Bob Braun covered education for the Star-Ledger in New Jersey for fifty years. He retired from reporting, and now he writes one of the best blogs in the nation.
And this is one of his best. He explains that he supports teachers and he supports the teachers’ union, and no one pays him to do it (as critics charge). Those who hate public schools can’t believe that anyone would defend them unless they were paid to do so. Those who hate unions can’t believe that anyone would side with them unless they were paid to do so. They are wrong.
He writes:
I do support unionism. I grew up in a family–two families, really, but that’s a long story not appropriate here–that owed their middle-class status to unions. My father was a railroad engineer and a union member. My step-father was a teamster and a shop steward. They made good salaries that allowed them to buy decent homes and afford vacations–only on their salaries. I believe the inexcusable income inequality from which many suffer today is a direct result of the collapse of the union movement.
So, yes, I support unionism–for private and public employees, including teachers. Teacher unions have helped many urban residents achieve middle-class economic status and that translates into better lives for their children. I do not believe it is a coincidence that corporate reforms that have led to school closures, Teach for America, charter expansion, and other changes have come just at a time when many persons of color finally got good, secure jobs as teachers and other public employees. Yes, I do believe many so-called “reforms” are aimed at African-American school employees.
One deranged blogger–a suburban school board member from Lawrenceville–has called me a “loyal union lackey.” Recently, she quoted none other than a paid charter supporter from Montclair–and former spokesman for the disgraced Cami Anderson–in her continuing rants against me. I am an outsider, they say, because I live in Elizabeth, a city that abuts Newark and is a hell of lot more like Newark than either Montclair or Lawrenceville.
I have been accused of “working” for the union. Readers will note I have one advertiser, a neighborhood restaurant that is almost a second home to me. Both the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA) and the Newark Teachers Union (NTU) have offered to buy advertising on this site. I have refused to accept those offers for the very reason suggested by the lying criticism of me–that I would express support for these organizations only because I was paid to do it. No, my friends, this blog doesn’t make any money–whether I have one reader or, as happened last spring with my coverage of Pearson’s spying on New Jersey students, 1.5 million. Bob Braun’s Ledger is brought to you primarily by my Social Security and well-earned pension checks.
People who are motivated by money can’t believe that anyone is different from themselves. Bob Braun is different. He writes what he believes, not because he is paid.

“People who are motivated by money can’t believe that anyone is different from themselves.”
That sort of sums up a lot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed.
An Ayn Rand devotee friend of mine has a … let’s just call it … an interesting take on “IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE”. She thinks that George Bailey is evil and weak, and Potter is true representative of what she calls “good,” because he lives for himself and never apologizes for it. Quoting Potter, she calls the ending where George’s friends rally to help him “sentimental hogwash”, as those people are equally weak and evil.
“So it would have been better if they didn’t help him, and he went to prison.”
“Yes, that outcome would have provided a societal good that would have allowed the free market to work uninhibited.”
“Uninhibited by what? George’s altruism?”
“No, George’s evil.”
“Ohhh, alrighty then,” I replied in an Ace Ventura voice.
What can you say to THAT? It takes all kinds.
Here’s that ending that she so reviles … where so much unrelieved “evil” runs amuck:
For a few laughs, here’s SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE’s alternate IAWL ending that was “discovered” in a Hollywood vault:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/4267
This also reminds me of when a reporter from REASON TV (an Ayn Rand-ian Libertarian org) had one if its telegenic reporters ambush Matt Damon after his speech at the SAVE OUR SCHOOLS (S.O.S.) rally across the street from the White House in August 2011. The premise of her questions is that people are only motivated by greed (desire for money, and maintaining one’s income stream) and fear (fear of losing one’s money and income stream … “job insecurity”).
She obviously holds deeply to that belief. She can’t comprehend how anyone could or would be motivated by anything else.
Matt sets her straight: (watch out for the bleeped f-bombs near the end of this, that are from a running skit on Jimmy Kimmel’s show … Small World : during my private school years, I taught both of Jimmy’s two older kids, Katie & Kevin)
Finally, here’s Matt’s “evil” (from a libertarian point of view, anyway) speech:
LikeLike
One more thing about the Rand-ians.
David Simon, one of THE WIRE’s creators/producers/writers, was interviewed by REASON TV’s Nick Gillespie. Early on, Nick references John Goodman’s character in Simon’s TREME, a tapestry of post-Katrina New Orleans:
Goodman’s character on TREME is a sort of George Bailey-meets-Howard-Beale who voices Simon’s and other writers’ opinions. SPOILER ALERT: Goodman’s character, unlike Bailey, succumbs to post-Katrina despair and commits suicide.
Gillespie has, again, an “interesting” take on this. He calls Goodman’s character “awful … a white-guilt liberal … I was happy when he died.”
Simon’s taken aback by such a vicious and callous comment directed towards a fictional character whom Simon created… as writers view characters a little like parents view their children.
Keeping his cool, Simon gently suggests, “You might want to rethink that.”
Watch the whole interview. Simon’s attack on Wall Street’s takeover of the newspapers sounds familiar. Just replace newspapers with public schools, and he’s dead on “There are some things that the market is not supposed to dictate,” intones Simon, regarding policies that lead our all-time, worldl-leader stats in incarceration. “This whole idea that the private sector can do everything better than government. I don’t want the private sector doing prisons better than government.”
Again, just replace prisons with “public schools.”
LikeLike
The union movement didn’t collapse … it was crushed by an orchestrated conservative movement. Unions have been painted in terms that were reserved only for vile dictatorial regimes in the past. Ordinary working people now loathe unions and only because of the PR campaign waged against them. In Canada no such union “collapse” has been noticed because no anti-union campaign was pursued and their union job proportion is now triple ours when we used to be at parity.
Unions, because they oppose plutocrats and often vote Democrat, were an obvious target for conservative think tanks. No opposition was marshaled, either by the liberal establishment or the unions themselves.
LikeLike
What is also egregious is that those attacking Bob are making money for doing so.
Laura Waters, the blogger that went after Bob, is paid to write such attack blogs by publications like EducationPost and EducationNext.
PC2E, a secretive new pro-charter organization that has been attacking Bob, has millions to spend and appears to draw its funding from the Walton Family Foundation and hedge fund managers. PC2E is scared to admit who its funders are or even what legal structure it is using to operate, but all indications are that this is mostly Walton money.
So these individuals are paid to attack Bob and yet they are trying to undermine his credibility by suggesting that he is on the take from unions.
This is dishonest, hypocritical and immoral behavior. But I fear they have no shame.
LikeLike
Julia Sass Rubin: the purveyors and defenders and pushers of self-proclaimed “education reform” attack in others what they see in themselves.
This is not pop psychology. It is a pattern, often and openly on view, that they project onto others the same sorts of vile thoughts and motives that they (publicly) deny animate them.
But troika style: double think; double talk; double standards.
So Bob Braun is a knuckle-dragging servile union thug doing it for the big bucks—whilst they are just poor innocents standing up like penniless beggars just for the sake of goodness and decency and honor.
Sure, like John Deasy applying a wrecking ball to LAUSD [1/3 of a trillion dollars loss on iPad and MISIS fiascos alone] and then walking off with a $60,000 buy-bye gift—what happened to “it’s all about the kids” and giving them a bit of his [at least morally] ill-gotten gains?
Not to forget NYC with Saint Eva with her $575,000@year [as last reported] at $57.50@student while that exemplar of venality Carmen Fariña makes less than 40% of that at less than 25¢@student. Or so rheephorm stink, er, think tanks would be more than happy to prove with their “studies show” if the money is right…
I applaud you for your last paragraph but just a reminder from your friendly neighborhood KrazyTA about rheephorm TFA-style “right corps member mindset”—
Shame doesn’t pay the bills and put your name in headlines and on the MSM national news programs. That takes $tudent $ucce$$…
Thank you for your comments.
😎
LikeLike
Indeed, a nice piece. Actually, Bob Braun’s defense of unions felt a bit like an early Christmas present to me.
This sort of post is one of the reasons I love this blog. What a diversity of intelligent, humane people we get to hear from on this site.
LikeLike
Great to see someone say something like that. A welcome change from the never-ending drek of MSM.
LikeLike
Good post, good man. Thanks.
LikeLike
I was born into a family that lived in poverty. As a pre-school child, I still remember the first house my parents owned. It had a roof, it was framed and it had tar paper for walls. It was all they could afford and owning their own home, like most Americans, was a dream.
There were no windows or doors when we moved in. The first thing my dad did was buy enough thin, cheap plywood to make the one bathroom in the house private. Then my Godfather (I was baptized Catholic soon after birth) managed to get my dad a union job where he worked, and our world changed. We moved up to the blue-collar middle class. When my dad retired, he had a pension but when he died 54 years after my parents were married, my mother lost my dad’s $1,800 a month pension and all she had left was $500 a month from social security and a small, comfortable two-bedroom house that was paid for.
I also belonged to a labor union for thirty years. That union protected my job when I was attacked by dictatorial administration for daring to be publicly critical of their autocratic top-down methods and refusing to do something I thought was wrong.
LikeLike
As a public education blogger, I feel the same way. It’s not easy – as Diane can attest – to sign your name to everything you write while others don’t.
It’s not easy to be called a “union lackey.” I both like and dislike unions but, overall, our country could not be what it is without them. And I think they also are seeing the need for more transparency.
But I have to smile when ed reformers complain about “their message” being drowned out by “bloggers.” How many faux groups has the Gates Foundation and the Walton Foundation funded to try to push their message? How can mostly unpaid bloggers be that powerful to sway people across the country without slogans and tv ads?
Well, the answer is the truth. Most people know in their hearts when they are hearing the truth and when they are being lead to a conclusion or being manipulated.
LikeLike