The Los Angeles Times reports that arts education has been shortchanged in the Los Angeles Unified School District in recent years, even as the district leadership was pouring millions of dollars into testing, test-prep, and technology. Former superintendent John Deasy was willing to allocate $1.3 Billion to buy iPads for Common Core testing, but at the same time, many schools across the district had no arts teachers.
Under the philosophy that test scores are the only measure that matters, that low scores lead to school closures, the district neglected the arts.
Normandie Avenue Elementary Principal Gustavo Ortiz worries that he can’t provide arts classes for most of the 900 students at his South Los Angeles school.
Not a single art or music class was offered until this year at Curtiss Middle School in Carson.
At Carlos Santana Arts Academy in North Hills, a campus abuzz with visual and performing arts, the principal has gone outside the school district for help. A former professional dancer, she has tapped industry connections and persuaded friends to teach ballroom dancing and other classes without pay until she could reimburse them.
Budget cuts and a narrow focus on subjects that are measured on standardized tests have contributed to a vast reduction of public school arts programs across the country. The deterioration has been particularly jarring in Los Angeles, the epicenter of the entertainment industry.
The Los Angeles Unified School District is discovering the extent of those cuts as it seeks to regain the vibrancy that once made it a leader in arts education. For the first time, L.A. Unified in September completed a detailed accounting of arts programs at its campuses that shows stark disparities in class offerings, the number of teachers and help provided by outside groups.
Arts programs at a vast majority of schools are inadequate, according to district data. Classrooms lack basic supplies. Some orchestra classes don’t have enough instruments. And thousands of elementary and middle school children are not getting any arts instruction.
A Los Angeles Times analysis that used L.A. Unified’s data to assign letter grades to arts programs shows that only 35 out of more than 700 schools would get an “A.” Those high-performing schools offered additional instruction through community donations, had more teachers and a greater variety of arts programs than most of the district’s campuses.
State policy is strong in support of arts education, but LAUSD doesn’t have the money to support the arts. Instead, the money has been spent on testing and implementing the Common Core.
Eight out of every 10 elementary schools does not meet state standards in the arts. The students least likely to engage in the arts are in the high-needs, low-income schools. In schools where there are parents with resources and contacts, they are able to supplement what the school does not provide.
Only four elementary schools — West Vernon, Magnolia, Bonita Street and 49th Street Elementary — had an arts teacher five days a week, according to district data.
“I feel real guilty because my kids go to schools where an art teacher and a music teacher are there five days a week,” said Ortiz, who pointed to Normandie’s limited budget. “I come here and I can’t give the kids what my own kids get. It just tears me up. It’s such an inequity.”
Arts education was not meant to be a luxury in California.
State law requires that schools provide music, art, theater and dance at every grade level. But few districts across the state live up to the requirement.
According to a story in the Wall Street Journal today, the state has allocated $4.8 Billion to the implementation of the Common Core standards and testing. This is a matter of priorities: What matters most: The joy of learning or standardized test scores?
It is ironic that billionaire Eli Broad, who just opened a new museum to house his own collection, wants to spend $490 million to open 260 new charter schools, but can’t find it in his heart to subsidize the arts in the schools of his adopted city.
Which will matter more to these children? The joy of performance, the discipline of practice, the love of engagement promoted by the arts or taking the Common Core tests that most will fail again and again?
You decide.

For those of you very familiar with LA Public Schools, how much budget discretion does a school have? How much of the dollars from the district must be directed to things other than arts? It appears that there are some designated funds from the central district? Is that true? I’m interested in how much individual schools can do if they want to.
Thanks
LikeLike
I heard from a union official that John Deasy said, “No arts classes in middle school.”
Also, I know several teachers who lead the Arts (Music, Drama, etc.) branch of UTLA. They said that they invited Deasy multiple times to sit in on a class each of all the different arts branches … to see what he was cutting.
His response: I’m not interested.
LikeLike
There is much more to this story than meets the eye and I will have a blog post about it shortly.
The timing of this article could not be worse, and that is surely no accident. Magnet school applications are due in ten days. The richest arts programs are to be found in our magnet schools. My own children attended a performing arts magnet, not in the hopes of becoming stars, but because that was the only way to access arts education in the Deasy austerity years.
The database the LA Times has put online to accompany this article will live for a long time, and it isn’t even accurate. Our performing arts magnet school has been lumped in with the Marine Science Academy on the same campus. So the two hours of sequential arts instruction each magnet student receives daily gets dissolved into less then 1.25 hours per week according to the database. It states that the school has no “teachers of extra classes” or “accomplished artists” when the truth is that master teachers who are working artists regularly teach classes both during the school day and after school. http://schools.latimes.com/grading-the-arts/marina-del-rey-middle-secondary/
So where did the data come from? Last year, the district told principals there was going to be an effort to rebuild the arts programs. “What do you need? What are you missing?” The LA Times got the data and spun it to grade schools. It’s as if the LA Times got a hold of somebody’s grocery list on shopping day and then criticized her for having a bare cupboard. Yes, definitely more to this than meets the eye.
LikeLike
Karen Wolf, are you aware of this? http://sd26.senate.ca.gov/news/2015-11-04-senate-committee-examine-schools-widespread-noncompliance-arts-education-requirement
LikeLike
Posting with permission:
Dear LA Times,
As the recently retired coordinator of Marina del Rey Performing Arts Magnet, I am reading with horror the substandard ranking of our most excellent performing arts program. I was the coordinator of this program since its inception in 1999 with 90 sixth grade students. I retired at the end of the 2015 school year as we looked forward to the enrollment of 350 + students for the 2016 school year. Then, as now, we have provided no less than two robust instructional hours per day per student in the performing arts.
Our students select a pathway in music, theatre or dance and follow that pathway which consists of one hour of dance daily and one other hour in ballet, music, or theatre. Our students are also offered after school arts classes in which they may choose to participate. (I personally continue to teach a two hour ballet class after school on Tuesdays that is open to all students.) All students have the opportunity to perform in our regularly scheduled dance concerts, Black History, Spring Musical, Choral music, etc. Our students become valuable assets to many of the high school and college programs throughout the country.
We have four full-time instructors in the performing arts, two dance teachers, a theatre teacher, and a music teacher. All are excellent teachers in their genres. Master classes taught by outside professionals are arranged by those teachers and provided at no cost to the students.
To be given a “C” ranking for our school is an outrage. Whether the survey given the administrators was poorly phrased, or improperly interpreted, I know not. What I do know is that the Arts are alive and well at Marina del Rey Performing Arts Magnet and I invite you to take a personal tour at your convenience.
Please know that when you publish misinformation like this at a crucial time in the Magnet selection process by parents, you do a disservice to all involved.
Please let me know if you would like to participate in a tour, a dance class, or attend one of our incredible performances.
Respectfully,
Nancy Pierandozzi
Arts Advocate and former Magnet Coordinator
LikeLike
Posting with permission:
Dear Ms. Torres and Mr. Menezes, [LA Times reporters]
I read with great interest your article about arts education and was surprised that we are not mentioned. We have been an arts magnet for 29 years. We have 11 performing arts teachers serving over 900 students daily to a minimum of 3 hours of arts education. During the great budget cuts, we were one of the few LAUSD schools that lost no arts teachers or curriculum.
Hamilton High School also has a Communication Arts program that offers visual arts to at least another 300-400 students.
We have an impressive list of alumni who have gone onto successful careers in the arts and would be delighted to share that list with you. Our students have played Orchestra Hall, Disney Concert Hall, opened for Sonny Rollins at the Monterey Jazz Festival, marched in the Rose Bowl Parade, performed at Redcat, Disneyland, The Museum of Tolerance, for Michelle Obama, Sidney Poitier and Hillary Clinton.
Two years ago our students performed with Pharrell at the Academy Awards and just recently with Common at the Fulfillment Fund. Out Dance team was selected out of 150 schools to perform at the Special Olympics this past summer. I could go on and on, but instead, I’d like to invite you to our campus to see for yourself what a superior arts education, combined with academics looks like.
Marlene Zuccaro
Director, Academy of Music and Performing Arts
Hamilton High School
LikeLike
Thanks for all this information, Karen. The members of Joining Forces for Education are doing letter writing to the editors in support of your position. We welcome others to join us in informing the public about arts programs and how vital they are to a well rounded general education.
LikeLike
Excellent!
LikeLike
One of the many reasons master teacher, Rafe Esquith, is/was so beloved by students and parents for the last 30 years at Hobart Elementary School, is his appreciation of the arts, and bringing the arts to his classroom even at his own expense. He bought his students band and orchestra instruments, created the world renowned Shakespeare group, and used the arts to teach history, literature, language arts, etc. He made the effort to form a 501c3 non profit to be assured of funding when it was not forthcoming from the district. Teachers came to his classroom from all over the world to observe and learn how to do all this. Rafe made the school experience what it should be for every child.
LikeLike
Ellen,
Please be aware: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov/news/2015-11-04-senate-committee-examine-schools-widespread-noncompliance-arts-education-requirement
LikeLike
Shame on our leaders for jumping on the testing, data mining bandwagon without regard for the impact of shifting so much money into testing. Programs should never take a back seat to testing. The tests associated with the CCSS are designed to enrich publishing companies, and do nothing for our students who are no more than pawns in the war on public education. We must hold those that have forced unproven testing on our students accountable for this malfeasance and disregard for the needs of our young people.
LikeLike
A well-funded, enduring, good arts program anywhere threatens the formation of Zombie Nation everywhere.
A graceful dancer, a talented lyricist, someone who knows her way around a media/communication/production lab, a fabulous DJ, a dedicated cellist, well those folks are hard to beat down to a compliant citizen.
The gifted poet will use her prose to protest the subjugation. Count on it.
So, out with the Arts Program and in with bubbling, bobble-headed test tyrants and crudely improvised “surveys” and conclusions.
Funded or Fashioned by Broad Foundation and a procession of other philanthropic frauds.
LikeLike
Edupreneurs decided that what our kids really need more than inspiration is a grit rigor filled classes about how much life sucks and how you need to overcome failure again and again to succeed.
They have an obsessions with failure too – they have entire festivals celebrating their greatest failures. They don’t celebrate kids failing though when that is the period where when they fail no-one should get hurt (whereas your business flopping hurts a lot of ppl).
Bizzarro world
LikeLike
“Most people suppose that artists are the decorators of our human existence, the esthetes to whom the cultivated may turn when the real business of the day is done. But actually, what an artist is is a person
skilled in expressing human feeling. Far from being merely decorative, the artist’s awareness is one of the few guardians of the inherent sanity and equilibrium of the human spirit we have.”
Robert Motherwell
(Testimony to Congress, 1970)
LikeLike
I love this! Thanks for posting.
LikeLike
“It is ironic that billionaire Eli Broad, who just opened a new museum to house his own collection, wants to spend $490 million to open 260 new charter schools, but can’t find it in his heart to subsidize the arts in the schools of his adopted city.”
Irony yes, but no arts education program in schools should have to depend on grants or on the generosity of one or several billionaires.
Grants-based arts education—long promoted by the National Endowment of the Arts (NEA) and many state arts councils—usually means that some version of the arts enter school episodically, much like a bonus or “extra.” More often than not these programs offer little more than “exposure,” a brief “chance” to meet a living, breathing artist, a little like bringing a “zoo animal” into the school.
NEA has viewed these programs as an opportunity for underemployed artists (the norm) to have some part-time if temporary work in schools even if the artists have not had much preparation for that venture. Arts Councils now sponsor training programs and workshops enabling artists to market their programs and services to schools. Some artists travel across an entire region marketing their services, with brochures and online marketing materials citing standards that “align” with their program(s).
Contrary to popular perceptions, these temporary, sometimes project-based programs are not usually free. Schools have kept these visiting artist programs going since the first version was piloted and evaluated under the auspices of the Central Midwestern Regional Education Laboratory around 1967.
There are of course, wonderful in-school programs that arts institutions have offered for a very long time—what NEA calls audience-building activities or “outreach.” Those programs may or may not be funded with grants from arts councils. In any case, the grants-based funding of arts education is filled with hurdles that only the most dedicated and savvy district leaders in arts education can pursue.
Arts organizations want to enter schools with programs or take students to their cultural facilities for reasons other than outreach and audience buildings. Their own funding can be justified as having a public purpose and especially for youth. Many donors and participants see these educational functions, whether in-house or in-schools, as a “selling point” in keeping the whole institution viable. Indeed, educational programs sponsored by arts institutions are getting a boost in their support by citing the cutbacks in school programs.
Less well known is the fact that ESEA Title I one funding for arts education instruction is intended to improve academic outcomes in subjects other than the arts; that is, to make learning those other subjects more attractive, appealing, enticing, engaging. For years, the federal programs earmarked for arts education were evaluated by reports on gains in reading and math scores.
Kudos to those active in challenging misleading reports that can potentially undermine strong programs.
This February 2015 letter illustrates the ambiguity and the anxiety about “proper” arts-related investments of Title I funds in California schools http://www.scpr.org/blogs/education/2015/02/20/17609/lausd-decision-ushers-in-new-source-of-funding-for/
LikeLike
Dear California Teachers Association,
You failed. You have ardently supported the Common Core. All of the professional development you deliver is dutifully aligned with the Common Core. You have cheered as the state has wasted $4.8 billion implementing these useless standards and the tests that allegedly measure them when we could have been spending this money on arts and foreign language instruction. What do we get for this vast expenditure (which doesn’t even include the vast waste of teacher time and energy)? Opaque SBAC test results. Our teachers look on the reports with puzzlement. What do they mean? How are they any better than the old STAR test reports? All this blood and treasure expended for THIS? Common Core is the educational equivalent of the Iraq Wars.
Sincerely,
A Disappointed Member
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Creative Delaware and commented:
The arts are in danger everywhere.
LikeLike
There are three schools within one to three blocks of our home: elementary, middle, and high. Because of cuts in L. A. at the time my son attended school, we sent him out of the neighborhood to school. We obtained opportunity transfers for after-school programs up until high school. We were able to drive him to an L. A. U. S. D. school that had a comprehensive program, including music, for elementary. Then we obtained an out of district permit to send him to a middle school near our home which had a superior music program, one of his few interests academically. He was permitted to continue at the high school on his out of district permit.
This was the way in which we were able to meet his individual interests and needs in a public school that had been decimated by budget cuts and curriculum restriction.
Hamilton High should not be an exception. Nor should Marina Del Rey Middle School’s Performing Arts Magnet. The programs at these schools should be common, not exceptions.
When I first began working in Los Angeles in 1979, it amazed me that the arts were not the stressed subject. Students came to my classes bearing Low Rider magazines filled with art. The students spent a lot of time drawing on their notebooks and practicing calligraphy. They were interested in taking art classes of which there were few. At the same time, Hollywood complained they had to go to Japan for cartoonists. It made no sense.
The reformers clearly never made a “needs assessment.” I suspect they still have not. What do kids want to study–computers, art? Then teach it. As a nation we cannot really predict what will be the next big thing. We say they have to have 21st Century skills. So, who knows what that will mean. The students we teach now will create it. That is why the curriculum must be broad for everyone.
LikeLike
Apparently, the curriculum has become Broad. As in Eli.
LikeLike
“A Broad Curriculum”
We love a Broad curriculum
With spread from B to E
And Eli Broad, we’ll stick with him
‘Cuz Broad is what he be
LikeLike
Love this jingle!
LikeLike
This Friday
Sacramento, CA – Senator Ben Allen (D – Santa Monica), chair of the state legislature’s Joint Committee on the Arts, will convene an oversight hearing to examine the state of arts education in California schools on Friday, November 6, 2015. Current state law requires all schools to provide arts education to students, but many schools are not doing so. The lack of arts education is particularly prevalent in disadvantaged communities. The hearing will delve into why there is a high rate of noncompliance with the arts education mandate, and what steps can be taken to compel more schools to incorporate visual and performing arts into the standard curriculum. The hearing can be watched live online at https://youtu.be/4HO-_-DF4JY. – See more at: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov/news/2015-11-04-senate-committee-examine-schools-widespread-noncompliance-arts-education-requirement#sthash.SLWtggls.dpuf
http://sd26.senate.ca.gov/news/2015-11-04-senate-committee-examine-schools-widespread-noncompliance-arts-education-requirement
LikeLike