The appropriations committee in the Arizona House voted 8-5 to approve vouchers (called “Empowerment Scholarship Accounts”) for about half of the state’s 1.1 million students. One of the supporters of the bill wanted vouchers for every student in the state. The vouchers will drain students and funding from public schools. There is no evidence that vouchers improves education, but it is a red-button issue for libertarians, who want to eliminate public schools. They seem unaware that every nation with successful schools has a strong public school system, with neither vouchers nor charters. I cannot explain why Republicans are so unwilling to call vouchers by their rightful name. They have come up with all kinds of euphemism (“opportunity scholarships,” “education savings accounts,” etc.), but a voucher is a voucher is a voucher. Vouchers have not improved the schools or the educational outcomes of children in Milwaukee, the District of Columbia, or Cleveland. But when dealing with ideologues, facts are irrelevant. Republicans in Arizona are determined to wipe out public education, step by step, starting with vouchers for special education, then expanding until it is vouchers for all.
A House panel voted late Wednesday to let more than half the 1.1 million students in Arizona schools use public dollars to attend private and parochial schools.
The 8-5 vote by the Appropriations Committee follows the failure of supporters of vouchers to line up the votes in the House to open the door for all students. Sen. Debbie Lesko, R-Peoria, said she hopes this scaled-back proposal gains more support.
Lesko also crafted this version of SB 1279 to try to overcome opposition from those who say that the vouchers are used largely by families who already can afford to send their kids to private schools.
It limits eligibility to students whose family income qualifies them for free- or reduced-price lunch programs. For a family of four, that figure is $44,863 a year.
Stacey Morley, lobbyist for the Arizona Education Association, said the most recent figures show about 565,000 students participating in those programs.
But that may not cover everyone who would be eligible.
Morley said high schools are not required to have such programs. Nor are charter schools.
That means the number of children whose family income would qualify them could be higher.
Lesko told lawmakers they should not worry there would be a sudden flood of children, armed with scholarships worth about $5,400 a year, fleeing public schools and taking with them the state aid that had gone to those schools. She said state law limits vouchers to no more than one-half percent of public schools students, or about 5,500 youngsters.
But Rep. Mark Cardenas, D-Phoenix, pointed out that cap disappears after 2019.
And Rep. Justin Olson, R-Mesa, conceded his goal is to eventually make vouchers available to every public school student in Arizona.

The libertarians in this country, a movement that is arguably financed and led by the Koch brothers, exercises far more power than their numbers warrant.
“It’s correct to say that few Americans identify as libertarian. Only 11 percent said the term ‘libertarian’ describes them well, according to a 2014 Pew Research poll.” – Nate Silver
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/there-are-few-libertarians-but-many-americans-have-libertarian-views/
Then there is this:
How Billionaire Libertarians Control the American Political System
Investigative journalist and staff writer for The New Yorker Jane Mayer spent spent five years conducting hundreds of interviews and examining records to uncover how billionaires with strong libertarian views have worked to fundamentally alter the American political system. In Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right, she reveals how the Koch brothers and others have shaped policy and legislation.
http://www.wnyc.org/story/how-billionaire-libertarians-control-american-political-system/
LikeLike
Euphemisms can be very helpful when seeking to accomplish a political goal. Republicans with help from Frank Luntz have been remarkably successful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is not just the Libertardian mindset on the march here, it is also the crypto theocrats who wish to drive all students into religious education with no consideration of the actual quality of education provided, “faith based” being their only test. If you want to learn more of the depths of depravity that is Libertarianism, read up on the Buchanan hearings where Milton Friedman was dragged before congress to testify about how he, at the behest of a bunch of “industrialists” fabricated libertardianism out of the purple frustrations of men who saw no reason why they couldn’t pollute, exploit workers, and any and everything else they wanted to do in the pursuit of profit and power. Libertardianism is to politics what Sweetest Day is to Christmas, a faux holiday whose sole purpose was to increase the sales and profits of greeting card companies. http://www.alternet.org/visions/true-history-libertarianism-america-phony-ideology-promote-corporate-agenda
LikeLike
Purple??? I truly hate having to fight it out with auto correct. Should have been “puerile”.
LikeLike
True, there are more forces at work to destroy the public school than just the libertarians and their masters, two of the Koch brothers. But there is an old adage that says the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
The neo-liberals want to destroy the public schools + the libertarians, and the crypto theocrats = an alliance of forces from the underworld. Once they have achieved their primary goal and the public schools are gone, then they will turn on each other.
LikeLike
The present form of the proposed legislation shows the cynicism of the R legislators. What child on free or reduced lunch could possibly afford private school tuition, roughly double the value of a voucher.
AZ has a piece of proposed legislation that would eliminate sate defined desegregation funds to select districts, a program supporting children in greatest need, only because one district should not receive more than any other district, regardless of need. The same argument will be used in the next legislative session to expand vouchers to all students.
Richard Gilman has just written an excellent article on AZ vouchers: http://www.bringinguparizona.com/poor-are-pawns-on-vouchers/
Should I add that a sitting and voting state senator, Steve Yarbrough, takes 10% of the so-called scholarship funds as an administrative fee?
LikeLike
Their state legislature is completely captured by the ed reform “choice” faction.
Hey. it could be worse. These thousands of state employees could be spending 24/7 on testing, which is the OTHER ed reform obsession and one that actually has some relevancy to children in public schools.
When’s the last time ed reform focused on something positive for children in public schools? The public employees in Arizona seem to have spent the last 9 months securing state subsidies for private schools. Do they ever do anything on behalf of the unfashionable “public sector” schools, or would that violate their ideology?
LikeLike
Where are the Democrats as advocates for public schools, BTW? Have they made themselves completely irrelevant and useless by following “free market reform” like loyal soldiers for the cause?
Have the potted plant “agnostics” weighed in yet, or are they waiting until ed reformers give them permission to object?
How many public school kids are there in Arizona? Can they hire an effective advocate?
LikeLike
The Democratic members of the AZ legislature are very much committed to public education. Despite every effort, their voice is the minority and ignored. Roughly 1 million kids in K-12 of which about 85% in regular public schools. Last year the legislature tried to pass a law silencing superintendents and board members. It failed. In the past year the volume of public school advocate has increased substantially. Despite a referendum to support public education, the governor and legislators ignored it, resulting in law suit. The compromise agreement pays about 70% of what is owed and requires another referendum since it draws on public trust funds – plus other issues. If the voucher legislation passes it will draw on these funds.
LikeLike
I don’t know if you-all saw the latest UNO scandal, but it’s bipartisan. Both Republicans and Democrats backed and promoted this fraud in the name of “ed reform”
Is bipartisan corruption and capture somehow superior to partisan corruption and capture?
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/uno-united-neighborhood-organization-charter-schools-chicago-spending-revealed-juan-rangel/
LikeLike
The taxpayers of Illinois should revolt! The amount of waste and fraud associated with charters is disturbing, and the corruption is on both sides of the aisle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
John Kirtley, chairman of Step Up for Students (Florida vouchers), giving speech at 2016 Catholic Foundation Celebration.
https://vimeo.com/156027350
He indicates that at least 50 Catholic schools would close if the court rules in favor of Citizens for Strong Schools. Since when is it the taxpayers’ responsibility to keep private and religious schools open? According to the Florida Tax Credit Final report, 19.3% of the new FTC students come from an “A” school and 25.1% come from a “D” or “F” school. That means 55.6% come from “B” or “C” schools. In other words, 74.9% of the kids are coming from schools that are not failing.
He says 80,000 kids would be sent back to public schools and currently they are saving the taxpayers 10’s of millions of dollars. Wouldn’t sending the kids back to public schools
– Put property back on the tax rolls
– Fill the seats of under-enrolled schools; therefore, providing the efficiency that is specified in the state constitution (Adequate provision shall be made by law for a uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality system of free public schools that allows students to obtain a high quality education)
He says the bishops raised $300,000 to fight the lawsuit. If these bishops are so pious, why aren’t they raising money and giving these kids scholarship without the taxpayers having to give money to religious schools.
LikeLike
Here is one of the latest state legislative moves to reduce the power of local school boards, parents, and teachers.
In Tennessee, Bill Dunn, a Republican legislator is proposing a constitutional amendment that would permit the legislature, at its sole discretion, to determine how to fund public education and when the budget was “adequate.”
Here is the proposed language for the constitution:
” The State of Tennessee recognizes the inherent value of education and encourages its support. The General Assembly as the elected representatives of the people shall provide for the maintenance, support and eligibility standards of a system of free public schools in such manner as the General Assembly may determine. The General Assembly may establish and support such postsecondary educational institutions, including public institutions of higher learning, as it determines.”
The current language is
“The state of Tennessee recognizes the inherent value of education and encourages its support. The General Assembly shall provide for the maintenance, support and eligibility standards of a system of free public schools.”
The aim is to remove all claims that the system of funding is not equitable and all judicial oversight of such claims. http://nashvillepublicradio.org/post/why-one-tennessee-lawmaker-wants-change-what-state-constitution-says-about-education-funding#stream/0
I think that other states will be trying to modify their constitutions to prevent citizens from bringing court cases on inequities and budget reductions (while preserving tax breaks for corporations).
One of the best overviews of the current language in state constitutions regarding public education has been compiled by Molly A. Hunter, ELC (Education Law Center), Newark, NJ . See more at http://pabarcrc.org/pdf/Molly%20Hunter%20Article.pdf
And there is the unbelievable Alabama’s constitution, still calling for segregated schools. with efforts to remove the Jim Crow language defeated in 2012 in 2014
Text of Section 256:
Duty of Legislature to Establish and Maintain Public School System; Apportionment of Public School Fund; Separate Schools for White and Colored Children.
“-The legislature shall establish, organize, and maintain a liberal system of public schools throughout the state for the benefit of the children thereof between the ages of seven and twenty-one years. The public school fund shall be apportioned to the several counties in proportion to the number of school children of school age therein, and shall be so apportioned to the schools in the districts or townships in the counties as to provide, as nearly as practicable, school terms of equal duration in such school districts or townships. Separate schools shall be provided for white and colored children, and no child of either race shall be permitted to attend a school of the other race.
“Amendment 111 regarding Sec. 256. Educational policy of the state; authority of legislature to provide for or authorize establishment and operation of schools by persons, municipalities, etc.; grant, donation, sale or lease of funds and property for educational purposes; election of certain schools for attendance by parents of minors.”
“It is the policy of the state of Alabama to foster and promote the education of its citizens in a manner and extent consistent with its available resources, and the willingness and ability of the individual student, but nothing in this Constitution shall be construed as creating or recognizing any right to education or training at public expense, nor as limiting the authority and duty of the legislature, in furthering or providing for education, to require or impose conditions or procedures deemed necessary to the preservation of peace and order.”
“The legislature may by law provide for or authorize the establishment and operation of schools by such persons, agencies or municipalities, at such places, and upon such conditions as it may prescribe, and for the grant or loan of public funds and the lease, sale or donation of real or personal property to or for the benefit of citizens of the state for educational purposes under such circumstances and upon such conditions as it shall prescribe. Real property owned by the state or any municipality shall not be donated for educational purposes except to nonprofit charitable or eleemosynary corporations or associations organized under the laws of the state.”
“To avoid confusion and disorder and to promote effective and economical planning for education, the legislature may authorize the parents or guardians of minors, who desire that such minors shall attend schools provided for their own race, to make election to that end, such election to be effective for such period and to such extent as the legislature may provide.”
If anyone can find a correction on this language an amendment, please let me know.
LikeLike
They come up with all these funny names for them because they are legalistic ways of skirting the tax/religious issues associated with them.
The line they draw which is a technicality is the state not collecting taxes vs taking in taxes and giving it to schools as vouchers. In the ESA/tax credit scheme, the state just doesn’t collect your taxes and puts them towards that education option while only paying out based on a school’s enrollment. Taxes weren’t collected, money isn’t taken directly from a student who there is no mechanism to show they were ever enrolled and their tution transferred – legal voucher magic even though the net effect is the same- people’s tax money ends up in private hands and enrollment/payments to public schools drop.
That is why all the shenanigans – once you intend to use tax money for something it has different due process than credits or “scholarships”
LikeLike