Edward Placke is Superintendent of the Greenburgh-North Castle Unified School District, which serves students from urban areas who are primarily of African, Caribbean and Spanish heritage. All students are eligible for the federal free lunch program and are identified as disabled, primarily emotionally disabled. He wants the public to know that these students have been shamefully neglected in the state budget, for years.
This is his message:
Shame on New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo. Shame on New York state’s legislators.
Once again the children with the most significant disabilities who live in our most impoverished communities throughout New York are totally ignored by our representatives. These are the students who their respective community school
districts have been unable to educate due to their significant academic and behavioral challenges. I use this term representatives lightly in that our elected officials only represent major contributors, special interest groups and benefactors; donors who ensure their reelection; contributors who unashamedly advocate for privatization of our public schools, contributors who advocate the dismantling of our unions; public rhetoric that demeans our public school teachers and administrators ;contributors who have little or no training in education and; representatives who support an educational reform movement that is ill conceived and will prove ineffective for students of all abilities.
The New York State assembly, senate and the Governor’s office represent all that is insensitive, corrupt and self-serving in our state and country, particularly around the students we are blessed to serve; those with significant disabilities.
Their latest demonstration of the aforementioned disturbing variables is their inability to pass a law this session that would provide alternative educational programs, which include the 853 schools and the public special act school districts (and I underscore the public nature of the public special act school districts), with a minimal annual increase in funding. Unlike other public school districts in New York, these vital educational programs as of this time will be funded at prior year rates for current year costs. The sustainability of these programs that consistently produce outstanding outcomes are in jeopardy of continuing to educate New York’s most vulnerable students. It should be noted that historically funding for these educational programs have at times been frozen which has caused enormous fiscal stress.
Shame on our so called representatives. Despite their outright disregard for our student bodies my advocacy and the advocacy of those with like minds will not rest until the education we offer is comparable to community public schools. Our mission to ensure our students successfully cross “The Bridge To Adulthood” and overcome the many societal obstacles they had no part in creating. I urge our representatives to rethink their position on this bill and join me in advocating for this highly deserving population of students.
Sincerely,
Ed Placke,Ed.D.
Superintendent
Greenburgh North Castle UFSD

You cannot shame those who have no shame.
LikeLike
agreed
“Blameless and Shameless”
Some folks know no shame
So shaming won’t succeed
They won’t accept the blame
For doing the dirty deed
“The Blame Game”
Everyone’s to blame
Except the ones who are
The finger-pointing game
Will really get you far
LikeLike
. . . nor those who seek fame!
LikeLike
Fool me once, fame on you …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW9x7OkwpxA
LikeLike
What are “alternative educational programs”? What are “853 schools”? What are “public special act school districts”? What’s the context here?
LikeLike
See edmusingsny.wordpress.com for an anonymous letter I received about race, poverty and discrimination in the schools Cuomo called “Failing.”
LikeLike
In 2014-2015, 33% of the students in this district, which serves Title I Part D students, were income eligible for free lunch. The district’s budget was $23.5 million for 297 students, or about $79,000 per pupil.
I don’t know how funding streams for these types of districts work, but I would think that a solution lies in asking for larger contributions from the students’ home districts.
LikeLike
Just curious– how can an entire school district be composed of only disabled students?
LikeLike
This is a special act district created by NYS for the purposes of educating Title I Part D students. Why these students’ needs can’t be met in their home districts might make for an interesting discussion.
LikeLike
Yes– doesn’t sound least restrictive, but then I am I NH, the live free and die stupid state.
LikeLike
We need to stop using the term “failing schools” coined by politicians and start using the term “failing politicians”.
LikeLike
I think we may be missing the point. Whether or not these special needs students should be educated in their home districts or in least restrictive environments, I don’t know. What I did understand from Mr. Placke’s posting is that his district is losing funding when it needs more funding to adequately educate this population. I am sorry to hear this. It seems the only way to bring about change is to educate the public. spread the word, and perhaps some people will be outraged enough back you.
LikeLike
actually if you want to attract the attention and affection of conservatives, you don’t ask for money directly. This is what I’m noticing. I think you ask ONE person to come volunteer who does, and then they get another and then one who has a little more time takes it on as a project and then they decide to start fund-raising and so forth.
LikeLike
The district’s funding is staying flat, and its budget for the academic year that just ended was up 6.2% from the previous year, despite a loss in enrollment. It is a budget that gives the district one million dollars to educate every 13 students. This district may be doing incredible work with students that regular districts won’t touch, but at that level of funding I don’t think it is unreasonable for New York State taxpayers and their representatives to ask to put the brakes on for a year.
But if you think that funding is a problem, then why isn’t it relevant to ask the districts that pass these kids along to contribute more to their education? If it isn’t happening already, referring districts should pay this district the whole true cost of educating each child rather than having the rest of the state subsidize it. (I say this with the full understanding that many of these students may not have a referring district.)
LikeLike
I wasn’t meaning to get the discussion off-track. Sorry!
LikeLike
On behalf of the parents of the NYC gen-ed public school students who don’t have an IEP; who don’t use the school buses; who don’t cost $80,000 to educate; whose school buildings are old, cramped, and falling apart; whose class sizes get bigger every year; who live in conditions even more cramped than the conditions they’re schooled in; yet who, I’m told, deserve a Lakeside High- or Harpeth Hall- or Dalton-style education, I would say to Mr. Placke:
Get in line.
With all due respect, of course.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
These children did not “win a lottery” to attend this school. They been assessed and re-assessed until this relatively restrictive school was chosen.
All children deserve a free and appropriate public education.
Fair is getting what you need, not getting the same as everyone else.
LikeLike