Our reader and amazing researcher draws a map of the covert networks that promote school choice, privatization, high-stakes testing, and the rest of the corporate reform agenda.
Chapman writes:
Third Wave is a new marketing package for ideas forged at the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE), aided by charter friendly Bellwether, field tested in Boston, New Orleans, and coming to other “Education Cities.” Third Wave is a planed tsunami intended to eliminate local school boards. Private foundations—the billionaire donor class—provides the impetus for the Third Wave. Themes in the pitch for donor-controlled education “seats” for kids, and nothing less than “great” schools.
Some remote links to this Third Wave brand can be traced to Alvin Toffler’s book with the same title, also “disruptive” narratives of many kinds in academe, with one example about “educational choice” in Great Britain: The ‘Third Wave’: Education and the Ideology of Parentocracy. Phillip Brown;Source: British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 11, No. 1 (1990), pp. 65-85 Volume Information. (1990). British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(1), 1-2. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1392908
A key feature of the Third Wave brand is getting “cross-sector universal student enrollment” installed as a new norm for thinking about education, with an ever diminishing role for elected school boards in policy making.
Here is a Gates foundation launch in Massachusetts: Grant to Boston Private Industry Council Inc. Date: September 2014, Purpose: to support the design and launch of a cross-sector universal student enrollment system for the city of Boston, Amount: $100,000 Term: 34 months.
That is one small grant. But the big push for Third Wave comes from the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE). This organization is really a multi-state policy/advocacy group funded by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Carnegie Corporation of New York, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Michael and Susan Dell Foundation, US Department of Education, Walton Family Foundation, and Anonymous. (Yes, USDE is a funder!).
The POLICY PARTNERS for the Center for Reinventing Pubic education are:
1. National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools funded by the Oak Foundation, Walton Family Foundation, Newark Charter School Fund, and Charter School Growth Fund.
2. Education Cities (100 of the largest cities, implicated in a rating scheme funded by the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation and connected to the GreatSchools rating and marketing website), and the
3. Policy Innovation Network (PIE). Let’s look at the connection of PIE to CRPE to Third Wave.
The PIE Network connects 48 “education reform groups” in 31 states and the District of Columbia. In addition to feeding information to these groups, PIE asks the groups to commit to policies formulated by its “policy partners” and work with “advocacy partners” including many national organizations “often active in state capitols, working in collaboration with network members or providing strategic advice and assistance as invited by network members.” Think Superpac.
Here are the MEMBERS of PIE by state: ALABAMA, A+ Education Partnership; ARIZONA, Expect More Arizona, Stand for Children Arizona; CALIFORNIA, The Education Trust- West, EdVoice; COLORADO, Colorado Succeeds, Stand for Children Colorado; CONNECTICUT, ConnCAN, Connecticut Council for Education Reform; DELAWARE, Rodel Foundation of Delaware; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DC School Reform Now; FLORIDA, Foundation for Florida’s Future, GEORGIA, Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education; IDAHO, Idaho Business for Education; ILLINOIS, Advance Illinois, Stand for Children Illinois; INDIANA, Stand for Children Indiana; KENTUCKY, Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence; LOUISIANA, Stand for Children Louisiana; MARYLAND, MarylandCAN; MASSACHUSETTS, Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education, Stand for Children Massachusetts; MICHIGAN, The Education Trust- Midwest; MINNESOTA, MinnCAN; MISSISSIPPI, Mississippi First; MISSOURI, Children’s Education Alliance of Missouri (CEAM); NEVADA, Nevada Succeeds; NEW JERSEY, JerseyCAN; NEW YORK, NYCAN, StudentsFirstNY; NORTH CAROLINA, BEST-NC, North Carolina Public School Forum; OHIO, KidsOhio!, Thomas B. Fordham Institute of Ohio; OKLAHOMA, Oklahoma Business and Education Coalition, Stand for Children Oklahoma; OREGON, Chalkboard Project, Stand for Children Oregon; PENNSYLVANIA, PennCAN; RHODE ISLAND, RI-CAN; TENNESSEE, State Collaborative on Reforming Education, Stand for Children Tennessee; TEXAS, Educate Texas, Stand for Children Texas, Texas Institute for Education Reform; WASHINGTON, League of Education Voters, Partnership for Learning, Stand for Children Washington. Surce: http://www.pie-network.org/who/network-members.
Then there are the POLICY PARTNERS for PIE—which is connected to CPRE— which is connected to Third Wave— with generous funding by with the mega-billionaire donor class behind the so-called Third Wave.
“Evidence and expertise play an essential role in forging public policy solutions to formidable institutional challenges; therefore, PIE Network partners with six leading national policy organizations that fuel reform on a national level, disseminate critical research, and offer guidance to network members.” These POLICY PARTNERS are: Center for American Progress, Center on Reinventing Public Education, Data Quality Campaign, Education Resource Strategies, National Council on Teacher Quality, and Thomas B. Fordham Institute. All are famous (infamous) for plots and policies and their obligations to the billionaire donor class. All are intent on eliminating elected school boards and pouring tax dollars into the coffers of private and religious schools.
Look again. Here are PIE’s ADVOCACY PARTNERS and what they do—The ”growing number of national reform organizations are also working at the state level to advance part of the network’s policy commitments. These organizations, which we recognize as advocacy partners, are often active in state capitols working in collaboration with network members or providing strategic advise and assistance as invited by network members. The current ADVOCACY PARTNERS include: 50CAN – national office, America Succeeds, Black Alliance for Educational Options, Democrats for Education Reform, Education Trust, Educators 4 Excellence, Families for Excellent Schools, Foundation for Excellence in Education, National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, Parent Revolution, StudentsFirst, Students for Education Reform – national office, Stand for Children – national office. You can learn more at
Click to access csa_ceo_jd-final.pdf
Now there is a bit more detail (if you can stand it) in how Bellwether aids and abets the Third Wave’s efforts to discredit and demolish elected school boards, silece teachers, parents, and citizens.
I live in Cincinnati. Local foundations with projects in education have been part of a STRIVE collaborative with the Cincinnati Public Schools, Some members in this group have become part of a foundation-led “Accelerator” with a recently hired CEO and a target of $48 million for eliminating every good school that is not a “great school.” The Accelerator is a pitch for cross-sector universal student enrollment for the metro area, and with a specific inclusion of Catholic schools.
Charter-friendly Bellwether handled the CEO recruitment. The Bellwether job description begins with the Gates mantra of college and career readiness for every child. It is filled with “business and charter speak”—the need for a talent pipeline to “create a total of 14,500 new high-performing seats in the city.”
Our local “Accelerator” is “committed to a three-part philosophy: 1. To focus on each school’s performance, not its operator; 2. To embrace and support all successful schools whether they’re District, public charter, or Catholic, and 3. To focus on the development and expansion of schools and school models that deliver outstanding results.”
Among other qualifications, the CEO of this Accelerator was to have: “political savvy, and instincts sharp enough to navigate and establish productive relationships across the Cincinnati educational, philanthropic and political landscape;” and the “ability to identify new sources of funding from foundations, corporations, investors, and/or individual donors, and the skills required to secure these resources through relationship-building.”
REPORTING STRUCTURE. This initiative “was founded with significant engagement and support from the local philanthropic community. Members of this community will play a key role on the Board of Directors.” Over the next three years, the Accelerator will build out the Board, including a focus on adding perspectives from one or more national funders and one or more local community leaders. The Board will not likely exceed nine members, will meet at least quarterly, and will focus specifically on providing strategic and financial guidance.“ See more at this ink, and note the long reach of CRPE. http://www.crpe.org/sites/default/files/csa_ceo_jd-final.pdf
The CEO of our Accelerator is Patrick Herrel. He seems to have held three prior jobs: a government and economics teacher in Charlotte, North Carolina; Teach for America manager of recruiters across the Midwest; and Vice President of The Mind Trust in Indianapolis, where he helped launch “autonomous schools,” and “in-district, empowered schools.” I guess he had the needed fast track tsunami stuff. In 2012, Herrel was named one of Forbes Magazine’s “30 under 30” in education.
I am not alone in questioning the Accelerator and presumptions of our local donor class, most of them speaking as if experts in education based on their great wealth accumulated from holding executive positions in corporations. They believe that the end—metrics for high performance” justify whatever means are necessary to get the intended outcomes. Operators of schools do not matter. What citizens and elected officials think is of no great importance. They think they can buy the “seats” for poor students in high performing schools and that will do the job. Sounds all too familiar.

Off topic, but here’s a compelling story, to understate it.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/06/07/nyregion/public-school-188-in-manhattan-about-half-the-students-are-homeless.html?ribbon-ad-idx=5&rref=nyregion&module=Ribbon&version=context®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=N.Y.%20%2F%20Region&pgtype=article&referer=http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2016%2F06%2F07%2Fnyregion%2Fpublic-school-188-in-manhattan-about-half-the-students-are-homeless.html
LikeLike
FLERP,
How to calculate a VAM rating for teachers f homeless children who come and go?
LikeLiked by 1 person
When the reformers say: “eliminate every school that isn’t a ‘great school'” what they really mean is “eliminate every kid who isn’t a ‘great kid'”
We live in an era where President Obama himself respects and funds a reform movement where the teachers who teach at schools where half the kids are homeless are utter failures unless their students are passing tests. While the praise goes to teachers who teach at schools that are ruthless in making the unwanted children “lucky” enough to win a lottery spot leave. Caring about attrition? That’s for naive folks who don’t recognize a loser child when they see one. The charter school CEOs the reform movement love know how to spot one of those loser kids from a mile away, and are superb at showing them the door.
From the article: “….But over the past three years, nearly 50 of its students have been accepted at some of the city’s most competitive high schools, including Brooklyn Technical, Stuyvesant and Millennium…”
The reformers and the charter schools they support will be more than happy to take those 50 students off the public school’s hands. As long as they are free to treat the others with whatever it takes to get them out of their school.
Why aren’t the billionaires pouring $35 million for THESE children? Because they don’t think those children deserve it. Except for the 50 who scored so high on the SHSAT. I suspect they will welcome them into charter schools with open arms.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Dear “Houston”
“Grit” will see them through — so I have included a dump-truck load of grit with this letter.
Please see that those in need get some.
Sincerely Yours
President Obama
LikeLiked by 1 person
The story about Third Wave won’t make Rebecca Klein’s column in Huffpo, not the AP, not major city newspapers, not TIME magazine, not public, nor network T.V./ radio,….
When history writes the chronicle of a once-great democratic nation, Laura and Diane’s analyses will be a foundation for the chapters on loss of common goods.
LikeLike
The problem is that those that want to destroy public education have very long tentacles and very deep pockets. Most typical citizens are totally unaware they are plotting to hijack democracy, and most will barely notice until after it happens.
LikeLiked by 1 person
More puzzling is the widespread reluctance to get involved enough, to even understand the issue.
LikeLike
Our Brave New World: Take your prescription opiate and shut up.
LikeLike
Our local “Accelerator” is “committed to a three-part philosophy: 1. To focus on each school’s performance, not its operator; 2. To embrace and support all successful schools whether they’re District, public charter, or Catholic, and 3. To focus on the development and expansion of schools and school models that deliver outstanding results.”
It’s funny how easily ed reform dropped the “public” from reform.
I’m old enough to remember when they used to tell voters they opposed vouchers, which was clearly a flat-out lie.
I guess Catholic schools are now “public” under their continuing effort to make “public” completely devoid of any meaning.
Why is the US Department of Education funding this, BTW? The Gates and Dell billionaires don’t have enough money to pay for their experiment themselves?
LikeLike
Chiara, The Cincinnati Archdiocese and Cincinnati Public School have a longstanding relationship on various projects. I do not think that the people who are marketing this Accelerator have a clue about the other faith based schools in the area or the symbolic and practical import of naming only one faith. “Operators” are not supposed to matter.
LikeLike
I appreciated the post. One little thing I noticed is that both the CRPE and CPRE acronyms are used. PIE is connected to CRPE, the “third wave” reform center.
CPRE is a different and older research consortium. Some of their projects probably do have reform connections, but many do not.
LikeLike
Stiles. Thanks for the note. Drowning in acronyms and typos like this.
LikeLike
Laura, I do it all the time too. CPRE and CRPE, CPM and CMP. Plenty of jargon and acronyms in education!
LikeLike
What is “cross-sector universal student enrollment”. I cannot download the jstor article from where I am.
LikeLike
It is a single application fr all schools–public, charter, religious
LikeLike
Máté Wierdl
This is one of three “policy briefs” on the process from 2014. This one examines Denver, New Orleans, and District of Columbia schools as models. The Walton Foundation paid for several of these reports. http://www.crpe.org/sites/default/files/crpe_brief_manage-enrollment-key-governance-ops-decisions_march14.pdf
LikeLike
I admire Laura for digging. It’s not an easy job as so many of these groups are not only intertwined but do spin offs which are simply disguises. Idaho Business for Education has received over half of its funding from the Albertson Foundation which makes one wonder just how separate these two entities are. In addition, some new players “Idaho Loves to Learn” and “One Stone” have sprung up. Tracking their funders is no easy task.
Year Amount Received from the Albertson Foundation 990 Reference
2014 $250,000.00 2014, page 27 #23965 and #24325
2013 $175,000.00 2013, page 32 #22897
2012 $150,000.00 2012, page 29 #22657
Perhaps we will all have to learn to be citizen journalists.
https://www.occrp.org/en/40-press-releases/presss-releases/5287-occrp-launches-new-search-engine-for-investigative-journalists
LikeLike
I. Here in Boston, where the Third Way confab was held, parents FOIA’ed emails between the mayor’s hit man on education and various entities hell bent on following CRPE’s playbook to close 30-50 Boston schools, while moving towards universal enrollment.
II. This afternoon, there was a meeting held for students to participate in the on-going budget discussions. It didn’t go quite as planned:
“ ‘I think the atmosphere is kind of tense in here so we should do an ice-breaker,’ she [a student] said. ‘I have one in mind. It’s a stand-up, sit-down game.’
‘Stand up if you felt patronized by this activity,’ Joseph said.
Every student stood up. Multiple students expressed how they didn’t come to play games. They came to talk about the budget.”
http://www.boston.com/news/education/2016/06/07/boston-students-take-over-budget-forum?s_campaign=bcom%3Asocialflow%3Atwitter
III. And here are some proposals from the Broad superintendent’s negotiating team to the members of the Boston Teachers Union, currently bargaining a new agreement. Even allowing for the usual give and take inherent in the process, this is a pretty extreme starting point. Anyone see anything of benefit to kids in a single one of these proposals?
“Here is a small sampling of where some School Department proposals remain after more than 4 months of bargaining:
Teachers may be excessed from a school without regard to their seniority, but based on their ‘performance.’ Performance will be defined by performance evaluation ratings, which can include Student Impact Ratings as determined by District Determined Measures (DDMs).
Excessed teachers who are proficient or better and who don’t earn a position by the first day of school will be placed in a positon of Suitable Professional Capacity (SPC). Those placed in SPC will retain salary and benefits for a finite length of time. If unsuccessful in finding a position, the person serving in an SPC position will be fired.
The length of time in an SPC position will depend on one’s service years, and whether or not the teacher is from a school that has been closed. (As most know, the city last year commissioned the McKinsey Report, which claims there are 39,000 surplus seats in the BPS and calls for the potential closing of 30 to 50 schools.)
Teachers with a less-than-proficient rating on their last evaluation who are not hired by August 31 will be fired immediately.
Teachers fired, regardless of rating, shall not have a right of recall to any teaching position.
On teacher staffing: Those who take approved leaves, including maternity leaves, for a duration of 6 months or longer will not have an attachment right to their old building & assignment. Any such person without a position on the first day of school shall become an SPC.
Within a school, administrators ‘can reassign teachers to any teaching position … for which they are qualified.’
On length of teacher work day: Teachers will be expected to work a ‘professional day required to perform their required duties.’ Translated, that means that the length of the school day will be solely at the call of your administrator — as will any additional compensation.
The class size maxima in Grades 6 and 9 in Level 3 and Level 4 (Turnaround Schools) shall be increased by one.
On enforcing class size: Instead of ‘an appropriate number of regular teachers shall be hired’ to enforce class size maxima, the obligation now will be that the ‘district (shall) endeavor to hire a sufficient number of teachers.’
Caseload maxima, both individual and system-wide average, for SLPs, OTs, PTs, Nurses, and Guidance Counselors – all limits will be eliminated.
The eight Social Workers hired for the duration of the 2010 to 2016 will be fired.
The SEIMS Agreement will be eliminated. Secondary SPED teachers will lose the benefit of having two administrative periods set aside to do SEIMS paperwork.
Paraprofessionals will be excessed from a school by performance, not by seniority. Excessed paraprofessionals may be eligible for – but are not guaranteed– a positon.
Excessed paraprofessionals who have not secured a position for the following school year by June 15 will be fired.
Fired paraprofessionals with satisfactory performance ratings will be eligible for an interview for one year, however they will not be able to claim a position.
Paraprofessional training: The current $25,000 that funds the Paraprofessional training program will be eliminated.
Paraprofessionals will be able to be placed in any classroom for substitute coverage purposes.
The 20 ‘Coverage’ Paraprofessionals hired to service those students with the most severe Special Needs when their regularly-assigned paraprofessional is absent will be fired.
Substitute teachers who are both certified and recommended for hire will no longer be guaranteed up to four interviews.
Per diem substitute teachers who work more than 120 or 150 days will no longer receive a $1000 or a $1500 bonus, respectively.
And finally — On the school calendar: The superintendent shall determine when the school year begins, in mid-August or September, and whether there is a February break.”
http://btu.org/e-bulletin/btu-ebulletin-44/
LikeLike
Christine,
I am sorry Boston hired a Broadie. Disruption, destruction, and privatization are their banner.
LikeLike
From the emails, it looks like he was just the frosting on the cake. The ball was in play before he stepped onto the court.
But our students, are, as we say, wicked awesome!
LikeLike
Christine, are you teaching in Boston or retired?
LikeLike
I’ve been retired for five years, after 36 teaching middle and high school. Now I have enough time to connect the dots and do a little advocacy.
LikeLike
This is exactly the result of hiring a superintendent who functions only as an enforcement officer who follows the recommendations of Mc Kinsey & Co. and the managerial training from the Broad Foundation. Your detailed account is amazing. The temporary staffing of professionals and paraprofessionals with just-in-time hiring for open slots is part of the same mindset that only thinks about education as a matter of supply and demand for “seats” or in the case of computer based education “customers.”
LikeLike
This “Third Wave” sounds much like the wave that obliterated New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina.
So expensive private schools (the Sidwell Friends-type) would be exempt from this Machiavellian plot? Interesting…
And, under this plan, the Gulen network could finally go off the radar, where they’ve tried to go for years.
LikeLike