The Chester Upland school district in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, will return to school even though the district has no money to pay them. The district is in a deep financial hole because of former Governor Corbett’s deep budget cuts and the charter schools that drain funding from the public schools. Chester Upland might be the first school district o go bankrupt because of competition with a charter school whose for profit owner is ranking in millions.
These educators are heroes of public education. They are truly doing it “for the kids” at personal sacrifice to themselves and their families. They join the honor roll of the blog.
On Thursday, about 200 members of the local teachers union voted unanimously to work without pay as the new school year opens. They were joined by secretaries, school bus drivers, janitors and administrators.
“The thought of it is very scary,” said John Shelton, 60, dean of students at the district’s only middle school and a 23-year employee. “It’s mind-boggling because there’s truly uncertainty. But we are all in agreement that we will come to work, so that the children can get an education.”
Shelton, who will be able to count on some income from his moonlighting job as a janitor, said he and his colleagues are willing to sacrifice because the students rely on the schools. “Some of our children, this is all they have as far as safety, their next nourishing meal, people who are concerned for them,” he said. “We are dedicated to these children.”
The district is about 20 miles west of Philadelphia and serves roughly 3,300 students, most them low-income.
A similar financial collapse occurred in the district in 2012, and the teachers also agreed to work without pay then. In the end, a federal judge ordered the state to pay the district, and lawmakers arranged a bailout, so that employees’ paychecks were just a couple of days late.
Chester Upland’s current fiscal crisis, however, is more serious, said Jeff Sheridan, a spokesman for Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D).
“They are in such dire financial shape right now,” he said, “unless something drastic happens . . . the school district is in danger of not existing.”
The governor is grateful to the teachers and other employees who are willing to work without pay, Sheridan said, adding, “It’s helpful and we commend them.”
But it’s not a solution, he said.
Chester Upland is facing a $22 million deficit that could grow to more than $46 million without major intervention, Sheridan said. He blamed several factors: local mismanagement, state cuts in education spending under the previous governor and a state law that requires traditional school districts to pay charter schools significant amounts for students who live within their boundaries but attend charters.
Public charter schools, which are publicly funded but privately run, have been growing to the point that they educate nearly half the students who live in the Chester Upland district. Chester Upland pays local charter schools about $64 million in tuition payments — more than it receives in state school aid.
State law includes a funding formula that is especially generous toward special education students who attend charters; Chester Upland has to spend $40,000 per student per year for every special education student from its district who enrolls in a charter school. That’s twice the amount the district spend on its own students with special education needs and more than any other district in the state, Sheridan said.
Chester Community Charter School, a nonprofit institution managed by a for-profit company, is the largest charter in the district. It began in 1998 with 100 students and now enrolls 2,900 students, nearly as many as attend the traditional public school system.
This week, a Pennsylvania judge denied a request by Wolf and Chester Upland officials to reduce the district’s payments for special education to charters by about half, or nearly $21 million, in the 2015-16 school year.
Wolf based his request on a recommendation by a 2013 bipartisan legislative commission that the law should be changed to bring payments to charter schools more in line with what it costs traditional public schools to educate special needs students. The committee also recommended lower payments to online charter schools, which currently get the same per-pupil payments that brick and mortar schools receive. That change would save the Chester Upland district an additional $4 million a year, state officials said.
Tell the story of the teachers and staff at Chester Upland the next time you hear someone complain about “greedy” teachers who put their interests before the interests of their students. Maybe StudentsFirst could offer to pay the salaries of the teachers who are working for free?

Wow.
Question: because I correspond with some pro-reformers, I would imagine they would just assume all those children should be in charters. What would I tell them about why they are not?
LikeLike
Public schoolteachers working without pay will be remembered as the “Pearl Harbor” of this private war on public education. Disarmed and disorganized by their own teacher union leaders, these brave and dedicated teachers still go to work for no pay for the sake of the kids, the community, and the families who need them. Just imagine a 35-year run of billionaires, govt. cronies, banks, and finance looting the nation and grabbing vast amounts of our wealth for themselves, refusing to pay taxes, refusing to raise wages or to hire more folks or to renegotiate the mortgages of millions of families underwater–and then compare this craven class running America with the generous teachers who put kids first and work without salary.
LikeLike
Ira,
BINGO! Right on.
LikeLike
Well, there you go. Greedy teachers just in it for the money.
LikeLike
Are there any fund raising sites for Chester Upland’s employees?
LikeLike
I will look for a fund raising site for Chester Upland teachers and staff.
LikeLike
Peter Greene already did: http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2015/09/if-you-want-to-help-chester-uplands.html
LikeLike
Peter and Dienne. Thank you.
LikeLike
Diane, the $40K/yr sounds about right for the sped kids. My district spends $12.5K per pupil. The average ratio is about 24:1 students to teachers. However, in addition to the normal teacher, sped teachers are required at no more than an 8:1 ratio. So for any 24 sped kids, there are 4 total teachers instructing them.
Do the math. 4 * $12.5K = $50K/yr. Now there is redundancy in buildings, etc. but it’s hard to see less than $40K/yr per sped student. The districts like to ask for more money but never want to publicize the true cost for sped students for fear the public won’t support endless spending on a select group. Nobody is arguing that sped kids shouldn’t get a good education but is it fair to spend 3x-4x on them relative to general education kids?
If the charters are educating these kids, that funding should follow. As more kids leave, the district will have to close schools. That was the whole intent of NCLB. If the schools don’t perform, students/parents should be given a choice. If that choice is beyond their neighborhood school, the school may shut down. Competition works.
How do you justify any number less than $40K?
LikeLike
Virginia, $40,000 per special education student is not right. That is not what the district gets for special ed. Your district spends $12.5K per pupil. Why should the charter school get $40,000 per pupil? By the way, under current law, the charter school is not obliged to spend that money on special education. It is just a nice cushion for the charter school, and it helps explain why the lawyer who created the school is making large profits.
LikeLike
In Virginia, districts must have additional teachers for the sped kids at no more than an 8:1 ratio. $40K/sped student is a low estimate. How many resources do you think they spend on students?
Imagine if instead of 24:1 ratios in Virginia, there were 8:1 ratios. That triples the cost per kid to $37.5K/yr. But that doesn’t even count the regular classroom teacher for sped kids. Btw, this would make an excellent PARCC or SBAC math problem.
LikeLike
Virginia, if $40K per pupil with special needs is right, why does the public school get half that much?
LikeLike
Diane, I’d be careful with those figures. Trust me, as someone who consults government agencies on cost management, few really know what they spend.
But note the district itself calculated $20k. They often do so to prevent the public from complaining about exorbitant sped costs. Have them show their books or ratios. Then, I’ll believe you.
Folks may be confused about federal subsidies that assumes certain kids are twice as expensive to teach. The feds aim to chip in part of the cost but have never even funded their fraction of the cost. However, sped guidelines clearly require 3-4x per kid. Fix their cost accounting and we’ll know for sure.
LikeLike
Virginia, did you know that the owner of the charter school in question extracts millions of dollars in profits every year? Is that a good use of taxpayer funds intended for education? Do you care?
LikeLike
Diane, yes, I believe there should be transparency in what companies are doing. As you know, I have filed a lawsuit against the chairman of my school board because he works for Dennis Bakke, owner of Imagine Schools, Inc, one of the largest for-profit charter school companies in the country. It’s just that Eric Hornberger has never disclosed that fact even though it’s required by Virginia law. Imagine also has a non-profit sister that often obtains the charter and then subcontracts the work to its for-profit sibling. All of these relationships should be disclosed.
As for the profit incentive, the answer to your question is “it depends”. Maybe we should require charters to not only disclose their test results (both achievement and growth by subgroup), but also disclose their spending. For example, we could compare what public schools spend on teacher (1) salaries, (2) pensions and (3) benefits vs what the charters spend. My understanding has been that private schools typically pay less than public schools. While your readers may not like that, you can’t say that there’s a teacher shortage is the private schools get good growth with less cost. I’m not saying they always do, but let’s put things out there. And it lets all candidates know what folks earn.
Profits are not a bad thing. When McDonalds started using cash registers with pictures because they were more efficient, productivity increased. But it also either lowered the wage of that employee or reduced the need for as many employees. That’s productivity. If a charter can get results with less cost (each charter must prove that), then they have a right to those profits. If they are extracting profit while not getting results, that information should be published and the charter might need to be shut down.
As I’ve said before, schools don’t exist to employ teachers (at high wages), schools exist to effectively educate kids. The most efficient means to accomplish that is the goal.
Note that I recently took my daughter for a standardized test (outside of school). Apparently all GREs and the like are now given at private testing centers with computers set up. I was used to taking them at a school in a group setting. That’s progress though. The testing center has more flexible hours and costs less to administer the tests. Surely, you don’t want to employ folks just for the sake of employing them? Why does the profit matter? The results are what count. But the results must count too.
LikeLike
McDonald’s does not receive public funding. Taxpayers would revolt if they knew how much of their dollars went to profiteers instead of schools.
LikeLike
Diane, so let me get this straight. A taxpayer normally pays a public school $1000/yr in taxes and gets a performance score of 50. With charter xyz, the taxpayer only needs to pay $950/yr and gets a performance score of 60.
You really think taxpayers will revolt? Less cost and greater performance!
That being said, you may have a point about the severely disabled. My day job involves creating and implementing cost models to accurately track costs. Most organizations don’t always do this well. It’s an important question for reimbursements (reimbursements are performed in nearly every business sector so this is a well-defined field). Has an outside audit been performed on that district?
Would you support publishing the cost of each group of students? Eg. general, ELL, FRL, Spec Ed., etc?
LikeLike
Virginia, charters get higher scores by excluding students with severe disabilities, students who don’t speak English, and students who are disruptive. They go to the public school, making the scores of the charters higher and the costs of the public schools higher but scores lower. Does your cost model take that into account?
LikeLike
Diane, I must admit I am not an expert on charter’s performance so please show me. Are you suggesting:
1) Their growth scores are higher or their achievement scores? If they are using achievement, I simply couldn’t care less because you can’t compare apples to oranges. But if it’s growth scores, then among similar kids, they are achieving better results. I do not know what the data shows. Links?
2) Because they allow kids that want to learn to avoid distractions from those who don’t, they achieve higher growth scores? You realize the public schools could do this as well by removing troublemakers from the classroom. The special ed students are another issue but generally they have SPED teachers to assist. Please tell me you are not attributing lower scores to a tiny percentage of the severely disabled?
A DC teacher called me up this spring after reading my comments on WaPo. In general, we found we agreed on 90%. He told me students had returned to class by their principal after assaulting a teacher!!! Say what? You say you want to support teachers but how can you possibly support that? Maybe some of these troublemakers need highly disciplined classes. What they used to call military boarding schools. Our kids live in affluent areas so we don’t have this problem. How can you sentence the cute, poor black or Hispanic kid who is well-behaved and hard-working to sit beside troublemakers who destroy their opportunity at an education? How is that ethical?
But do you support transparent cost reporting? You seem to be quite pleased that the PA charter school had to report its reimbursement rate. I say release it ALL. For everyone. Let the people decide.
Linda, Wal-Mart is one of the best things that ever happened to this country. Here’s why. In the 1700’s 90% of Americans had to farm to survive. Only 10% could provide additional goods and services. Today, that number is reversed. We have iPhones and cars and Disney because we are so much more efficient.
Are you seriously suggesting we need all those inefficient mom and pop stores? You realize they worked crazy hours for little profit, right? And all of the consumers of Wal-Mart save $$$ that they can spend elsewhere. If 200M consumers save $1000/yr ($200B), should that be thrown away to keep 1M jobs @ $50K/yr ($50B)?
You want to send us back to the pre-industrial age.
LikeLike
Good point and question, Diane. Yes…NICE CUSHION for charter schools, indeed = large profits.
LikeLike
The economic multiplier effect, of middle class community salaries, fuels local economies. The Walmart efficiency model, benefits the 6 heirs to the Walton fortune, who have wealth equivalent to a combined 42% of Americans. The model has not made the nation stronger. We witness its impoverishing effect, when taxpayers, who have humanity, willingly absorb the social costs of the corporation’s subsistence wages. There are no defenders of America’s greatness,. based on Walmart’s status as the largest U.S. employer.
Walton political clout is substantially responsible for the deplorable state of U.S. infrastructure, which is having and, will have, consequences to American growth and prosperity, for generations to come. Arkansas, headquarters for Walmart for decades, remains the 2nd poorest state in the union.,
LikeLike
Fairness does not mean every child gets the same thing. It means every child gets what they need.
LikeLike
Pennsylvania has been promising to reform the charter funding for years. The state auditor led a big push but it got nowhere.
“DePasquale called for the creation of a statewide charter school oversight board to help improve the accountability, effectiveness and transparency of charters. Legislation making its way through Harrisburg as part of HB 530, which overhauls Pennsylvania’s 20-year-old charter school laws, would create such an agency. But that bill is tied up in political gridlock, along with other school funding reforms.”
Like in Ohio, ‘tied up in gridlock’ means lobbyists are blocking reform.
LikeLike
Who came up with that nonsense jcgrim? So if it takes $200K/yr to educate one child, that child is “entitled” to it? How about if a person needs a $10M medical procedure? Btw, Obamacare would not cover that procedure. Society as a whole has to decide how much to pay. Most would admit that the challenged might need a little more, but 4x? Many of you even object to publishing the true cost of each subgroup. I asked this question locally and nobody was willing to release the information (probably hadn’t even calculated it)
And it raises other policy issues like immigration. Diane didn’t let my previous post through but Hispanic immigrants have lower earnings and lower educational attainment in the 3rd generation vs the 2nd generation (Pew survey). Asians have more with each generation. Couple that with the Urban Institute’s analysis that each person in America receives about $250K more in SS/Medicare benefits than they contribute and that rises as their skill level decreases. We have a golden sign on our southern border saying come on down. If everyone knew how much it cost to educate an ELL or SPED student, some of these policies would change.
Note I am not anti-immigrant. I want to double legal immigration. But we should pick those with skills and potential rather than letting the most desperate decide. Btw, there are a few 100M’s of folks in China/India who would hop across the border if they could. Are you going to let another 150M+ come on over? Or should we control how many and what the rules are?
LikeLike
YES, Virginia, if it costs $100,000 to educate a student, it should happen. Some of our really disabled and medically fragile kids do cost quite a bit to educate. It is right and proper that we do this. Other students with special needs require far less interventions and equipment. Since the charter school is not accepting the severely disabled, they should not be received the money that it would cost to serve a student with more difficult needs.
And for “not being anti-immigrant,” you sure SOUND anti immigrant. Your tired arguments are the same ones used against every wave of migration to the United States since the 1820s. As a group, immigrants always make less that native born Americans in the first generation or two. Always. But the earnings improve in subsequent generations. They always have. There is NO reason, except racism, to assume that this particular wave of immigrants will not have the same economic improvements over time.
LikeLike
Threatened Out West, if Diane will allow me to post my full entry from before with the links I will do so. But I think you missed some key points:
1. I favor doubling legal immigration. How is that “anti-immigrant”? We allow more folks to immigrate (1M/yr) than the rest of the world combined! And I want to double that!
2. We are the only advanced nation with “family-based” immigration. Other countries select immigrants based on skills (Canada has points system). You can’t tout “every country has x health care” and then ignore their immigration policy when it’s not convenient.
3. I will show you the data from Pew. Other immigrant categories:
a. Increase earnings over successive generations through the 3rd
b. Increase education over successive generations through the 3rd
c. Have higher income than native born Americans.
Hispanics do not on all three points.
4. That said, I am not saying Hispanics are inferior. The intelligent and skilled Hispanics stay in their home countries. They have middle class jobs and families to care for. The less skilled ones with nothing to lose just “break in line” in the US hoping to get to stay. If we only select “undrafted free agents” from Mexico, for example, it’s no surprise we don’t think they are as talented as the 1st – 3rd round picks. If we allowed the Mexicans who follow the rules and are talented immigrate, those numbers in #3 would change.
So, I gather you have no problem publishing the true average cost of special education kids so we can have a public discussion? Democrats are always so cavalier when spending other people’s money. I do support accurately measuring cost. That includes possibly creating subgroups of sped kids if there are significant cost differences. Charters should be reimbursed according to the actual cost of their students.
LikeLike
By all means, Virginia, publish the amounts. In Utah, all districts MUST have all financial reporting on their websites. Charters, on the other hand, have absolutely no reporting requirements. I just heard of a scam here where a company would “lend” the names of homeschooled kids to charters so that the charter could report more students and get no money, even if the homeschooled child never attended classes there. Do you think that’s right?
And for most of the country’s history there were no “illegal” immigrants. That’s a 20th century invention.
LikeLike
Threatened Out West, first schools should not be allowed to count students that don’t attend. There is a word for that. It’s called fraud. Btw, many for-profit secondary educational institutions are known to do this with college aid. Since the feds give out so much money, they enroll kids for a semester or so and get their money. As I recall, that’s how George Shinn made a ton of $$ and founded the Charlotte Hornets bball team. I agree with Obama about only giving aid to students who attend successful universities but in general, I oppose a lot of that aid for other reasons.
I don’t think you understand what I am saying. Look up cost accounting or maybe even activity-based costing. The question is how much does the “activity” of instructing a general ed student cost vs the cost of instructing an ELL student or SPED student. They are not the same. If you spend $10K/yr with few ELL and then you get an influx of ELL (say increase of 25% of enrollment), your new cost is >> new ELLs * $10K/yr. Unless you breakdown costs by function/product/service, you can be wildly inaccurate. Diane’s readers are making this point implicitly by saying “normal SPED” cost much less than severely disabled SPED. Same idea as SPED costs more than gen ed.
Currently, because of different characteristics of the immigrants we welcome, Asians contribute > taxes and have higher incomes than costs. Hispanics contribute less taxes than they consume and receive lower wages. Have you heard of the EITC being paid to illegal immigrants? To the tune of $B’s per year. In any case, if you selected immigrants based on skills/talents regardless of origin, the characteristics of each group would largely be the same. If India/China bordered the US, you might get the same inverse result when 100M’s of low-skilled Asians jumped the border. If you want to pay the extra $$ for the ELLs, go for it. But when you want to spend other people’s money on your chosen philanthropy/political strategy, that’s a problem.
LikeLike
Virginia, you are not aware of charter school accounting. It is a common—though not universal–practice to enroll students until the day of the state count, usually Nov 1. Then they send the ones they don’t want back to public school. And they keep the money for the entire year, and the public school gets the student and no money.
Is that fair?
LikeLike
If that’s the case with charters, that is not fair. In fact, it sounds like fraud to me. I’m all for accurate accounting. It sounds like the $40K number is accurate to me but there may be other shenanigans being pulled. I’ll back you on calling out sleazy deals but both sides need to be honest about everything and let the chips fall where they may.
LikeLike
OF COURSE it’s fraud. That’s the point. Charters constantly commit fraud with impunity. You seem to love charters, and you need to wake up to the fact that fraud is part and parcel of many charters. In Utah, many legislators and state school board members and/or their families own charters, work for charter management companies, etc.
LikeLike
In L. A. $40k is paid to special education schools that take the most behaviorally disabled. I am not sure what Speech and Language services cost per student for 30 minutes per week in a small group. I do not understand how Penn is figuring it, but it does sound high to me, esp., when “bringing in line” is mentioned. Are the charters accepting only children with moderate to severe disabilities?
LikeLike
West coast teacher,
The charter in question is not accepting the most severely disabled students. SPED is a cash machine
LikeLike
PA is one of the states that doesn’t make the ed reform success roster, along with OH, MI and IL. Winners and losers, baby. We lost.
No fair looking at the giant swathe of states that have adopted these policies with disastrous results, Diane. Ruins the narrative.
LikeLike
could that be why many students are not in the charters? Again, (I am a public school supporter) but I want to know the reasons these students stayed in the public schools. Good parents? No other options in the circus of choice?
Focusing on why they stayed gives the reasons we need good public schools, right? So why are they still in public schools?
LikeLike
Corbett, the current Governor of Pennsylvania, Legislators, and Department of Education personnel should be in jail. This is child abuse. This is leading to the deliguency of minors. This is destroying the futures of thousands of students, disrupting families, impacting communities as a whole, etc., etc., etc. How can anyone in a position of authority in Harrisburg, PA sleep at night? This is criminal.
The pay should be cut for all state officials and workers so that they can actually feel the pain the Teachers and Administrators in their public school systems.
LikeLike
Corbett was the governor that created this mess, and I agree he should be in jail. Tom Wolf is the new governor that has to sort out this mess. He has to change the reimbursement formula and get Pennsylvania back on track. Charters are no magic bullet, and they can fragment services, make them less efficient and a lot more expensive.
LikeLike
Chester Upland may be first district in nation (excepting possibly Inglewood in California) where the entire public school district was bankrupted by charters, one in particular.
LikeLike
Charters nationwide have NOT proven to be the answer for improving the education of this country. There are too many for profit charters making big bucks for people who could care less about the educational outcomes for the Students. The non-profit charters are too often run by people though well intentioned do not really know how to run a school. In the end, Students are the losers.
LikeLike
Some of the “non-profits” have that status for tax purposes, but they are really for profits. With the lack of transparency and oversight, the charters can hide the profits. It is a shell game.
LikeLike
Agree: a real gov would sacrifice his own salary for every day these workers work for free.
LikeLike
“State law includes a funding formula that is especially generous toward special education students who attend charters; Chester Upland has to spend $40,000 per student per year for every special education student from its district who enrolls in a charter school. That’s twice the amount the district spend on its own students with special education needs and more than any other district in the state, Sheridan said.”
So they deliberately bankrupted a public school system rather than buck the lobbyists who are protecting this ridiculous funding formula?
LikeLike
Bravo to all these courageous folks in Chester PA. Bravo, bravo, bravo. I’m inspired by their collective defense of democracy. Only this kind of solidarity will defeat Big Money. That’s our history. We need more of it.
This is the kind of popular action that pushed FDR to do the right thing in the 1930s. We need more of it. It worked wonders in PA in the 1930s. Can PA be a leader once again?
LikeLike
cross posted at
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Teachers-and-Staff-at-Ches-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Charter-Schools_Public-Education_Public-Education-150901-980.html#comment561265
with this comment at the end… AND embedded links to this are in the comment.
With the ‘smaller government’ & austerity rants from the GOP, the first budgets to be cut were the schools…thus without the professionals and the support for learning that kids must have, the schools failed… and could be taken over by the legislatures…and handed over to privateers. with not a shred of accountability. Read:
Jon Pelto: Charter Schools Want Public Funds Without Public Accountability
The fraud is astonishing. Take Arizona’s voucher program. Vouchers are the Orwellian ‘choice’ offered to an ignorant public. “Daniel Luzer, the news editor of Governing magazine, reviews Arizona’s voucher program, enacted almost 20 years ago.
Competition was supposed to be a game-changer. Advocates said it would cost the state only $4.5 million a year and would lift the performance of minority students.”
“None of that was true. The program now costs $140 million a year, and there has been little change in test scores for minorities.”
And just look at Chrisite’s slight of hand “In his unrelenting determination to advance the privatization of public schools in New Jersey, Governor Chris Christie has shifted $37.5 million from public schools to charter schools in the state budget. Last year,he shifted $70 million from public schools to charters.”https://dianeravitch.net/2015/06/25/gov-christie-diverts-money-from-public-schools-to-charters/
Submitted on Tuesday, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:29:46 AM
LikeLike
According to the school administrators, media and public opinion, teachers are either incompetent, greedy pigs or priests and nuns. Whichever suits the agenda of the day.
http://windycityteachers.blogspot.com/2015/08/cps-teachers-greedy-pigs-or-priests-and.html
LikeLike
“Chester Community Charter School, a nonprofit institution managed by a for-profit company, is the largest charter in the district. It began in 1998 with 100 students and now enrolls 2,900 students, nearly as many as attend the traditional public school system.”
This is baloney, too. Setting up a non-profit school entity to comply with state law and then outsourcing every school function to a for-profit means the school is a for-profit.
We see the same kind of legalistic parsing in OH and MI ed reform. Their schools are run by a for profit contractor. It’s no more complicated than that and it wouldn’t be described any differently than that if this were any other form of government contracting.
Isn’t it funny how public schools always seem to do so poorly under ed reform leadership? Why is that?
LikeLike
“Vice President Joe Biden is set to march with the leader of the country’s largest union at a Labor Day event in Pennsylvania this weekend, an event that will highlight the vice president’s close ties to organized workers as he mulls a presidential campaign.”
I just find this stuff amazing. Can anyone show me something Joe Biden has DONE on behalf of regular working people while in government? Accomplished. Show me one thing. This has to be the most egregious example of unearned populist cred in the history of the world.
LikeLike
Biden’s brother, Frank, is a charter school edupreneur in Florida. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/brother-of-vp-biden-promotes-charters-invoking-family-name/2011/11/22/gIQAnhLFfO_blog.html
LikeLike
How does this work:
Will the district send letters to the teachers’ bill collectors?
Will they be compensated later in the year?
Are police, firemen, and other public servants working without pay?
WHY ARE TEACHERS EXPECTED TO SUPPORT THE UNSUPPORTIVE?
LikeLike
Because it’s “all for the kids.” I’m so sick of that term, because teacher and student needs are not mutually exclusive. That dean of students in Chester Upland should NOT have to moonlight as a janitor. He can’t give as much as he could to the students if he’s exhausted from working another job. That goes for all of those brave souls in that district. And if the teachers had said, “No way. We’re not working if we can’t get paid,” they would all be accused of “only being in it for their paycheck.” Those poor teachers can’t win either way.
LikeLike
I could not do this. I need my income to meet my expenses. I do not know how the teachers can handle this. I wish I were in a position to teach without pay. My stress level would drop. I would teach continue to work with out the pay if this were the case.
LikeLike
I don’t know how they do this, either, but that’s why I’m sending a little money to help the fundraising in Chester Upland. I don’t have much, but I am sending what I can. I wish I could do more.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Lifelong Quest.
LikeLike