Mike Klonsky reports that Forrest Claypool, CEO of Chicago Public Schools, reacted to the Chicago Teachers Union’s rejection of his contract offer with a threat of layoffs and cuts.
“A letter sent by Forrest Claypool to the union Tuesday said that within 30 days, CPS would stop paying the teachers’ share of pension contributions (as if they’d been paying them up until now), order school administrators to cut $50 million by laying off 1,000 teachers and “re-shuffle” $50 million that goes toward general education funding to schools. That re-shuffling of Title I and II funds will hit hardest at kids with special needs and English-language learners.
“Claypool says he will drop the threats if the union would only agree to his contract offer which CTU’s bargaining team unanimously rejected. I believe that’s called blackmail. Or maybe — hostage taking.”

I see it as an act of war. Who will fire the first shot that will be heard around the world?
LikeLike
Sounds illegal to me.
LikeLike
It’s the empty promises that killed the deal although they did make some progress. Promises about teacher retention are only good if 10% of the teachers retire. Charter caps are meaningless since they can be overruled at the state level. Since CPS and Rahm have proven themselves unworthy of trust, there can be no language that allows for wiggle room.
LikeLike
I agree.
LikeLike
One item that Clayfool did not give the media: Over 2,000 teachers must retire by June. If the number falls short, the contract is voided and all go back to the table.
LikeLike
Clayton is retaliating.
LikeLike
If the district strips the public schools of funds they need to be sued and the Feds should not send any federal money there. This is wrong and it’s bullying the teachers into a contract they do not want. The union is doing the right thing in resisting. The union’s persistence in fighting for students, parents and their community will win ultimately.
LikeLike
OMG. Sounds like BULLYING to me! And he’s CEO of a public school system … OY!
Wow, he’s a “hit” man.
LikeLike
It’s as if Simon Legree is in charge of the negotiations. He would have his whip out if he could get away with it.
LikeLike
And also “not bargaining in good faith”
LikeLike