This just in:
Arizona education supporters, led by the state’s Teacher of the Year Christine Marsh and Valley Interfaith Project (which is the local affiliate of the Industrial Areas Foundation), will launch an effort this Thursday, May 19, to signal to the public and to policy makers that the abysmal lack of education funding in Arizona is not acceptable.
The rally, called #NowItStarts, will be held on the Arizona State Capitol grounds at 4 p.m. in Phoenix to draw attention to the nearly $2 billion in cuts to Arizona public schools, which have stymied teacher pay raises, slashed classroom spending, and left the state’s aging school facilities in disrepair.
The rally comes in the aftermath of a controversial ballot proposition being voted upon today. Proposition 123, a lawsuit settlement brokered by Gov. Doug Ducey, would end a protracted lawsuit filed when the state withheld voter approved inflation funding from Proposition 301, a voter approved measure from 2000 that legislators ignored during recession budget shortfalls.
The measure, which has deeply divided supporters of public schools, would replace 72% of the funding due to the schools and would draw largely on the state’s land trust fund to resume inflation funding. If it passes, the state would still rank 48th in per pupil spending, spending $3,000 less than the national average.
“Regardless of whether Proposition 123 passes or fails, it’s not OK that Arizona education is so underfunded and undervalued by the powers-that-be,” said Marsh, an AP English instructor in Scottsdale.
Prop 123 is a complete sham! There are triggers that don’t guarantee that the money will be there and after 10 years the funding will fall off a cliff. The governor, Ducey, loves this plan because it frees him to give all the tax cuts he has promised and it lets him off the hook for public education, which is committed to blowing up! He’s all in for private education, and this will only help him achieve his goals. Here are some articles on the pro and cons of prop 123:
http://kjzz.org/content/298436/arguments-and-against-arizonas-proposition-123
https://www.azpm.org/s/38678-prop-123-teachers-see-relief-opponents-see-challenges/
http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2016/04/18/montini-gov-doug-ducey-league-of-women-voters-proposition-123-arizona-legislature-state-land-trust/83157214/
https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video;_ylt=AwrSbnD3sDtXiN8A7YNXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTB0NjZjZzZhBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNwaXZz?p=arizona+proposition+123+ads&fr=yfp-t&fr2=piv-web#id=6&vid=66d3d996f0bdda7245ddb3bf72597c8a&action=view
If it doesn’t pass in the short term, it will be bad for education. But if it passes it will be a disaster for education in the future! I fear the prop will pass given the propaganda campaign that presents it as a win-win (teachers will get a raise and there will be no raise in taxes): https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video;_ylt=AwrSbnD3sDtXiN8A7YNXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTB0NjZjZzZhBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNwaXZz?p=arizona+proposition+123+ads&fr=yfp-t&fr2=piv-web#action=view&id=43&vid=47de108a1bbd968d16c40c2371f41b9c
This is an example of why term limits for politicians is bad policy. It fosters as quick fix mentality that passes on structural instability to the next set of politicians.