A teacher left this comment on the blog:
Your blog has provided me solace in my darkest times as an educator. I have left two comments on your blog. One of the comments I left as anonymous (because I feared the consequences, some imaginary and some very real, if that mega-influential corporation worth multi-millions in California, who ran the charter school where I was last working, found out I had said anything), which you shared as a post with your readers. And another time I left a comment as myself to applaud all that you share.
I am sad to report that I have to leave this comment as anonymous as well. Although it has been almost a year since I worked at that place ( I am no longer even in that state), I still haven’t found the courage to share all that went on there. I am a daughter of a man who was granted political asylum a long time ago, a man who came to this country risking everything, including his life, so as to be able to exercise his freedom of expression. And yet here I am, afraid to share that story because of that corporation. I have enough knowledge of the law to know that I can’t be prosecuted for libel or defamation if I shared the truth. But legal action is the last thing one needs to worry about when it comes to these corporations; they can ruin your lives.
I have worked as an educator in three states now (east coast, west coast, and southwest, sorry I can’t reveal more) and I can tell you that the problem isn’t going to be fixed by either of the Democratic candidates. My African-American friends tell me that they can’t support Bernie because focusing on class takes away from focusing on race. My white friends tell me they want to support Hillary because America hasn’t had a female president yet. Relatives who have identified with the Republican party in its so called glory days feel disloyal switching parties even if they don’t support Trump. The only thing all of them have in common is they have no clue, absolutely none, about what is going on in public and charter schools. Teachers every day are dealing with parents who are really ignorant or really entitled; administrators who have very little control over decisions; and responsibilities that go far beyond inspiring real learning.
Can any candidate fix any of the following?
1) Parents, regardless of their socio-economic status, are unable to raise their children like they once could. Of course, this is even worse for those who have had to deal with generational poverty.
2) Teachers who have no mentors and are getting their lessons from Pinterest (I love all the websites for teachers; technology has made sharing of ideas so easy for educators but it doesn’t address lack of depth of knowledge that teachers now have). Teachers who have little to no knowledge of history are teaching social studies.
3) Learning for the sake of learning, for exploring curiosities that instill desire to change the world, is no longer acceptable. If you are not going to work for Google (which may not even exist by the time some of these kids grow up), what is your education worth? A college degree is now the equivalent of a high school diploma, except one used to be able to get a job with a high school diploma and could still be a literate citizen. We can’t fail kids.
4) The shoving of technology in the classrooms as a solution.
5) The preying of corporations in the form of charters on communities where you can’t find teachers, experienced administrators, and parents who don’t have knowledge.
6) The inclusion of students who once had to go to behavior programs because they just couldn’t work with other students are now the teacher’s responsibility or the parent will sue the school.
Once upon a time, Hillary Clinton wrote a book, It Takes a Village: And Other Lessons Children Teach Us that influenced me deeply. This was in 1996. I was inspired by her clarity. I wished she was the President then. Except a few years later we got the No Child Left Behind by a different president.
It baffles me how a woman who once believed and wrote, “forward-thinking teachers and school administrators across the country are creating a whole range of alternatives to cookie-cutter teaching and evaluation methods, such as the use of student portfolios and exhibitions in addition to conventional exams to assess students’ progress” could support the privatization of charters that do nothing but testing.
I have emails upon emails from former students who were passionate learners when I had them who are now stating, “we are so tired of interim testing every few weeks.” Most people don’t know that in addition to PARCC and SBACC, if the school can afford it, there is interim testing. The frequency depends on the administration. The less an administrator knows about education, the more testing there is, as if magically the students will read and write better by taking more tests.
No one is asking any candidate real questions because no one in a position to ask knows any better.
I don’t know how long we can continue fighting the good fight regardless of who “wins”. At the local district and state level, everyone is in bed with Silicon Valley in one way or another, this delusion that somehow the start-up generation is going to jump start education, a car they have never even sat in, is beyond ludicrous at this point.
Both Trump and Sanders are extremes. I am afraid Clinton will offer more of the same Obama “progress” and we just can’t have more of the same anymore. The country will crumble under Trump, an extreme, sad, crumbling, but perhaps that’s the only way forward after it all falls apart for good instead of pretending things are fine like we have for the last 8 years.
I respect all you said and all you do. I thank the Universe for this blog every night!
Sincerely,
Very tired teacher who won’t give up.

Great Article! Be sure to take care of yourself. I’m working in my classroom right now. All of the extra paperwork…I can’t get it all done during regular school hours. The only thing that keeps me going is next year is my last year. If it wasn’t, I think I would have to retrain. Also, my children are older, and they are busy in practices and etc. I am so thankful that my husband and I were able to raise our children before my profession became unmanageable, crazy, and toxic. I could not have done this crazy career when my children were little and very dependent on me when they were in elementary school.
It is all sad what has become of our profession. I know you say you won’t give up, but don’t let this toxic profession destroy and eat you alive either. Thank you for your article. I love Diane’s blog too. I thank God for it. I look forward to her articles every day.
LikeLike
I have heard political commentators complain that teachers spend about six hours in the classroom and go home. One I have heard, a local Boston woman, made this comment, yet she is only on the air three hours a day. Now I know that if I pointed that out to her she would respond by saying she spends hours preparing for each program and I know this is probably true, but what she does not seem to understand is that teachers in order to teach six hours a day (twice the amount of time she spends doing what she does on the air) teachers have to put in hours preparing for each class and in addition there is the grading. Suppose this radio commentator after the show had to respond to each comment and assess its relevance and value. I think too many people outside of education think that we just go into class, make it up as we go and then go home and play. The way I individualize instruction is by responding to the problems I see in the work that individual students do and try to address those problems, advise them on how to remedy those problems, and, perhaps most difficult of all, encourage students not to stop trying and help them to believe in themselves. I often think how absurd it would be if the government told other professionals how to do their jobs, what chaos there would be. It would be like setting up a system where accountants told doctors how to practice medicine, or lobbyists told lawyers how to practice law. That could never happen, right? It reminds me of the land of Laputa in “Gulliver’s Travels” where people who know nothing of farming or architecture dictate to farmers how to run their farms and to builders how to build their buildings. The result is that nothing grows and all the buildings are falling down.
Cordially,
J. D. Wilson, Jr.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I have heard political commentators complain that teachers spend about six hours in the classroom and go home. ”
Even if this was the case, it’s too much, especially in this country where the breaks are only 5 min long. You cannot be excited, encouraging, enthusiastic for more than 4 classes a day.
Teaching is not the same kind of job as most others where you, say, sit in front of the computer, can yawn, chew gum, look depressed, sleepy, be grouchy, think about the beach or the little cabin in mountains. You have to be in top form, you have to be inspiring, you cannot relax: kids are watching you, want to learn from you, want to catch you not paying attention to them.
Nobody says, actors or opera singers should be on the stage for 8 hours a day. Teaching is similar to acting, except you have to improvise a lot if you want to stay interesting, unpredictable.
LikeLike
JDW Jr,
NJ Governor Christie thinks teachers work only 10 months a year, have all those weeks off. However, his wife, Mary Pat Christie, was working 10 days per month for well more than $400K (before she resigned to join him campaigning). One of his lawyers for the Bridgegate investigation bills $350 per hour to defend 1 governor; a median-salary NJ teacher earns about that per day instructing 25 students at a time.
LikeLike
As a teacher who found herself pushed out of a much loved inner-city district by the insanity of test-score “reforms,” I have looked for, and found, a lot of emotional support out here in the world of bloggers!
LikeLike
I sometimes think of standup comedians who spend a year or so working an act, polishing and refining the act, then making a record (do they still make records they did in my youth, not sure anymore) than doing an HBO special. Then after about two years start the process all over again with a new act. Classroom teachers have to come up with (in Massachusetts) 180 different acts for two or three different preps in a single year. When the next year comes there is some refining of the act, but due to the dynamics of the classroom the old stuff often doesn’t work as well. I know this is a bit hyperbolic, but teachers have to be able to improvise the presentation of the material have studied and devote a good deal of their time continuing to study. This is not to say we make up what we teach, but that we have to keep the presentation of the material that is the heart of our discipline spontaneous and fresh in order to engage students who often do not share our enthusiasm for what we teach.
Cordially,
J. D. Wilson, Jr.
LikeLike
“This is not to say we make up what we teach, but that we have to keep the presentation of the material that is the heart of our discipline spontaneous and fresh in order to engage students who often do not share our enthusiasm for what we teach.”
Exactly: people go to theater because they want to, and usually they are already psyched up. Kids go to school because they have to, and they usually come with an attitude.
LikeLike
To the teacher who wrote this: I hear ya! I, too, was blessed to find this blog, and I had a chance to thank Diane in person at NPE Conference of Chicago. She was very humble. This blog saved my life in many ways. It helped me see that I was not the problem, but the system had become toxic. Since then, I’ve changed my teaching position, taking a massive pay cut in the process…but where I am now, although not completely safe from rephormy thinking, is a much healthier teaching environment. I’m scraping by, but am able to take better care of my health. Education in America is now toxic…NOT because of teachers, but because of corporate influence and austerity. I hope you are, or will be, in a place where you can TEACH, and take care of you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, that’s quite a rant. Lot of points as a fellow teacher I can really relate to.
LikeLike
What a wonderful article! Without Diane Ravitch & Jonathan Pelto’s blogs I don’t feel as though I would have a clue as to what is going on! I have loved teaching, since switching careers from the corporate world. We all must try to remember that we have to continue to focus on teaching & learning as doing whatever we can for the kids. Hopefully, the intentional, unnecessary paperwork that we’re inundated with won’t swallow us up in the process. Keep doing what you do for our children and do the best that you can do with the rest, until somehow, it is gone.
LikeLike
“Can any candidate fix any of the following?”
No candidate can fix those things on their own. Some candidates will be better than others at setting up foundations for these changes, and leading us to make these changes.
“Sanders is extreme”
Sanders’s positions are those of the majority of American people, he is a true democratic representative. He is only extreme if it is extreme to fight for more affordable healthcare and higher education, paid family and medical leave, racial justice, infrastructure reconstruction, immigration reform, campaign finance reform, climate change/energy system reform, veteran healthcare reform, diplomacy over regime change, raising the minimum wage, the right to collective bargaining, open internet, gender equality, fair trade, expanding social security… and telling the truth in politics.
Anyone who still calls Sanders “extreme” continues to be deceived by corrupt mainstream media.
LikeLike
“Anyone who still calls Sanders “extreme” continues to be deceived by corrupt mainstream media.”
Exactly. Even 50 years ago, Bernie would have been mainstream.
“This was accomplished through a series of policies that if they were proposed today, would strike most Americans as socialist-Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, strong union rights, high minimum wages, high marginal tax rates on the wealthy (with a 90 percent top rate under Eisenhower), and strong enforcement of financial regulations and anti-trust laws.
Democratic presidential candidates that can be associated with this ideological tradition include Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Adlai Stevenson, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, and George McGovern. That’s it. Starting with Jimmy Carter in 1976, the Democratic Party became something different, something that was no longer ideologically continuous with this. Even the Republican Party to a large degree acknowledged the need for these policies during this period-Eisenhower and Nixon supported and even extended parts of this system that kept investment and consumption in balance.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/benjamin-studebaker/bernie-vs-hillary-matters-more-than-people-think_b_9209940.html
What sensible businessmen 50 years ago realized, people need money in order to buy their products. Otherwise
“Whenever there is too little consumption to support the level of investment in the economy, investors struggle to find profitable places to invest their money.
Investment is usually a positive thing — it helps businesses increase their production and create jobs. But with consumption weak, businesses have little reason to increase their production, because no one will buy the additional goods and services provided. So instead, businesses that receive investment tend to reinvest that money rather than use it to grow. That investment circulates through the financial system and accumulates in speculative bubbles — places like the stock market, housing market, commodities market, or various foreign markets.
These assets become massively overvalued until one day, the markets recognize the overvaluation. The assets collapse in value and the bubble bursts. People relying on these assets to pay off other debts get into serious trouble, and a contagion can spread throughout the economy with horrifying consequences.”
LikeLike
I agree ED, Sanders is the only candidate making sense and talking about real issues that matter to most Americans. Sanders is supposedly extreme because he wants Medicare for all or single payer?!? Is this where we are in 2016? Truly sad and tragic. All the other wealthy democracies have some form or version of true universal health care but not the richest country on earth. At one time, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid were portrayed as extreme and “commie” pipe dreams by the right wingers and the AMA but we now take them for granted as basic necessary programs.
LikeLike
My latest observation garnered me Effective ratings on everything except Student Engagement. The problem was that the students weren’t talking enough – too focused on the text and answering scaffolding questions to help familiarize them with the data. Instead, it was suggested that in my next observation I would be more effective if I remove scaffolding and just give students the overarching question which they are expected to debate. This supposedly will force them to be more actively discussing the text and thereby “engaged”. My job is apparently to get right out of the way. All my hours preparing multimedia presentations and guided readings are wasted. I have a BA in History and two MAs. But the teacher evaluation system forces me to comply with their prescribed pedagogy.
LikeLike
Wow. What a post.
The fact that dedicated teachers like you are under pressure to post anonymously is a tragic indictment of the direction public education is taking in our country. Our democracy can only suffer if teachers and students feel this way.
It’s people like you who keep this blog going. So, thanks to you for writing….and not giving up.
LikeLike
I borrowed this comment from Peter Greene’s blog article entitled “High Infidelity”. It is being re-posted for anyone who thinks that Pearson is in it “for the kids”.
The blog post:
http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2016/03/high-infidelity.html
The reader comment:
Dear Mr. Greene:
My fidelity warning follows. It includes my first clue that Pearson would participate in the fundamentals of my evaluations.
My principal did not write this email, though she signed it as if she did. I guarantee she has never used the term “internalize.”
“Team,
…Last Thursday while visiting classrooms with the Pearson team we saw many students talking with peers, using technology, and reading and writing complex texts about complex topics.
Since we know you have our students’ development and success foremost in mind, we think it is important to note that we also observed some students engaging in tasks below grade level expectations.
The admin. team is working hard to be up to speed with Pearson and the support they are providing, so we are learners, too. It is understandable that some pre-Common Core expectations still filter into your instruction. That said, we know that the Pearson System of Courses (“Pearson”) was developed from the ground up by some of the writers of the CCSS, to explicitly target the CCSS; as such it is comprised of grade level appropriate learning tasks, sequenced to ensure our students read, write, and speak daily about complex texts. This is the level of rigor we need our students to achieve.
In order to involve our students in CCSS-aligned learning that prepares them for college and careers, we request that you rely on Pearson instead of developing tasks/activities outside the app, which may not target CCSS. Let’s use Pearson to discover how to engage our students in this more rigorous learning and work with one another to make that learning even more meaningful for our kids (and us!). This year is an important step in learning the curriculum guides that are embedded in Pearson, so with that said, you will need to spend this year diving into the curriculum and getting to know the standards targeted. The only way you can do that is if you use it to organize and guide your lessons.
To that end, please continue to use the Lesson Planning protocol (attached), which has been the focus of recent teacher meetings. Please note how the protocol includes a step for scaffolding, inviting teacher creativity and providing time to think through how to meet the needs of our individual students.
Several of your peers have had lessons that apply this protocol modeled by J*** and S***, and we encourage you to talk with them about that process.
So, to summarize, unless you teach AP courses, you will use the Pearson System of Courses to organize and plan your lessons with fidelity for the rest of the year in order to understand and internalize the curriculum maps and the standards embedded within the lesson. From this point forward, you will be expected to use Pearson and use it sequentially.
Thank you again for the invaluable role you play in our school and for demonstrating for students that we too are learners.”
LikeLike
No joke. Read the article.
LikeLike
Enjoy being the last of a dying breed: the “classroom teacher”.
It may not be too late for re-training as a . . .
“Competency Tracker” or a “Learning Naturalist” may a “Data Tracker”
Even Randi supports this new wave of faux educators!
This is a must read article from Emily Talmage.
http://emilytalmage.com/2016/03/17/welcoming-the-next-gen-ed-overlords/
LikeLike
cx.
My bag. There’s no such career as a “Data Tracker”.
But you can become a “Data Steward”
LikeLike
I hope that “learning naturalist” is a joke.
LikeLike
RageAgainstTheTestocracy—
What sort of teaching and learning practices drive rheephorm policies and mandates?
Exhibit #1. From David Coleman, a witness par excellence and a supernova of the education establishment.
[start]
It was Lauren who propounded the great rule that I think is a statement of reality, though not a pretty one, which is teachers will teach towards the test. There is no force strong enough on this earth to prevent that. There is no amount of hand-waving, there‟s no amount of saying, “They teach to the standards, not the test; we don’t do that here.” Whatever. The truth is – and if I misrepresent you, you are welcome to take the mic back. But the truth is teachers do. Tests exert an enormous effect on instructional practice, direct and indirect, and it‟s hence our obligation to make tests that are worthy of that kind of attention. It is in my judgment the single most important work we have to do over the next two years to ensure that that is so, period. So when you ask me, “What do we have to do over the next years?” we gotta do that. If we do anything else over the next two years and don‟t do that, we are stupid and shall be betrayed again by shallow tests that demean the quality of classroom practice, period.
[end]
For the original source and much valuable contextual information, go to—
Link: http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2015/09/david-colemans-master-plan.html
Exhibit#2. From an equally impeccable charter member of the rheephorm establishment, Dr. Frederick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute:
[start]
And that brings us back to the Common Core. If the standards are better than those that many states had in place, swell. If more common reading and math standards make things easier for material developers and kids who move across states, that’s fine. But I don’t think that stuff amounts to all that much.
In truth, the idea that the Common Core might be a “game-changer” has little to do with the Common Core standards themselves, and everything to do with stuff attached to them, especially the adoption of common tests that make it possible to readily compare schools, programs, districts, and states (of course, the announcement that one state after another is opting out of the two testing consortia is hollowing out this promise).
But the Common Core will only make a dramatic difference if those test results are used to evaluate schools or hire, pay, or fire teachers; or if the effort serves to alter teacher preparation, revamp instructional materials, or compel teachers to change what students read and do. And, of course, advocates have made clear that this is exactly what they have in mind. When they refer to the “Common Core,” they don’t just mean the words on paper–what they really have in mind is this whole complex of changes.
[end]
For the source of the quotation and much valuable contextual information, go to the blog of deutsch29, 12-28-12013, entitled “The American Enterprise Institute, Common Core, and ‘Good Cop.’”
Standardized mediocrity. Failure as a norm. One size fits all. Doubling down on whatevers. Comforting the comfortable and afflicting the afflicted with tests that are designed and produced to reinforce every sort of noxious social inequality.
Out of the mouths of…
I will let others finish the above.
😎
LikeLike
Anonymous. Your courage is amazing, and your indictments of the individuals and groups who have contributed to what Diane has properly called the “Reign of Error” are warranted.
Some who contribute to this blog are beyond the reach of the intimidators. I count myself fortunate to be among them, not retired, not directly teaching now, but fully aware of the tactics of muzzling people, including teachers.
I entered teaching in the McCarthy era. My first job interview could begin only if I signed a paper certifying that I had never joined a communist organization or one labeled a “communist sympathizer.” I was handed a list of these “blacklisted” organizations, three legal pages, two-column entries…several hundred groups. The “sweet talk” intimidation posted by Krazy TA about compliance with Pearson’s Common Core instructional dicta is one of many examples of the culture of coercion supported by surveillance systems of our era.
LikeLike
“My white friends tell me they want to support Hillary because America hasn’t had a female president yet.”
These white friends are sexist. This and similar arguments are weird, to say the least. Imagine that Hillary becomes president, so “finally” the all important goal of a female president is accomplished. Then will come the next all important goal of having an Africanamerican female president. Somehow they will find a female candidate who is 10% black, so they will try to make her the president, because that little non-whiteness will show the world, we are an all inclusive, equal opportunity country, and we can feel good about ourselves.
This preoccupation with unimportant “qualifications” for presidency will not end. Here are some firsts from other badly and unfairly under represented groups for presidency: first Muslim woman, first Native American, first gay, first blind, first single mother, first truck driver, first communist and any combination of two or more of these should give motivation during the next hundred years of presidential elections.
LikeLike
SO, SO, SO TRUE! Absurd reason to trust the running of a nation with a certain person.
LikeLike
This blog has also kept me going and has warned me what terrible trends were headed our way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am having a distinct problem with understanding the new way of teaching comprehension. It seems that teaching text features, text types and question types are more important than the content of the text. Somehow knowing this is supposed to increase comprehension. I agree that it helps, but there is more, a lot more to understanding text. We are supposed to teach author’s purpose. I believe first and foremost that an author hopes we understand the content. This means tapping into our own previous knowledge. Reading is a conversation with an author and his/her ideas. Close reading speaks more to the authors craft or writing abilities.
Close reading is supposed to be done with text that the children find easily accessible. How is that even possible with the low lexile levels of early readers? The texts given in these ccss aligned core programs are too difficult for about 75% of my students. They totally ignore the children’s needs for deep practice with decoding. Expecting that a child will learn one phonics skill in a week with little review and nothing for students who didn’t get it is unrealistic. It couldn’t be that we balk at their ideas because we have experienced that their ideas don’t always lead to the success of our students, could it?
At our school, one teacher found a phonics text for third graders from the sixties. It is what my first graders are expected to know now. How were they to have learned all the knowledge between first and third grade in their half day kindergarten classrooms? While I have tried to learn and incorporate these new ideas, some of my cohorts have not. Their students are having better success than the rest of us using these classroom shifts at getting children to read. It leaves me confused and frustrated.
LikeLike
Sadly, you are now a part of a very large world of today’s confused and frustrated teachers!
LikeLike
I deeply appreciate and respect this very tired teacher. God bless you that you won’t give up! Your thoughts shared here are so clear and simply stated and so very accurate. You have focused in on exactly what is dogging the educational system. I hope and pray that change will come quickly. I do believe that parents in many communities are waking up and understanding the seriousness of the problems. Parents will ultimately be the ones who can affect change, as well as courageous, energetic administrators and superintendents who are up for the fight.
LikeLike