Day by day, we are making inroads into public opinion. Newspapers in Ohio have been speaking out against the frequent violations of public trust by greedy charter operators. Now the Salt Lake Tribune steps up with a bold denunciation of charter school profiteers. It’s about time.
Inviting the private sector to run schools was a colossal error. For the first time in American history, we have schools claiming to be “public”that operate for public. We have charter schools launched by entrepreneurs, not educators. It is wrong. Many members of the public believe that charters are privately funded, not realizing that it is their tax dollars that are paying off investors.
Here is concrete evidence that the tide is turning. It is an editorial in the Salt Lake Coty Tribune called simply “Charter School Profiteers.”
The editorial board says:
“A handful of private companies have banked more than $68 million from Utah taxpayers over the past three years. The money is delivered through no-bid contracts by people who don’t work for government, but the companies are often connected to political officials.
“An extensive examination of charter school spending by Salt Lake Tribune reporter Benjamin Wood shows several companies that exist only to contract with charter schools. While public schools have always contracted for some services, many charters go so far as to contract for their principals and teachers, providing undisclosed profits to the companies while shielding financial information from the public.
“Under state law, the schools must be operated as non-profits, presumably to avoid people profiteering on public education. Charters that contract with for-profit companies for their largest expenses effectively circumvent that requirement. There is no way for Utahns to know how many of their education dollars are ending up as someone’s salary or profits.
“In the meantime, charters are slowly losing one of their most persuasive arguments: that they can educate students for less money than traditional public schools.
“According to a report from the Utah Foundation released last month, Utah charters collect about 10 percent less per student than regular public schools, but they have cost advantages, too. They have fewer non-English speakers and economically-disadvantaged students. Add in the public schools’ requirements to provide busing, to build inefficient rural schools and to provide such things as gang-prevention services, and the cost difference virtually disappears. Looking at test scores, charters track pretty closely to public schools on average.
“In other words, there is no evidence the free-market capitalism allowed in Utah’s charter school system is providing better results for students.
“But it clearly is producing winners. One company that received more than $4 million last year is headed by the sister of the president of the state charter school board. Another company ($1 million from charters last year) is operated by a state legislator, and two others ($4.7 million and $4.5 million last year) are run by relatives of legislators. (Surprise! All three voted in favor of increasing charter school funding by $20 million last session.)
“One of those relatives promised, “We keep it pretty separate.”
“How many charters operate this way? Hard to say, but it’s not all of them. This isn’t an argument for ending charter schools, but it is a system that begs for reform. Otherwise, the worst is yet to come.
“Long before charters, there were non-profit entities providing K-12 education in Utah. They hired their own principals and teachers, and they still do. That is because there are no efficiencies in creating that second entity, but there can be profits.
“And with profits come profit pressures. Some of today’s charters look less like non-profit schools and more like for-profit proprietary colleges. They market on television and employ sales staffs. As charters become more common, competition for charter students increases. Expect to see these for-profit non-profits apply more sales pressure to prospective parents.”
http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/3923608-155/editorial-charter-school-profiteers

Charter schola esse delendum!
LikeLike
This has been occurring for a very long time in Utah, facilitated by those in the legislature.
When I lived in Utah decades ago, one of the state legislators was running an “alternative school”, essentially a home study program that was getting state money for every student enrolled (which meant very little with regard to how often they attended) and was paying himself a very high salary as school head (particularly for back then)
So it literally took the SL Tribune decades to come to their current realization. Better late than never, I guess.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The other “news” outlets in the state won’t even look at charters except to praise them, so at least the Trib did something. But I agree, it’s VERY late to be starting into it now. I’ve been screaming to anyone who would listen about the company that got $4.7 million (that’s Academica West) employing legislators and children of of legislators, but no one would listen.
LikeLike
Threatened
I agree that the SL Tribune is far better than the rest of the mainstream “news’ outlets in Utah. But unfortunately, that ain’t saying much. Of course, they are probably not any worse than most mainstream “news” outlets outside of Utah, either: NY Times, LA TImes, NPR, etc.
I can’t remember any of the names now, but when I lived in SL, there were some really good small time “alternative” news sources that did some very good investigative reporting. I even had some letters to the editor published in some of the latter (my 15 minutes of reporting fame!)
At the time, I could not understand how these rinky dink news outlets could produce such hard hitting stories while the SL Tribune and Deseret News could not. Needless to say, I was very naive (some might say stupid) back then.
LikeLike
I think you’re thinking City Weekly, SomeDAM Poet. They DO some good work. I don’t know if they’ve ever done a report on charters, though.
LikeLike
“But it clearly is producing winners. One company that received more than $4 million last year is headed by the sister of the president of the state charter school board. Another company ($1 million from charters last year) is operated by a state legislator, and two others ($4.7 million and $4.5 million last year) are run by relatives of legislators. (Surprise! All three voted in favor of increasing charter school funding by $20 million last session.)
“One of those relatives promised, ‘We keep it pretty separate.’ ”
… “pretty separate” … ? How utterly laughable.
How about COMPLETELY “separate”, as set forth in future laws:
— laws that establish prohibitions against such self-dealing, and then — with the threat of prison terms and fines for violators — enforces these safeguards against contracting services out to any for-profit companies …
… operated by any state legislators,
or
… operated by any relatives of legislators,
or
… operated by any relatives of state charter school board members…
especially when those legislators are voting on whether or not to increase charter school funding and expansion, and the state charter board members vote on which charters are allowed to open — i.e. the ones that have and/or will contract out to these companies that the state charter board members and/or their relatives operate and own.
LikeLike
They’ll do what Ohio does- carefully cherry-pick charter “success stories” and promote those:
“Registration is now open for the Ohio Charter School Summit in Columbus. The event is presented by the Auditor of State’s Office and features:
Dr. Geoffrey Canada – President of the Harlem Children’s Zone;
Dr. Steve Perry – Founder of the Capital Preparatory Magnet School; and
Mike Feinberg – Co-founder of the KIPP Foundation.
No one outside the exclusive club will be invited. It’s another state-produced and funded cheerleading event. All of the ed reform politicians will be on hand to pledge their undying devotion to the “sector”.
I don’t understand why public schools can’t do the same thing. If I identify strong public schools can’t I use that to justify expanding/supportiing them? Why is there such a glaring double standard?
http://education.ohio.gov/Media/Ed-Connection/May-16-2016/Save-the-date-for-the-Ohio-Charter-School-Summit-A
LikeLike
The politicians who are benefiting financially from this have no conflicts of interest because they say they have no conflicts of interest.
They’re just better people. That’s what they’re telling you. Ordinary mortals need conflict of interest and ethics rules, but not these people- they’re so pure they don’t require rules.
It’s an amazingly arrogant attitude and it conflicts with everything we know about ethics and corruption learned over 200 years, but THAT’S how good they are- ordinary rules simply don’t apply to them.
LikeLike
I’m not sure there’s any genuine arrogance involved. Billing yourself as the possessor of some higher morality (or other inexplicable secret sauce) is the time-honored way of getting snake-oil customers. Just dazzle ‘m w/bs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And Utah has NO legislator ethics law whatsoever, so the senator whose son directs Academica West doesn’t even list that on his conflict of interest form. Doesn’t have to. People have begged for legislator ethics laws for years, and the legislature won’t do it. Obviously.
LikeLike
I wonder if the newspaper will find time to examine the Utah preschool pay-for sucess contract where investors pay the upfront costs, have a say in the management of the programs, and have rigged the payout system for return on investment, backed by Goldman Sachs and others. And wowzie, the Clinton Foundations thinks these contracts are great.
LikeLike
The Trib has mentioned the program, but it was essentially a press release of how wonderful it was. To be fair, the Trib has been dealing with some major financial struggles over the last three or four years. It’s just been bought by a local company, so hopefully that will help.
LikeLike
I hope that the pressure to investigate the charter scandals in Ohio becomes intense, and not swept away by pay-offs and manufactured press. Kasich is being looked at differently since his over-stay in the primaries. Ohio tax payers are not pleased with his lack of accountability for debts racked up on his travels, let alone his absence in general. His judgment is questionable, and more see it.
LikeLike