Bruce Dixon of the Black Agenda Report writes a scathing commentary on Arne Duncan and John King.
Unlike his underqualified predecessor, John King is highly qualified to nail down the gains of educational privatizers. For the last ten months, King has been Arne Duncan’s deputy, and before that he headed the New York State Department of Education. Like Duncan, he’s never taught in or administered a public school in his life. King started out as a charter school teacher and administrator, and eventually headed a chain of charter schools with exceptionally onerous disciplinary policies.
As commissioner of NY State Department of Education King was instrumental in forcing Common Core, a standard curriculum developed by non-educators and corporate consultants from the Gates Foundation, the testing industry and others, upon parents and schools while his own children attended a local Montessori school, which of course did not administer standardized testing. In New York King distinguished himself as a thin-skinned, tone-deaf bully, insisting in the face of widespread public opposition that cutting recreation, music, literature and real teaching in favor of Common Core’s “teach to the test” and other “run-the-school-like-a-business” practices were good for children and good for education.
There are two pieces of good news here. The first is that the $4 billion in stimulus funds the administration had under Duncan to coerce states and school districts into compliance is gone, and provisions of the successor to No Child Left Behind, which of course will institutionalize as much of the privatization regime as possible, are not yet finalized. The second is that like Arne Duncan, John King is no charmer, no persuader, and no salesman. He’s an arrogant autocrat in a highly public, highly visible position, committed to enforcing a set of massively unpopular policies. There’s a serious political opportunity here to galvanize and make visible a movement of national resistance to the juggernaut of school privatization. The Obama administration is well aware of this, and is transparently seeking to buy time with empty declarations of intent to reduce emphasis on standardized testing.

It will be difficult to entice the “best and brightest” to join the teaching profession in the STEM subjects in the current atmosphere. I love the last lines of this article. “As the economy improves, it will be harder to attract people to teaching.” Hmmm…now why do they think that is so????
http://money.cnn.com/2015/11/13/smallbusiness/stem-teachers-100kin10/index.html
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
I don’t have any objection to Obama or Duncan or King having a specific agenda for public schools. I don’t agree with them but they’re entitled to believe whatever they want.
Obama is the only one of the three who was elected, and I think he had a duty to make his education agenda clear when he ran. If his intent was to limit any policy to that of the education “reform” movement and hire only people who adhere to that I think he should have run on that. I don’t think he did.
I don’t feel like it’s asking a whole lot to insist they run on what they plan to do. I think ed reform “movement” Democrats hide the ball with this nonsense about how they’re “agnostics” and it’s “win/win!” and ordinary public schools can put in the whole reform “movement” agenda along with policy many of outside “the movement” value under some “plus/and!” management slogan. That’s just not true. Doing one thing often means not doing another, and setting one priority means putting another lower down on the list of priorities. If the Democrats’ priority is “accountability” and “choice” they should run on that.
It’s really dishonest to hold these fake debates. Democrats in Congress knew they were planning on backing standardized testing, yet they played this silly game where they pretended to take “input” from the public. The Obama Administration have an agenda in place for “transforming” high schools- they’ve already issued a statement on where the money is going- yet we’re subjected to yet another billionaire-backed marketing campaign where they’re supposedly taking “ideas”. Enough. Enough sales pitches and political campaigns. They’ve been in office almost 8 years. We all know what they do on education.
LikeLike
Entitled to believe but not to foist beliefs on the public when they are the voice that th media puts forth… see my comment on this post! We teachers should be guiding these conversations, and our solid facts should be the rule of reporting!
LikeLike
“WHEN PEOPLE WHO ARE NAIVE TO HOW EVIL THE PRIVATIZATION FOLKS REALLY ARE…
… TALK FACE-TO-FACE…
… WITH A PRIVATIZER…
… THEN FINALLY GET IT —
“TWO CHILLING ENCOUNTERS, (each with
a U.S. Secretary of Education):
—————–
1) CHILLING ENCOUNTER NUMBER ONE:
PEDRO NOGUERO talking to JOHN KING —
– – – – – – – – – – –
PEDRO NOGUERO:
“I’m not against charter schools, let me be clear, I’m in favor of any good school that’s good for kids. But some of the charter schools that are being held up as a model believe that their goal is to regiment, to completely control their students. To control how they sit, control their eye contact, control their movements in the hallway. Many of them have silence in the hallway and no talking in the lunch room.
“John King, the new commissioner of education of New York state, is held up as a real reformer because he founded a very successful charter school in Boston called Roxbury Prep and went on to found a network the called Uncommon Schools. And I would say that academically this school is far out-performing many public schools that are serving the same population of kids. So I would acknowledge that they are doing a much better job. I would also acknowledge that the model they use does not appeal to me.
“I’ve visited this school, and I noticed that children are not allowed to talk in the hall, and they get punished for the most minor infraction. And when I talked with John King afterwards, I said, “I’ve never seen a school that serves affluent children where they’re not allowed to talk in the hall.” And he said, “Well, that might be true, but this is the model that works for us, we’ve found that this is the model that our kids need.”
“So I asked him,
” ‘Are you preparing these kids to be leaders or followers? Because leaders get to talk in the hall. They get to talk over lunch, they get to go to the bathroom, and people can trust them. They don’t need surveillance and police officers in the bathroom.’
“And he looked at me like I was talking Latin, because his mindset is that these children couldn’t do that.”
– – – – – – – – – – – –
This is at:
http://www.morningsidecenter.org/courageous-schools-conference-2011
—————————————-
—————————
2) CHILLING ENCOUNTER NUMBER TWO:
STAN HOLLENBECK talking to ARNE DUNCAN —
– – – – – – – – – – – –
STAN HOLLENBECK: (public school parent
& Chicago city official)
“Arne Duncan is a tool, and has been from the
beginning when he was appointed here.
“I don’t know if the Lab School has a legacy
program, but this is the same school from
which (Duncan) graduated. He was appointed
at the time I was still director of the City
Council’s Legislative Reference Bureau, and
I made it a point to meet him in the
hallway before his appointment hearing.
“As I shook his hand, I said I’m glad that,
since he was a Lab School graduate, we
finally got someone who has experienced
what good education should be, and there’s
no real reason that schools like the Lab
School can’t be models for real reform.
“He stared at me as though he’d been shot,
and never spoke another word to me again.”
– – – – – – – – – – – –
The above quote is from an article
I found this (BELOW) over at the
“Chicago Public Fools” blog. It’s
a COMMENT underneath an article
about Arne Duncan’s hypocrisy regarding
sending his kids to the Chicago
Lab school (where, btw, where
my nephew went, and where my
niece now attends.), and what that
school does and does not offer VS.
his prescription for the rest of the millons
of children across the country while
Secretary of Ed..
The COMMENTS section includes
those supportive of Duncan’s choice,
who employ twisted rationalizations
defending Duncan’s hypocrisy. The
COMMENT to which I refer is not
one of those.
The above COMMENT, the one that really
hit hard, was from city official recalling
a private conversation the writer had
with Duncan in 2001. It was just
after Mayor Daley appointed Duncan
CEO of Chicago Public Schools.
The writer, Stan Hollenbeck, naively
thought that Duncan’s having attended
the Lab School, and his familiarity with
all it has to offer would lead Duncan to
bring that type of school environment
to kids in all of Chicago’s public schools.
First, here’s the blog post, by the blog’s
owner, Julie Vassilatos:
http://www.chicagonow.com/chicago-public-fools/2015/07/arne-duncan-chooses-a-school-free-from-his-influence/
LikeLike
And as you know, Jack….John King is on the short list to become the new Supt. of LAUSD. The recent report by the expensive consultants who are in charge of the search shows other similar ideologues to King as contenders as well (e.g, Paul Vallas, Thelma Melendez).
But the LA Times, in it’s Education series, never reports on any of this. However, they do show a disclaimer so to speak, in the final paragraph of each article (today see Howard Blume on the charter takeover) that they are paid by various charter supporter Foundations such as Broad, Wasserman, Walton, and the non profit United Way.
LikeLike
Addendum…it might be that with the announcement yesterday that LAUSD BoE member Monica Ratliffe is now studying the legalities of making LAUSD an ‘all charter school district” similar to New Orleans, it could already be ‘a fait accompli’ and the FIX is in to have King as the supervisor Supt. I would not put anything past the education players from all sides (from Broad to the media to Obama to local school boards), all of whom seem to manipulate the use of taxpayer money for their own end.
LikeLike
Also? Duncan going out every day promoting a new approach to discipline for public schools and carefully exempting “no excuses” charter schools shows blatant bias. That they don’t see this is an indication of how completely captured that administration is as far as ed reform “movement” priorities. Really? They launched a campaign on public school discipline issues and they’re just planning on omitting their extremely close connections to “no excuses” charter schools- where they fund and cheerlead for the schools? It reaches the point where it’s insulting. They really must believe people who attended public schools are stupid, since most of the country attended public schools and we’re the intended audience for this stuff.
LikeLike
I know, two standards for schools. In publicly funded charters they support no excuses, strict discipline. That’s applauded. In real public schools, we get no suspensions and know nothing restorative justice programs. How fair is this?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on stopcommoncorenys.
LikeLike
Here’s another stern lecture from Congressional Democrats to parents and students in public schools on our duty to comply with any and all testing schemes.
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/education/259609-accountability-puts-kids-first
Is this all Democrats have to offer public school kids? Not just retaining the testing but elaborate new rules that schools will have to comply with in order to control testing?
They are making this worse. All it means to me is public schools will have to spend more on testing. We’re now directed to make analyzing the tests we have to take a priority, and then reporting back to Congress on our tests of the tests. How does this allow public schools to move away from the focus on testing that these same people stuck us with?
LikeLike
There is this kind of bad news from Politico
Today.
Business Roundtable President John Engler is asking House and Senate leaders to keep accountability strong in the new law. “Both the Senate and House versions of ESEA legislation contain elements that business leaders support, but more needs to be done to deliver a meaningful education to our students,” Engler writes in a letter sent Thursday, provided first to Morning Education.
He is also asking lawmakers to include an opt-out requirement stating that states must test at least 95 percent of students annually in order to receive federal funds.
See the letter: http://bit.ly/1QkZUic.
LikeLike
This is a horrible proposal, and a big step backwards. Once again, the Feds are trying to extort compliance with the old test and punish agenda. Maybe they figure if school districts fail to use the Title 1 money, they will be able to ship it off to charters under the portability clause of the law.
LikeLike
Chiara, as far as I’m concerned candidate Obama who flew around the country with “educational consultant” Linda Darling Hammond only to dump her as soon as he was elected engaged in deliberate, conscious deception. What teacher or educated person would have been so enthralled with Obama had he campaigned honestly with a clown like Arne Duncan as his education man ?
Bruce Dixon and Glen Ford of Black Agenda Report have been providing the American public with the disturbing truth about Obama ( and little Obama Cory Booker) for years now but many prefer fairy tales.
Both men are unsung treasures who deserve a national audience.
LikeLike
I will always view Obama’s educational policy as the greatest dismantling of public schools and a continuance of Bush’s equally failed educational policies. It’s sad to have to acknowledge that the first Black President did this since it negatively affects so many Black and Hispanic students. Money is truly the root of all evil and in a democracy, when the market runs the government, how can the people rule ?
LikeLike
It’s much bigger than Bush. I wonder if even the most zealous ed reformers will come to regret it. There won’t be any “accountability” because there never is in this country- mistakes will have been made, you know the drill, but they have to be getting alarmed at how fast privatization is moving.
They can’t improve public schools if they’re ideologically opposed to the continued existence of public schools, and the fact is most children attend public schools. We’ll pay for this belief system down the road.
LikeLike
I’d just like to personally thank the Obama Administration for stepping in and continuing the marketing campaign to expand charter schools in this state, with their huge federal building grant.
The public schools that 93% of the children attend couldn’t get anyone in state government to tear themselves away from “the choice sector” long enough to do anything for our schools as it was. It’s worse now. “Choice” promoters entirely dominate public school policy in this state and now ill continue to do so for yet another year, so Mission Accomplished.
The President might have mentioned that when he was camping out here campaigning in ’08 and ’12- that he intended to help John Kasich in the laser-like focus on the “choice sector” that completely ignores the 93% of students who attend the unfashionable public schools.
Let the charter slick marketing campaign begin! Maybe Obama, Duncan, King and Kasich can reach their goal of privatizing every public school in the state.
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2015/11/ohio_charter_schools_may_be_reeling_from_attacks_but_now_is_a_time_to_shine_national_experts_say.html
LikeLike
Yay! Another DC debate that is about “public schools” but is actually limited to charter schools:
View at Medium.com
Did Hillary Clinton say anything about public schools? Probably not, but if she did we’ll never hear about it, because none of our Thought Leaders care to discuss such a dull and “traditionalist” subject and they all know they’re “winding down” the public sector schools anyway. I’ll just sit this election out. Obviously none of these people share my interests.
LikeLike
This is tragic! Billions spent? What lesson will be learned, if any?
LikeLike
CROSS POSTED AT https://dianeravitch.net/2015/11/13/black-agenda-report-a-scathing-report-on-the-obama-education-legacy/
WITH THIS COMMENT which has embedded links at the site:
Read in The American Educator Richard Kahlenberg’s report, http://www.aft.org/periodical/american-educator/fall-2007/agenda-saved-public-education
If you want to grasp the core of Al Shanker’s idea to preserve a system of public education against those who would like to see it dismantled in favor of a system of private-school vouchers.Explaining his plan to defend public education by improving it, Al often said, “you can’t beat something with nothing.”
King offers more of nothing. Bush said yes, and foisted this on our nation. Duncan directed the next assault, and now we have the charlatan John King, who has no conception of public education, or how children learn, and certainly not authentic evaluation.
“Doctors have their medical boards and attorneys have their bar associations, but most teachers have no such opportunities to take responsibility for their profession. Like doctors and lawyers, shouldn’t teachers set the standards for their own profession, help newcomers meet those standards, offer intensive assistance to anyone who is struggling, and recommend the removal of those individuals who, after receiving assistance, are not meeting those standards? Are any of these things really better left to administrators?”
“In Our Hands Teachers Should Guide and Guard the Teaching Profession”
Click to access editors_note.pdf
Right on! Snake-oil salesmen like KING who is selling more magic elixirs,
articles/Magic-Elixir-No-Evidence-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-130312-433.html and in the thrall of the Educational Industrial Complex
https://greatschoolwars.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/eic-oct_11.pdf
“There are right and wrong ways to address teacher evaluation. Unfortunately policymakers and administrators across this country are ready to toss out both peer assistance and review. What’s their alternative? Complex statistical models that rank teachers according to their “value added”
LikeLike
Susie Lee…can you see any rationale in LA for the search committee to have listed John King as a prime prospect for hiring as Supt of LAUSD?
This culled list of 43 candidates includes some of the most pro charter school ‘know nothings’ about how to educate children, and who have no academic education training at all, much less classroom experience.
Are we in this district being set up for the local choice of someone like Thelma Melendez, a mini clone (and Broad Academy grad) of King in her support of charters, but at least she is a trained educator who was a teacher and a principal?
As you often say, it is all sold to the public by snake oil hucksters which includes our biased media and too many of the non profits like United Way (which manipulates the inner city uninformed residents).
LikeLike
Sometimes I’m optimistic that as parents and teachers we can reverse the damage these juggernauts have forced upon us, but more often I despair of the future for my grand kids.
Now Buffalo is caught in the throws of a takeover pushed by our new Education Commissioner and her hand picked Superintendent. Yes, they are going to take control of seven low performing (according to the test results) schools, throwing out the union contract. Next year they have additional identified schools to add to the list.
Buffalo, an urban, mostly minority, highly impoverished city is first on the list. I feel this is the testing ground (the union here is strong and they’ve been trying to take it down for years). Next they’ll move on to other urban areas, such as Rochester and Syracuse. After that . . . . . . . . Nobody will be safe.
This is education’s version of The Black Plague. Guess who the rats are!
LikeLike
I would be more optimistic but they’re privatizing everything so I don’t know why public schools would be immune. They’re a giant target- as big as Social Security, which will go next.
I used to say they couldn’t privatize the court system, but as it turns out, they already have!
They’ve set this up so ordinary people can’t access the civil court system. Courts will be reserved for contract disputes between corporate entities, I suppose. The peons will be directed to the private justice system, which is stacked, and where they can’t possibly win. They’ll give up, which is probably the intent.
LikeLike
Chiara – the idea of sentencing individuals (usually poor and minority) to jail, often for minor offenses, so that someone can make a profit (not for the good of the prisoner or society) is gut wrenching. The perpetrators of this scheme should be sent to prison instead.
It’s like we are going back in time to France just prior to the Revolution. Les Miserables anyone?
LikeLike
“On 1 March 1757 Damiens the regicide was condemned “to make the amende honorable before the main door of the Church of Paris”, where he was to be “taken and conveyed in a cart, wearing nothing but a shirt, holding a torch of burning wax weighing two pounds”; then, “in the said cart, to the Place de Grève, where, on a scaffold that will be erected there, the flesh will be torn from his breasts, arms, thighs and claves with red-hot pincers, his right hand, holding the knife with which he committed the said parricide, burnt with sulphur, and, on those places where the flesh will be torn away, poured molten lead, boiling oil, burning resin, wax and sulphur melted together and then his body drawn and quartered by four horses and his limbs and body consumed by fire, reduced to ashes and his ashes thrown to the winds” (Pièces originales…, 372-4).
“Finally, he was quartered,” recounts the Gazette d’Amsterdam of 1 April 1757. “This last operation was very long, because the horses used were not accustomed to drawing; consequently, instead of four, six were needed; and when that did not suffice, they were forced, in order to cut off the wretch’s thighs, to sever the sinews and hack at the joints…”
Foucault’s description in “Discipline and Punish”.
LikeLike
Once again Obama is deceiving the public about his education policy. Though Obama is quick to go on record as wanting to reduce high stakes testing, his appointment of John King, an intransigent “hit man,” for charter schools speaks volumes. King may have the pedigree, but he lacks boots on the ground experience in public education. What he does have is Obama’s skewed view of destroying public education while promoting charter schools. Since most American students attend public schools in this country, experience in public education should be a minimum requirement for the job. The secretary of education position should be more than a patronage appointment.
LikeLike
Please dear colleague, send these excellent comments to the LAUSD BoE members who are actually considering John King as a candidate for Supt. of LAUSD.
LikeLike
I did, but I doubt anything will make a difference, if the LAUSD Boe has already been sold to the devil.
LikeLike
NEA is endorsing Hillary, so I was motivated to contribute to the NEA Disaster Relief Fund instead
LikeLike
In October, Drew Franklin published, “TFA’s Embedded in Black Lives Matter”, at the on-line website “Popular Resistance”. He identifies the chronology and the people who have transitioned from TFA to Black Lives Matter. He makes compelling arguments about the disastrous effects the reform movement has had on the minority population. The article is definitely worth a read, as a continuation of the Black Agenda Report cited in this post.
LikeLike
Yes, having TFA operators like DeRay McKesson and Brittany Packnett infiltrate Black Lives Matter simultaneously works to keep the organization/movement in a tight.y controlled box, and also helps redeem TFA’s increasingly tarnished brand.
Thus, it’s no accident that Privatizer-In- Chief Obama made a point of meeting publicly with her, validating her and her position, and that the Democratic Party has endorsed and absorbed BLM.
LikeLike
Thanks for pointing out the “tarnished brand” angle.
LikeLike
TFA’s effect is to decimate the teaching profession and middle class jobs. If Black Lives Matter is looking to destroy police unions, they are serving the goals of oligarchs. The Koch’s, Walton’s and ALEC’s agenda to starve public services of funds, have worsened conditions across America, in a multitude of spheres.
LikeLike
New 12 minute video:
Common Core: Hostile Takeover
LikeLike