In a column in the Daily Beast, ex-TV journalist Campbell Brown praised David Cameron of the United Kingdom for his proposal to eliminate all traditional public schools and replace them with private academies. The column was reprinted on her website “The 74.”‘
She writes:
The vision and courage needed to take on the crisis of failing schools has surfaced during our presidential campaign—just not in this country.
Last week, addressing his party for the first time since re-election in May, U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron called for an end to the country’s traditional public school system, endorsing instead a nationwide conversion to academies, which are essentially the British equivalent of charter schools—publicly funded, but with greater freedom over what they teach and how they are run.
He also urged current and would-be educators across the U.K.—parents, community groups, social service organizations—to create small new academies known as free schools.
“So my next ambition is this,” Cameron told a nationally televised audience, “five hundred new free schools. Every school an academy…and yes—local authorities running schools a thing of the past.”
She complains that the Presidential candidates in the U.S. have failed to be equally bold in calling for the privatization of all schools.
Americans are being disserved when the campaigns ignore a school system that leaves three-quarters of students unprepared for college in writing, reading, math, and science. The United States soared for most of a century because its schools produced the world’s best labor force, ensuring the dominance of American industry in everything from soap to missiles. In the past few decades, lagging school achievement—especially among our most disadvantaged young people—has led to economic slowdown. By failing to educate these children we threaten our collective livelihood.
Campbell Brown knows nothing about public education. She attended the elite Madeira School. Yet she despises public education and considers herself an expert.
I previously wrote a post with some advice for her, but she ignored it.
She needs to understand that the schools with the highest test scores are the ones that select their students, like the private school her own children attend (which does not administer standardized tests or use the Common Core).
Scores on standardized tests are a reflection of family income and education, as well as the schools’ resources and opportunities.
The lowest test scores are found where there is high poverty and racial segregation.
What she should know, but doesn’t, is that on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the scores of white students, black students, Hispanic students, and Asian students are at their highest point in history.
What she should know, but doesn’t, is that none of the world’s top-performing nations on international tests have privatized their schools. They have instead strived to make them equitable for all children.
What she should know, but doesn’t, is that privatization does not decrease inequality, it increases inequality and segregation.
Note to Campbell Brown: Our public schools are not failing.
Our society is failing to address the root causes of school performance, which are the conditions in which children and families are living, such as their access to good jobs, medical care, food security, and decent housing.
I read that as an act of war against the community based, democratic, non-profit public schools. Since Campbell Brown has declared war, then she shouldn’t be surprised when many of the people fight back.
As for David Cameron of the United Kingdom, I see his declaring of war on the public schools in the UK as evidence of who owns him and who he really serves—Pearson.
Yes, Lloyd….These DEformers are becoming ever more arrogant, and scary since Broad’s edict to takeover at least 50% more of LAUSD schools and charterize them. His Broad Academy grads, CEOs, are now embedded nationwide and it seems as though his ‘calls to arms’ reaches his media and foundation partners to aggressively expand the battle now, as witness Campbell Brown.
Parents and others in favor of public schools MUST speak out loudly every day and MUST strengthen an organized massive opposition.
We need the vision and courage to take on the deficiencies and fallacies in Campbell Brown’s mind and perform a complete brain transplant.
It’s time to investigate Campbell Brown
Word
Say what happened to parent “choice”, and a family
of schools, or a community of schools — public,
charter, private, original recipe, extra crispy —
all co-existing together to help educate kids
and to help each other? That’s the original
policy position of the market-based corporate
reformers.
I guess that’s all over now.
Indeed, it was just a temporary false pose
until now, and Campbell just let the cat out of
the bag about their real goal.
She posted the same nonsense article over at her
own “THE 74″ blog”
https://www.the74million.org/article/campbell-brown-britains-education-reboot-and-why-america-needs-a-david-cameron
Well, I went a little nuts and left a comment
that will probably not remain more than an hour
or two (her administrators remove everything
I post there ASAP… i.e. a piece about the
Kevin Johnson police interview video, and her
hypocrisy for not going after the guilty-of-molestation
Johnson, while Campbell goes after the innocent teachers
falsely accused of the same thing)
So hurry if you want to read it (and save it if
you like):
(It starts… “Campbell, you are the biggest fraud on two feet… ”
ad then continues in that vein for quite a while.)
Awwww… what the heck. I’ll just post it here: (it’s long)
———————————
Campbell,
You are the biggest fraud on two feet.
Like Prime Minister Cameron, you want the entire U.S. public system to go charter, and that any presidential candidates must express this same goal to get your support? That would make them heroes in your eyes?
Really?
Seriously?
If these charter schools are so gosh-darn great, why do you spend tens of thousands of dollars of your husband’s ill-gotten hedge fund salary to make sure that your own kids are kept as far away from them as possible?
If Common Core is so gosh-darn great, why do you spend tens of thousands of dollars of your husband’s ill-gotten hedge fund salary to make sure that your own kids are kept as far away from Common Core as possible, and are exposed to a curriculum that is diametrically opposed to Common Core?
Indeed, why aren’t you barging into the office of your kids’ private school Heschel, and demanding that they impose Common Core curriculum and test prep and testing that you’ve defended and praised so much?
Here you are defending Common Care and attacking those “opt out” parents who want to do exactly what you are doing… opting out and keeping their own children away from Common Core:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/political-attacks-on-common-core-are-driven-by-pandering/2015/02/27/bfbf9f80-bad8-11e4-b274-e5209a3bc9a9_story.html?postshare=4201425094031685
———————–
CAMPBELL BROWN:
“Let’s be clear about what Common Core is. It spells out what students should know at the end of each grade. The goal is to ensure that our students are sound in math and literacy and that our schools have some basic consistency nationwide. But the standards do not dictate a national curriculum, and teachers are not told how or what to teach.
“The unpopularity of the initiative with segments of the public has been caused by rough implementation in some states and the tests linked to the standards. That frustration is legitimate and can be addressed. But abandonment of the initiative for political reasons is craven…
“Education never quite gets the attention it deserves in presidential campaigns, but monster flip-flops surely do. So here’s some advice for people running for office: If you want to campaign against core standards, perhaps you should try having core standards of your own first.”
======================
Really Campbell? So what standards and testing (and schools) do you have for your own children?
According to blogger Mercedes Schneider, you send your kids to a private Jewish school
with A CURRICULUM, STANDARDS, AND TESTING THAT IS DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED TO COMMON CORE.. AND NO STANDARDIZED TESTING OF ANY KIND UNTIL HIGH SCHOOL.
http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=232
It also has a pedagogy and classroom management that is DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED TO THE WHAT GOES ON AT THE CHARTER SCHOOLS YOU WANT THE 99% OF AMERICANS TO ATTEND — once you and your money-motivated allies achieve that David Cameron wet dream of no more traditional public schools taught by unionized teachers.
More on your kids’ school BELOW…
Instead of the non-stop test prep, and militarized walking in lines that Eva provides
SUCCESS ACADEMY (where you serve on its board …. a high-up SUCCESS ACADEMY administrator told NEW YORK MAGAZINE proudly that the school turns its kids into “test-taking machines”….
Heschel HAS NO TEST PREP, AND NO STANDARDIZED TESTING.
The first standardized tests that kids are exposed to in 11th grade
in preparation for applying to college. Gee, I wonder how any of
them ever get accepted, after being denied a decade of test
prep that turns them into “test-taking machines”?
Instead, this is what your own kids get:
(one more thing: notice how the Heschel kids in the
pictures are all dressed in their own clothes, where they
can, in sartorial terms, express their individually, AND ARE
NOT FORCED TO WEAR THOSE HIDEOUS, GOD-AWFUL
ORANGE-‘n-BLUE Success Academy UNIFORMS FROM
L..L BEAN, and forced to buy the matching orange-‘n-blue
backpacks, or face expulsion.
If those uniforms and backpacks are so great, why aren’t you
and your husband demanding the Heschel administrators
come up with their own Pink Floyd ‘THE WALL’ uniforms
to crush their kids spirits and individuality????!!!
“If you don’t eat your meat, you can’t have any pudding…”
(from 02:10 on)
(from 02:10 on)
No, no, no…. dressing individually is only for the special
people’s kids… other people’s kids have to wear this crap. )
Without further ado, he’s the Heschel MISSION STATEMENT:
http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=9
———————-
HESCHEL:
“In an open and engaging academic setting, the
school’s curriculum interweaves the best of both Jewish and
general knowledge and culture throughout the school day.
“The school’s approach to education is governed by profound respect for
students. It nurtures their curiosity, cultivates their imagination,
encourages creative expression, values their initiative and engenders
critical thinking skills. The school is committed to development of the
whole child and supports each student’s intellectual, emotional,
social, physical and spiritual growth. In addition, the school seeks to
create an environment that encourages the professional and personal
growth of teachers, administrators, and staff.
“Among the Central goals of the Abraham Joshua Heschel School are the following:
“Fostering
a lifelong love of learning. The school seeks to develop the
understanding that the discovery of personal meaning and the growth of
individual identity can emerge from the rigors of study.
“Creating an environment of intellectual challenge and academic excellence.
“Creating
an ethical learning community that inspires its students to become
responsible, active, compassionate citizens and leaders in the Jewish
and world communities.
“Cultivating the spiritual lives
of its students and the nurturing of their commitment to Jewish values.
The school helps students learn about and respect a range of Jewish
practices and encourages them to embody these traditions in the way they
live their lives; students learn the skills that enable them to
participate fully in Jewish life.
“Building of bridges
between different sectors of the Jewish community, and between the
Jewish community and other communities, as expressions of our religious
imperative to unite human beings through justice, shared humanity and
mutual respect.
“Fostering
in its students a deep commitment to and a lifelong relationship
with the State of Israel and its language, culture and people, in
recognition of the centrality of the State of Israel to Jewish
identity and to the Jewish people.”
————-
Here’s more of what you can get at Heschel—a comprehensive Arts Curriculum—
one that is impossible at public schools thanks to so much its funding going to Pearson and
the other Common Core-related vendors:
http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=1130
————————
“The Arts at Heschel
“As students are exposed to a multitude of media in their daily lives, art courses
can help them navigate the unfolding context of contemporary culture and
technology in order to understand and find meaning in the possibilities
through creating and analyzing.
“The Visual Arts department is rooted in the school’s
vision that the discovery of personal meaning
and the growth of individual identity can emerge from the rigors of
study, of student centered inquiry and the development of a sensitive
eye, a discerning mind and skillful hand.
“Music as non-verbal expression continues to say something
universal, essential, and native to even the humblest of involved
seekers. Music education, therefore, must stand alone as an
important and necessary part of the total learning and growing process.”
=======================================
And here’s what happens at Heschel in Grades 1-5 (i.e. “Lower School”) :
http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=16
————————————-
“It is my pleasure to welcome you to the Heschel Lower School. We hope you
will learn about our philosophy and curriculum. If you have additional
questions after you have read through the website, please contact us.
“The Lower School comprises grades 1-5 and offers a rich and rigorous
curriculum in both general and Judaic studies. Every part of the school
day is planned to offer each student a challenging, well-supported, and
nurturing environment. Our highly qualified and enthusiastic faculty
brings the curriculum to life through analysis of text, thoughtful
discussion, projects, and field trips.
“In all areas, the emphasis is on thinking and questioning. Jewish traditions form the
basis for teaching ethical values and the imperative to treat others as
we would like to be treated. ”
“As you walk through the Lower School, you will see children happily engaged.
“The classrooms and hallways are alive with students learning, studying, singing,
praying, and playing with joy. You will learn a great deal about us from our
website, and we hope you will schedule a visit to experience the spirit
of our faculty and students.
“Dina Bray
“Lower School Head”
————————————————
=======================================
Thanks to the ludicrous over-emphasis on those f—ing tests you love
so much for “other people’s kids”, but hate for your own,
kids at charters are denied such a full, rich curriculum—music
the arts, joy, etc.
I’m going to say it again, and again, and again, and again…
Campbelll, in effect, you spend tens of thousands of dollars of money to make sure that
your own children are, figuratively speaking, kept as far away from Common
Core and your beloved charter schools as your money can manage.
Check out these costs:
According to the above link, this is what Campbell pays
FOR EACH CHILD (she has 2 or 3… I forget):
http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=232
=======================================
Tuition for the 2014-2015 school year is as follows:
N $26,125
PK $35,775
K $36,050
1 $37,425
2 $37,425
3 $38,150
4 $38,150
5 $38,150
6 $38,800
7 $38,800
8 $38,800
9 $39,650
10 $39,650
11 $39,650
12 $40,225
=======================================
Campbell, since you think charter schools and Common Core is so great, I’m sure that you and/or your husband have stormed into the offices of the administrators of your Heschel, and demanded they implement Common Core standard, curriculum, and testing forthwith… with threats to remove your kids if this doesn’t occur?
We all know that ain’t gonna happen.
Finally, Campbell, as to your concern for the well-being of our country and and its educational system…
Can you point me to any country in the history of the human race
that has improved its educational system by privatizing it?
I can point to two that tried:
Chile — thanks to three decades of the Pinochet dictatorship, the
privatization advocates did exactly what you want to do here…
and what’s the result? A total, unmitigated, unqualified disaster.
The working and middle classes are constantly protesting against
this free-market fiasco they live in, where education is more
stratified by class than any country in history.
Sweden — while not as widespread as in Chile, the privatization
efforts there were such a disaster that the government there
recognized this, and apologized for it.
A quick search of the school website reveals that they administer a standardized test to all admitted students in grades 4,5,6,7, and 8, and that they conduct practice sessions before taking it.
Heschel’s staff is entirely comprised of “at will” employees. No tenure. No pensions. No administrative bloat or district bureaucracy. Lower salaries and fewer benefits. No students with special needs, very few students who can’t pay full tuition (which in and of itself has characteristics of what’s known as a Veblen good).
Which of these features would you like to see applied to public education, Jack?
Tim,
I can’t find any reference to standardized tests at the Heschel website.
The school emphasizes social and emotional, as well as academic, development.
This is the description of the academic program for middle school: http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=1031
“The vibrant academic life at Heschel encompasses all aspects of our general and Judiac studies programming, as well as college counseling, our Holocaust Archives Center, and opportunities for performing acts of hesed.
“The educational philosophy of The Abraham Joshua Heschel School is grounded in a strong curriculum which requires each student to seek personal meaning in that curriculum. Our concern for the whole child is reflected in attention to and the balance between intellectual and emotional growth. We emphasize values and moral education. We view concern for the child’s emotional development, the quality of relationships among students and staff, and reaching out to others as critical components of such an education.
“Our educational program is designed to develop skills of inquiry and expression, and to foster understanding of the self and others. We provide models of excellence in our staff and program and emphasize the importance of hard work in the pursuit of achievement. Goals for each school year are viewed in the context of our longer range vision of education as a developmental process.
“Teaching at Heschel is guided by the principle that children learn by doing. We believe that acquiring knowledge through experience enhances the student’s understanding of life in school as well as outside of it and enables him/her to better understand his or her world. We are mindful that exploratory learning requires structure and that spontaneity coexists with, and indeed may be cultivated through, a skillfully ordered environment. Reliable routines facilitate purposeful investigation. We seek a balance of freedom and boundaries which together cultivate inner discipline.
“Our ultimate goal is to develop individuals who are seekers and learners, to educate people who integrate Jewish values in all areas of their lives, and who feel a deep responsibility to the larger world within which they live.”
Heschel is expensive and elite. It is also Jewish. Campbell Brown made a good choice for her children. She pays for it. Does she want the government to pay for it? As long as she pays for it herself, no problem.
We could have the same philosophical devotion to true learning in public schools at no extra cost. The unions don’t prevent it. Nor does the supervision by public officials. The problem is the mandates from NCLB and Race to the Top, which Heschel may safely ignore.
None of them.
You’re talking to someone who’s taught at both… for want of a better description… a rich kids’ private school… AND a hard-core inner-city public school (but no charter in my resume… yet 😉 )
So, to quote Joannie & Judy, “I’ve looked at clouds from both sides now.”
However, you”re actually and unintentionally making my point, Tim.
Not one of the teachers at the rich kids’ private school was the sole breadwinner for her household, and only a couple were moms. They didn’t need the same salaries or the benefits or job protections that come with teaching more challenging students, and in more challenging environment. There’s no way any of them could have afforded to live in Los Angeles on that salary. I barely did so myself… and went into debt in the process.
Public school teachers—I am now one—need and deserve a salary and benefits more in accordance with the environment, large class size, and challenges that kids bring from their socio-economic environments. Compared to the private school in which I taught, the stress and workload was and is several times more intense and demanding.
What from the private school world WOULD I like applied?
Lower class sizes. The kids that need that the most are the ones who are not getting it—public school kids … and vice-versa.
A rich curriculum—with dedicated arts teachers, music teachers, musical instruments, full-time P.E. teachers… and on and on… I struggle to fit this in, but it will never be what it is in the private school.
Those are two that come to mind.
Part of what made the private school teaching experience more enjoyable and favorable was that I never had to discipline a child… ever… There was total cooperation, and little to no dysfunction brought from the family, the neighborhood, entrenched poverty, etc.
There was a famous movie star whose kid shot a rubber band that left a red mark on the neck of another student. Do you want to know how that was handled?
IMMEDIATE EXPULSION… AND A NO REFUND OF THE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS OF TUITION ALREADY PAID.
And what was the result of that? The teachers were Gods that were feared and revered as such. Those kids knew that they could and would be dealt with likewise if they did or said anything against the rules. All I had to do was say, “Do you want to go to Ms. Jane’s office?” and they’d be grovelling and apologizing… The place was like Sesame Street. That’s all I can say. This pleasant atmosphere and happy, cooperative kids made up for the rest of it.
(Actual conversation the first day after Christmas break that I overheard…
“Where’d you go over break?
“London. How ’bout you?”
“Paris.”
These were the nicest kids, mind you… not snobby rich kid cliches from an ANIMAL HOUSE type movie. Let me be clear about that. )
The class sizes at the private school were also small — 8-to-12 in a room.
As regards the testing at Heschel, you haven’t contradicted my main point.
THERE’S NOT COMMON CORE TESTING, AND CONSTANT TEST PREP.
If Common Core test prep, curriculum (I forgot that in my post), and testing were and are so gosh-darn great, why doesn’t Ms. Brown’s school follow it? Why isn’t Ms. Brown and Mr. Senor in the offices of Heschel demanding that they follow it forthwith, and threaten to remove their own children, or start a petition among the Heschel parents if this does not happen?
Because they all know, and you know that Common Core is sh#%, and that’s it’s only for “other people’s kids.”
TIM: “A quick search of the school website reveals that they administer a standardized test to all admitted students in grades 4,5,6,7, and 8, and that they conduct practice sessions before taking it. ”
You’re a better website searcher than I, Tim. Could you please provide a link to this, and the name of the tests that they do take?
Also, what’s a “Veblen good”? Is that keeping rich kids as far away from the middle and working classes… until they graduate college and become TFA Corps Members?
Diane,
Search the Heschel website for the acronym “ERB”. In November the school will set aside no fewer than ELEVEN mornings, from 8:30 – 12:00, for the testing of its fourth and fifth graders. For grades 6, 7, and 8, testing takes place over the course of three days in January.
NCLB was necessitated by disgraceful inequities in school performance. It turns out that when the employment status and salaries of district officials, school administrators, and teachers depend on their own opinion of how well their schools are functioning, it gives them an incentive to rate themselves as being great! The fancy Dewey private schools, even the school that Dewey himself founded, recognize this tendency toward bias, which is why they administer tests like the ERBs as a supplement to in-house/in-classroom assessments.
There is nothing at all to stop districts, schools, and teachers from pursuing true learning. Anyone who believes that schools influence only 1-16% of a student’s test score performance and then goes ahead and preps and narrows the curriculum anyway is making his or her priorities exceptionally clear.
CORRECTION
NCLB was necessitated by ALLEGED disgraceful inequities in school performance THAT WERE MANUFACTURED by CORRUPT, FRAUDULENT CORPORATE REFORMERS. FOR INSTANCE, THE WALTON FAMILY, THE KOCH BROTHERS CABAL, ELI BROAD, AND THE BILL GATES CABAL in addition to a lot of hedge funds drooling for public money.
Evidence:
Poor ranking on international test misleading about U.S. student performance, Stanford researcher finds
As a result of the new information, the U.S. rankings on the 2009 PISA test in reading and math would rise, respectively, to SIXTH from 14th
6th (TOP 9%) in math (66 economies took part in the PISA—this means the U.S. outranked 60 of these economies or countries)
and to 13th from 25th after controlling for social class differences and a sampling error by PISA and after eliminating between-country differences that are statistically too small to meaningfully affect a country’s ranking.
13th (TOP 19.6%) in reading (66 economies took part in the PISA—this means the U.S. outranked 53 of those economies or countries)
IN ADDITION, There is an achievement gap between more and less disadvantaged students in every country; surprisingly, that gap is smaller in the United States than in similar post-industrial countries, and not much larger than in the very highest scoring countries.
Achievement of U.S. disadvantaged students has been rising rapidly over time, while achievement of disadvantaged students in countries to which the United States is frequently unfavorably compared – Canada, Finland and Korea, for example – has been falling rapidly.
U.S. PISA scores are depressed partly because of a sampling flaw resulting in a disproportionate number of students from high-poverty schools among the test-takers. About 40 percent of the PISA sample in the United States was drawn from schools where half or more of the students are eligible for the free lunch program, though only 32 percent of students nationwide attend such schools.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/january/test-scores-ranking-011513.html
And the U.S. has the highest rate of childhood poverty in the developed world.
Jack, as I said to Diane, search the Heschel website for “ERB.” Taking the ERB is not only a prerequisite for admission to Heschel, it is also administered to enrolled students in grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.
A Veblen good is a good for which demand will actually decrease if the price decreases. Private school tuition in New York City is a status symbol; many wealthy parents would like it to be even higher than it is, both for added status and for increasing their child’s chances of gaining admission. A manufacturer of a pure Veblen good (jewelry, high-end luxury cars) can simply pocket the excess as profit. A luxury private school has to plow its excess into staffing and amenities that are deemed central to the exempt organization’s mission, so it gets gratuitously low class sizes, gorgeous facilities, etc.
Tim, who pays your salary?
NYU pays mine.
Who pays yours?
TIM
HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO REPEAT THIS IDEA: STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES OF HESCHEL STUDENTS ARE NOT USED TO THREATEN TEACHERS AND HENCE TESTING IS NOT TWISTED INTO A WEAPON AGAINST TEACHERS.
THE TEACHERS AT HESCHEL DON’T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT HAVING THEIR REPUTATIONS RUINED OR THEIR CAREERS DESTROYED BY TEST WRITERS.
COME ON TIM JUST GIVE UP. YOUR COMMENTS ARE BLINDED BY YOUR IDEOLOGY.
RageAgainstTheTestocracy:
I will borrow, unabashedly, from a compliment paid to me on this blog—
“Your moniker is most appropriate.”
Yours too!
😃
Perhaps a new record is being set today on this blog for deflecting, avoiding and evading.
I am pulled in three directions.
1), There are valid points and info being brought up that provide much food for thought.
2), A bit insulted at a crude attempt to rewrite rheephorm history.
3), A feeling of sadness that someone thinks he can do such a clumsy job at pushing defective eduproducts on this blog.
Of the three, it is the third that leaves the most lasting impression.
😎
P.S. If you haven’t already, read BANESH HOFFMAN, THE TYRANNY OF TESTING.
Tim,
Sorry I’m late getting back to you. I went to see the new Spielberg movie. Good, but not as good as Lincoln.
I’m curious though. What is the standardized test that they take?
What’s the name of it?
Veblen, shmeblen… the rich get a royal education funding and facilities and low class size…. everyone else gets what they get, depending on the state.
On the topic of class size hypocrisy, here’s a devastating article that points up Bill Gates’ hypocrisy when it comes to the variation between what he demands for his own children, and what he subjects children from middle and lower income communities:
http://seattletimes.com/html/dannywestneat/2014437975_danny09.html
THE SEATTLE TIMES’ Danny Weastneat takes Gates to task for promoting policy all over the country that jacks class size sky high, with Gates using the common-sense-defying logic that kids will fare better in larger classes.
Well, Weastneat sends his own kids to public schools, and will eventually attend Garfield High School (in the news of late). These are the schools that—once Gates has his way—will have obscenely large class sizes… A bit fed up, Weastneat did what perhaps no other writer has yet dared to do:
he investigated the two rich kids’ private school where Gates sends his own children and—doncha know it? —these schools major selling point is that they have… wait for it… EXTREMELY SMALL CLASS SIZES:
——————-
WEASTNEAT: “I bet (Gates) senses deep down as a parent that pushing more kids into classes isn’t what’s best for students. His kids’ private-sector grade school has 17 kids in each room. His daughter’s high school has 15. These intimate settings are the selling point, the chief reason tuition is $25,000 a year — more than double what Seattle schools spends per student.”
—————–
Calling out Gates’ hypocrisy, Weastneat ends the article with a knockout finish:
WEASTNEAT: “Bill, here’s an experiment. You and I both have an 8-year-old. Let’s take your school and double its class sizes, from 16 to 32. We’ll use the extra money generated by that — a whopping $400,000 more per year per classroom — to halve the class sizes, from 32 to 16, at my public high school, Garfield.
“In 2020, when our kids are graduating, we’ll compare what effect it all had. On student achievement. On teaching quality. On morale. Or that best thing of all, the “environment that promotes relationships between teachers and students.”
“Deal? Probably not. Nobody would take that trade. Which says more than all the studies ever will.”
My eyes hurt nothing is repairing what we know is it. my eyes hurt reading the rethoric. My kids go out in crisis. They do to classmates what is done to them in their environment. They tell me they are 7 years old. They are new and so ready to beat anybody else down
Whose deep pocket is Campbell Brown residing? A talking head.
Her husband is hedgie Dan Loeb.
No, her husband is Dan Señor, who worked for the Bush administration as an advisor on the Iraq war.
Dan Loeb is a hedge fund billionaire, and a DFER.
She’s a buddy of Dan Loeb who’s on the board of the Success Academy. I’ve been arguing with Loeb for years (I went to public elementary through high school with him – yes he’s a product of public schools), and I can tell you he’s a sociopath – as are all reformers.
The Dan Loeb article in a past issue of Vanity Fair confirms Carrie’s statement. That’s why it is imperative that reformers get nowhere near America’s children.
As loud as Campbell Brown barks for the annihilation of the community school, not a sound comes out of her regarding the rampant charter fraud and mismanagement. And not one peep about her “peeps,” Michelle Rhee and her fittingly-matched, power hungry, twisted husband, Kevin Johnson.
It bears repeating the the latest about Kevin Johnson, the privatizing, union-busting husband of the privatizing, union-busting Michelle Rhee:
**** SPECIAL BULLETIN ***
**** WE INTERRUPT YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED PROGRAMMING to bring you the latest on the pedophilia scandal swirling around Kevin Johnson, the current Mayor of Sacramento and prominent proponent of school privatization and union-busting … oh yeah, and the husband of Michelle Rhee.***
BELOW is the recently-released police interview video — conducted during the 1996 investigation — with the alleged victim Mandi Koba herself. Here she recounts the horror of being molested by Michelle Rhee’s husband Kevin Johnson, the current mayor of Sacramento and a prominent proponent of busting teacher unions, and replacing public schools with privately-run charter schools.
Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson is the same man who has no court-mandated limits on his access to the two daughters of his current wife Michelle Rhee (who are also, of course, the daughters of her ex-husband and former Tennessee Education Commissioner Kevin Huffman.) Conceivably, these two daughters, when visiting their mother Michelle Rhee and their step-father Kevin Johnson in Sacramento, could be left alone with this perv, without any supervision whatsoever.
Scary stuff. (Mr. Huffman, if you’re reading this, what are you going to do about this?)
Watch the video and judge for yourself.
Keep in mind, folks, that this is a sixteen-year-old girl, recounting events of a few months prior when she was just fifteen. The video is even dated July 19, 1996 ( “7-19-1996” )
———————————————————————-
( 00:37 – 01:35 )
( 00:37 – 01:35 )
PHOENIX P.D. DETECTIVE: “What … what specific areas (of your body did Kevin Johnson fondle)?”
MANDI KOBA: “My stomach. My breasts. My butt… ”
PHOENIX P.D. DETECTIVE: (almost whispering) “Anywhere else?”
MANDI KOBA: “As it progressed.”
PHOENIX P.D. DETECTIVE: “Where ELSE did it progress?”
MANDI KOBA: “Between my legs.”
PHOENIX P.D. DETECTIVE: “Okay, and what do we call that area?”
MANDI KOBA: “My vagina.”
PHOENIX P.D. DETECTIVE: “And – and I know some of the questions sound stupid. Okay? And I apologize for it, but there are certain things I’m looking for. Unless I know these things, then…
MANDI KOBA: “I understand.”
PHOENIX P.D. DETECTIVE: ” … then I don’t know what’s going on.”
— (PAUSE)
“He (Kevin Johnson) had HIS clothes off?”
MANDI KOBA: “Yes.”
PHOENIX P.D. DETECTIVE: “What happened after the fondling?”
MANDI KOBA: “That’s … we didn’t have intercourse… It was… just a lot of THAT. I don’t know how long it lasted, and then… ummm ”
CLIP ENDS
———————————–
(ONE SIDE NOTE: what’s up with choosing a male detective to conduct this incredibly sensitive and delicated interview? Wouldn’t this be better handled by a female detective? Just askin’.)
There’s so much to be asked here.
If this video were about the predations of a prominent teacher—especially one in the anti-corporate reform movement, or perhaps a prominent teacher union leader…
—what do think Campbell Brown would be doing in response to this video?
What would Ben Austin would be doing in response to this video?
What would Michelle Rhee be doing in response to this video?
The same question goes for Eli Broad, Mike Petrilli, Wendy Kopp, Richard Barth and the rest.
Before she went on her campaign to take away all teachers’ rights and job protections, Campbell Brown first came to prominence with her accusations that among the unionized teachers of New York City were hundreds of pedophiles on the loose, thanks to their being protected by their union. When all of that was proven to be nonsense, she simply moved on to her current crusade.
Now that Ms. Brown and the rest of the corporate reform world have video proof that one of their pro-charter, union-hating allies Kevin Johnson (and also the husband of one of their most prominent allies) is a pedophile, the question must be asked:
What is Campbell Brown doing now? SILENCE
Where is Kevin Huffman doing now? SILENCE
From this shameful silence, they communicate to the world that they apparently view this girl in the video above — and Johnson’s other victims — as collateral damage in the movement to bust unions and privatize the public school system. Now that Kevin Johnson has successfully pulled off a hostile takeover of that Black Mayors’ association, he will be instrumental in privatizing hundreds of schools in those cities run by black mayors in the organization. Since the ends justify the means, someone like Johnson who is that key in the anti-union movement to privatize public schools must be given a pass for his fondness of teenage female flesh.
To watch the entirety of this video in context, watch here:
There’s more about Johnson rubbing his … against her leg. I’m not doing any more transcribing, as this is seriously creeping me out.
————————————–
from the SACRAMENTO BEE:
“Johnson’s camp was incredulous Monday that ESPN would announce postponing the film just hours before hundreds of Sacramentans gathered to celebrate its viewing at the Crest Theatre.”
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/article38838423.html#storylink=cpy
Well, boo-freakin’-hoo. Poor Kevin.
The only person to whom anyone should be showing sympathy is…
MANDI KOBA
———————-
ELLEN LUBIC: “Can it be that this Broad-protected and nurtured pair are so insulated that they can get away with anything they wish to do, that would get ordinary people indicted?”
BINGO!
I should have given DEADSPIN more credit, plus a link to the article:
http://deadspin.com/police-video-shows-teen-girl-graphically-accusing-kevin-1735279363
There are details in her full video testimony that are simply beyond bizarre.
After each time Kevin Johnson would molest Mandi Koba, he would then tell Mandi, “Now, we have to pray for God’s forgiveness for what the sins we’ve just committed.” Then he would lead the pair in prayer.
WTF????!!!
Excuse me, but what’s this “we” sh#@ that Kevin tries on her? EXACTLY what does SHE have to ask forgiveness for? She’s the victim here…and a passive one at that. She says that throughout these molestation sessions that she was too scared sh#%-less to do anything. Is Kevin claiming that Mandi is a Jezebel-Delilah-like temptress who acted as a Lolita and used her 15 year-old nubile body to drive him to sin?
Again… WTF???!!!!
Kevin also makes the counter-argument that it could have been worse; they could have been kissing. Kevin maintains that kissing is far more sinful and intimate to what he was doing… so good thing we’ve never kissed.
Again… WTF???!!!!
http://deadspin.com/police-video-shows-teen-girl-graphically-accusing-kevin-1735279363
ONE MORE THING: People have been asking the question for the last year:
“How could Bill Cosby have gotten away with raping women for so long?”
Well, here’s why. Just as with the Bill Cosby’s behavior, the mainstream media is TOTALLY IGNORING THIS RELEASE OF VIDEO. They are acting like it never happened.
That’s why he and Kevin get away with this stuff. They’re celebrities who get a free pass. Kevin allegedly molested girls in Sacramento from his St. Hope charter school. Their silence was allegedly bought off by lawyers under the direction of Kevin Johnson’s wife, Michelle Rhee.
OH… AND ONE LAST THING: Later this week, ESPN Sports Network is broadcasting a totally positive and glowing documentary portrayal of of Kevin Johnson. This will be total hagiography. The folks at ESPN know better — they almost certainly have watched the video of the police interview — but they’re still running the piece.
Think how painful that must be for Mandi Koba and Kevin’s other victims.
The film is called: DOWN IN THE VALLEY. Here’s a preview.
http://espn.go.com/30for30/film?page=downinthevalley
——–
By the way the mainstream media has finally responded. ESPN’s cancellation of its pro-Johnson documentary force their hand. They couldn’t ignore it at that point. But for that cancellation, they would still be ignoring it.
For a good laugh, check out the local Sacramento CBS news take on this. It’s like Kevin Johnson’s equivalent of the North Korean News Agency:
SEE THE NEXT POST
The main news organization that has been exposing Kevin Johnson has been the on-line sports magazine DEADSPIN.
The general contention of DEADSPIN’s editor Tim Marchman and its writer covering Johnson, Dave McKenna, has been that the mainstream media has been totally inept and biased in its coverage of Kevin Johnson. It’s all ridiculously one-sided and favorable to Johnson, while diverting attention from Johnson by attacking Johnson’s critics motivations and tactics.
So, when the mainstream local CBS TV outfit responds to this latest outrage, they … wait for it … barely mention the main story — the police interview video — and instead pursue a full-on attack on DEADSPIN… thus proving DEADSPIN’s point.
Thus, the day that a story hits big that a police video of a 16 year-old-girl recounting Johnson molesting her when she was fifteen provokes ESPN to pull a pro-Johnson documentary…
… the story gets transmogrified into …
“Johnson’s critics have a vendetta.”
As the saying goes, this CBS report has to be seen to be disbelieved:
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2015/10/14/kevin-johnson-supporters-claim-deadspin-has-vendetta-against-sacramento-mayor/#.Vh8av3xwRJ4.twitter
From the anchor introducing clip making a cute reference to Mayor Johnson as “K.J.” (“Kay-Jay”) onward, it’s a pretty dismal performance.
For example, the reporter focuses on how DEADSPIN editor Tim Marchman uses profanity during a phone conversation, not an official interview for broadcast — which is heavily chopped up into short bites.
Therefore, what?
Johnson’s critics at DEADSPIN’s use profanity = Johnson is innocent.
The logic escapes me.
DEADSPIN writes multiple stories criticizing Johnson = Johnson is innocent.
Uhhhmmm… yeah… okay. Whatever you say.
And of course, there’s a portion where Johnson’s spokesman is lobbed softball questions by Tony Lopez, the reporter. The reporter even throws out as absolute fact, during his narration, that the sexual misconduct accusations against Johnson “are old, and already unproven.”
No, they’re old, but they’re not uproven… in part because Johnson paid off multiple victims in an unfortunately successful attempt to keep them out of criminal or civil court, where they could have been proven or “unproven.”
If this were a piece put out by Johnson’s PR machinery, that would be one thing. But this is the supposedly objective mainstream media… from the same network that produced Edward R. Murrow.
Lopez asks if Marchman paid for the police interview video that DEADSPIN posted, and Marchman denies doing so…. BUT WHAT IF DEADSPIN DID PAY FOR IT? WHAT DIFFERENCE WOULD THAT MAKE???!! In a story about the ethics of news organizations purchasing evidence or testimony… yeah… then it would be relevant, but that’s not what’s important here to the citizen of Sacramento; the newly-released video is.
Why is whether or not DEADSPIN purchased the video the focus of Lopez’ story? What about the content within the video itself? It never gets discussed, and Lopez gives a lame-ass reason for this when the news returns to the studio.
The reporter Tony Lopez even tweeted about this piece as if it actually scored any points against Johnson’s critics:
——————-
TONY LOPEZ:
How angry was Deadspin’s Editor when I asked him if his publication has a personal vendetta against #KevinJohnson ? Wow! Watch at 5 #CBS13
—————-
Boy, you local CBS boys really put Johnson’s critics in their place, Tony…. NOT!
When the segment is over, and it goes back to the newsroom with Tony chatting with the anchors, the male anchor, perhaps going off-script, asks the obvious question — (What about the newly-released video???? HELL-LO!!!!”):
——–
MALE ANCHOR: “Did you two (Lopez and Marchman) talk about this new video that’s out there, and that’s really touched off a reaction in this community? Did you get to the specifics on THAT, and the reactions we (CBS) have received (from the public) on that?”
TONY LOPEZ: “Not so much, because of that confidentiality agreement that she (the victim Mandi Koba) signed (19 years ago)?”
——–
What an absolute load of b.s.! The old confidentiality agreement that Mandi Koba signed 19 years ago — under pressure from adults, including her parents — has totally been rendered totally null and void by her decision to go public under her own name. Everything is now public and “on the record” for anyone — including Lopez and Marchman — to discuss as freely and in as much detail as they please. That includes the video and everything that’s said on that video.
The people tweeting in response to Lopez were spot on:
——–
Stephen Rodrick @stephenrodrick Oct 14
@tlomedia @timmarchman “Well, if you actually reported on the story rather than another publication’s reporting, u wouldn’t be in this position”
memefan2000 @memefan2000 Oct 14
@tlomedia “do you even practice journalism?”
Mark In Victoria @markinvictoria Oct 14
@tlomedia Crazy idea. “How about you address the substance of the reports rather than attacking the messenger?”
Jeffrey Wuhl @jeffreywuhl Oct 14
@tlomedia @timmarchman cbs “13 covers ‘Mayor Johnson’ like I imagine the North Korean local news covers Kim Jong Un”
Brendan Kennedy @swingkennedy Oct 14
@tlomedia “How much did it look like you were shitting your pants when he told you how bad the Sac media is at their jobs? Wow! Watch at 5.”
Carson Stanwood @carsonstanwood Oct 14
@tlomedia @tomscocca “I hear they also have a vendetta against statutory rape. Some nerve!”
Drivewest @drivewest Oct 14
@tlomedia “maybe you should be asking the mayor about his corruption and molesting girls instead of using your platform to troll blogs.”
A. Win @AlwaysWinning1 Oct 14
@tlomedia “how many dinners with Kevin Johnson did your integrity cost–1, 2?”
Pat Burda @gremlingolfer Oct 14
@tlomedia “that is such a horseshit tweet. Deadspin did your job for you, bud. And did it well.”
SirAter ® @Sir_Ater Oct 14
.@tlomedia “judging by the response this has backfired.” ��
andrew @larson8er Oct 14
@tlomedia grow up. “It’s not a joke and your mayor is a predator.”
Guillermo Elenes @gdelenes Oct 14
@tlomedia @timmarchman “your missing the story bud ! And it’s not
0 retweets 3 favorites
Mercedes…you left out an operant word in identifying Rhee’s basketball player husband who is Mayor of Sacramento…I think your description might read “power hungry, twisted PERP husband” Kevin Johnson…..
David Cameron is facing strong opposition; There is a fair chance at least that he is in trouble over his policies, not just in this, but in the parliamentary system which the U.K. has a vote which could replace him could be in the offing.
Exit public good, sense and sensibility.
Enter classism at its worst, Fleet Street and Sweeney Todd.
It’s good the ed reform “movement” is (finally) saying it, though. Maybe now we can have a debate on whether the public wants to privatize public schools.
I think eradicating public schools would be a huge mistake and we’ll deeply regret it, but it’s better if politicians say it publicly instead of limiting the “debate” to think tanks and lobbyists and experts.
It’s amazing to watch the goalposts move as privatization continues. First it was “choice” to “escape” from “failing schools”, then it was “choice” to provide “competition” everywhere and now we’re just getting rid of public schools altogether. This is exactly what people who value public schools warned would happen, and it has come to pass.
In my state, there is absolutely nothing “in the data” to justify expanding charter schools to the exclusion of public schools. This must be based purely on ideology and anti-organized labor positions, because it sure isn’t based on performance.
The folks in the drivers’ seat sell privatization to ideologues, to anti-union types, to those who believe testing-data measures edu achievement, & any other way they can market it. Goalposts shift as reqd…
Another rheephorm cat let out of the bag…
I refer interested viewers to the thread of another blog posting today, “Beaumont, Texas: 13-Year-Old Opts Out, State Officials Freak Out, Online Campaign Ignites.”
Chiara begins: “You-all should really read the Obama Administration people who leave the administration and go on to private sector consulting. It gives one a good sense of how closed the ed reform community is, how there was universal agreement on policies like testing and any dissent was dismissed.”
Campbell Brown rolls with many of the heavyweights, shot-callers and decision makers of the self-proclaimed “education reform” movement. She’s part of the inner circle.
She is not what you would call a “thought leader” of corporate education reform but something more valuable for those in favor of a “better education for all””: she is a “speak the thoughts out loud that the leading rheephormistas would prefer to keep behind closed doors” kind of person.
So it turns out that the foundational principles of self-styled “education reform” such as charters and privatization are not the “rising tide that lifts all public school boats” but rather a destructive tsunami (precipitated by a few self-serving adults at the expense of the vast majority) that is meant to degrade, displace, replace and eliminate public schools.
I, for one, am glad she spilled the beans. She is, quite literally and accurately, describing corporate education reform as it really is and not as it pretends to be.
Reminds me of a posting by the redoubtable Dr. Mercedes Schneider aka deutsch29 on what another charter member of the rheephorm establishment, Frederick M. Hess of the American Enterprise Institute, had to say about the pedagogical and curricular joys of Common Core:
[start]
In truth, the idea that the Common Core might be a “game-changer” has little to do with the Common Core standards themselves, and everything to do with stuff attached to them, especially the adoption of common tests that make it possible to readily compare schools, programs, districts, and states (of course, the announcement that one state after another is opting out of the two testing consortia is hollowing out this promise).
But the Common Core will only make a dramatic difference if those test results are used to evaluate schools or hire, pay, or fire teachers; or if the effort serves to alter teacher preparation, revamp instructional materials, or compel teachers to change what students read and do. And, of course, advocates have made clear that this is exactly what they have in mind. When they refer to the “Common Core,” they don’t just mean the words on paper–what they really have in mind is this whole complex of changes.
[end]
Link: https://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/the-american-enterprise-institute-common-core-and-good-cop/
Speaking strictly for myself, I think Mr. Hess and Ms. Brown deserve some sort of award to thank them for exposing rheephormsters for what they are.
Maybe call it the John Steinbeck?
“Man is the only kind of varmint sets his own trap, baits it, then steps in it.”
😎
Great info ‘Krazy One’…made me wonder if corporate America will locate their massive businesses in only states with high test scoring students?
Goolge moved to Venice, California, and drove up property values so high that regular buyers of real estate/homes must look elsewhere. But they must have confidence that So. California can supply an educated work force…with so many coming from our public schools which are consistently defamed by the DEformers like Eli Broad.
What are your thoughts on investors in both Google and in Charters?
Is Eli’s current push (using Deasy as hatchet man yet again) being done to satisfy the Google industry??? Nah…more likely to satisfy Milken and K12, Dan Loeb, Tilson, Icahn, and their other billionaire hedge fund cronies nationwide.
I wonder????
Jeez…dear Krazed…just read your link to Mercedes great column on Hess and Deasy from almost exactly two years ago, and see I made a long comment….saying basically what I say here and on other public sites and in articles, almost daily. Big bummer that this all has escalated instead of diminished in the last two years.
Ellen Lubic: cannot answer your questions because, unlike the rheephormsters, I have learned it’s not a sin to say—
Sorry, I haven’t studied up on that, I don’t know.
As for escalation rather than diminishment over the last two years of the toxic effects of rheephorm:
I didn’t know you were such a Yogi Berra fan!
¿😳?
“It’s like déjà vu vu, all over again.”
😎
It’s time for all public schools to call for the elimination of Campbell Brown.
She has had a lot more than her fifteen minutes of “fame.” She should crawl back under the rock from which she came.
Campbell Brown, Monica Lewinsky, and Bristol Palin. Media keeps giving attention to the three know-nothings, whose record of meaningful contribution is nil.
Monica Lewinsky does not fit in this group, Linda. She has a very good university education and a very high IQ, and reasonably better taste in men.
A defense of Lewinsky that fails to answer the question, why does her choice in men, elevate her to media attention.
If the ed reform experiment in privatizing all public schools does not make for better schools, can we get public schools back, or are they gone forever?
This is a rhetorical question.
I know the answer and so do all of you- nothing that is privatized is ever returned to public control and ownership, no matter how poorly privatization turns out. It isn’t an “experiment” at all. It’s permanent- it will be more or less regulated or more or less corrupt but once it’s privatized it’s gone. That’s the one sure thing in privatization. Politicians and lobbyists don’t undo it.
Scares me. Scares me a lot.
Why attack Campbell Brown? This is about David Cameron, the Prime Minister of United Kingdom and his policy speach to his party members. It is not our country and is no where near certainty.
Campbell Brown and her lobbying group have a duty to admit they are not “agnostics” because that is obviously, painfully not true.
For people who are supposedly calling for a “debate” they spend an awful lot of time promoting privatization and insisting that’s not what they’re doing. The fact is this “movement” have been moving the goalposts for 20 years and it never moves toward “public schools”.
Shouldn’t the politicians who support this have to run on it? At what point do they drop the pretense that they are about “improving public schools”? We can hardly have a “debate” if one side of the debate refuses to say what they support.
Raj, let me explain. This post does not “attack” Campbell Brown. In public discourse, it is permissible to disagree. In a democracy, that is. The point of the post is that she chides American presidential candidates for not following the lead of David Cameron, who proposed the complete elimination of traditional public schools and local school boards. The post is not about Cameron. The post is about Brown’s support for Cameron’s radical proposal.
I believe this is an admission of the reformers, who have denied this mission to the public, that is finally exposed. She profits off our kids, and is supported by the foundations whose mission is to privatize to profit off our tax dollars at the expense of democracy. This isn’t just about the UK, it is about us all.
Raj, dude…
We’re attacking what Ms. Brown said in HER article… that she echoes his call for the total elimination of traditional public schools in THIS country, and stating a presidential candidate must say and believe this as well, in order to receive her support, and the support of her “THE 74” organization.
Go re-read it.
An observation-
I’ve noticed a trend among some right wing blog commenters. When they post their unpopular opinions, at websites geared to the 90% (the people Congress ignores), they select pen names or photos that indicate that they are protected class minorities.
When the commenters are asked to clarify, (other commenters noting that, writing styles (M/F), expressed attitudes, and described experiences are generally inconsistent with minority status), it’s met with defensiveness.
The same attempt at duplicity, among commenters from the left, doesn’t seem to occur.
What a fool she is and how greedy! …..I sit here writing this as I am in my classroom working on a Saturday. I can’t get all of my teacher work done through the actual work week. I do all of this for free because I truly care about my students and their learning. I am an older teacher..you know….the older teacher who is “greedy” to pick up the paycheck and cheat the kids out of their learning.
I know how this movie ends. I am presently teaching with 3 of the most wonderful first year teachers at my grade level. I have helped each one of them immensely with resources, running papers off for them, conversation….anything I can do to help them transition into their very first year. Anything I do with my kids…I give to them. I hold nothing back……..These lovely young people are exhausted, discouraged….and do not know how in the world they will do this to 60 years old or older. They are already questioning why they went into this exhausting career. I feel so badly for them…..for next year is my last year, and I honestly do not know how they will make it with the current toxic policies either. The paperwork is ridiculous, time consuming…..and it has nothing to do with what you are doing with your kids in the classroom. I cannot grade papers this weekend at all, because I am answering pages of Marzano questions for an upcoming evaluation. I will go into the classroom exhausted on Monday morning…..because I have worked the entire weekend on paperwork that means nothing to the learning advancement of my kids. I will not even be able to grade papers this weekend…..it has gotten beyond crazy. The teacher shortage in the U.S. under these toxic policies is unavoidable. No one in their right mind will make such low salary with high college costs and low job satisfaction. No one.
Not everyone can send their children to expensive private schools like Campbell. The public schools are all the middle class have. There are evil forces in play in our country right now that are trying to take college educations away from the middle class. Campbell wishes to seal the deal and take away our public schools too. Campbell’s actions are evil, and I honestly do not know how she sleeps at night. I used to watch her many years ago on television, and I really liked her. It is sad that she gave into evil, and makes money off the backs of the middle class by trying to take their schools away. Campbell will have to answer someday for her actions. I truly feel sorry for someone so clueless.
Deeply touched by your words, Sad Teacher. I would hope that Diane posts them as an article. You are a class act…pun intended.
Sad Teacher
With one year remaining in your career why worry about Marzano? I fill out the iobservation questions with one or two word answers. It takes me less than three minutes. I line my bird cage with his rubrics and wrap dead fish in my evaluation. Go back to grading your papers and ignore the BS. Make your final lap all about the kids. Time to change that name.
Your’s is my favorite post of the day. Spot on, and uplifting. Great advice.
I agree – pure, distilled, concentrated evil. Now we know how much her soul is worth.
Seriously, what is the difference between Brown and a drug dealer? At least the drug dealer is honest with you and will tell you he is in it for the money. And EVERYBODY knows that his product and actions destroy people and communities I don’t think there is a person alive that thinks crack and heroin improve lives, families and communities.
Brown on the other hand is deceptive in her rhetoric and would prefer to undermine families and communities for the bidding of her master. All the while purposly deceaving while using other peoples children to make a profit.
Make no mistake, she does not have a burning desire in her heart to right wrongs and do what is right for the greater good even at the expense of self – aka integrity. Nope, she is in it for the money and power.
Like I said, she sold her soul.
I concur with the other posters Sad Teacher. Make this last year a celebration of a long career of teaching and caring. Maybe, when you’re on the “outside,” you can become “Mad Teacher” and start fighting back. Greed is powerful as hell, but it is not the only human motivator.
Great comments. You are absolutely right.
I agree
Public schools are fundamentally necessary to a TRUE democracy (not the oligarchy we live in now). Brown is one of many haters of true democracy now getting attention way beyond what they deserve. Instead, they should be seen as threats to true democracy, not simply as no-nothing pundits trying to wield power and get more wealth. Academies are elitist, exclusionary, and anti-democracy.
Agree.
Academies, like charter schools, choose their students. That is why there is more social stratification in countries like Chile and Sweden, which adopted Milton Friedman free-market reforms. And neither country is a top-performing country. Sweden has actually experienced a decline on international tests and an increase in social stratification since introducing for-profit schools and choice.
We should quit calling them charter schools. They should be referred to as “publicly funded private schools, often known as “charters.” Repeat that. Bottle that. This has to be the new phrase. The conversation needs to become market oriented to expose what has happened. The wolf has on Grandma’s night gown and it says “charter.” No more! Who are we afraid of offending on that? Why do we tiptoe around calling a spade a spade? Red Riding Hood is very close to the edge of Grandma’s cot here—-lured in by that nightgown. Where’s the woodsman?
Epistomology reigns. Ask Lakoff.
I would also suggest that we call these deranged greedy Ayn Randians, ‘DEformers’, not “REformers” of the “publicly funded private schools known as charters.”
Involved Mom, I’d go even farther.
We are the reformers now, since we can cite 15 years of failed education policy dominated by BS tests and so-called national standards. In other words, THEY are the status quo, and we need to call them on their soft racism of the last 15 years when things got worse, not better. How can they defend their records?
We call them east coast and west coat elitists. We accuse them of big government, nanny state regulation that deny freedom and liberty to local communities, and the democratic administration of local schools.
Frame our arguments in their own terms, consistently, and I believe we will, in small part, begin to change the direction of the rhetoric. There are so many people who swallow only what they hear from the standard sources, but in the end, people rely more on personal conversations to come to their opinions, if they trust who they personally hear it from.
None of what I suggest will solve the problem. But it certainly makes me feel better about what I do when I’m engaged in conversation with a wavering citizen or an anonymous commenter on the Internet. They seldom can refute what I say, and using the deformers own words usually drives them a little crazy.
My two cents…
I want to have a different debate than Campbell Brown. I’d like to talk about how ed reform has improved public schools. I know ed reformers like to talk about charters and vouchers, but I remember what these people ran on, and it was “improve public schools”.
Let’s talk about that. How are public schools doing under ed reform leadership? They’ve lost funding and they have more testing, so that’s two negative effects of this “movement”. Anything they can point to on the positive side of the ledger, or are we planning on the spending the whole campaign promoting charters and vouchers?
It’s always enlightening to see the absolute contempt ed reformers have for public schools:
“It may be difficult for Americans to appreciate Cameron’s radical, uneuphemistic boldness. He hopes to replace a state bureaucracy that is even more entrenched, more sclerotic, than its American cousin.”
That may be “difficult for Americans to appreciate”, Campbell, because “Americans” may not agree with you and David Cameron that their public schools are some horrible scourge that has to be eliminated.
Not only did Brown attend the elite $50,000+ a year Madeira Academy, she reportedly was expelled from the Madeira Academy! https://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2014/08/01/pretty-campbell-brown-and-her-ugly-misguided-anti-due-process-crusade/
It’s amazing how many anti-public school activists never actually attended one, isn’t it?
Lisa Eggert & Chiara: quite so.
They literally have no skin in the game, emotionally or practically.
😎
Thanks for bringing that up.
The thing about that is that Campbell ignores the evidence from her own life and decisions when criticizing public school teachers for failing to reach every student, and not overcome any and all obstacles with every student.
No matter how great and caring you are as a teacher, you can’t overcome kids and/or parents who don’t care, or who are not motivated, or whatever. The teacher can fuel the fire, but he or she cannot light it, as it must be lit from within through the cooperation of the parents and the child.
At the same time, her favorite charter operator Eva Moskowitz at SUCCESS ACADEMY (Campbell serves on its board) is notorious for kicking out and failing huge percentages of her students. When asked about this, Eva denies it, calling such accusations “crazy talk.”
Check out that “Captain Queeg” moment in John Merrow’s video earlier this week:
————————————
( 7:48 – 8:17 )
( 7:48 – 8:17 )
JOHN MERROW: “Do you ever use out-of-school suspension as a way to persuade parents that… to- (let Eva kick them out, JACK) ”
EVA MOSKOWITZ: “No. No … uhmm … we don’t … suspend… in order to boost our academics (performance, JACK) … uh-huh … that’s just … crazy talk!”
—————————————-
Now, freeze-frame the following…
8:03
8:03 … Eva is clearly losing her sh#% at this moment … this is the evil Eva that so many defectors and refugees from her school speak of… the one she only shows behind closed doors. Her skin is going blood red.
It’s a face right out a Hieronymus Bosch or Edvard Munch painting.
It’s a face that says, “You’re asking me things I don’t want to answer!!! You’re making me lie!!!! And IT’S REALLY PISSING ME OFF!!!”
8:03… try it again…
If Eva and her charter network were innocent of these accusations, she’d be able to calmly respond in the negative to Merrow’s question. She didn’t, and unless she gets a lot of practice, she lacks the ability to do so.
In short, she’s lying.
Here’s the reference from THE CAINE MUTINY (with Humphrey Bogart, of course, as Captain Queeg losing HIS sh#%):
Let’s give a shout out to Campbell Brown for making the first honest though repugnant statement of the entire “reform”movement, as we all know that this has been their true agenda from the start; now here it is blatantly stated in black and white in no uncertain terms. This will help confused peopleclearly understand what is at stake and to take off their gloves, galvanize, organize and fight back if they want to conserve and save what’s left of our public school institution.
Brava. It’s out on the carpet now!
Flip the public service oblige.
Jail or impeach top officials for stupid policy, not just legal gaffs and sexual scandals. That would be a real game changer.
Yes. Hold them accountable to state constitutions diligently!!
Disheartening.
You know if people are dumb enough to fall for stuff like what she is selling, then whatever they need probably isn’t available through public schools anyway. The problems begin when the weight of this stupidity brings everyone down with it.
That’s why we have to be strong. And not stupid.
What’s she going to do, go change state constitutions one at a time?
I love how she believes charter schools are “innovative”. The charter schools in my state aren’t innovative at all, other than innovating on ways to pay teachers less and administrators more. Even the “specialty” charters here aren’t “innovative”. We have “arts” and “gifted” charters that operate just like poorly regulated and unplanned-for “magnet” schools. I don’t know why that’s an improvement. Cleveland was desperate for a selective publicly-funded “gifted” school that admits children from surrounding suburbs? Why? It’ vital that parents in the suburbs get their own gifted school in an urban area?
Based on Ohio, charter school managers aren’t innovative. Paying off politicians to fleece taxpayers is old school.
Yeah yeah the innovative stuff has cloaked a lot of other intentions. If you turn off the sound and just watch the actions from the last 20 years, it’s like our society just doesn’t want to cooperate with one another on educating our young.
I intend to speak of publicly funded private schools as just that. They wanted a market? Fine. Let’s talk about a market in light of state constitutions and revenue. If people realized how much this so called innovation wastes in terms of dollars, would they get excited over it so easily? When the right to your neighborhood school goes away in the name of innovation, the cost outweighs the benefit IF we are supporting our schools.
As for magnets: they can work. Had I been Sec of Ed, I’d have structured incentives for magnet cooperatives where families can still choose their neighborhood school. That would be better than the incentives offered to privatize or McSchool-ize. People are too kind to charter choosers who leave perfectly good Public schools for that private school (but publicly paid for) experience and philanthropists who have wanted to give but also call the shots are arrogant.
I recently made a geographical move and while I was looking for teaching jobs I did some research on charter schools. Innovative? I don’t think so. One school proudly listed ALL the formal, standardized assessments their students would be taking that school year. There was at least one a week, if not more. How is this innovative? Does anyone take into account how much instructional time is lost prepping for the test, taking the test, recovering from the test? In my own regular Title 1 school I figured out that was SIX WEEKS of lost instructional time, and we ‘only’ assessed once a month or so. Weekly? It’s a wonder any instruction happens at all.
How can people with good intentions be so clueless to such a simple concept? I suppose if you only live an elite life, that is the viewpoint you see the world through. I agree that privatizing schools would only create mass segregation.
And ultimately, as with everything else, eventually one or two companies or conglomerates would own all schools and that truly would be Big Brother. No. Thank. You.
These “reformers” DO NOT have good intentions. Disabuse yourself of that notion. All they see are dollar signs–not students.
I have truly enjoyed all of your comments. It’s 5:02 PM, and I’m still sitting here at my desk on a Saturday afternoon working away on my lesson plans and my Marzano questions. A delightful, caring 1st year teacher is working away right across the hall from me right now. We have agreed to leave our building at about 7PM tonight…..and we will set the alarm together as we leave the building. I’m hoping I can take Sunday afternoon off after church tomorrow and take a nap.
I know I could line the bird cages with my evaluation…since next year is my last year….Your comments were so funny, and they brought a belly laugh from me!!! Ha!! Ha!! But, I just have to leave my profession….knowing I gave it all I had. I have fought the good fight, and I have almost finished the race of my teaching career. I pray for the future of that sweet, caring 1st year teacher across the hall…and I hope and pray these toxic policies change. She will be the perfect teacher for my future grandchild that is born someday. I hope she will still be there working away….My prayers are that we can keep these precious, young, caring teachers who will give everything…like I have….these past 31 years of teaching…..I pray these toxic policies will not burn them out and make them leave a profession which has been left battered by uncaring governors and legislators who do not value what we have selflessly and humbly given our students.
I love reading all of your blogs!!! Keep writing!!! Thank you so much for all of the encouragement!!! It means a lot to me!!! God led me to Diane’s blog!!! Diane’s blog saved me!!! God Bless all of you!!! (:
It really isn’t just Campbell Brown. We have an ed reformer in the statehouse who chairs the ed committee in the lower chamber. He regularly issues attacks on the public schools in the state- he’s opposed to “government schools”.
Since 93% of the kids in this state attend public schools, this clown goes to work every day “opposing” the schools 93% of the students he’s supposed to be serving attend.
It’s ludicrous.
Now, now… Don’t go confusing Campbell Brown with facts… Why, her pretty little privileged head will explode…
My district does fine. Leave my public school alone!
Ditto
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads and commented:
Read this and weep. And read the comments. There are a lot of them, but they are well worth reading.
Kudos and many thanks to the public school teachers who continue to work in the trenches, despite the obstacles, despite the increasingly Byzantine and onerous requirements, despite the lack of respect they are getting from their own school districts, the charter proponents and various governments.
Zorba…how come you have a prominently placed ad for the Broad Museum right next to this reblog on your Poody Head site? That seems really out of place if you are a supporter of public schools. Did Eli pay for that placement?
Let us not forget that Bill Gates also let his true intentions out about the purpose behind common core.
Glenn Beck Program: Did Bill Gates admit the real purpose of Common Core?
Thanks for the post. Where are the Congressional hearings?
OMG!!!
Here’s a must-post, must-read Salon.com article that just hit the internet:
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/19/campbell_browns_insidious_new_lie_charter_schools_dark_money_and_the_war_on_teachers_unions_and_your_kids/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
Here’s the text:
—————
” ‘Campbell Brown’s insidious new lie:
Charter schools, dark money
and the war on teachers’
unions — and your kids’
“by JEFF BRYANT
– – – – – – – – – – – –
“Before Democratic Party presidential candidates readied for their first debate on CNN, they turned down an opportunity to meet at another forum.
“That meeting was to be hosted by ex-CNN anchorwoman Campbell Brown, who now operates a media outlet, ‘THE 74,’ that promotes charter schools and other public education policies favored by wealthy foundations and individuals. Brown’s financial backers include the philanthropic organization of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and the foundation of the family that owns Wal-Mart.
“As Politico reports, Brown’s group and another charter advocacy organization had already brought six Republican candidates together in New Hampshire in August to talk about education policy. Next, in conjunction with the Des Moines Register, the two organizations wanted Democratic candidates to gather in Iowa. None of the candidates would commit to attend even in principle.
“Politico reporter Michael Grunwald was quick to frame the candidates’ snub, with obvious help from Brown herself, as proof of the political might of teachers’ unions.
“For sure, Brown’s history of fighting with teachers’ unions. As an article in The Washington Post last year reported, she led an effort to cast the New York City teachers’ union as a protector of sexual predators.
“After that venture, Brown launched a group that filed a lawsuit in New York State to dilute teachers’ job protections, commonly called ‘tenure.’
“So she is clearly at it again. Grunwald quotes her, “The teachers’ unions have gotten to these candidates.”
“ ‘It’s shameful how my party is being held hostage by the unions,’ Grunwald quotes Kevin Chavous the head of American Federation for Children, the other organization sponsoring the event.
” ‘I see no difference between their strong-arm tactics on the Democrats and the gun lobby’s tactics on Republicans.’
“This is not the first time a proponent for charter schools has compared an organization representing classroom teachers to an extremist group that responded to the gun deaths of school kids and educators in a Newtown, Connecticut, elementary school by blaming the teachers for not packing heat.
“Comments like these show how hyperbolic people who back charter schools, high-stakes testing and a crackdown on teachers’ collective bargaining rights have become.
“Trolling For Education ‘Reform’
“But aside that offensive remark, Brown and Chavous also took to The Daily Beast to accuse the teachers’ unions of “bullying” them and being “anti-democratic.” They warn the Democratic Party presidential slate:
“ ‘Voters have demonstrated time and again that candidates who buck the teachers’ union are rewarded.’ (Uh-huh, tell that to ex-Pennsylvania governor Tom Corbett or failed California state education superintendent Marshall Tuck, who both lost elections, in large part, for bucking unions.)
“Charter school proponents in other corridors of the education reform echo chamber offered similar counsel to the candidates.
“On the blog site EducationPost — a media outlet funded with $12 million by some of the same wealthy foundations and individuals who back Campbell Brown — Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and the rest of the candidates were called ‘pathetic … They’re afraid of the unions who warned them not to attend the event.’
“In an op-ed appearing in USA Today, Richard Whitmire — a routine commentator at The Seventy Flour and author of a ‘worshipful portrait,’ according to education historian Diane Ravitch, of former Washington, D.C., school chancellor Michelle Rhee — wrote, ‘The party of Hillary Clinton must decide:
” ‘Support teachers’ unions OR fight for low-income, minority children.’
“This overheated rhetoric sounds a lot like concern trolling coming from conservative Republicans. One of those, Fox News contributor Juan Williams, noticed the candidate no-shows for Brown’s event and wrote for The Hill, ‘Clinton and her Democratic rivals have shunned an invitation to an education reform forum because it was sponsored by former CNN anchor Campbell Brown … out of apparent fear of antagonizing the unions. The price of a union endorsement is too high for school children.’
“All this bloviating over a botched attempt by charter school proponents to stage an event allowing them to frame issues for their own end is not only rhetorical overload, it’s really bad political advice.
“It’s the Parents, Stupid
“First, opposition to rich people’s agenda to convert more public schools to charters and attack teachers’ job protections is not confined to teachers unions.
“In communities such as Nashville, Tennessee, and Jefferson County, Colorado, parents, not teachers’ unions, are leading the opposition to the takeover of public schools by self-proclaimed reformers.
“The successful mayoral campaigns of Bill de Blasio in New York City and Ras Baraka in Newark, New Jersey, drew their strength from coalitions of voters who, yes, supported public school teachers, but also wanted solutions to the growing inequities in their cities, such as raising the minimum wage and big changes in the criminal justice system.
“There is a reason, after all, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan made his now infamous remark about ‘suburban moms’ being the main opposition to the roll out of his high-stakes testing agenda for schools. Those really were suburban moms, and not the teachers’ unions, speaking out in defiance.
“Unions Are Good for Low-Income Kids
“Also, if Brown and her fellow education activists were really so concerned about the future of kids who live in low-income communities, they would be advocating for labor unions rather than opposing them.
“My colleague Dave Johnson at the Campaign for America’s Future recently came across a new study conducted for the Center for American Progress, which found in places where union membership is higher, low-income children, in particular, benefit from ‘economic mobility’ and ‘intergenerational mobility.’ In plain English, this means union strength correlated with low-income children being more apt to rise higher in the income rankings — and for their children in turn to be better off.
“Reporters at the New York Times looked at the study as well and noted, “There aren’t many other factors that are as strongly correlated with mobility” as the presence of unions.
” ‘A 10-percentage-point increase in the rate of unionization in an area coincided with a rise of an additional 1.3 points on the income distribution as the average child becomes an adult,’ they wrote.
“Combating unions is not only a strategy unlikely to result in good outcomes for low-income kids, it also seems completely out of step with the political zeitgeist of the times.
“Missing the Populist Bandwagon
“Robert Borosage, another CAF colleague with over three decades of experience as a political strategist, observes that among presidential candidates in the Democratic Party:
“‘The growing populist movement in this country is driving this debate.’
“ ‘Populist’ as Borosage uses the term, is stridently pro-union and opposed to the agenda of the big moneyed interests — the same folks who are typically behind charter schools and crackdowns on teachers’ rights and parent and student voice in school governance.
“Likely sensing the populist uprising, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton, after turning down the invitation to Brown’s klatch, made a surprise appearance at a union rally in Las Vegas where boisterous protestors were demanding higher wages and better treatment from their employer, a hotel bearing the name of Republican presidential primary frontrunner Donald Trump.
“The wave of populism washing across the country is not lost on Republican candidates. Tellingly, two Republican candidates currently leading in polls who did not show for Brown’s event in New Hampshire, Trump and neurosurgeon Ben Carson, are arguably the most populist candidates in that field.
“Also, the two Republican Party presidential hopefuls who are most aligned with the anti-union, pro education reform advocacy stances of Campbell Brown and her fellow advocates have not fared well.
“Bad Political Advice
“The fate of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is the most obvious example of how union bashing is not a sure-fire strategy for political gain. As another CAF colleague and veteran political observer Bill Scher observed upon witnessing Walker’s withdrawal from the presidential race, “Scott Walker proves you can’t union-bash your way to the White House.”
“Walker, who had made a political career out of ‘his glorious union battles,’ in Scher’s words, ‘became pathetic. … In the waning days of his campaign, he offered his one big idea: eliminate federal worker unions and abolish the National Labor Relations Board. Nobody cared.’
“The other Republican candidate most aligned to the pro-charter, anti-union agenda of education reform proponents, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, is still in the race but has faltered severely in polling results.
“More than any other candidate, Bush has made his battle for charter schools and punitive education policies in the Sunshine State a centerpiece of his campaign. This strategy hasn’t done him any good, most notably because those policy ideas are now widely held in contempt in his own state.
“ ‘The Bush-era reforms have failed,’ writes a columnist for the Tampa Bay Times, noting the state’s school accountability system established during Bush’s regime has collapsed in ruins, and the system of testing put into place ‘turned schools into sweatshops.’
“Investigative reports conducted by this author for the Alternet news outlet have found Bush’s expansions of charter schools have done little to advance the academic and life achievements of low-income kids and have instead opened of the state’s education system to widespread corruption and fomented chaos in communities.
“Given what has happened to Walker and Bush, no candidate in his or her right mind should embrace the strategy promoted by Brown and her cohorts.
“An Authentic Movement, if Democrats Want One
“Many people leading the effort to stifle classroom teachers and do damage to public schools so charter schools can be presented as an attractive alternative like to believe they are leading a movement. But it’s far from certain their movement is catching on.
“As the dust settles after the first debate among the Democratic Party presidential candidates, it became clear none of the issues charter school advocates care about came up in the discussion. While that’s not a good thing, necessarily, it shows despite all the money the Wal-Mart foundation and other rich folks can bring to bear, the return on their investment so far is pretty poor.
“In the meantime, a grassroots constituency that sees big money pouring into campaigns for closing neighborhood schools and opening up more charters is increasingly unconvinced wealthy white people have the best interests of low-income black and brown children in mind.
“This from-the-ground-up movement has also yet to influence the presidential debates, in either party. But should Democratic candidates decide to pay attention, it will be obvious to them which of these two education ‘movements’ really represents an authentic voice for positive change.”
– – – – – – – – – – –
JEFF BRYANT is Director of the Education Opportunity Network, a partnership effort of the Institute for America’s Future and the Opportunity to Learn Campaign. Jeff owns a marketing and communications consultancy in Chapel Hill, N.C., and has written extensively about public education policy.
The deformers have opposition at last. So now we see this type of thing. In another arena it might be called a Hail Mary Pass. It was really the goal all along.
How nice of Campbell Brown to volunteer to fund so many scholarships to the schools her children attend.
Oh, wait, that’s not what she’s saying, is it?
“Public” schools in England ARE private schools.
As long as we continue to fund all these so-called consultants, testing conglomerates (Pearson), and educational experts, we are not funding the schools. And we need to stop blaming teachers who work in socioeconomically stressed areas for not being good enough. We are working harder with so much less! I have more kids than desks! How many charter schools do not have enough desks in their classrooms for all of their students? I have kids who test out at the 1 percentile and are NOT receiving Special Ed. services because the state says we have too many Sp-Eds. The school system is not as broken as the social system is! When the social system is fixed, we can educate everyone without a charter system that only deals with the cream of the crop.
All well and good, but can someone please tell me the real reason I average 10% parental attendance on “Meet the Teacher” night? We also offer an a.m. Conference day that yields about 4-5%. Is this due to racial/social/economic inequality? Or do many parents simply not give a shit about their kids’ futures?
Parents work retail! If they have no notice, they cannot get off from work for anything, except their own death. They don’t go to work, they risk their jobs and lose money. Time doesn’t matter if no notice is given when most parents are hourly wage workers.
And when I say they need notice, they need to be told two weeks in advance that the event is happening and even then half the time managers say “a request is just a request, if we need you you have to work it, who cares about your kids”
Our schedule goes out the first day of school, our parents know then when the meet the teacher nights, conferences, and meetings are, if four to 35 weeks is not enough notice, what then? My turn out is less than 10% and everyone gets plenty of notice. Not all parents work retail.
THEY HAVE NO STRINGS LEFT AND THEIR VOICES HAVE BEEN SILENCED.
…and how in the world can such a problem be solved by legislation at ANY level??
These are good questions, Pete. Over the yrs my sis taught in both poor city and poor rural communities and always spoke of this. My kids’ p.s. experience in a mid&upper-mid town was very different. But I think the diff was more about small-town nbhd schools, not so much SES. The elementaries here each have a decades-old annual event– a play or craft event which involves short-term heavy parental involvement (eves, wkends)– parents, teachers, principal (in some cases kids too) onstage so heavily attended, often celebrated w/an after-event adult party. Between that & block parties, nbhd parents get to know each other socially, which tends to boost attendance at more routine school events where parents will be milling around. And that tends to boost interest in BOE elections/ mtgs & other town efforts because you personally know some of the people involved. Shows how important small-ish nbhd schools are to community-building.
Help me please…I’m not good at acronyms. I understand the context, just not the abbreviation.
“nbhd”?
My guess would be that …
“nbhd” is the texting abbreviation for “neighborhood.”
This person may have sent this from his portable device.
Let me try.
Ps: public school
Ses: socio-economic status
Boe: board of education
No doubt, Campbell Brown is an education version of Sarah Palin.
rush limbaugh
When the facts are not just not on your side, but refute everything you say and claim, the only course of action that remains is to go for the full blown hair on fire crazy fear mongering extremist thing. There’s no intellectual or moral basis for that, obviously, but it will keep you in front of the cameras.
I totally agree with Diane Ravitch’s point of view. Same thing happens in my homeland Puerto Rico. This blog must seriously be of interest to every government in the world. As you say school is not the problem. Social
conditions are. There must be a better balance between capitalism and socialism and education and health and education to be the very first priorities. A BETTER SOCIETY IN ALL ASPECTS WILL BRING FORTH BETTER STUDENTS WITH APPROPRIATE ATTITUDES AND PERSONAL GOALS.
“Our society is failing to address the root causes of school performance, which are the conditions in which children and families are living, such as their access to good jobs, medical care, food security, and decent housing.”
EVEN BARACK OBAMA UNDERSTOOD THE PROBLEM BACK IN 2006.
FROM WIKIPEDIA:
the Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream is the second book written by then-Senator Barack Obama.
The title of The Audacity of Hope was derived from a sermon delivered by Obama’s former pastor, Jeremiah Wright. Wright had attended a lecture by Dr. Frederick G. Sampson in Richmond, Virginia, in the late 1980s, on the G. F. Watts painting Hope, which inspired him to give a sermon in 1990 based on the subject of the painting – “with her clothes in rags, her body scarred and bruised and bleeding, her harp all but destroyed and with only one string left, she had the audacity to make music and praise God … To take the one string you have left and to have the audacity to hope… that’s the real word God will have us hear from this passage and from Watt’s painting.”[4] Having attended Wright’s sermon, Barack Obama later adapted Wright’s phrase “audacity to hope” to “audacity of hope” which became the title for his 2004 Democratic National Convention keynote address, and the title of his second book.
“TO TAKE THE ONE STRING YOU HAVE LEFT
AND HAVE THE AUDACITY TO HOPE”
WHAT CAMPBELLBROWN AND EVERY OTHER REFORMER FROM THE RULING CLASS DOES NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING IS THAT IT CANNOT HAPPEN WHEN THERE ARE NO STRINGS LEFT AND YOUR VOICE HAS BEEN SILENCED.
Earlier in this thread, an attempt was made to support Campbell Brown’s opting out of charters and Common Core curriculum/test prep/testing. “Tim” corrected my contention that the students and Ms. Brown’s private school Heschel have no standardized testing until high school.
He found out that the students in some grades take the “ERB” tests. (Someone rightly pointed out that, even if Heschel students take some version of standardized tests, the results are not used to punish teachers, humiliate students, or as a metric for closing those schools so those schools can be reconstituted and converted to private management.)
What is the “ERB”?
Well for one thing—and this is significant—it’s the only he only not-for-profit educational services organization providing testing for private schools. If you are going to subject kids to standardized testing, taking the profit motive out is a healthy way to go:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educational_Records_Bureau
Listed at the top of ERB’s Board of Trustees is one “Dr. David Magill, from the University of Chicago Lab School.”
Hmmm … now where have I heard THAT name before?
Try this video from Chicago’s pro-public-school and parent activist Matt Farmer, at a union rally during the Chicago Teachers’ Union’s successful 2011 strike:
——————————————————-
( 4:44 – 6:04 )
( 4:44 – 6:04 )
MATT FARMER: “Do you want to know what Dr. Magill at the Chicago Lab School says about standardized testing? The same testing that fills our (public schools’) calendar for weeks?
” (Magill writes) ‘Measuring outcomes of standardized testing, and referring to those results as the evidence of learning, and the bottom line is, in my opinion, misguided, and unfortunately continues to be advocated under a new name, and supported by the current (U.S.? Chicago Public schools?… not sure…) administration.’
“That’s the Lab School, folks!”
“Do you want to know what Dr. Magill from the Lab School has to say about art, music, physical education, and libraries?
“He says, QUOTE – ‘Physical education, world languages, libraries, and the arts are not frills; they are an essential piece of a well-rounded education.’
“And finally, do you want to know what the director of the Lab School — yes, the person who runs Rahm and Penny Pritzker’s kids’ school — what has to say about teachers’ unions?
“And it’s from the (Lab School) website, folks.
” (Magill writes) QUOTE – ‘I shudder to think who would be attracted to teach in our public schools without unions.’
“And my friends, I too shudder at that thought. We (parents & citizens) stand with you.”
(The Chicago Lab School the Obamas’ kids before they went to Washington, and Arne Duncans’ kids schools now, and where Arne Duncan’s wife is now employed as a teacher after leaving Washington.)
————————————
The entire video of Famer’s speech is worth watching, as it lays the hypocrisy of the 1% naked for all to see. Farmer starts with excerpts from an interview with Hyatt Hotels billionaire and then-Chicago Public Schools board member Penny Pritzker (appointed by the pro-privatization, anti-union Mayor Emanuel, of course, along with a bunch of other business people with ZERO background of training or experience in education … oy vey!).
When asked what the children of the middle and working class — the proverbial 99% — should be allowed to receive as education, Pritzker outlines a bare bones skill set that makes them just capable of working a low level job. That means no arts, music, world languages, physical education, and no exposure to a school library.
Pritzker closed over 100 school libraries in the Chicago … PUBLIC… schools, while simultaneously spearheading a multi-million-dollar fundraising effort to build a state-of-the-art library and arts center for her own kids school and the children of some of Chicago’s wealthy elite (including my niece and nephew… my niece was a classmate of Malia Obama.. full disclosure, JACK)… the Chicago Lab School.
To highlight Pritzker’s hypocrisy, he then quotes Ms. Pritzker, in another context, go on about how important the arts were for her when she was a student in rich kids’ PRIVATE school, and for her kids now in the rich kids’… PRIVATE … schools.
BOTTOM LINE: The kids of the 1% get a “Saks Fifth Avenue” education, while the rest get the “99 Cents Store” education… especially those kids of the inner city.
Watch the whole thing:
MORE TO FOLLOW ON “ERB”
In my on-line surveying of ERB, it seems to be a sort of standardized testing LITE for elite private schools, radically different from the Common Core version that is mandated for the public school system.
On that score, here’s a piece from Lois Levy, an administrator (“Assistant Head of School”) at a different private school, the Center for Early Education (CEE), describing “what ERB standardized testing is and isn’t.”
http://www.centerforearlyeducation.org/page.cfm?p=774&eid=559
Loise Levy says CEE subjects students to standardized tests reluctantly. It’s part of the world we live in NOW, so the folks and her school can’t NOT do it. (This is likely the same view that the folks running Heshel and other elite private schools share.)
—————————————
LOIS LEVY: “A major reason for administering the ERBs is that they provide our students with practice taking standardized tests. Whether we like it or not, standardized tests are currently a part of the educational world, mainly due to the fact that they provide an efficient way to produce data.”
—————————————
Levy minces no words about the limitations of ERB standardized tests, and standardized testing in general.
—————————————
LOIS LEVY: “Before receiving student results that will be mailed home early in the summer, it is important for parents to reflect on what these test results represent as well as what they don’t represent.
“Unlike today’s public schools, CEE is lucky in that we aren’t forced into the position of using test scores as the dominant means of evaluating our curriculum (and the quality of the teachers, school, etc. JACK).
“Instead, we are able to use our mission statement and school philosophy to guide our development of curriculum. Evaluating the effectiveness of our curriculum relies on feedback from our standardized testing program, but also on feedback from other means of assessment as well as from faculty, administration, parents, and CAIS Accreditation teams.
“It is important to first understand what ERB test results do not tell us about our students.
“ERB tests do not even attempt to measure a student’s initiative, motivation or ability to persevere.
“ERBs do not measure study skills, organizational skills, collaborative skills, cooperative skills, communication skills or creativity.
“This list could go on and on, but it is obvious that all of the above skills are essential for being a successful student, and, for that matter, a successful adult. Yet standardized tests are not able to measure these essential learning skills/life skills.
“Thus, when looking at children’s standardized test results, we always need to remember that they are not a summary of all qualities that are needed to be a successful student.”
————–
Amen, sister!!!! Testify!!! Testify!!!
She blows apart the test prep strategies that Eva and Campbell force upon the kids of the 99%. (i.e. the administrator at SUCCESS ACADEMY who proudly bragged to New York Magazine that SUCCESS ACADEMY employs marathon test prep sessions that turns its students into “little test-taking machines.”)
Levy contends that such an insane amount of tutoring and/or test prep itself nullifies the very purpose of testing — assuming one accepts that there is such a purpose — and renders the results meaningless.
—————————————
LOIS LEVY : “(Test prep) Tutoring actually defeats the purpose for what the school hopes to learn from the tests. We want to know how the curriculum supports children’s learning, not how tutoring may or may not bolster results.
“For many years, tutoring for ERBs was not even an issue as it was understood that the ERBs are not ‘high stakes’ tests; they are not admissions tests. But as parents get more concerned about how well their young children ‘measure up’ against other children, fear and anxieties can drive parents to tutoring.
“Test prep is a huge business and professional tutors are more than happy to take parents’ money, especially since their work preparing children for admissions tests end in December or January.”
” .. ”
“In summary, my goal is to help parents understand what ERB test results do measure, and what they don’t measure. When parents receive the one sheet of paper summarizing their child’s ERB test results, it is important for them to remember that these results don’t point to any hard cold facts about their child.
“Instead, the results need to be viewed in conjunction with the child’s classroom performance, the child’s developmental learning path, as well as teacher and parent observations.
“Standardized tests are indirect measurement tools that measure how a child performed on a given day and on a given set of questions.
“Once we understand what these test results tell us, as well as what they don’t tell us, the ERB information gathered through the years can be helpful to the school as well as to parents.”
—————————————
So “Tim”, if you’re still out there, this points out the stark difference between what version of standardized testing and its accompanying emphases & importance as they are administered at Heschel and other elite private schools… and what Campbell wants for the children of the middle and working classes in her Brave New Privatized School World.
Do you get it? The difference between…
… what Campbell Brown wants for her own children, and for the other children of the 1%—
VERSUS
… what Campbell Brown wants for “other people’s children” of the 99%, should she achieve her David Cameron wet dream of eliminating all public schools (that currently have oversight and input from the public via democratically elected school boards) and replacing them with privately-managed charters with ZERO accountability to the public, ZERO transparency to the public, and which do not educate all the public… basically private schools with public money ?
I’m sure Tim will refute everything you wrote, even if he is wrong. Thank you for your 2 posts above, and for the video. Very enlightening.
“Jack,”
This reminds me of exchanges I’ve had with other commenters regarding this issue.
“The private schools that the elites who are shoving this crap down our throats send their kids to NEVER make them take standardized tests!”
“Well, actually, they do. Just about every single one of them: Sidwell Friends, the Lab School, Harpeth Hall, Lakeside, you name it. Across most or all of the NCLB testing grades, over the course of several days, most often on a desktop, laptop, or tablet.”
“Oh. Okay, but that’s totally different because etc. etc. etc.”
It isn’t different at all. The parents who write the $30,000-$50,000 tuition checks view testing as an important “trust but verify” reality check. Taxpayers, families, and students deserve an independent reality check as well.
The next objection, that the results aren’t used to fire teachers, is completely irrelevant. With the exception of the Lab School, none of these schools are unionized, and no teacher has tenure. Schools don’t need a test to get rid of their bad apples, they can let them go whenever it is apparent that things aren’t working out.
The main purpose of the various ERB/CTP-IV tests is to let parents know that their child is in the same ballpark as the other kids whom they’ll be fighting for slots at competitive colleges. But it has another purpose, and that’s to identify kids that the K-12 schools might want to consider counseling out. So to say that the tests aren’t high stakes for kids is simply wrong. Look at this document that the most elite private school in New Orleans put together to calm parents and students: http://www.newmanschool.org/ftpimages/161/download/Getting%20Ready%20for%20the%20ERB's.pdf
You seem to have selectively cut and paste from the “Lois’s Blog.” Here is a passage that you chose to omit–
“Finally, ERB test results do provide helpful information to our faculty and administration. Since each grade level’s results are compared to results of other independent school students, the results give us a rigorous comparison to help us ascertain how our curriculum supports our students’ learning. In addition to providing us with data reflecting each student’s verbal and mathematical strengths and challenges, the results can also guide us as we look at our curricular materials and needs for professional development.”
Huh. She views standardized testing as a reality check, too.
People are free to make whatever terrible argument-by-analogy using elite, luxury-product, non-unionized, no-tenure private schools. But when they claim that these schools do not administer standardized bubble tests in grades 3-8, they are wrong, and they can expect to be called out for it.
Tim,
It’s good do see you… or as Victor Laszlo said in CASABLANCA:
(0:04)
(0:04)
“Welcome back to the fight. This time, I know our side will win.”
Regarding standardized tests at private schools, I can speak from my own experience teaching at one. In contrast to your claim, no child was ever targeted for removal based on standardized tests results. Perhaps your experience is different.
By the way, I just didn’t throw out the “Heschel doesn’t used standardized tests lightly.” I heard it elsewhere, and was unable to find anything on the Heschel site… that is, until you pointed me in the right direction.
However, I stand by the substance of the claim that the purpose, the experience for the students, and the use of, and emphasis on standardized tests are radically different in the private schools and in the post-NCLB public schools. Any teacher who taught pre-NCLB will tell you this as well.
TIM: “It isn’t different at all. The parents who write the $30,000-$50,000 tuition checks view testing as an important ‘trust but verify’ reality check. Taxpayers, families, and students deserve an independent reality check as well.”
Again… not my experience at the private school I taught. Many parents were not thrilled with their kids having to take these tests, and objected vehemently to any test prep — process of elimination and other strategies. They pay that $30,000 – 50,000 to avoid that very thing.
I can’t remember who… maybe it was Rick Hess… but one of the corporate reformers that was pushing Common Core for public schools, was also simultaneously shilling for a charter chain. One of the selling points he used was that “you can escape Common Core if you come to our charter school.” Seems a bit duplicitous. There would have been no Common Core to “escape” if you and your allies hadn’t forced it on the public schools, ya big douche!
TIM: “The next objection, that the results aren’t used to fire teachers, is completely irrelevant. With the exception of the Lab School, none of these schools are unionized, and no teacher has tenure. Schools don’t need a test to get rid of their bad apples, they can let them go whenever it is apparent that things aren’t working out.”
What you said here ignores some facts, and exaggerates others. At the private school in Los Angeles where I taught, and I presume at the Chicago Lab School (based on what Matt Farmer quoted in the above video), the reason that standardized tests are not used to fire or evaluate teachers is NOT, NOT NOT… because teachers have no job security. It’s because those in charge are smart enough to know that using student test scores is a stupid way to judge a teacher’s effectiveness, our a child’s academic outcomes.
… from the Matt Farmer video ABOVE:
————————————–
DR. DAVID MAGILL, DIRECTOR OF THE CHICAGO LAB SCHOOL:
“Measuring outcomes of standardized testing, and referring to those results as the evidence of learning, and the bottom line is, in my opinion, misguided, and unfortunately continues to be advocated under a new name, and supported by the current (U.S.? Chicago Public schools?… not sure…) administration.”
————————————–
I don’t believe Dr. Magill would then add, “But thanks to private school teachers not having tenure, we can ignore the results anyway when making personnel decisions.”
TIM: “People are free to make whatever terrible argument-by-analogy using elite, luxury-product, non-unionized, no-tenure private schools. But when they claim that these schools do not administer standardized bubble tests in grades 3-8, they are wrong, and they can expect to be called out for it.”
Tim, I’m conceding that I was wrong about standardized tests are used at Campbell Brown’s kids’ school, Heschel. So you can stop calling me out.
However, in the years I taught at a private school for wealthy Los Angelinos, we spend a few days taking them in the spring… but ZERO test prep, or test-taking practice, or any of that. The results were given to the parents, but not used in any way for personnel decisions, or for for curricular decisions. These tests were, at best, reluctantly administered to students. The graduates of this school all get into the selective private high schools in Los Angeles… Crossroads, the Buckley School, and the rest.
The ERB tests, again, are a Standardized Tests LITE version—specifically and exclusively designed for use in elite private schools.
Hence, one of its board of directors, Dr. David Magill, is a fierce critic of the using these tests as a barometer of anything. He’s there at ERB applying the brakes, if you will, so that these tests are done right, and not over-emphasized or misused.
These ERB tests are radically different from the Common Core. Again, and this goes back to the very first arguments I’ve made. If Common Core curriculum, test prep, and testing are as great as Ms. Brown claims it is—i.e. in her Washington Post op-ed—then why is she spending tens of thousands of dollars so that… figuratively speaking… her own children are kept as far away as possible from it.
Campbell and Dan like that school for their kids, you might argue, and the non-Common Core curriculum is what they use.
Okay, then why aren’t Campbell and Dan barging into the administrators at Heschel and demanding that they implement Common Core curriculum, test prep, and testing immediately, and threatening to remove their children forthwith, or perhaps starting a petition drive among the other Heschel parents to force the school leaders to implement curriculum, test prep, and testing?
I’ll tell you why.
Because Campbell and her husband Dan know in their hearts that Common Core sucks on ice, and that following a curriculum, test prep, and testing based on Common Core would make their kids hate school… as it has done based on spectacles such as this when then NY State Ed. Commission faced down angry parents two years ago this month:
Watch the entire video, and consider with an open mind the objections that those parents have.
Campbell and her husband, and John King and his wife believe that that that Common Core stuff is only for OTHER PEOPLE’S KIDS, not ours. We’re privileged, and our kids are privileged, so we deserve and get something better — i.e. the arts, music, world languages, physical education, libraries, etc.
The same goes for John King sending his kids to a private Montessori school with no Common Core curriculum, test prep, or testing.
The same goes for the folks sending their kids to the Chicago Lab
School—the Obamas, the Arne Duncans, and the Rahm Emanuels.
They all deserved to be called out on that, and I’m doing so.
I just watched the video above and a thought hit me.
Does anybody not see a contradiction here?
The Former Secretary of Ed spent 6 and half years talking about how testing kids is the answer to everything, that we need to test, test, test… and then use that data to judge teachers, students, schools and on and on. He extorted states into doing this with federal money.
Only now he recently chose a school for his own kids, and his wife now works at a school whose philosophy directly contradicts all of that, and whose head openly writes a texts that condemns and despises that same use of standardized tests.
If anyone doubted whether there is a responsible way that tests can be used to judge/shape instruction and assess student progress, one need look no further than this school. This school that condemns and despises some uses of standardized tests nevertheless administers a standardized test to every single one of its 3rd, 4th, 6th, and 8th graders: http://www.ucls.uchicago.edu/data/files/gallery/ContentGallery/ERBAssessments2014.ppt
Tim, is any teacher at the University of Chicago Lab School evaluated by student test scores?
Why the love of standardized testing? Why do you think children should be ranked and rated and labeled by these flawed devices? Do you look at your children and see a test score? Are you a person or a bot?
Diane, is there an opt-out movement at the University of Chicago Lab Schools? At Sidwell Friends? At Lakeside?
If not, why not? Why do you think that the parents who are so invested in their children’s education, both literally and figuratively, continue to insist–nay, demand–that their children be subjected to standardized testing?
I think my views on standardized testing are actually quite close to those expressed by the head-of-school whom Jack selectively quoted above, and they are especially close to the thoughts of the head of Sidwell’s middle school:
“It is important to remember that standardized test scores are only one measure of a student’s academic profile, a snapshot if you will. A more complete and accurate picture emerges when the scores are combined with classwork, daily performance, regular assignments, projects, and tests. Still, the ERB/CTP’s can help parents and teachers understand more clearly and completely a child’s balance of strengths and needs. Teachers may review the scores in detail, looking for patterns that emerge from one year to the next, and then use that information to be more effective in the classroom.”
Tim,
There is no opt out movement at the elite private schools because standardized tests are rarely (if ever) given, and have NO high-stakes attached to them. Tests used diagnostically are OK; I am assuming that is what Sidwell uses them for. Tests used to label, rank, rate, and stigmatize students are not permitted. Parents in New York and elsewhere are opting out because their schools are subject to closure based on test scores; their principals and teachers are subject to firing; their teachers are forced to teach to the test. They have lost the arts and recess to test prep. NONE OF THAT IS TRUE AT SIDWELL OR UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAB SCHOOL OR DALTON OR LAKESIDE!!!
One wonders if Cambell Brown is smart enough to know that, in Britain, what they call “public schools” are what we in America call “private schools”–they’re “public” in the sense that anyone who can afford the hefty fees can attend, but mostly they’re attended by elites like David Cameron.
I’m thinking she’s not.
We need to address the elephant in the room, that is the vicious cycle and direct relationship between school performance and real estate value resulting in the families that buy in to the “good” schools. Exceptional schools aside (look up 90/90/90 schools, which are extremely rare and IMHO almost impossible to replicate), take any school district and break down its demographics and you will see that higher performing schools have higher property value. It’s chicken and egg as far as which came first, school performance or property value, but it is a vicious cycle; one always follows the other. It all has to do with students and the families that can afford to buy a home in the right school. You can pump tons of money, resources and professional development into schools until the cows come home, but you will not make as much a difference as having the demographics of students who are ready to learn. We cannot address school reform until we realize the fact, which a large number of researchers try to disprove, that the greatest variable in teaching and learning is the student, not teacher. Bottom line is that students who are ready to learn, do so despite their teachers. This leads to a much needed discussion on parental involvement, parent education level, home environment, family structure, etc., which are politically incorrect topics, therefore seldom discussed. Don’t believe the lie which many educators have been told for years that parents have little impact on student learning. Tldr: The primary factors in school acievement are supportive families and students’ readiness to learn.
“The primary factors in school achievement are supportive families and students’ readiness to learn.”
YES!
What Campbell Brown doesn’t realize is that in the UK the “public schools” are really elite private schools. What Americans call public schools are referred to as “state schools” in the UK. So Cameron was really proposing the opposite of what Brown thought.
Don’t fall for the “failing schools” diversion. She, like Gates and Zuckerburg, know how to seize a business opportunity. It’s now so clear to me why my district is leading the charge among public schools for initiatives in personalized learning and one-to-one: so that when the fancy, trendy, charters arrive in our city, we have something to compete with. So far, there are few charters in our area, and public education is viewed effective (by most), but don’t doubt that the teaching-slaves behind these initiatives aren’t starting to question where the personal in personalized learning is or where the work-life balance and authentic learning have gone. We teachers each are doing the work of two or three. That’s unsustainable.
Is there any case of privatization of a government function that didn’t result in increased costs? In the short term, maybe, but once you are committed, the cost goes up, and so do your taxes.
To clarify, in the UK, state schools are what WE call public schools and what THEY call public schools are what we call private schools here, because like “pubs” (aka “public houses”), they are privately owned but open to serving the public. We also call privately owned businesses “public accommodations,” such as in the Americans with Disabilities Act, which includes virtually all businesses except private clubs and religious organizations: http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/adaqa2.html
Regardless of the terms, the education “reform” movement in the UK is very similar to what’s going on here. The names and methods differ somewhat. What we call charters are called “academies” there, when they cover elementary education, and they are called “free schools” there when they cover high schools. As far as methods, they have ways similar to our parent trigger laws enabling schools to be taken over by private management, but just like for us, there’s a lot of smoke and mirrors and propaganda falsely claiming that privatization and the loss of local control are about kids, not money and eliminating democracy.
Cameron is a Conservative. However, just like Bill Clinton turned the Democratic party hard right into “New Democrats” in support of GOP birthed neoliberal economic policies (free-trade, privatization, etc.), Tony Blair declared the Labour party to be “New Labour,” also promoting neoliberal policies. So their two primary parties have been co-opted by the greed of wealthy elites who could not care less about the struggling masses as well. (It’s a little more complicated because they do have other influential parties, but Cameron’s Conservatives are in control now.)
[…] all public schools to private charter schools? […]