In his post this morning, Whitney Tilson, a member of the board of Bridge International Academies, described the reasons why for-profit education was doing valuable and constructive philanthropic work in African nations. He pointed out that teachers’ unions oppose for-profit schools for what he assumes for selfish motives, to protect their jobs. He said that one of the most vocal critics of Bridge’s activities is Education International, an international organization representing teachers’ unions around the world.
As it happened, I just received a letter from Angelo Gavrielatos, the project director for global response at Education International, and former president of the Australian Education Union.
Gavrielatos writes that Bridge International harassed a Canadian researcher who was studying their operations in Uganda and had him jailed under false charges.
As this incident was unfolding, Gavrielatos wrote me about it and asked me to keep the matter in confidence as he was concerned that the young researcher might be jailed indefinitely. He was trying to get him safely out of Uganda.
He wrote:
Just when it thought its business couldn’t get any worse, for-profit education provider Bridge International Academies has resorted to dangerous tactics to avoid questions of its practices. Last week, Canadian Curtis Riep, a University of Alberta doctoral student and researcher for the global teachers’ federation Education International (EI), found out the length the corporation is willing to go to silence its critics.
After arriving for a pre-arranged interview with school officials on 30 May, Riep was detained by police and later charged with impersonation and criminal trespass. Although he was dismissed after two days of questioning, the experience left him shocked.
“It shows to what extent they will go to muzzle and repress the truth about their operations,” said Riep, in e-mail correspondence. “Every school inspector and ministry official I have spoken with has told me about their unwillingness to cooperate and withhold information. This just happens to be another manifestation of that.”
Now safely back in Canada, Riep was unaware that days earlier Bridge published a ‘wanted ad’ in a national newspaper accusing him of impersonating one of its employees, an allegation proven to be false.
Addressing Bridge co-founder Shannon May in an open letter, EI General Secretary Fred van Leeuwen said that the company’s “actions have been exposed as not only unwarranted, but also irresponsible. We consider this whole episode and this behaviour totally unacceptable, and unworthy of an organisation which claims to have the interest of young people at heart.” Van Leeuwen has demanded Bridge to apologise to Riep in addition to compensating his legal expenses.
Bridge, operating so-called ‘low-fee,’ for-profit schools in Uganda, Kenya, is financially supported by the likes of Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and education conglomerate Pearson Ltd. It is also supported by the World Bank and DfID-UK. Bridge’s business model, which includes fee charging schools run by unqualified teachers delivering a scripted standardised curriculum, has faced heavy criticism. Also attracting significant criticism is the Liberian Government’s announcement to outsource its primary schools to Bridge.
Although it promotes ‘affordable’ education to some of the world’s poorest children, Bridge forces families to pay for inadequate scripted lessons read from tablets. Many children are left to learn in questionable environments, such as classrooms lacking proper materials, including desks and chairs.
Please open the article to read it in full and see the links to sources.

The sun never sets on the British East India Company …
LikeLike
This is on Gates, Zuckerberg, and Pearson every bit as much as it’s on Bridge.
LikeLike
Whitney Tilson is 100% correct that teachers unions are interested in keeping their jobs. Only matters if they are wrong. Is his argument that wanting a respectable job is always wrong? Has he ever negotiated a labor contract for himself? This guy is annoying with his endless hypocrisy.
LikeLike
I bet he negotiated a contract to sit on that board. Maybe Diane could ask him why he isn’t “self-interested” as a result of that.
I love how selective this ‘self interest’ analysis is by ed reformers.
I think the for-profit charter operators in Ohio are “self interested”. Why are they excluded? Just inherently better people? Not icky, low class labor union members?
It’s nonsense. Everyone is “self interested” except the noble and pure ed reformers. They shouldn’t start believing their own hype.
The government contractor being paid by Liberia is self-interested. That’s a fact. It doesn’t mean they are bad people but they ARE self-interested. Obviously.
LikeLike
Daniel Spaniel and Chiara: right in the bullseye!
So when rheephormsters around the world battle furiously against “burdensome” regulations and oversight and transparency they are fighting those horrible “big gubmint monopoly school”-style bureaucrats that are vile opponents of creative disruption and achievement gap crushing pedagogy and management—
But apparently [mis]using the governmental police apparatus against those digging into the secret sauce of $tudent $ucce$$ is A-OK.
😳
Just following their Marxist playbook:
“Those are my principles, and if you don’t like them… well, I have others.”
Groucho: yesterday, today, tomorrow, and forever.
😎
LikeLike
Ed reformers are ideologically opposed to a public sector because they believe the public sector is stodgy or mediocre or whatever, but I’m worried about the private sector.
Is this the only thing the private sector knows how to do now? Replace public sector services and insert a profit layer?
Because that’s not “innovating”. It’s just privatizing. Seems to me the private sector is bankrupt and out of ideas if they’re sucking profit out of the public sector.
Someone should hold an Aspen ‘ideas’ forum on that- ‘what’s wrong with the private sector that they’re all operating on government contracts”?
LikeLike
You got it. They are attacking public services to gain access to taxpayer funds to underwrite their capitalist endeavors. The more money they get; the more they want. Hedge funds have a never ending thirst for profit. This is really high end corporate welfare posing as a social benefit or a solution. They are creating a lot more problems than they solve. In order to accomplish their greedy goals, they fight dirty and try to run smear campaigns against legitimate public schools and educators. They buy our feckless representatives, and set out to plunder school districts for profit. The only way to stop them is to enact legislation that prevents outside vendors from accessing public education funds, but the feckless opportunists that represent us would have to vote on it. We should also change laws so that a local community has to vote on who will manage a school, not a corrupt legislator or governor. It is not a democratic process if governors and legislators are in the pockets of corporations.
LikeLike
There is no place for the Aspen Institute in a democracy. Aspen should be shaved and splintered into slivers and, then glued to form a fiberboard trash can.
LikeLike
After the collapse of the international real estate market due to the frauds perpetrated by the international banking industry, which soon approached collapse itself, public services was the last available area for monetizing and profiteering.
The IMF has acknowledged their unsuccessful push of neoliberal policy for the last few decades. Susan Ohanian started warning about this global takeover in 1996.
This is sad but no surprise.
LikeLike
The story is a reminder of Prof. Stroup and Pearson. Schools should eliminate all Pearson teaching materials until it’s proven that their leadership and employees respect academic freedom and, refrain from corporate and political influence in education. Corporate coercion against democracy, should be a violation of law, punishable with imprisonment.
LikeLike
This article is very interesting and explains some of the subterfuge involved in for-profit schooling in poor countries:
http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/2015/07/the-elephant-in-the-classroom-the-world-bank-and-private-education-providers/
LikeLike