Barbara Bowen, president of the Professional Staff Congress at the City University of Néw York, reports that Givernor Cuomo vetoed an increase for CUNY. This affects the education of the city’s neediest students.
Dear Members,
We got the news at midnight last night that Governor Cuomo vetoed the Maintenance of Effort bill. We had been receiving signals for more than a month that there would be a veto, but we continued to press till the final night.
Governor Cuomo’s veto represents a decision not to invest in sustaining top-quality college education for the working people, the poor and the people of color in New York. His position is now absolutely clear.
Cuomo had the chance with this bill to take an action that had huge bipartisan support and that would have resonated not only in New York City but across the state. He deliberately refused that chance, despite his repeated claims of being a leader in progressive policy. He cannot be a progressive while systematically withholding funds from CUNY.
No doubt Cuomo ‘s defense–which will soon appear in the veto message–will be that the bill would take spending over the 2% cap he has imposed on any increases. But what is the justification for the 2% cap? Nothing. With State revenues up by 5.6% this year, there is no fiscal justification for imposing such a cap. It is simply austerity politics: the decision to transfer wealth from the many to the few and call it “necessity.” And like everything else in this country, austerity policy cannot be separated from the issue of race.
Austerity policy means that we in the faculty and staff have been subsidizing New York State as our salaries have not kept up with inflation, and that students have been forced to facilitate the State’s disinvestment in their education as they pay an ever-greater share of the costs. It means that CUNY and SUNY are prevented from making enhancements desperately needed after decades of fiscal starvation, and that endless tuition increases are demanded just to keep the universities afloat.
You, as PSC members, did an exceptional job of supporting this bill. The bill would not have been passed and sent to the Governor without our collective work. You mobilized to get thousands of messages from members, first to the Legislature and then to the Governor. You collected 40,000 postcards on the MOE from students. You traveled to Albany and organized here in the city.
And the bill’s sponsors, Assembly Member Deborah Glick and Senator Kenneth La Valle, deserve our thanks. They went beyond sponsorship to tenacious support.
The union’s work is not wasted. We have made it clear to Albany that the issue of CUNY funding has deep support and that it will not go away. We will not be stopped by one veto. The PSC already has in place our response to the veto and the next steps in our campaign. The fight will continue–and escalate.
With enough depth among our own membership and breadth among our allies, it is a fight we can win.
Barbara Bowen
President, Professional Staff Congress/CUNY
212-354-1252

Vetoing a bill that would help educate more poor people, people of color, the underserved, disadvantaged segments of the population? That can’t be the Governor Cuomo I know and love. Surely that has to be some Reagan-loving Republican governor like George Pataki. No way Gov. Cuomo would do that.
What’s that? Oh, you mean ANDREW Cuomo, the neoliberal pseudo-Democrat. And here I thought you meant Mario Cuomo. Silly me.
LikeLike
The faculty perhaps should point out that the average prof salary increase in the US in the last two years was 3-4%. So why cut back at CUNY?
https://www.insidehighered.com/aaup-compensation-survey/2014-2015
https://www.insidehighered.com/aaup-compensation-survey/2013-2014
LikeLike
Have CUNY’s faculty been promoters of Silicon Valley and hedge fund profiteering schemes, in K-12 education? Have they been neutral about the oligarchs’ power? Or, have they been vocal and strident opponents?
In a world with justice, IMO, Harvard’s school of education and Columbia’s Teachers College, among other colleges, would be negatively reviewed by accrediting bodies and their federal funding, would be in jeopardy.
LikeLike
Linda, I do have the same impression as you. While faculty kissing up to corporations is not a surprise, profs not being vocal about their opposition to privatization seems to be new to the present generation. Our generation probably forgot that academic freedom and tenure needs to be defended and argued for continuously.
As Sun Tzu says
“Security against defeat implies defensive tactics; ability to defeat the enemy means taking the offensive.”
LikeLike
Agree, Mate Wierdl.
When Prof. Shroup, at the University of Texas, testified in the state capitol, against the interests of Pearson, it should have been a call for action. University faculty across the nation, should have stood with him, as a statement of the profession’s virtue.
LikeLike
Linda, I admit, I didn’t know about this testimony against Pearson at all.
LikeLike