This is the official reaction of the National Education Association to the new PDK-Gallup poll. The three key findings that the NEA highlighted are that the American public thinks there is too much testing; 41% of the public think that parents should have the right to opt their children out of standardized testing; and only 31% support vouchers that send public money to pay for private schooling.
WASHINGTON – The 47th Annual PDK/Gallup Poll of the Public’s Attitudes Toward the Public Schools, which was released today, reinforced—yet again—what students and educators nationwide have been saying: there is too much emphasis on standardized testing.
“All students, regardless of their ZIP code, deserve a great public school education. But the high stakes obsession of test and punish has only served to widen the gap between the schools in the wealthiest districts and those in the poorest,” said NEA President Lily Eskelsen García. “We must reduce the emphasis on standardized tests that have corrupted the quality of the education children receive. The pressure placed on students and educators is enormous. We wantstandards to succeed and be challenged by teaching critical thinking and problem solving skills, as well as creativity.”
NEA has been instrumental in advocating for policies that do just that. As Congress is considering reauthorization of the ESEA (Elementary and Secondary Education Act), key aspects of NEA’s Opportunity Dashboard have been a part of the discussion. The Dashboard includes a menu of indicators of school quality and student-centered success, such as access to advanced coursework, school counselors or nurses, and fine arts and regular physical education. Our focus should be on ensuring access to those types of programs because they are much more likely to lead to student success than rote memorization and bubble tests.
Key findings of the 47th Annual PDK/Gallup Poll of the Public’s Attitudes Toward the Public Schools include:
• 64% say there is “too much emphasis on testing”
• 41% say parents should be able to opt their children out of standardized testing
o 57% of Blacks say parents should not be allowed to excuse their child
o Among Hispanics, that margin is 45%
o But among Whites, 41% said “no” while 44% said “yes”
• While 57% of public school parents give their local schools an “A” or “B” for performance, that drops to 19% when asked to rate public schools nationwide
• 95% of Americans rated “quality of the teachers” as very important for improving local public schools, putting it at the top of a list of five options
• Nearly all adults surveyed (84%) support mandatory vaccinations for students attending public schools
“NEA fully supports parents and supports our affiliates who take a stand against tests that serve no educational purpose,” said García. “But making it easier for parents to opt out is not the end game. The end game is designing a system where parents and educators don’t even consider opting out of assessments because they trust that assessments make sense, guide instruction, and help children advance in learning.”
The poll also showed that many Americans have come to accept school choice and charter schools as part of the education landscape. But that support declines when vouchers are introduced. Only 31% of Americans favor allowing students and parents to choose a private school to attend at the public’s expense.
“School vouchers divert essential resources from public schools to private and religious schools, while offering no real ‘choice’ for the overwhelming majority of students and their families— and particularly not for the parents of children with special needs, low test scores or behavioral problems,” said García.

The time is long overdue for NEA, a labor union, to step up and defend/promote the profession instead of parrot reform propaganda. Thank you to any non-union member citizen who has spoken up for what is right and against what is wrong in education policy because union leaders have played cautious lapdogs pretty much up to this point.
LikeLike
Absolutely! If there is a well-orchestrated PR campaign to make public schools look horrible and teachers as even worse – where is the NEA, a well-funded organization that should be
building an even better PR campaign promoting Public Schools, teachers, the profession, the students, etc.?? We ARE the professionals! It is past time for NEA to stand up to these bullies and put forth a strong, truthful, and well planned PR campaign of their own – including parents, communities, and of course, teachers and STUDENTS! This is all for them!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm. no question about Common Core? Worthless, they can only respond to what the mainstream media feeds them. 40% of children in poverty and the teacher is the most important component? Polls are dangerous tools,
LikeLike
Yes, Joseph, there was a question about Common Core. Very few people support it; about 25% of the public and of parents. 54% oppose it and the rest don’t know.
LikeLike
“…there was a question about Common Core. Very few people support it; about 25% of the public and of parents. 54% oppose it…”
Interesting that neither the NEA or the AFT statements made mention of that.
LikeLike
The public’s low opinion of Common Core is getting out there.
http://edsource.org/2015/national-poll-shows-most-oppose-common-core-standards/85212
LikeLike
Also the low opinion of linking teacher evals to test scores:
http://www.journalgazette.net/news/education/Poll–Low-marks-for-grading-teachers-based-on-kids–tests-8398471
LikeLike
Yes, well, at the risk of being rude, whatever. Here’s what NEA has to say about EdTPA: https://preaprez.wordpress.com/2015/08/23/neas-amazing-statement-on-edtpa/#comments NEA is no friend to teachers and the reaction to this poll is just so much bobbing and weaving, typical of Eskelson Garcia.
Not that AFT is any better. Both unions are almost enough to make a person anti-union, which I think is intentional.
LikeLike
Thanks Diane, I missed it, great. Here is Susan Ohanian on this fraudulent organization that I used to love. http://susanohanian.org/core.php?id=745.
LikeLike
Thanks for the link.
We’ve learned that Pew pension research was a collaboration with hedge fund and Enron’s, John Arnold. University, think tank, and polling research reflects media bias. All four are funded by plutocrats. Big business designs measurement schemes, in assessments for everything related to labor.
The first step for change, is elimination of tax avoidance for “philanthropists”.
LikeLike
A majority feel parents should not be able to opt their children out? That is really scary.
LikeLike
I do not think this is scary. Opt-out is civil disobedience– protest against state/fed regulations imposed without vote or other consultation with families– tho’ the regs materially change the nature of public-school ed for their family, & they are reqd to pay for implementation via taxes. We do not need special riders ‘allowing’ us to protest, nor do we need a wave of popular support saying ‘it’s OK to protest’.
I suspect among those in this ‘majority’ [44% – 41%] are many like my otherwise-highly-intelligent friend who exclaimed, ‘would you *opt out* of paying taxes?’ Some people (especially those born after the draft) have never met a regulation they couldn’t conform to, apparently having been taught that those in charge know what’s best for them. Some (like my friend) got their kids thro’ just dandy before RTTT/PARCC & are out of touch with today’s public-school realities.
LikeLike
I don’t think that 44% support for opt out is scary. I think it is amazing.
Opt out went from an idea on the fringes to an idea that is rising and about to overtake the mainstream.
LikeLike
In Colorado. prior to PARCC, we had state standardized tests and schools were rated by test scores, but there was no opt out movement. When SB 191, which tied scores to teacher evaluations, was proposed, educators lobbied hard against it but lost. Opt out is the fruit produced by coercive testing that limits learning to multiple choice guessing.
LikeLike
Cuomo says he’s for parents’ rights, opt-outs unlikely to be penalized by feds.
http://news.wbfo.org/post/opt-out-trend-unlikley-be-penalized#stream/0
LikeLike
bethree5,
You have described exactly what I observe in the retired teachers I know, who consistently vote Republican.
LikeLike
Does anybody not know how this has played out, or will play out?
PUBLIC: “After a careful study and witnessing what corporate school reform is doing to our schools, we’re against all things corporate school reform. Please stop.”
CORPORATE SCHOOL REFORMERS: “No. We’re now going to force all this on you and on your schools, and shove it down your throats, and down your kids’ throats whether you want it or not.. and we’ve got the unlimited money and bought-and-paid-for politicians to do it.”
PUBLIC: “But wait. Aren’t you corporate reformers supposed to be all about ‘choice,’ and parents having a choice? Don’t we have a choice?”
CORPORATE SCHOOL REFORMERS: “No, actually, you don’t.”
PUBLIC: “But you said we did.”
CORPORATE SCHOOL REFORMERS: “We lied.”
LikeLike
No, they’ll simply blame over-testing on local schools. They already do.
On Common Core we’ll get the NYC or DC analysis, where there are only “wealthy suburban schools” or “failing schools” and they’ll completely ignore all the schools that don’t fall into one of those two categories, because anyone who is satisfied with their public schools must live in a “wealthy suburb” or (obviously) their school would be in the other category which is “failing”.
You heard it with Arne Duncan. The only people who could possibly object to the Common Core were “suburban moms” who were worried about property values. That’s the “wealthy suburban” category.
It’s weirdly parochial, really, for people who claim to be interested in national policy.
LikeLike
I so agree with this. On the one hand, it’s a reflection of galloping inequality, the hollowing of the middle class. But the middle class isn’t dead yet– except in the minds of pols like Duncan & many other pols, who cease to see the middle class as a voting bloc, & are already using its declining influence as an excuse to polarize, divide & conquer.
LikeLike
The reason parents believe testing has taken over public schools is because it has.
This is the Cleveland Schools “CEO” on how he now sets start and end dates to revolve around “the testing season”:
“The early start to the academic year, he says, is aimed at getting as much work in as possible before the big state and federal test period in the spring.
“More and more school districts like us are going a little bit earlier in the summer so that we end 1st semester before winter break and then start second semester as soon as we come back. And so we have more time before achievement testing in April. And then we get out at the end of May at Memorial Day giving the full summer. It’s just that we set the summer a little earlier,” Gordon says. ”
And before anyone says he’s one of those terrible “public school administrators”, Cleveland has an Ed Reform Approved Plan where they’re busily replacing all the existing public schools with charter schools. Testing is the entire focus of the school year. Of course he focuses on testing. He’d be an absolute idiot not to. The whole “Cleveland Plan” will be measured on test scores.
http://www.wksu.org/news/story/44039
LikeLike
I agree this is pathetic (i.e., the CEO’s admitting the school schedule is dictated by the testing schedule.) But I’m not sure I get the point. Here in NJ our school year starts 3 wks later than yours– but it also ends 3 wks later.
The PARCC testing windows are adapted to our school schedule [1st round March, 2nd round May]. We can dink around with the schedule ad nauseum, the facts remain that we have 36 weeks. Sitting for 2rounds of PARCC disrupts normal teaching schedule & staffing for 2 to 4 wks [2 for h.s., 4 for primary]– let’s add a conservative 2wks test-prep in advance of each round. That makes a loss of 11% teaching time for 11th grade, 17% for 3rd-8th grades.
For tests which are used only to gather data (a)to see how schools compare across state & nat’lly, w/an eye to closing some to open the field to charters, and (b)as input to VAM algorithms measuring teacher ‘effectiveness’, w/an eye to firing some to make room for lower-paid newbies or scab TFA’s.
Pretty shabby all the way around.
LikeLike
“Of course he focuses on testing. He’d be an absolute idiot not to.”
He’s an absolute idiot to focus on testing, following a fool’s idiology* that begins with the false concept that the teaching and learning process can be “quantified” and “measured”.
He’s one who obviously believes that expediency triumphs over justice.
*idiology (n) 1. Any belief system based on falsehood(s).
LikeLike
Diane, I think the NEA and Valerie Strauss failed to understand those results. Rather than reposting here, why don’t I just direct the readers to my comments on WaPo.
LikeLike
This was my reply to you at WaPo:
You portray the Strauss summary of the 2015 PDK/Gallup poll as false, then set out a series of results which do not match, and link to the 2014 Gallup poll.
I went to this link:
Click to access PDKPoll2015_PP.pdf
Here are just 3 main poll results countering your summary:
COMMON CORE – 54% of public school parents oppose having teachers in their community use the Common Core State Standards to guide what they teach. (54% no, 24% yes, 22% don’t know)
STANDARDIZED TESTING – Testing came in last as a measure of effectiveness with just 14% of public school parents rating test scores as very important, making it the last in the list of options (38% felt examples of student work most important, 26% written observations by teacher, 21% grades by teacher). On another question, 64% say there’s too much testing
VAM – 55%-43% against including student scores on stdzd tests in teacher evaluations
In addition, several of your statements relate to general dissatisfaction with public schools. The 2015 poll is consistent with all results since 1969, showing strong positive opinions of the polled for their own public schools, yet negative opinions for the nation’s public schools in general. If you zero in on those Q’s at the PDK site, you’ll find some analysis by a political scientist and a Gallup-poll methodologist. The former opines that people assess their own district through personal contacts & their children’s experience; for natl ps in general they fill in from external sources eg media. The poll expert notes this pattern of response is typical of all issues polled, eg, they know & like their own congressman yet opine negatively about ‘Congress’.
LikeLike
bethree5, you are correct and I was wrong. I went to gallup to get the latest poll I could find and it appears they haven’t publicly published the 2015 data. I used the 2014 data by mistake.
Based on the looks of it, Diane and her crew have changed some attitudes. But I think the PDK group doesn’t always show all the questions asked on their slides. We’ll see what the comprehensive poll shows.
LikeLike
Ohio had the PARCC testing last year, with both tests, but parents complained so the PARCC contractor agreed to shrink testing to one session. After that, the state hired a different contractor anyway.
They’re starting school earlier and ending it earlier based on the spring testing dates- “front-loading” instruction days. That means the children will have fewer school days after the spring tests.
I’m not blaming the CEO (although I wish he would call himself a superintendent- I think “CEO” is a silly and fake title for public employees) but the fact is they’re managing these schools entirely around testing. Parents know there is an excessive focus on testing because there is an excessive focus on testing. They’re going to have to change the test-obsessed culture ed reform has created. They can’t just change the rhetoric.
LikeLike
One need not have a full fledged voucher system to avail oneself of its most toxic effects. Rahm Emanuel who claims to not be a reformer and to be opposed to vouchers has never the less imposed student based budgeting, where the money follows the student. It has been quite effective in burdening all of Chicago’s schools, even though a number of charters have seen their budgets grow at the same time. Smaller schools suffer from the lack of economies of scale, and all schools are loosing vital resources and personnel making their work that much harder.
LikeLike
this helps. The central issue though……that public education is being re-segregated, carefully disguising the process……..needs to be pursued. It appears that some of it is being recognized on gut level reactions from people.
LikeLike
“The poll also showed that many Americans have come to accept school choice and charter schools as part of the education landscape. ”
What is the result among those parents whose kids go to a charter as the result of a take over?
LikeLike
I also wanted more analysis of that factoid. I think it deserves its own poll including asking respondents how charters are funded.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Lifelong Quest.
LikeLike