Lest we forget, today is the 62nd anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled that separate but equal could never be equal. It began the long and painful process of disestablishing legally sanctioned separation of the races in different schools. As we have observed, de facto segregation has replaced de jure segregation and resegregation is on the rise.
The UCLA Civil Rights Project has been tracking the trajectory of racial segregation and desegregation for many years. Its newest research brief has bad news.
As the anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education decision arrives again without any major initiatives to mitigate spreading and deepening segregation in our nation’s schools, the Civil Rights Project adds to a growing national discussion with a research brief drawn from a much broader study of school segregation to be published in September 2016. Since 1970, the public school enrollment has increased in size and transformed in racial composition. Intensely segregated nonwhite schools with zero to 10% white enrollment have more than tripled in this most recent 25-year period for which we have data, a period deeply influenced by major Supreme Court decisions (spanning from 1991 to 2007) that limited desegregation policy. At the same time, the extreme isolation of white students in schools with 0 to 10% nonwhite students has declined by half as the share of white students has dropped sharply.
This brief shows states where racial segregation has become most extreme for Latinos and blacks and discusses some of the reasons for wide variations among states. We call the country’s attention to the striking rise in double segregation by race and poverty for African American and Latino students who are concentrated in schools that rarely attain the successful outcomes typical of middle class schools with largely white and Asian student populations. We show the obvious importance of confronting these issues given the strong relationship between racial and economic segregation and inferior educational opportunities clearly demonstrated in research over many decades.
The most intensely segregated states are New York, Maryland, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, and California.
It is worth noting that the two major federal initiatives of the past 15 years–No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top– completely ignored racial segregation.
Racial integration is no longer a federal or a national priority. It is no longer unusual to see the media celebrating the academic success of schools that are 100% nonwhite, without mentioning their racial isolation.

Disheartening. Our most populous states in some cases and in several incidents, the state’s with the largest numbers of charter schools. Many negative trends reemergence with the concentration of wealth at the top and privatization of previously public activities. These things are not making the country stronger but more splintered.
LikeLike
The privatization of schools is unequally applied to largely, poor minority areas. Many times whole systems are converted to charters without any democratic input. The “choice” that is so valued often becomes the choice of the school to accept or reject students. Overall, charters contribute to greater segregation. Forced charters deny parents any voice in what school their child will attend. Why should white children have the right to a democratic public education, but the education of many minority students is turned over to a corporation, despite community protestation. Why should white children be treated differently from poor minorities? Monetization of schools often denies democratic rights to poor minorities and communities.
LikeLike
Without shared multiracial struggle, we will never have equity. Progressives- and in fact, all people of good will- need to reassert and embrace the political, social and economic case for, “An injury to one is an injury to all.” We do not have to accept shortages as given so that we fight over crumbs. We need to explicitly and loudly embrace a movement across the divides of race, religion, ethnicity, gender and sexual identity against hate and greed. Immediately… It is possible for everyone to lead a decent, secure life, but it will require limiting the privileges of the wealthy. Achieving that goal will not be easy or fast. It requires unity and trust across traditional religious, racial and ethnic divisions. To do so, we need integrated neighborhoods and schools. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arthur-camins/an-injury-to-one-is-still_b_9556976.html
LikeLike
“It is possible for everyone to lead a decent, secure life, but it will require limiting the privileges of the wealthy.”
Phew, I was afraid it might require some sacrifice on my part!
LikeLike
You’ve sacrificed enough time to be here, FLERP!
LikeLike
on page 8 of the report
“We have spent decades trying …policies that have focused on attempting to equalize schools and opportunity though accountability and high-stakes testing policies, not to mention the federal subsidization of entirely new systems of school choice, like charter schools, without any civil rights provisions. These policies have not succeeded in reducing racial segregation or inequality.
In our last national examination of charter schools, for example, we found that the percentage of black students in 90-100% minority schools was twice as high as that of black students in traditional public schools.”
Failed policies favored by the very rich to avoid addressing the need and value of integrated schools and communities, not only by income but by the demographic census category of race.
LikeLike
In many states, charters and vouchers are dramatically contributing to resegregation. In NC, 20% of charter schools are 90% or more white. My district has lost half of our white student population to local charters: https://patientlyimpatientblog.wordpress.com/2016/05/14/no-mans-land/
LikeLike
In case you missed it in yesterday’s NYTimes: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/us/cleveland-mississippi-school-district-desegregate.html?emc=edit_tnt_20160517&nlid=26825267&tntemail0=y
As you can see, “with all deliberate speed” has a different meaning in MS…
LikeLike
Hmmm…. Are the most segregated states the states with the most charters?
LikeLike
Brown does not treat the more complex issue of equitable funding for differences in economic class. While this is often associated with ethnicity, it is also associated with geography. Rural schools often produce students who move to other places where their tax dollars fund school districts with dramatically more opportunities. Meanwhile the cradle that rocked them continues the underfunded effort that produces only a few well educated professionals who move to where the money is. While I have not experienced it, I would suspect the same phenomenon to exist in other underfunded geographical locations.
LikeLike
Unfortunately so much of this segregation is legal and economic. It’s families with money who refuse to move into communities with poor people. And by poor people, we also mean children of color. I see this in my community of Peekskill, NY, where the school population skews much poorer and “browner” than the community around it. There’s a pernicious idea that middles class families should not send their kids to the local schools because they are “bad”. Of course the schools are fine, with many passionate, experienced teachers, but most people refuse to believe that. They see the color and income level of the student body (and some of the negative behaviors) and write the schools off.
Yes, I send my children to these schools, and my wife and I fight damn hard to make sure they get the education they deserve. However, we’re not just fighting for our kids, but all the kids in our community.
LikeLike