I received this notice today. I responded and asked if the Commission might investigate how school choice via vouchers and charters was affecting racial resegregation. The growing resegregation of America’s schools should be an urgent concern for this Commission.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Announces Date for Briefing Related to its Report, Public Education Funding Inequality in an Era of Increasing Concentration of Poverty and Resegregation
WASHINGTON, April 26, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights announced today that it will hold a public briefing on Friday, May 20, 2016, to examine the funding of K-12 education and how the inequitable distribution of these funds negatively and disproportionately impact the educational opportunities of low-income and minority students. The briefing will also address how the practice of underfunding public schools has exacerbated the academic achievement gap in an era where the nation’s most vulnerable children are increasingly educated in highly segregated and under-resourced schools.
The Commission’s public briefing and report titled “Public Education Funding Inequality in an Era of Increasing Concentration of Poverty and Resegregation” will address federal and state law related to public education funding, including Title I of the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The report will also offer recommendations on how federal, state, and local government can independently and collaboratively help ensure that all children in the United States have an equal opportunity to quality education regardless of race, national origin, and zip code.
Commission Chairman Martin R. Castro stated, “Education is the great equalizer in the United States. When we make access to education for our minority children more difficult and less equal and when the education they received is of less quality, whether de jure or de facto–it is unjust and must be changed. When we diminish educational opportunities for the least among us we diminish ourselves as a nation.”
Commissioner Karen K. Narasaki stated, “Despite Brown v. Board of Education, schools attended by minority children are still more likely to be racially isolated and lacking in sufficient resources with high concentrations of poverty. All students should have meaningful access to a quality education.”
WHAT:
Briefing on Public Educational Funding Inequality in an Era of Increasing Concentration of Poverty and Resegregation.
WHEN:
May 20, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST
Please arrive early as seating is limited or participate via teleconference.
WHERE:
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 1150
Washington, DC 20425 (Entrance on F Street NW)
LISTEN IN:
To listen to the Commission’s Briefing via telephone, please follow the instructions below:
Dial toll-free number 1-888-572-7034; Provide operator conference # 7822144.
DOCUMENTS:
The Commission is going green! Electronic versions of the briefing documents will be made available online the day before the briefing.
Deaf or hearing-impaired persons who require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pam Dunston at (202) 376-8105.
Follow, share, and be a part of the conversation on Twitter @USCCRGOV
Contact: Gerson Gomez
Media Advisor
(202) 376-8371
publicaffairs@usccr.gov
Tweet: https://Twitter.com/USCCRgov/status/725072639279124480

The Commission is going green! Electronic versions of the briefing documents will be made available online the day before the briefing. One day before? Looks like the agenda is set, and papers long since commissioned by the Commission. Your question is on the maek, and by now there should be data on the role of charters in NOT addressing segregation and contributing to it.
LikeLike
Diane,
Questions we are pondering include the role of Section 8 housing policies in creating these clusters of intense poverty in urban areas. Are there alternative models that could dissipate these housing patterns somewhat?
Sue Legg
________________________________
LikeLike
Sue, I am not optimistic but the latest federal information about section 8 housing is here. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/05/03/2016-10328/section-8-housing-assistance-payments-program-annual-adjustment-factors-fiscal-year-2016
Check the Urban League website as well.
The White House has been pushing Social Impact Bonds and Pay for Success programs to get so-called public-private “partnerships” going to address persistent social problems. The grant program and the recipients can be found here. Judging from these grants, most of the agencies that receive funds pass that money on to community agencies who want to “scale up” existing programs. The administrative architecture of civic/social organizations and some private non-profit foundations passes federal grant money on to smaller operations that apply, with promises to meet specific targets within a fixed time period.
For example, AARP has received some funds to pass on to other groups working on housing for low-income seniors. A program is designed to increase the likelihood of success in making home ownership possible for low income families. Many of these grants go to mentoring programs for students “at risk” of dropping out of high school, or testing their wings in college, or completing college, or finding initial jobs at these transition points. Here is the website
http://www.nationalservice.gov/programs/social-innovation-fund/our-programs
There are many initiatives called social impact bonds or pay-for-success programs that operate without these federal grants. These are structured as financial products for investors who hope to earn 5% or more return on investments in social welfare programs that they can help to scale up and structure for their profit. The well-known examples are preschool programs in Utah and in Chicago. Here is a link to the Utah contract.
Skeptics of these programs( and I am among them) note that the payback to investors is easily rigged but the terms of the contract and the actions of “intermediaries” who are hired to monitor the project, with power to hire and fire the people providing the program. The preschool programs probably exclude the students who have severe physical and/or learningproblems.
The theory is that preschool “interventions” can overcome mild learning disabilities so that children are able to enter Kindergarten and do well on grade three tests, especially reading, andreach other milestones like that, including high school graduation. The intermediaries (accountants, financial and project managers) and external researchers track the achievement of these milestones by successive cohorts of students. Because these contracts are considered risky investments, they are usually underwritten by foundations and deep-pocket financial groups (e.g., Goldman Sachs).
Here are the key terms of the contract for the Utah program. http://socialventures.com.au/case-studies/Utah-high-quality-preschool-sib/
LikeLike
Thanks, Laura. You are terrific, and know so much.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
There should be questions about harm caused to large numbers of students due to charter proliferation. Marketplace ideology, high stakes testing, and reckless waste and fraud in charters is contribute to increased levels of inequity in public schools. I would also like to understand how a state can lose a lawsuit about inequitable funding, and the governor can just ignore the court order. As we know, this happened in New York. I would also like to know why the DOJ rarely enforces integration laws anymore. They seem to accept the status quo.
LikeLike
If ever you get through to them, ask how it is possible for teachers to be unable to fight any and all allegations, and to have no civil rights in the education workplace, so this can happen
http://www.perdaily.com/2011/01/lausd-et-al-a-national-scandal-of-enormous-proportions-by-susan-lee-schwartz-part-1.html
and this
http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/2010/07/defamation-of-david-pakter-by-new-york.html
or this:
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/LAUSD-OR-TARGETED-TEACHERS-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Deception_Evidence_Fired_Innocence-150720-360.html#comment555646
http://www.perdaily.com/2015/01/were-you-terminated-or-forced-to-retire-from-lausd-based-on-fabricated-charges.html
It is all-out money not children and certainly not about AMERICANS who just happen to b eTEACHERS.
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/06/lausds-treacherous-road-from-reed-to-vergara–its-never-been-about-students-just-money.html
LikeLike