Michael R. Ford, a professor of public administration at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, reports that 41% of private schools that received vouchers have closed their doors since the inception of the voucher program. Milwaukee has the nation’s oldest voucher program, and anyone looking for the miracle of school choice should look elsewhere. On the National Assessment of Educational Progress, Milwaukee continues to be one of the nation’s lowest performing urban districts. Milwaukee has had charters and vouchers for 25 years–two generations of students. If charters and vouchers were the answer to the problems of students and schools in urban districts, Milwaukee should be a shining star of student success. It is not.
Ford writes:
Forty-one percent of all private schools that participated in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP) between 1991 and 2015 failed. I do not mean failed as in they did not deliver academically, I mean failed as in they no longer exist. These 102 schools either closed after having their voucher revenue cut off by the Department of Public Instruction, or simply shut their doors. The failure rate for entrepreneurial start-up schools is even worse: 67.8 percent.
Fredrik Andersson and I discuss these data in a new article just published online in Policy Studies Journal entitled “Determinants of Organizational Failure in the Milwaukee School Voucher Program.” We frame the article in the context of public and educational entrepreneurship “with the goal of explaining the factors that put voucher schools specifically, and public entrepreneurial public polices in general, at greater failure risk.” The Milwaukee voucher case is particularly fertile ground for this line of inquiry due its long history, organizational churn, and relevance as the birthplace of the modern school voucher movement.
We test several hypotheses using a survival model and find:
Start-up voucher schools have a much higher failure rate. It takes almost ten years for a new voucher school to lower its failure risk to that of previously existing schools;
When new MPCP schools fail they tend to fail quickly, on average just 4.3 years into program participation;
Schools without a religious affiliation are more likely to fail;
Stricter program regulations led to more failure; and
Schools can reduce their failure risk by gaining market-share.
Read his research article for the full findings.

A link would help
LikeLike
LikeLike
Off topic- It’s no wonder that the public is ill informed about the takeover of public education. Weingartner has 15 paragraphs in Huffpo today. Only one of the paragraphs obliquely refers to privatization. And, even that paragraph forces the reader to connect huge distances between dots. Positioning herself as centrist on all political issues, should have waited until she stopped failing in the education sphere. It reflects more of the self aggrandizement that we saw in her Labor Day shout out from Israel. Extolling the troops back here, to carry on their fight, from thousands of miles away, which showed PR stupidity, also showed disregard for American values and lack of dedication to the cause of the union she represents.
LikeLike
Well, if this researcher had been able to see the brokerage accounts of these “education entrepreneurs,” then he might have a very different definition of “$ucce$$.”
LikeLike
This level of failure in autocratic, for profit, corporate schools should not be a surprise for a business in the private sector.
Inc.com reports on “Why 96 Percent of Businesses Fail Within 10 Years”
http://www.inc.com/bill-carmody/why-96-of-businesses-fail-within-10-years.html
Forbes reports on “Reasons 8 Out Of 10 Businesses Fail”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericwagner/2013/09/12/five-reasons-8-out-of-10-businesses-fail/#368891095e3c
There are many other pieces about the failure rate of private sector businesses and why they fail.
Then there is the damage caused by the Walmart business model. Money reports “The New Way That Walmart Is Ruining America’s Small Towns”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericwagner/2013/09/12/five-reasons-8-out-of-10-businesses-fail/#368891095e3c
The for-profit at any cost, autocratic, corporate billionaire supported war on community based, democratic, transparent, non profit public education is the Walmartization of education and that means a high rate of failure is built into the corporate reform education agenda.
The Corporate education reform agenda is built on a foundation of competition and failure becasue in the private sector competition is the name of the game and in a horse race, only one horse can win. The rest are considered failures. The same applies to the Olympics. How many athletes in each event win a gold medal — one or all of them?
It starts with children being rejected or ejected from the corporate charters because they don’t fit the profile of the docile and easy the manage and control children the corporations want as their scripted assembly line product.
Then there’s the public humiliation of failure witnessed and documented in Eva’s Success Academies where children who make simple, human mistakes on assignments are singled out in class in front of their peers and bullied by teachers trained to be heartless and ruthless.
Next is the test and rank mentality to judge all children and teacher from the results of tests. The first commandment of the corporate testocracy is a child must improve their test scores from test to test or be labeled a failure for life and publicly shamed repeatedly.
LikeLike
Here is the link to the Ford and Andersson article. The abstract is free but the full article is behind a paywall.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/psj.12164/abstract
For some context, Ford has historically been a support of choice schools and market based approaches to school reform. He was employed by School Choice Wisconsin 2004-2011 and then by the conservative WPRI think tank 2011-2013. I do not want to be unduly optimistic, but if one of the longtime supporters of the Milwaukee choice program is having doubt that is a sign of progress. And long overdue as as Milwaukee choice program has a quarter century of failure as its track record.
It is also promising to see that Ford and Andersson acknowledge the negative externalities of school churn. For all that market based reformers like to embrace economic concepts, they are almost always selective in doing so and are silent on the question of externalities.
LikeLike
From personal experience in about the town(s) where I reside(d), and work(ed), the schools that wish to be voucher schools are, invariably, Catholic schools that have been drying up for the past 25/30 years. When I was a kid and attended St. Aloysious in Newark, NJ, it was tuition free, you had to be Catholic, live in the neighborhood, attend church and toss the required amount into the collection basket every Sunday. My parents didn’t send me there because they were religious; they sent me there because they were Catholic, and it was a block from our apartment. It was convenient. That school was abandoned about 25 years ago.
The religious requirement to attend Catholic schools disappeared, along with the live-in-the-neighborhood component that historically went hand in hand, and Catholic schools began taking anyone, so long as tuition was paid and/or subsidized by those who could pay and, I guess, tax write-off donations.
In Kearny, NJ, before the elementary school closed in, if memory serves, 2002, St. Celia’s in Kearny, NJ graduated 12 eighth graders, had been hawking vouchers to parents, and served kids from Newark, Belleville and Jersey City. Catholic schools all over are finding new life as charters. in Kearny, NJ currently, there is a charter school opening this September at the old St. Stephen’s school, ostensibly to serve kids from Jersey City, and practically begging for more students from Kearny, Harrison, North Arlington, Belleville, Newark. It hasn’t even opened yet, but it is already extolling its academics and extra curricular activities, all of which are B.S.
In Harrison, NJ, Holy Cross school reopened by leasing its buildings to Liberty Charter School, attended by kids from Newark, NJ.
This is a trend? Open charter schools in one town and bus kids in from another?
Anyhow, not to stray from my observational point – it seems that Catholic schools are closing, regardless and in spite of vouchers that are their last ditch effort to stay open. Somewhere along the way, Catholic schools became vultures for the public taxpayer dollar and betrayed what it stood for in pursuit of cash. The archdiocese is a harsh boss, and keeps closing them down when they are no longer profitable, or simply financially sustainable. Would the reformers call this survival of the successful and a casualty of education reform? When all the religious schools are gone, who will the voucher pushers turn to? Do private schools need and/or want vouchers? Doubtful. The voucher doesn’t even cover the tuition of a place like Pingry or MoBeard here in NJ. Its laughable. Just another way to siphon dollars from the public schools so they can be ran into the ground, closed, and turned over to the privatizers.
Is this just a north east phenomenon?
LikeLike
St. Louis has been experiencing a consolidation of elementary Catholic schools for quite awhile now. I don’t know details but I’d be surprised if there are half of the schools left from when I was a kid (60s) The high schools have held their own especially since now (as far as I know) they allow non-Catholic students which didn’t occur way back when I went K-12 Catholic schools. St. Louis has historically been a Catholic town with at one point something like 40% of students in Catholic schools. Obviously that is not the case now except in white county, oops, I mean Southern St. Louis County (where I grew up) where the figure is around 35% attending religious schools (not just Catholic).
The other thing that has changed is the percentage of teachers/staff that are brothers, nuns or priests. When I attended there was a rough 50/50 split between the religious teachers and lay teachers. Now, I believe in my old grade school, there are no nuns and in my high school there are two listed as being religious, one priest and one brother.
LikeLike
Duane, back in the 60s/early 70s for me in elementary, there were 3 lay teachers in a school of nuns. The church still stands, and is active. Last time I was there, there were bars on the stained glass windows and a drug deal going down across the street where I used to live. Most of the Catholic schools available here in the 80s were 100% lay teachers, with many veterans and just as many novices who were happy to land their first teaching job, get the experience, and move on to public schools.
I find it interesting what you write about the high schools – around here, they are usually the first part of the Catholic education to close as attendance dwindles.
The [prestigious?] private schools seem exempt from vouchers since the voucher doesn’t cover the tuition, they don’t have to say “we don’t want your voucher kid.”
LikeLike