I earlier posted about a reformy conference at Harvard Graduate School of Education where corporate reformers have the platform to themselves, to praise the measure-and-punish-and-privatize strategies that have failed for more than a decade.
Here is good news if you are in the New York-New Jersey-Pennsylvania area. Rutgers University is sponsoring a conference on May 20 to take a close look at what is being done in the name of “reform” and what should be done instead. The panels are the polar opposite of the workshops at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Here is a thumbnail sketch:
Session 1
There will be two concurrent sessions. Click a paper to see abstracts.
Session 1.1: Choice, Charters and Segregation
The Effect of Charter Schools on Neighborhood and School Segregation: Evidence from New York City (Sarah A. Cordes, Temple University, and Augustina Laurito, NYU)
The Untold Story of the Morris School District and the Quest for Educational Diversity (Paul Tractenberg, Rutgers -Newark Law School)
Evaluation of Charter School Impacts: The Cases of Newark and Trenton (Maia de la Calle, Rutgers University)
Charter School Effectiveness Research: Do We Really Know if “Successful” Charters are, in Fact, Successful (Mark Weber, Rutgers University)
Do No-Excuses Disciplinary Practices Promote Success? (Joanna Golann, Princeton University, and Chris Torres, Montclair State University)
Charting School Discipline (Susan DeJarnatt, Temple University, and Kerrin Wolf, Stockton University)
Session 1.2: Standards and Assessment
Misinformation and Misconceptions about PARCC, College Readiness and Mathematics Education (Eric Milou, Rowan University)
More [Time] is Better or Less is More (Allison Roda, Rutgers University-Newark)
What Happens to Students When Corporate Reform Fails?: Oklahoma City as a Case Study of the Test and Sort School Reform Experiment (John Thompson)
Problems with High Stakes Testing: Exploring the Gap Between Citizen Concerns and Government Recommendations (Sue Altman)
Hacking Away at Pearson & the Corporate Octopus (Alan Singer, Hofstra University)
Session 2
Session 2.1: Finance, Private Investment and the State
The Business of Charter Schooling: Understanding the Policies that Charter Operators Use for Financial Benefit (Bruce Baker, Rutgers University, and Gary Miron, Western Michigan University)
The Impact of Charter Schools on Suburban Districts: The Case of Red Bank, NJ (Julia Sass Rubin, Rutgers University)
Planning School Improvement Districts (Ken Steif, University of Pennsylvania)
TFA’s Leadership Model and Neoliberal Education Reform (Leah Z. Owens, Rutgers University – Newark)
Poverty, Student Achievement and Union-Management Collaboration in Public School Reform (Saul A. Rubinstein, Rutgers University)
Session 2.2: Schools and Neighborhoods
Making the Public Choice: How Parents in Philadelphia’s Gentrifying (and Gentrified) Neighborhoods are Choosing Neighborhood Schools (Katharine Nelson, Rutgers University)
Altering the Relationship between Neighborhood and School to Improve Life Chances (Ryan Coughlan, Rutgers-Newark)
A Community Good? Developers, New Schools and Gentrification (Molly Vollman Makris, Guttman Community College/City University of New York, and Elizabeth Brown, William Paterson University)
The School Choice Decision for 70 Families with Diverse Backgrounds in Oakland (Carrie Makarewicz, University of Colorado Denver)
School Choice and Latina/o Students: Misappropriating the Notion of Diversity (Michael Scott, University of Texas at Austin)
“Opt-Out” as Democratic Civic Engagement (Monica Clark, Temple University)
Session 3.1: Democracy and Education
A Tale of Two Cities: Education in Global Chicago (Constance A. Mixon, Elmhurst College)
Democracy and National Education Standards (Nicholas Tampio, Fordham University)
The Renaissance will be Technocratic: Contrasting Community Voice with Educational Leaders in Camden, NJ (Stephen Danley, Rutgers University – Camden)
Fighting Against Their Just Prescriptions and Fighting for Our Visions for Educational Justice (Liza Pappas and Zakiyah Ansari, Alliance for Quality Education)
Better for Whom? Community Perspectives on State-Mandated Charters (Keith Benson, Rutgers University – Camden)
Session 3.2: Closing Schools
Using National Data to Understand School Closures (Megan Gallagher, Rolf Pendall, Sierra Latham, and Tanaya Srini, The Urban Institute)
Constructing Students as Targets: Racial Differences in Attitudes Towards Public School Closure (Sally Nuama, Northwestern University)
Injustice and School Closure (Jacob Fay, Harvard University)
Neighborhoods, Schools and Economic Landscapes: Rooting Schools in Place in Philadelphia’s School Closure Debate (Ryan Good, Rutgers University)
A City Reimagined: Baltimore’ s School Closings (Jessica Shiller, Towson University)
Branding Against Closure: Philadelphia Neighborhood Schools and the Management of Risky Futures (Julia McWilliams, University of Pennsylvania)
An interesting contrast: The Harvard Graduate School of Education conference is peppered with politicians and media celebrities.
The Rutgers conference features scholars who have actually studied the subjects they are writing and speaking about.
Isn’t that amazing?

Session 2, is an indictment of all of the Lewis Powell Republican and Democratic politicians who confirmed a privatizing Secretary of Education. When Gates funds “Senior Congressional Education Staff Network”, for the Aspen Institute, which has David Koch on its Board. IMO, we can expect the common good to be destroyed.
Harvard shills for the 0.1%. JFK is turning over in his grave.
In reputation, Rutgers moves way ahead, of schools like little h, harvard, which builds a dais for the un-noted scholar, Campbell Brown (backed by the Walton’s, infamous for valuing profits over people). A great message for students.
LikeLike
AMEN to your comment, Linda.
And AMEN to Diane’s last 3 sentences.
LikeLike
Diane, thank you so much for posting this. My hats odd to Rutgers. This is fantastic. John
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
It’s the difference between “Peer review” (Rutgers) and “Pee-er review” (Harvard)
LikeLike
amusingly clever, again
LikeLike
“Harv Ed Pee-er Review”
The Harvard Pee-er Review
is really something new
Replacing edu journal
With Harvard edu urinal
LikeLike
This could give urinals a bad name.
LikeLike
“Harvard edu urinal”. Thanks for the laugh.
LikeLike
The reformers who own and/or run most if not all of the autocratic and opaque corporate charter schools have not failed to make a profit, and they haven’t failed at making their fraud mostly legal. Maybe that is how they measure their success — not student achievement gains but fatter bank accounts fueled by public funds that once supported community based, transparent, non-profit, democratic public education.
LikeLike
Wonderful news. Best yet. Will try to go. Harvard has always been a slippery slope even tho I have dear friends who used to be connected. Today I know no one. Best Eva
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
What a refreshing breath of rare sanity. Oh how I wish I could attend every session. I hope they will be available on video. I like Brown’s Annenberg Foundation reports but didn’t know about Rutgers work.
LikeLike
Unlike Harvard I don’t believe Rutgers takes funding from Walton or Gates. Go RU!
LikeLiked by 1 person
They may even be able to present some evidence based information rather than hype and spin!
LikeLike
I was stunned when it finally dawned on me that our great universities, such as Stanford and Harvard, were producing “research studies” to please the people funding them. Perhaps now universities without such great endowments will be the ones to conduct research without strings attached.
More than anything, education needs the truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is a term for slanting studies to please those who are funding you: scientific fraud.
It used to be that this would get you booted right out of the academy.
But now (at least in fields like education and economics) it can get you recognition at the highest levels.
LikeLike
Contrary to what one might expect, endowments seem to have a perverse influence on the independence of a university.
Places like Harvard seem never to be satisfied with all the billions in their endowments and seem always to be looking for more, which they can only do by pleasing donors.
LikeLike
“Perhaps now universities without such great endowments will be the ones to conduct research without strings attached.”
Those universities “with strings attached” remind me of Middle Ages “universities” run by the Catholic Church (with funding from wealthy patrons)
“More than anything, education needs the truth.”
Be sure to read my soon to be published (should be available in the next couple of weeks) book “Infidelity to Truth: Educational Malpractices in American Public Education” for what is hopefully an insightful look into issues of “truth” in education.
LikeLike
I hope the lectures will be taped and put on youtube.
LikeLike
Wasn’t Harvard always the university of snobocracy?
LikeLike
At one time, Harvard, despite a few politicians to the contrary, was viewed as a university, of scholarship and outreach, in service to humanity.
Now, IMO, symptoms of affluenza dominate Harvard’s reputation, like the economics professor who went ballistic against a small Chinese restaurant owner, over a few pennies and, Harvard gouging the government, with research overhead payments, 30% higher than other universities. (Boston Globe).
LikeLike
Not just Harvard. Universities increasingly are doing work for private interests: they get grants from private companies to do work for them. Profs are even told, they need to make money for their university.
At public universities, this is particularly controversial: profs are paid from public funds but they end up doing work for private companies instead of the public.
You can imagine what a prof will say about Microsoft to a class if he has a grant from Gates, or whether he’ll choose a free database software for his class or makes the students pay for the one from Oracle if he has a grant from Oracle, or if he’ll push for graduate students to take GRE if he has a grant from ETS, GRE’s parent company.
LikeLike
A California professor, at a public university said, his university only receives 12% from state sources.
LikeLike
Do you have more information about the Rutgers conference? I would love to attend.
LikeLike
You can register at this link, also included in Diane’s post above:
http://edandsocialjustice.wix.com/rutgersedconference
LikeLike
All the information is on the link in the post.
You can also contact Rutgers Professor Julia Sass Rubin. jlsrubin@rutgers.edu
LikeLike
The future of Harvard:
LikeLike
Thanks for that one, Akademos!
LikeLike
Reminds me of this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur5fGSBsfq8
You gotta love Monty Python!
LikeLike
So encouraging! YAY Rutgers!
LikeLike