Sarah Blaine invited a parent to tell her story on Blaine’s blog called “Parenting the Core.”
This is the story of Maatie Alcindor. When she moved from Cambridge to New Jersey to work in the pharmaceutical industry, she enrolled her son in a charter school that ended at grade 4. They loved that charter. She then searched out the best charter school in the area on the New Jersey education web site, which was said to be North Star Academy in Newark. She attended the mandatory parents’ meeting.
“And that is where the trouble began. From the very first meeting I knew something was not right. I did not like the way we were spoken to but I thought to myself… give them a chance. The successive meetings did not change my initial uneasy feeling toward the administration. We were given application packets and advised that we the parents had to drop off the completed forms. If not, the application would not be accepted. It was explained to us that if we were serious about our children’s education we would make the time to submit the applications ourselves. No other people would be allowed to deliver the packets for us. Even when parents explained that due to their work schedules it would be a problem to bring in the forms, NSA said no accommodations would be made. Imagine my irritation when I arrived at the downtown Newark location to submit my application and was told to just drop it in a bin (no one was there to confirm the submission). There was no reason to force parents to take time from work to simply drop an envelope in a tray; it was just a test of our commitment to follow the schools rules.
“We were told to expect 2-3 hours of homework per night and extensive homework packets during weekends and vacations. I expressed concern that the amount of work seemed a lot for an 11 year old child and left no time for other activities or family time. It was basically inferred that if I cared about my son’s future I would follow their program or find another school and watch him fail. Rules of conduct while in school were even more concerning.
“Throughout their day the students would get in trouble for such things as talking in the hallway, missing or incomplete homework, uniform pants not being the right shade of beige and the dreaded “not tracking the speaker with your eyes.” Yes, the children would get in trouble for not looking directly at the teacher during their lesson. Even during lunch there were more opportunities to get detention including talking too loud and talking when the principal entered the lunch room. They were expected to stop talking if the principal walked into the lunch room!!!!! Detention was usually an hour meaning that during the winter months the kids were let out around 4:30 or 5:00 pm which left them to navigate home in the streets of Newark alone by either walking or public transportation after dark….
“I hated the North Star model but I think if done right there may be a place for charter schools. North Star’s main issue was lack of engagement with the community. It was a school in the community but not of the community. To be honest it felt very racist though I do not think they thought of themselves as racists. The principal took on the air of an overseer, our children were no longer our own but property of NSA to be raised by their rules of behavior. On several occasions I witnessed the surreal scenes of all white “board members” that would come to visit the school smile as the children would beat the African Style drums to call every one to morning circle. The board members seemed very pleased to watch the call and response exercise as the white Principal walked around to check the uniforms of the school’s all black and Hispanic students. Later I asked the Principal why as American citizens the children didn’t just do the Pledge of Allegiance as in any other school? I was told mockingly, that since we were African Americans, the drums represented our history. I advised him that I went to school with predominantly Irish Americans and we never started the day with Celtic music or Toe Dancing. With only one black teacher on staff at the time I wondered who gave them their ideas.
“The idea of Charter school was appealing to me. We had such a great experience his fourth grade year at East Orange Charter School and we wanted more. North Star Academy was a nightmare and a decision I will always regret. In 2009, my son was part of the first eighth grade class to graduate from North Star Academy Middle School. That fall we moved to a different town but his four years at North Star had done its damage. My son’s freshman year in high school was very hard for him. In spite of the hours upon hours of homework that he endured at North Star Academy he did not have any real study or note taking skills. North Star normally gave them their notes and study sheets but did not allow for any independent thinking. For several years he had trouble engaging in class due to North Star’s passive learning style of teaching. Where North Star allowed for him to repeatedly take the same test over and over in order for them to record the most acceptable score, he was frustrated by the fact this was not the case at his new school.”
Her son is now in college. He had to unlearn the bad habits of passivity drilled into him at North Star to be able to think for himself.

“It was explained to us that if we were serious about our children’s education we would make the time to submit the applications ourselves. No other people would be allowed to deliver the packets for us. Even when parents explained that due to their work schedules it would be a problem to bring in the forms, NSA said no accommodations would be made”
Who can blame NSA? They were probably worried about Edward Snowden intercepting the packets and putting them on the internet.
LikeLike
As I read this, what I think I perceive in this narrative (and maybe I’m off here) is the difference between serving a college-educated community (Cambridge) and teaching to a community that has mostly high school education or less (Newark).
It’s not quite racism, but classism, in which the better-educated patronize the less-educated.
LikeLike
And the less well educated take it because they think those well educated people know better! The smell test really works for most people regardless of what degree they have. If it stinks, it’s bad. If a parent is uncomfortable with something that is going on with their child, chances are they have reason to be.
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing, Diane. And of course, thank you Maatie for being willing to take the time to write and tell your story.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“From the very first meeting I knew something was not right. I did not like the way we were spoken to but I thought to myself… give them a chance.”
And that’s what’s so sad. We human beings have amazing intuition which, when noticed and acted on keep us out of a lot of bad situations. But members of non-dominant classes (women, minorities, the poor, etc.) are almost always taught from early on to suppress that intuition and just go with the flow, don’t make a scene, be nice, trust us – it’s for your own good. Of course, there is a good being served by this message, but not your own.
LikeLike
“. . . are almost always taught from early on to suppress that intuition and just go with the flow, don’t make a scene, be nice, trust us – it’s for your own good.”
Sounds like the majority of public education teachers and adminimals. GAGA*ers through and through! The teachers usually have that instinct and indeed do suppress their reaction against the malpractices that are shoved onto them (still no excuse). Now the adminimals, unless fairly recently in the classroom don’t have that “intuition”. Their only intuition is to brown nose ass kiss as they know only to say “Yes, that’s the best thing since sliced bread” to their supposedly superior superiors.
*Going Along to Get Along (GAGA): Nefarious practice of most educators who implement the edudeformers agenda even though the educators know that those educational malpractices will cause harm to the students and defile the teaching and learning process. The members of the GAGA gang are destined to be greeted by the Karmic Gods of Retribution** upon their passing from this realm.
**Karmic Gods of Retribution: Those ethereal beings specifically evolved to construct the 21st level in Dante’s Hell. The 21st level signifies the combination of the 4th (greed), 8th (fraud) and 9th (treachery) levels into one mega level reserved especially for the edudeformers and those, who, knowing the negative consequences of the edudeformers agenda, willing implemented it so as to go along to get along. The Karmic Gods of Retribution also personally escort these poor souls, upon their physical death, to the 21st level unless they enlighten themselves, a la one D. Ravitch, to the evil and harm they have caused so many innocent children, and repent and fight against their former fellow deformers. There the edudeformers and GAGAers will lie down on a floor of smashed and broken ipads and ebooks curled in a fetal position alternately sucking their thumbs to the bones while listening to two words-Educational Excellence-repeated without pause for eternity.
LikeLike
A perfect example of the dehumanizing gulag-ization of American education. Only psychopaths and/or fools would think this was the proper way to educate OUR children but not theirs.
LikeLike
And she stuck it for 4 years !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
Some of us are slow learners. :o)
LikeLike
I reproduce the very first paragraph from the linked piece:
[start]
We were residents of East Orange, NJ the spring before my only child started the 5th grade. At the time, my son was attending fourth grade at the East Orange Charter School and we loved it. Unfortunately for us East Orange Charter only went up to the 4th grade. Through the NJ State Education web page I found out that the highly touted North Star Academy (NSA) Charter School in Newark was opening a middle school in North Newark not far from my East Orange home! Soon after, some friends and I attended the prospective parents meeting for the new North Star Academy Middle School.
[end]
Taking the above into account, and what is in the posting, I anticipate what will be (and has been) asserted on this blog by those fervently in favor of imposing (at the expense of public schools) charters and privatization and the like on the general public:
Everything on this blog, every jot and tittle, is anti-charter. Negative negative negative!
One can refer to the posting above re the first charter: “They loved that charter.” In the original piece (see above): “At the time, my son was attending fourth grade at the East Orange Charter School and we loved it.”
Which, according to rheephorm’s gold standard of proof by the assertive sneer, jeer and smear, proves that everything on this blog, every jot and tittle, is anti-charter. Negative negative negative!
😳
So this posting and anything else like it, hasn’t and doesn’t and can’t exist. Erase it from your minds. Nothing to see here. Move on—
to $tudent $ucce$$. And let the chief enforcers and beneficiaries of self-styled “education reform” enjoy being in their Happy Place where their egos and wallets enjoy miraculous ROI.
😎
LikeLike
That’s because the school was not really there to service the kids and community, it was there to demonstrate how effective they could carry out their program. Whatever behavior reinforced their model is what they stressed. Did this type of regimentation benefit the child? They could care less. To bad you didn’t realize this earlier. Our kids should not be robots but free, independent thinkers.
LikeLike
“. . . was not really there to service the kids and community,”
Not sure you really want to put it that way, Paula. Service has a certain connotation that I don’t think you intended.
Serve, yes, service, no!
LikeLike
It’s so easy to get outraged by accounts like this if you ignore the context. The context is public schools perpetually on the brink of (or over the brink of) chaos. A system where kids not only don’t “track the speaker”, they never look at the speaker. As a group, kids realize they have a ton of power. It doesn’t take much to get them to use that power to subvert the learning process and substitute more amusing activities such as socializing. This is the context out of which North Star, KIPP and Success Academy has arisen. These are imperfect responses, but those who attack them may be making the perfect the enemy of the good. Show me one successful inner city middle school that uses a progressive education approach.
Separate point: North Star’s demand that parents drop off the application in person is proof of underhanded skimming.
LikeLike
Central Park East.
LikeLike
Public schools are perpetually on the brink of chaos for reasons including:
They now educate a much higher percentage of low-income students, and newly arrived immigrant students who speak a myriad of languages.
Their school based budgets are constantly being cut. Now we can argue — as dishonest pro-charter school folks always do — that “overall” we appear to be spending more money. But in fact, those dollars are now spent on 1. expensive aides, private schools, etc. for the much higher number of students now classified as special needs. 2. Testing materials, private consultants, and all the money spent to reward the corporations who pushed Race to the Top that directed public school dollars to corporations who profited handsomely from providing “materials”, etc. to public schools 3. Costs of facilities in ever crumbling buildings needing constant maintenance. 4. Debt service for those buildings and for the growing costs of pensions for long retired teachers that are paid out of public school budgets. These costs are high enough, but in fact, they are now borne by a lower percentage of pubic school students as charter schools cherry-pick the cheapest to educate and none of those students is charged for all these historical costs which now fall disproportionately on the public schools that also educate the most expensive students!
Thus you see very large class sizes in public schools, very little money for supplies, all the while that the people who hate public schools claim there is so much money being spent and wasted. Yes, wasted on charter schools and corporations who profit from it at the expense of the kids who need it most.
If there is a reason to have progressive schools for some kids and no excuses schools for others, then there is no reason to have that all within the same school system. Even within the same school! If 50% of the well-behaved kids are able to learn in progressive classes of 30, and the remaining 50% need classes of 10 or 15 to address their issues, that should be school based, with students being free to move to the progressive (or whatever other system is used) classes as long as they don’t disrupt the learning of others. But the school system is responsible for ALL of them and uses the resources to help all of them.
LikeLike
The Central Park Easts, which use the exact same admissions process as NYC charters, A. don’t have middle school grades and B. are 30 and 27% FRPL-eligible, which by NYC DOE standards is quite well off, and probably not the type of school Ponderosa had in mind.
Ponderosa, families applying to Newark charters, even those who don’t live in the city, can now use this handy and very mobile-friendly common application: http://newarkenrolls.org/
LikeLike
NYC public school parent– this jersey jazzman post is great for line item cost comparisons between charters & publics, using Newark schools as the example: http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2015/09/dont-believe-data-in-prize.html
His charts show that by far the cost differential resides in public schools’ higher investment in ‘service’ and ‘support’ personnel, i.e., teachers, aides, counselors, librarians, nurses, child study teams (supporting your no.1.)
Admin costs for Newark public schools are at the low end. JJ says this is due to high admin salaries among charters. Interestingly, bldg/ mnt funds are middling. That could mean that charters spend more on their leased facilities (Newark is not reqd to find free space for charters as is NYC). Altho I expect it’s more likely due to failure of NPS over many yrs to make the outlays that would prevent constant boiler bkdns, leaking/ mold etc.
LikeLike
HI Everyone Maatie here!
This is my story so just some additional info for those who wonder why i kept my son in that school for so long… 1. I did not have that many options for a good middle school in the neighborhood we were living in. 2. I had moved several times in the search of better schools ( 3 schools from grade 1 – 4). Third grade a little girl brought a box cutter to school so she could confront another child in his class. Hence why I pulled him just for one year to go to East Orange Charter 3. I belonged to a group of single mom’s that shared responsibility of child care, pick up and drop offs. They did not want to look for another school. Switching schools would have meant losing my network. I have no family in NJ. By the second year I liaised with some of my son’s teachers and the vice-principal so my son and his friends were able to get a little leeway due to the staff not wanting to “deal with me”.
I hope that clarifies some things. Most parents in those towns don’t have the time to fight and protest about school reform. For most working poor finding a safe and secure environment is first on the list before trying to have opinion’s about testing and teaching styles. All parents even those with high-school educations in urban towns want the best education for their children. They don’t always have the time to fight the good fight so they take the best they can get and schools like NSA know it and take advantage.
LikeLike
Maatie, you rock! It is very evident that you value your child and his education. It is also quite apparent that he was able to stay the course and flourish.
I really find the African drums, no Pledge of Allegiance scenario bizarre. I found the admin’s reasoning offensive. With the exception of Native Americans most of us are descendants of immigrants.
Diversity is important and perhaps I am wrong ( I am quite often) but the saying Pledge serves as a unifying activity.
Using the African drums as a signal for assembly is one thing like playing Reveille or ringing a bell but in place of the Pledge?!? I don’t think so.
Thanks for your post. Keep spreading the word.
LikeLike
maatie: I applaud your honesty, your persistence and your courage.
You are your son’s greatest teacher.
Because the most important lessons in life are taught by someone who leads by example, doing the right thing even when it’s very difficult.
😎
LikeLike
+1
LikeLike
My son was accepted into an Uncommon Charter in Brooklyn which was the same model. At the orientation we left and never returned. All of these charters under that Roxbury, CT model are the same. I do not understand why someone would allow their child to endure this and expect a successful outcome. This same son attended two other charters and it was the same implementation of detention. The final straw was when they tried to hold him over. I reenrolled him in public school. Charters are not what they could of been.
LikeLike
North Star in Newark is run by TFA. That is probably all I have to write for you to know, but I will continue.
An interview takes 5 hours. You must read their bible, “teach like a champion.” You must prepare your demo in strict accordance with North Star’s instructions/directions, possibly with another outlay of cash beforehand. Before your demonstration, you are instructed to sit and watch “a real teacher” at work – and that real teacher is a TFA recruit being summer trained for his/her 5 weeks. Even though you have graduated with an Ed degree, are certified and licensed, you are told to watch a TFA trainee show you how its done. Does this not amaze you?
Then you wait another hour or 2, and thereafter, you meet with the principal and she rips you apart. She does an exercise where she acts like an interrupting young “scholar” and you are supposed to shut her down. Then she berates you for having an Ed degree.
I know this because I know of a young teacher who interviewed who left there incredibly upset stating “I could never work there” and “I’ve never been so disappointed in a school in my life.” Ultimately she did not get the job, much to her relief, and the reason she was told is “you are too nice; we do not believe you buy into our discipline policies” to which she replied “you’re right and I’d have declined the job if offered.”
North Star is in a very dangerous section of Newark, NJ. 4 years ago, directly across from the school, there were several abandoned homes. There is crime on the corner.
LikeLike
I wish everyone who leaves a charter would tell their story, like brave Maatie. We know attrition rates are very high. We know kids with special needs are counseled out. We know the management of these places can be as weird as they want to be.
Actual public schools are a safety net now, but that net could break, and then what? We’re getting close to the tipping point.
Before this blog, many of us had nowhere to turn for the truth about the privatization of public education., and how much collateral damage it’s causing.
In the corporate media, Maatie’s story would likely never been told.
LikeLike
If I’m reading between the lines correctly, though, Ms. Alcindor’s story is still a testament to the power of parent choice. She didn’t triumphantly return to East Orange School District schools to help “fix” them; she moved to an adjoining town where there are far fewer at-risk students and a court-ordered integration plan. It’s complicated.
LikeLike
So the power of school choice is to make people move away? Especially people not in the charter industry. Our traditional public schools were supposed to be improved by privatized charters -, what we received is disruption and damage
If charters worked the way the sales pitch said, East Orange School District Schools would be better than the were.
Privatization of our public schools is not the answer to any question but – How do we create more Robber barons?
LikeLike
What is the common thread we keep hearing?
The concept of school “choice” is not what it seems.
It is the charters that really get to “choose”
They choose their parents, and they choose their students.
Parents who think that they made the choice have been fooled by a charter system that does all the choosing.
LikeLike
Is this tracking by other means? I wonder if the push for heterogenous, inclusive, non-tracked public schools helps fuel the rise of charters. I know my own high school education would have been gravely compromised if there hadn’t been tracking. The few non-honors classes I took were battle zones where academics-hating students baited the teachers for sport.
LikeLike
Ponderosa, you raise an issue that deserves an in-depth discussion on this blog (tracking). Many of us posting here went through ps in tracking days. Today it seems to have a bad name, usually cast as a failed method that was justifiably thrown out.
My own tracked ps experience was in a rural college-town. We did not have the behavior issues you cite in non-honors classes. I was in the track just below ‘accelerated’ (top track at my school) & had many friends in ‘average’. Had I been in their classes, I would not have had to stretch to outdo classmates, which would not have been good for me & perhaps unfair to them. The tracks were flexible: several times I found myself in the accelerated track of a subject I’d aced the previous year [a severe stretch for me, but good experience].
My kids’ experience in a relatively wealthy NJ town (’90’s thro ’00’s) seemed better in reaching more kids, yet very similar to my own (even though there was no tracking per se). STEM nerds were able to zip thro algebra in one instead of 2 yrs & complete adv math courses before graduating. 2 of my kids had IEP’s which accommodated their odd combination of hi IQ/ lit/ arts skills plus slow processing. The third benefited from our alternative sch-w/n a sch that catered to those who flourished in a project-oriented curriculum. Bottom line: today’s wealthy ps offers so many options that students can rise to their own level.
Newark ps appears to offer a sort of ‘tracking’ found in very few charters, i.e., ESL, SpEd, social & psych counselors. Are Newark charters offering a missing ‘track’ for higher aptitude students who get lost in the shuffle? I’m not so sure. It’s going to be impossible to figure out in the ‘One Newark’ model (which happened after the author’s son’s experience), as many students have been pushed out of closed ps & assigned willy-nilly to various charters. In many cases parents have to plough through red-tape & waiting periods to get kids re-assigned because they can’t (for example) get 3 kids to 3 geographically far-flung charters.
There will be plenty of others who (like the author) select charter for safety/ security regardless of quality & method. Calling that tracking is a misnomer. It reflects the abject failure of ps to deal w/ behavior.
LikeLike
It isn’t tracking, per se. It is handing over the “franchise” to educate the obedient students who have no learning issues to a private organization. Since their “franchise” is only those kids, they are absolved of educating any others who turn out not to be those kids.
Kind of like a public hospital turning over the “franchise” to treat the patients with strep throat and twisted ankles to a private organization so they can profit from the least expensive part of delivering health care.
That was never what charters were supposed to be about. They were supposed to provide models to public schools for ways to educate the kids who were failing. Not cherry pick the ones who were not.
The problem is that charters who actually embraced that mission were “failures”. The ones who pretended to embrace it while purposely targeting “unsuccessful students” for removal were financially rewarded.
“No excuses” is and has always been one of the biggest frauds in education. Its’ purpose was to provide an excuse for a charter school to weed out the students it didn’t want and keep the ones it did. That’s why the no excuses charter schools expanding into middle class markets don’t really use it as there are fewer students among the offspring of middle class college grads that need to be weeded out.
If charters had been honest about their success instead of pretending that no excuses worked some miracle on the exact same poor kids found in failing public schools, you might see public schools figuring out ways to address the needs of the kids who disturb learning or need more academic intervention separately from the students who are well-behaved and can learn easily. But what the fraud has wrought is politicians thinking that those schools should manage with less money and no real resources since of course, the fraudulent “no excuses” schools get great results with the exact same students with less money. Except they don’t and never have. They receive more money to teach only the kids who can be taught cheaply in their system.
LikeLike
Okay, I said I was going to mind my business and let you guys discuss but I just wanted to say this…
Please don’t think that or education woes were resolved because we moved to a better school district. Once my son got into high school there was a rude awakening that my job was not over. There were / are subtle differences in the way minority students are treated period. The high school my son went to had opportunities for small learning communities (for grades 10 – 12) that were never mentioned by his advisor. I had to push for him to apply to the program and others like it with an advisor who could be less than bothered to help. My son and I did all of the foot work. End of junior year my son was “advised” to drop out of AP History in spite of him having an A in the class. He was told that the next year was going to be too hard and he was better off taking the High Honors class. By the time I got the advisor on the phone to ask how they managed to change his class without my signature I was told it was too late to change him back as the class was full. Every step of the way up until now we have fought to get the best opportunities including college internships as the minority student is not always taken seriously. We have had to make our opportunities, network ourselves and just keep pushing through. I have been able to do this because of my flexible work schedule and the fact that I only have one child. Most of my friends cannot as they are being pulled in a million directions where I can focus on one. The better school district was not the end of our troubles just a change in scenery.
LikeLike
This clearly is your business and I for appreciate the added details–and let me say that you should comment more often even on issues that aren’t your business! Parent voices help to add nuance and perspective. Thank you!
LikeLike
Thank you for posting. That is utterly appalling that your son would be told to drop out of an AP Class in which he was getting an A. I hope you were able to fight that.
It saddens me tremendously that you would have experienced so much blatant racism and that your friends are experiencing the same without the time and resources to fight it. I do think that the difference between public and charter schools is that if you raise your voice loud enough and your cause is just, public schools can’t get away with it. Charter schools seem to use the word “choice” to mean “our way or the highway” — as in “you chose this school so if you don’t like it, leave”.
Nonetheless, it is inexcusable that a public school could practice such blatant discrimination. Whoever is responsible should be fired.
LikeLike
Read more about it in the upcoming solutions based book “Why We Failed: 40 Years of Education Reform.” http:/.www.lonniepalmer.com
LikeLike