The Washington State Supreme Court turned down an appeal from its September ruling that charter schools are not public schools and cannot receive public funding. The vote was 5-4.
Only one charter existed before August 2015, when another 8 opened. Advocates for charters said these new schools were already getting “tremendous results,” even though they opened only three months ago.
As is now customary, charters bussed their students to the state Capitol, in hopes of swaying the decision, but they produced only hundreds of students, not the thousands that appear to pressure legislators where charters are well established. No one asked about the legality or propriety of closing the school for a political rally, a practice that public schools are it permitted to do.
Some background: Washington State has conducted four referenda on whether to permit charters. The first three failed. In 2012, Bill Gates and a handful of other billionaires put $10-15 million behind a new charter law, a sum that overwhelmed the law’s opponents. It passed by a margin of less than 1%.
Charter critics hoped the county’s decision would return the legislature’s attention to another Court decision: adequate funding.
“The court’s announcement Thursday should help refocus the Legislature’s attention on boosting funding for K-12 public schools, said Rich Wood, a spokesman for the statewide teacher’s union that challenged the charter law.
In the case known as McCleary, the Supreme Court has held the Legislature in contempt for its failure to come up with a plan to fully fund basic education by 2018.
“Now it’s time for the Legislature to focus on its paramount duty … and fully fund K-12 schools for all of our state’s kids,” said Wood, of the Washington Education Association. “That’s what we expect lawmakers to do when they return in January.”

They’ve got money and they won’t go away. In Boston, MA Lieutenant Gov. Karyn Polito led a march of charteristas through Boston Common to the State House (the Gov was on vacay, but appeared in a pre-recorded video.) No bullhorns for these demonstrators – a fully mic’ed ssound stage.
http://wwlp.com/2015/11/18/polito-leads-charter-school-advocates-in-boston-common-rally/?utm_content=buffer52d60&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
LikeLike
They may not go away in our state, but they’ll be throwing their millions down a rat hole. The clear majority of Washington’s citizens opposed charter “schools” and their support in the legislature is under 40%.
And our governor is a public, steadfast opponent. We beat them here! It’s over. And now it’s time to use the momentum from our victory out here to inspire and activate students, parents, taxpayers and teachers in EVERY state to begin the rollback of this failed, deceptive experiment.
The Privatizers are now running scared; you can almost smell their panic and hear their legs shaking in their boots. They understand the implications of our state’s supreme court ruling, and that’s why they’re all so hysterical and shrill, whining about the fact that their “dream” of gradually phasing out public schools, using charters as the “wedge” to begin the process, is now dead. Forever.
Oh Happy Day!
LikeLike
“The court’s announcement Thursday should help refocus the Legislature’s attention on boosting funding for K-12 public schools, said Rich Wood, a spokesman for the statewide teacher’s union that challenged the charter law.”
Fat chance, if their legislature is anything like Ohio’s. It’ll be all “choice” all the time from here on out. Every single education debate will center around charters/vouchers. The only time they’ll hear public schools mentioned is when they’re talking about tests or test scores, and then only in (negative) comparison to real or proposed or imagined charter schools.
It’s “accountability” and “choice” in the ed reform movement. That leaves public schools with “accountability”- pretty grim and joyless agenda as far as public schools.
LikeLike
No disrespect intended, but this is one state where The Privatizers do NOT control the legislature, nor the governor’s office; it’s time to “stick a fork” in charters, here in Washington State; they’re DONE!
LikeLike
The assault on public education will not stop.
There are discussions about changing the charter school law, have school boards authorize charter schools and provide oversight.
LikeLike
Look, we have to and should remain constantly on guard against The Privatizers—here in Washington State and everywhere else.
But, it’s over here. We won. Parents are knowledgeable and well organized in our state and we WON’T allow the poison of charters to pollute our education streams in the future, going forward.
In Washington, as opposed to elsewhere in the country, politicians RUN from the label “pro-charter.” They know that in this state charters are highly unpopular, much more so now than they were in 2012, when the awful billionaire-funded referendum passed by less than 1%, while outspending their opponents 17 to 1. That’s not a misprint: Seventeen to One just to end up in a statewide tie.
The people don’t want charters. Taxpayers oppose them. Public school parents detest them and even the typical targets for Privatizers—poor neighborhoods in the inner city—have been clued in; they see this for the scam it is and what it’s done to similar neighborhoods in Chicago, Washington D.C. and Newark.
We parents and taxpayers are much better organized than in the past. And the public is more knowledgeable. We’re NOT Ohio, here in our state, nor Florida, Louisiana, or Pennsylvania; in fact, the word is out on the disaster of “charters” and “choice” in those states and that’s one of the reasons charters are finished in the Evergreen State.
We’ll remain VERY vigilant about this and related “Ed Reform” attempts to privatize our schools—we know that certain sleazy elements will attempt to take over our schools again.
But it won’t work; charters have NEVER made it through the legislature and we have a governor who opposes them strongly.
It’s time to celebrate; now let’s begin dismantling charter “schools” all over the country, one by one, inspired by the legal pushback from this state’s highest court; the SHOT “heard ’round the world”, or at least ’round the country!”
Woo Hoo!
LikeLike
Puget Sound Parent,
I’m being told, from a well informed individual, that there are enough votes in the House and Senate to support an initiative to put charter schools under the jurisdiction of school boards.
The legislature is being held in contempt of court. I am concerned that pro charter legislation will be passed in exchange for funding education. Our only hope would be for the governor to reject such a bill.
I hope I’m wrong.
LikeLike
If Bill Gates actually cared about this country, he would start by getting his company to repatriate the nearly $100 billion that Microsoft is holding in offshore accounts to dodge US taxes and fork over the $30 billion in taxes that are owed.
I know that politicians would undoubtedly fritter it away on special interest pork and it would never make it to public schools, but just think of what could be done for schools with the $30 billion that Gates’ company is currently cheating the American public out of. That’s $600 for every one of the 50 million public school students in the United States.(BTW, Apple computer is currently holding about $180 billion offshore and owes about twice what MS does in taxes)
But, of course, Gates is primarily interested in “creating markets” out of schools (he has even said so) by setting things up –eg, through national standards (Common Core) — so that companies like his can “plug into” students in the future through software and hardware sales.
He (or his foundation, at least) pays just a few hundred million* for stuff like Common Core and his company then reaps billions in profits down the road.(*much of which would have been lost by Gates to taxes anyway if he had not ‘donated” it for education — with strings attached, of course).
If Microsoft sold software (operating systems, testing and/or curriculum) to public schools, they could rake in $1 billion for every $20 dollars made on each of the 50 million public school students. MS could easily make $1 billion on just one OS release installed on a computer for each student, for example. And the sky’s the limit on curriculum software.
Of course, Gates understands all this very well, which is precisely why he has been pushing soooooo hard for national standards and national tests.
This fellow is no dummy. But the same can not be said for those who do not see the game he is playing.
LikeLike
So the voters turned it down 3 times, on the 4th after massive billionaire bucks behind it, it passed by less than 1%, and after the courts said they shouldn’t receive public dollars, 8 more charters opened? Wow. Impressive.
Billy Gates is a bull dog. I hope he and his billionaire cronies enjoy paying the expenses of those charters.
LikeLike
“Ve are clapping like leeetle girlz!”
LikeLike
Good news for Washingtonians! Meanwhile, in California, the Dept. of Ed. subcommittee on charters breaks with the ACLU by recommending conditional approval of a charter which is the conversion of a discriminatory program. http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/cc/cs/accsnotice120215.asp
Click here to sign our petition: http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/cde-deny-ross-valley?source=c.em.cp&r_by=11553673 Final vote December 2.
LikeLike
Diane, doesn’t it seem like a conflict of interest that the body charged with administering and overseeing public education (Departments of Ed) are also tasked with rubber stamping charters, which erode the public schools they oversee? I am pretty informed on this topic and I still don’t get how that is legal, or was allowed to happen!
LikeLike
Is the CA Teacher’s Union paid off and secretly supporting Charters? Crazy to pose such a question but…
I’m wondering how CA Charters manage to receive state funds. How do they get around the California Constitution, Article 9, Education? See section 8. “No public money shall ever be appropriated….”
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_9
The way I see it, Sectarian, in the case of charters, would mean the (indirect) ideological discrimination against our public school teachers. After all, one could argue that by removing kids from a public school and placing them in a charter you are ‘educating’ them with the doctrine that their PS teachers were not good.
However, in CALIFORNIA EDUCATION CODE SECTION 47615 – they simply claim different.
Section 47615. (Added by Stats. 1998, Ch. 34, Sec. 16.)
Cite as: Cal. Educ. Code §47615.
(a)The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1)Charter schools are part of the Public School System, as defined in Article IX of the California Constitution.
(2)Charter schools are under the jurisdiction of the Public School System and the exclusive control of the officers of the public schools, as provided in this part.
(3)Charter schools shall be entitled to full and fair funding, as provided in this part.
(b)This part shall be liberally construed to effectuate the findings and declarations set forth in this section.
Since when does legislative law trump a constitutional requirement? Someone, please tell me what’s missing here.
LikeLike
The CA Dept of Ed rules for LCAP include the push for “School Climate” feedback from parents and students in the form of surveys. These include questions like, “Do you feel there is an adult at your school who really cares about you?” Isn’t this kind of thing adding to the discrimination and rhetoric that makes parents want to pull their kids out of public schools?
LikeLike