite fell for this guy? This is like what Roger Ebert called an Idiot Plot, a plot that can only make sense if you assume everyone involved is an idiot.
LikeLike
It’s one thing for Trump to say he will forgive his 43 million dollar loan and another thing for him to actually do so. Remember his promises to the vets. It wasn’t until much later when he was exposed as welching on that promise that he donated money. Let’s see the documents detailing the change from “loan”to “donation” before we accept his statement as fact.
LikeLike
Okay so who will accomplish more harm Clinton working with a Republican congress or Trump fighting a Democratic congress . Trump gets nothing done because he can be stopped by Democrats in the senate if they want to ,as Republicans stopped Obama when he lost the supper majority. . Clinton on the other hand will work with Republicans on a corporate agenda that attacks Education , the Environment with fracking , delivers corporate friendly trade agreements at the expense of Workers ,the Climate and Consumers.
How I can be with Hill, as a progressive when her representatives on the Platform Committee can not even oppose the TPP that she says she no longer supports supposedly .
I am feeling very Green and trapped either way. But then again I live in NY and if
she needs me in NY . I’ll move to Canada .
LikeLike
Joel…keep in mind that both Billary and Drumph can use Executive Orders…greatly expanded by both Baby Bush and Obama. Dangerous.
LikeLike
Ellen: that I am even considering voting Green is a sign of despair .
It also is a sign of how weak I think she is . Trump being in striking distance in Michigan , neck and neck in Pennsylvania and Ohio should have been a wake up call to her. It wasn’t ,if the platform committee is an indication she is pivoting toward her corporate sponsors already . It is a total misread of the electorate. She is ahead in National polls because of numbers in states she can’t ever win .
I speak to many blue collar workers who have a lot to lose with Trump’s right to work stance yet they support him . . Half of them would vote for Bernie . Brexit should have been a wake up call . Yes it was right wing and somewhat racist . But it was put over the top by a significant vote of labors base who have been battered by neo liberal trade and immigration policy that is eviscerating the working class . And long before refugees became the issue it was Eastern Europeans, white christian immigrants competing for jobs that was the issue.
George Will,Mitt Romney and a half dozen Republicans will cross over to vote for her . The rest will foam at the mouth with the prospect of having all three houses. The youth vote will stay home, the black and Hispanic vote will not turn out in the numbers they did for Obama and the Labor vote after 25 years of being played by neo-liberal Democrats will ignore the pleas of leaders.
Tell me California is looking to secede. I’m looking for a warm place for me and the wife to retire. (LOL)
LikeLike
Understand completely…I just got home from a dinner with 18 people at the table, none are educators, and almost all are voting for Trump. I am in shock. I am hearing this on a daily basis in So. California although my personal friends and close colleagues are still in ra ra mode for Bernie. I am very worried that the ignoramus could win.
LikeLike
I’ve read about Trump’s business history and he often says he will do one thing and then does another, and he always walks away (and often brags about it) with more money often at the expense of others he didn’t pay because of one of the 4 chapter 11 bankruptcies his corporations have filed. Trump has never filed a personal bankruptcy but his coronations have.
Trump is tricky.
How is Donald Trump Able to File for Bankruptcy So Many Times? Click the link and discvoer the tricky game he plays to the tune of billions.
http://thelawdictionary.org/article/how-is-donald-trump-able-to-file-for-bankruptcy-so-many-times/
LikeLike
Trump can afford to hire slick lawyers that manage to keep him afloat. If a poor person goes into bankruptcy, they walk away with nothing. The wealthy can afford to hire the best so they live to plunder another day.
LikeLike
The wealthy can create tax sheltered foundations and corporations. The foundations help them avoid paying taxes and when a corporation goes broke, the corporation files for bankruptcy, not the billionaire that controls the corporation. His personal fortune is safe when the corp goes under. This is the allegedly legal Ponzi scheme (what else can we call it) people like Trump play. He gambles with money inside the corporation and pays himself vast sums to his own fortune making that money safe. If the risks he took with the corporation fail, from what I’ve read, Trump still walks away the richer for it.
LikeLike
Drumph has literally hundreds of lawsuits in process now…and he files for Chapter 11 for his individual corporations (that Citizens United ruled as “people”) while reorganizing. Meanwhile he cheats endless creditors out of their payments. What a deal! What a President he would make! He might find a way for the US not to pay the trillions it owes to foreign investors such as China.
LikeLike
Trump probably would be able to figure out a way to default on the national debt, but beware, about 60% of the national debt is owed to the people of the United States.
China only owns 8% of the US federal National debt. Japan owes 7% and other foreign countries own 19% for a total of 34%. Most of the debt is owed to us, the American people so Trump would be cheating us.
With Trump’s business history as a warning, there is a strong chance that foreign countries that own 34% of the US debt would demand payment the instant they knew Trump was president because Obama would still be president for a couple of months after the election. That would probably cause the U.S. economy to collapse heralding in a depression worse than any the US had been through.
By the time Trump was sworn in as president, the country would already be in bankruptcy with more than 25% unemployment rate and climbing, but he’d blame it all on Obama and then go to work increasing his own fortune with public dollars. If there is a way to do, he’d do it.
LikeLike
Bankruptcy Bill . Gee it got tough on who?. Women whose ex husbands declared bankruptcy . Americans who for medical reasons went bankrupt . Oh yes oligarchs are exempted.
LikeLike
Hello Ms. Ravitch,
Your column seems intended for people who have little education — rather than the people who — I think, read your column and can decide the facts when they are presented. The law says one must report all the expenses of the campaign and when Mr. Trump does so, he is mocked for enriching himself.
Once again it shows how biased the media, and particularly the NY Times, as well as your column are. No wonder the normal people do not have confidence in the so called elites of the US. How much has the Clinton campaign paid for airplane travel — or food — or office space?
LikeLike
It’s not a column. It’s a blog. There’s a difference. And you are wrong. Most of the followers of this blog are highly educated professionals.
Just because you think and can spout an opinion doesn’t make what you think a fact.
What we have in this election is a choice between two stinkers. Most of us would rather vote for someone else but we aren’t offers the type of person we’d like to vote for. Instead we are offered two flawed and arguably corrupt individuals.
Because of this situation, if Trump wins, it will be because the Democratic Party didn’t offer the people someone they could vote for. If HRC wins, the same can be said of the GOP.
No matter who wins, we end up with someone most of the people will not trust but which one will do more damage as president, that is the question?
I think Trump is far worse than HRC.
LikeLike
Right on, Lloyd….you speak for many of us.
LikeLike
Lloyd : I agree so we have worse and worse r get me a drink.
I have all I can do to tell Trump supporters to do themselves a favor and stay home. There is pain and anxiety out there and I think the ex finance minster of Greece Yanis Varoufakis put it best in explaining the Brexit . He stated he understood the vote he is a Europeanist just not this Europe dominated by austerity and neo liberals.
“We tried to save the EU from you. But you have poisoned the EU so badly by silencing the voices of democrats that, though we tried, we could not convince to people of Britain to stay.”
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Varoufakis-Blames-Neoliberals-Like-Hillary-Clinton-for-Brexit-20160625-0008.html
Just Change that to Democrats and the USA.
“Hillary wants you to stand with her . I will be there for you ” Do I believe it absolutely not but it is catchier than .Make America great again . And it hits home to a disaffected working class. He gets it she don’t and she will never .
Telling my wife to get me another drink .
LikeLike
With choices that are only worse and worse, getting drunk will only make it worse.
LikeLike
Come on Lloyd I get drunk maybe once a year . I may need something stronger on election night.
LikeLike
The next morning after the drunk and the election, you wake up double miserable because you will be hung over and the news will still be bad. :o)
LikeLike
I think we should actually have co-Presidents.
The fraction of the time each got to serve as President would be based on the fraction of the popular vote that each received.
That way if Trump did something on Monday that Clinton did not like, she could undo it on Tuesday.
Of course, much of the time Trump and Clinton would probably actually agree, which is why it would be good to also have someone like Jill Stein in there every once in a while to potentially cancel out everything that both Trump and Clinton had done up to that date.
LikeLike
Of course, if either Trump or Clinton launched the nookyalur missiles, Stein would have a bit of a problem undoing that, but short of that, she might be able to do something to cancel out “foolish actions” by either Trump or Clinton” (sorry for the redundancy)
LikeLike
Rachel Maddow did a terrrific piece on this subject early last week. She compared him to Newt Gingrich who was pushing his books and his wifes business while running
LikeLike
Bob Wright was drummed out of the corps for pushing his books while Speaker…I seem to recall. Not a good idea to mix personal business with legislating.
LikeLike
Trump is a two legged disaster but he did save us from JEB!, Ted Cruz, Marco, Kasich and the rest of the GOP horror show. I was/am for Bernie, voted for Bernie but sadly he didn’t make it. Bernie says he will vote for Hillary. I will vote for Hillary because she’s far less disgusting than Trump and she won’t stack the supreme court with far right wing crazies. She’s not a climate change denier, she’s not a creationist and she won’t try to abolish abortions.
LikeLike
I agree Joe , Trump saved us from the Ideological Republicans . So what will Trump do once in office . He will become the greatest Keynesian since Roosevelt “deficits wont matter”. At the same time he will deliver a right wing court and every right wing dream of the ideological right from right to work to abortion bans.
But what will Hillary do ???? Come Hillary win me over say something to make me believe you’ve got my back.Actually I’m retired make that my millennial children’s back. Should be easy for a Democrat . Sanders wasn’t a socialist. He was an FDR-LBJ Democrat .
LikeLike
Voters should ask politicians if they support the coordinated ed reform campaign to go to an all-voucher system:
https://www.redefinedonline.org/2016/06/child-not-system-jeb-bush-podcasted/
We should have a real debate on whether people in the US want to completely privatize public schools. It’s dishonest for ed reformers to hide their goal from voters.
One of the most important questions is what happens to all the tens of millions of kids currently in public schools while the ed reform lobby moves to complete privatization?
Can we expect the wholesale abandonment of public schools to continue while they take this system private?
LikeLike
That’s why they hide what they want to do or are doing to education because they are dishonest, know it and also know that most of the voters disagree with them. They probably read Pew and Gallup’s polls on education too and know what most of the people think. If you are a liar and are doing stuff that is fraudulent, then of course you hide it as best you can. That’s why the Corporate Charter school movement is into opaqueness and pays lobbyists to pass bills in each state that allows them to hide what they are doing.
LikeLike
Breaking: Trump had minor epiphany yesterday, thought it was a heart attack. Circles area of chest with gold sharpie, but doctors and educators assure it was a small, subtle epiphany. First time ever, and he is a slightly better person for it. With assistance Trump wrote an essay about it, calls it a “fantastic poem”. David Coleman reached out to remind him that nobody cares. Trump charged him for the call.
LikeLike
Circled
LikeLike
How can people vote for a family who don’t pay contractors when they complete work on a project? The Trump family don’t pay people for the work they do, yet they live so lavishly themselves. They’re literally living off contracts they didn’t pay to painters and plumbers and electricians. I’d be ashamed to fly around in a private plane when I wasn’t paying painters. They’re ethically bankrupt- there’s just no shame at all.
If they don’t pay contractors they won’t make good on promises they make to anyone else. I wouldn’t hire any of them to repave my driveway let alone run the country.
LikeLike
Kansas public schools might open in the fall:
I watched the whole ed reform echo chamber come out and lobby for 1,000 charter students in Washington, yet not a peep out of the thousands of paid ed reform lobbyists on behalf of public school students in Kansas.
Kansas must not have any poor children. It must be a state composed entirely of “wealthy suburban districts”.
Odd how self-described “agnostics” never, ever advocate for public schools. Mysterious omission, wouldn’t you say? They support public education except not public schools.
LikeLike
Is it awkward for Democrats and the Obama Administration when their fellow ed reformers in state governments like Kansas deliberately destroy a public school system?
They can’t break ranks without offending members of the “movement”, yet Clinton and Obama run around the country saying they support public education. Tough sell! Ed reform never stands up for public schools yet they tell us they “support” the abstract concept of “public education” in some mysterious way.
I would find it awkward but then I’m not a political professional. It’s probably so sophisticated it’s beyond the ken of ordinary mortals to understand. Hard choices! Public schools had to go under the ‘ol ed reform bus. They had to destroy the village to save it.
LikeLike
Chiara, it all makes sense if you consider any publicly-funded school to be a “public school.” So that makes most universities “public,” as well as contractors like Boeing.
LikeLike