FairTest writes that the past year was amazing for opponents of high-stakes testing for students and teachers.
Testing Reform Victories 2015: Growing Grassroots Movement Rolls Back Testing Overkill
for further information:
Lisa Guisbond (617) 959-2371
Dr. Monty Neill (617) 477-9792
or Bob Schaeffer (239) 395-6773
NEW REPORT: “TESTING REFORM VICTORIES 2014-2015:
GROWING GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT ROLLS BACK TESTING OVERKILL”
Pressure from parents, students, teachers, school officials and community leaders began turning the tide against standardized exam overuse and misuse during the 2014-2015 school year, according to a new report released today. “Testing Reform Victories 2015: Growing Grassroots Movement Rolls Back Testing Overkill” shows that many states reduced testing mandates, eliminated score-based consequences, and implemented better assessments. The National Center for Fair & Open Testing (FairTest), a leader of the U.S. assessment reform movement, released the study.
Lisa Guisbond, the report’s author, explained, “Public pressure has forced policy makers to respond to the many harms resulting from the fixation on high-stakes exams. Even President Obama now concedes that testing has gone too far. Opinion polls show a sharp shift against overreliance on test-and-punish policies in favor of assessments based on multiple measures.”
Among the concrete assessment reform victories documented in the new FairTest report:
– Policy-makers repealed California’s graduation test. Six other states recently overturned similar requirements, reversing a trend toward exit exams. California, Georgia, South Carolina and Arizona also granted diplomas retroactively to students denied them by test scores.
– Florida, Oklahoma, New York and North Carolina suspended or revised their test-based grade promotion policies. New Mexico legislators blocked their governor’s attempt to impose one.
– Several other states, including Texas, Minnesota, Virginia, Colorado and Maryland rolled back testing mandates. So did many districts, led by Lee County, Florida.
– Opting out surged to record levels in New York, New Jersey, Washington, Colorado, Illinois and elsewhere. The national total approached 500,000.
– Polls show that large numbers of Americans agree that there is too much standardized testing and that it should not be used for high-stakes purposes.
– Three dozen colleges and universities eliminated or reduced admissions test requirements. The record test-optional growth means that more than 850 schools now offer such policies.
– Promising efforts to develop alternative systems of assessment and accountability are under way in California, New Hampshire and New York. All deemphasize standardized tests while incorporating multiple measures of school performance.
Ms. Guisbond concluded, “The movement’s growth and accomplishments are tremendously encouraging. But it’s far too early to declare victory and go home. Activists will use lessons learned from last year’s successes to expand and strengthen the testing resistance movement and ensure that policy makers go beyond lip service to implement meaningful assessment reforms.”

I don’t see much movement in the NYS government towards eliminating testing. A lot of rhetoric, but actions speak louder than words. In Buffalo the receivership issue is coming to a head. Evilia has given our new Superintendent permission to suspend the teachers contract at seven identified schools (selected due to low test scores). Next year there will be more schools added to the list (which is impossible to get off even if the test scores do improve). Eventually there will be no more contract – the district will decide the working conditions. The BTF (Buffalo Teachers Federation) meets tonight. They are fighting this issue all alone since the “parent” union organizations have signed off on the deal.
Pray for these teachers and grant them the courage to fight this monster.
Remember – Today Buffalo, tomorrow ……..
LikeLike
Buffalo needs to take a page from Seattle and strike today. The only proven methods thus far have been walkouts and strikes
LikeLike
The BTF has gone on strike before. It is painful – the loss of two days pay for each day of strike. It is also illegal, but it is impossible to jail up to 4,000 people.
However, at the meeting tonight the union is sure to discuss striking. They will use Seattle as a model. Even more relatable is their fellow teachers in Chicago,
I will keep everyone posted, but a strike is surely a possibility. (Hopefully sooner rather than later because picketing in several feet of snow will not be fun).
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
I had a parent teacher conference yesterday that was kind of encouraging. I had read the talking points the state wrote on Common Core testing (awful- they’re basically telling parents that a score lower than a 4 means their child is doomed) and I was really primed to be disappointed if teachers delivered them, but that didn’t happen. My son likes to fit in- he’s at the age where they worry about that- so we asked him if he wanted to opt out last year and he did not. Anyway, they downplayed test scores and talked a lot about his work in class and whether he’s happy in school or not. A + for not delivering talking points and using their own judgment 🙂
LikeLike
Just curious why you choose to allow your son to take part in these bogus tests that are unfortunately driving the narrowed curriculum
LikeLike
I have trouble with the concept. He likes school, I believe he thinks he’s a part of the school, and he seems to value that commonality. He wasn’t comfortable setting himself apart in that way and he’s old enough where we take our lead from him. I’m not taking the test. He is. My husband went to private schools and objects to testing more than I do so laid out his objections to the testing and my son was just not persuaded 🙂
It’s hard for me because one of my big themes is school isn’t entirely about what he wants- there are other people there and sometimes they’re wrong but they don’t believe they are- and I haven’t figured out how to incorporate opting out into that bigger idea. This kid is easy going too. My eldest probably would have opted out, and he was a 1. really good student who 2. questioned everything he was ever told to do. They’re all different, as you know! 🙂
LikeLike
I understand..I’ve made the decision for my kids..i’ve let them know that when you don’t believe in something you should question it and take a stand…right now, opting out is the only way to express our displeasure with our current state of education…the tests are driving these reforms…without testing, these reforms will crumble…if they benefitted my child in any way, i would consider them..but the reality is these tests provide no such benefit
LikeLike
Brad
November 13, 2015 at 11:37 am
I understand..I’ve made the decision for my kids..i’ve let them know that when you don’t believe in something you should question it and take a stand…right now, opting out is the only way to express our displeasure with our current state of education…”
I agree that opting out was the only tactic that got their attention. I think they (you) have been very effective advocates for public school children. My state seated a panel and reduced testing time so they’ll get something like 8 weeks of uninterrupted time back. That benefits every single kid- a real tangible improvement that no one in government or the +/- 5000 (!) paid professional ed reform advocates were doing until opt out took off.
I freely admit I’m a free rider on the opt-outers. My son didn’t opt out but he benefited, bottom line. It;s interesting to watch how they navigate these reforms. His teacher gave me an essay he wrote. They are using a “Common Core” vocabulary book. In this essay he had placed just about every word they had gone over in the book, which she recognized. It really looks like he did a draft and then just plugged in vocabulary words. He’s treating this like beating a game which was supposedly not the goal, but that approach fits his personality.
LikeLike
I live in New York state with a child learning problems. All the rhetoric about less testing and looking at the common core is Cuomo’s way of trying to salvage his sagging approval ratings. The situation on the ground hadn’t changed. My daughter will still need to pass 5 very tough exit exams. The modifications the Regents have made do nothing to help my daughter. They allow passing certain cte school related exams to substitute for regents which is great for CTE schools but doesn’t help my daughter who goes to a special education private school paid for by the state. They also allow SAT scores to substitute for some exams but SAT too have high benchmarks and are the type of test my daughter does poorly on. They allow some substition of one test for one history but in no way reduces the number of tests or their essence. There are the Consortia of Schools for Alternate Asessment that only take the English regents and then use portfolio assessment. I would happily send her there but the support she needs in school is more than I can expect a general education school to provide.Her toughest tests are the history texts. She has failed global twice. I suggested as a way of studying and to bring her grades up, she make a power point summarizing each unit. She really likes the idea and does it without being reminded. If I had my dream, she would have the option of portfolio assessment and these power points would be a part of assessing her. The Opt Out movement only focuses on grades 3-8 because there you can opt out without penalty. Opting out of regents means your kid doesn’t get a high school diploma. Don’t get fooled by the spin. The new ed commisioner is still trying to convince parents to allow their children to take the tests and wants to take receivership of schools in Buffalo based on test scores. I feel helpless and sad that I despite my efforts I may not be able to support my daughter in getting a high school diploma in this state.. I have heard the new high school equivalency test is hard too. Thanks for listening. If any parents have suggestions besides moving, love to hear them.
LikeLike
Lenore – A good reason to move to another state! I foresee a future where states without CC or exit exams attract large numbers from states like NY.
I feel for you as my son also had learning disabilities which would have made a Regents Diploma impossible. We were able to get him modifications for the GED (listened to on tape) which he passed, but that was pre CC.
I predict the graduation rates will drop drastically, not just for special Ed, but for other students having difficulties in one or more of the five tested subjects.
So what are the contingency plans for those who aren’t “career or college ready”? Welfare?
LikeLike
I live in New York state with a child learning problems. All the rhetoric about less testing and looking at the common core is Cuomo’s way of trying to salvage his sagging approval ratings. The situation on the ground hadn’t changed. My daughter will still need to pass 5 very tough exit exams. The modifications the Regents have made do nothing to help my daughter. They allow passing certain cte school related exams to substitute for regents which is great for CTE schools but doesn’t help my daughter who goes to a special education private school paid for by the state. They also allow SAT scores to substitute for some exams but SAT too have high benchmarks and are the type of test my daughter does poorly on. They allow some substition of one test for one history but in no way reduces the number of tests or their essence. There are the Consortia of Schools for Alternate Asessment that only take the English regents and then use portfolio assessment. I would happily send her there but the support she needs in school is more than I can expect a general education school to provide.Her toughest tests are the history texts. She has failed global twice. I suggested as a way of studying and to bring her grades up, she make a power point summarizing each unit. She really likes the idea and does it without being reminded. If I had my dream, she would have the option of portfolio assessment and these power points would be a part of assessing her. The Opt Out movement only focuses on grades 3-8 because there you can opt out without penalty. Opting out of regents means your kid doesn’t get a high school diploma. Don’t get fooled by the spin. The new ed commisioner is still trying to convince parents to allow their children to take the tests and wants to take receivership of schools in Buffalo based on test scores. I feel helpless and sad that I despite my efforts I may not be able to support my daughter in getting a high school diploma in this state.. I have heard the new high school equivalency test is hard too. Thanks for listening. If any parents have suggestions besides moving, love to hear them.
LikeLike
By definition there can be no “fair” standardized test. It’ll make my day when FairTest comes out and declares that they are against all standardized testing. Until then, I consider Fairtest to be part of the problem in that it attempts to legitimize the educational malpractices that are educational standards and standardized testing through claiming that some of the tests are supposedly fair.
LikeLike
Now at 7,832 emails/letters sent to Congress and President Obama.
http://www.petition2congress.com/15080/stop-common-core-testing/
LikeLike