A large coalition of grassroots groups and civil rights organizations wrote a powerful letter to the leaders of the U.S. Senate and every member of the Senate expressing their views about what should–and should not–be in the rewrite of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.
This is how their letter begins:
The Journey for Justice Alliance, an alliance of 38 organizations of Black and Brown parents and students in 23 states, joins with the 175 other national and local grassroots community, youth and civil rights organizations signed on below, to call on the U.S. Congress to pass an ESEA reauthorization without requiring the regime of oppressive, high stakes, standardized testing and sanctions that have recently been promoted as civil rights provisions within ESEA.
We respectfully disagree that the proliferation of high stakes assessments and top-down interventions are needed in order to improve our schools. We live in the communities where these schools exist. What, from our vantage point, happens because of these tests is not improvement. It’s destruction.
Black and Latino families want world class public schools for our children, just as white and affluent families do. We want quality and stability. We want a varied and rich curriculum in our schools. We don’t want them closed or privatized. We want to spend our days learning, creating and debating, not preparing for test after test….
The letter points out that the children of Chicago will have taken 180 standardized tests by the end of eighth grade. This is not education.
We want balanced assessments, such as oral exams, portfolios, daily check-ins and teacher created assessment tools—all of which are used at the University of Chicago Lab School, where President Barack Obama and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel have sent their children to be educated. For us, civil rights are about access to schools all our children deserve. Are our children less worthy?
High stakes standardized tests have been proven to harm Black and Brown children, adults, schools and communities. Curriculum is narrowed. Their results purport to show that our children are failures. They also claim to show that our schools are failures, leading to closures or wholesale dismissal of staff. Children in low income communities lose important relationships with caring adults when this happens. Other good schools are destabilized as they receive hundreds of children from closed schools. Large proportions of Black teachers lose their jobs in this process, because it is Black teachers who are often drawn to commit their skills and energies to Black children. Standardized testing, whether intentionally or not, has negatively impacted the Black middle class, because they are the teachers, lunchroom workers, teacher aides, counselors, security staff and custodians who are fired when schools close.
Standardized tests are used as the reason why voting rights are removed from Black and Brown voters—a civil right every bit as important as education. Our schools and school districts are regularly judged to be failures—and then stripped of local control through the appointment of state takeover authorities that eliminate democratic process and our local voice—and have yet so far largely failed to actually improve the quality of education our children receive….
They don’t just complain. They have clear solutions that Congress could enact if it had the will.
First, there are 5000 community schools in America today, providing an array of wrap around services and after school programs to children and their families. These community schools serve over 5 million children, and we want to double that number and intensify the effort. We are calling for a significant investment in creating thousands more sustainable community schools. They provide a curriculum that is engaging, relevant and challenging, supports for quality teaching and not standardized testing, wrap-around supports for every child, a student centered culture and finally, transformative parent and community engagement. We call on the federal government to provide $1 billion toward that goal, and we are asking our local governments to decrease the high stakes standardized testing with its expensive test prep programs and divert those funds into resourcing more sustainable community schools.
Second, we want to include restorative justice and positive approaches to discipline in all of our sustainable community schools, so we are calling on the federal government to provide $500 million for restorative justice coordinators and training in all of our sustainable community schools.
Third, to finally move toward fully resourcing Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we call on the federal government to provide $20 billion this year for the schools that serve the most low income students, and more in future years until we finally reach the 40% increase in funding for poor schools that the Act originally envisioned.
Finally, we ask for a moratorium on the federal Charter Schools Program, which has pumped over $3 billion into new charter schools, many of which have already closed, or have failed the students drawn to them by the illusive promise of quality. We want the resources that all our schools deserve – we don’t need more schools. We need better ones.
So now we are prepared to say, clearly, that we will take nothing less than the schools our children deserve. It will cost some money to support them, but that’s okay, because we have billionaires and hedge funders in this country who have never paid the tax rates that the rest of us pay. We are a rich country, and we can afford some world class community schools.

I have been waiting for civil rights groups to wake up to the fact that Obama’s educational policies have been detrimental and exploitative to poor, minority children. Obama’s policies have allowed poor, minority children to be monetized as a market for corporate America. Sadly, the charter movement in poor urban areas reminds me of the slave trade for the 21st century! Finally, civil rights groups are standing up for positive changes for their communities! Their proposals are brilliant and on the right track. They should form an alliance with United Opt-Out and other pro-public education groups to march on Washington. There is strength in numbers! We need to show corporate America and Washington that they cannot steamroll over the people.
LikeLike
retired teacher,
“Sadly, the charter movement in poor urban areas reminds me of the slave trade for the 21st century!”
I don’t see the connection nor do I understand what you are trying to say with that sentence. Would you please clarify/explain?
TIA
Duane
LikeLike
The charter assault has mostly been in large urban districts that contain lots of black and brown students. A value is placed on their attendance at a charter school that most of the students are forced to attend. If you look at New Orleans, Newark, and now Detroit. Profit is derived from the attendance of minority students at the charter school. While it can be argued it is not slavery, it can also be argued that it is exploitative, especially if the truly free public school is not an option. Why should white children get a comprehensive public school, and brown or black children are tossed into chaos? Why should black or brown children get a narrow curriculum? These are legitimate questions.
LikeLike
Thanks, rt, for the explanation.
No doubt that your last two questions are legitimate and I believe we both know the answer. I’m not sure I would consider the privatization movement, though as akin to slavery, exploitative yes, and perhaps, as some suggest a type of neo-colonialism where some folks believe they have the right and duty to tell others how they should live. But “slave trade” no unless, maybe if one considers the commodification of the data generated in the whole edudeformer regime, whereby those being exploited have no control over, in many times, very personal information.
LikeLike
Sorry:profit
LikeLike
While I agree it’s a stretch (I see red over inequity- I taught black and brown ELLs for decades), the parallel can also be drawn that the profits from the operation go to the white overseers. It is as reasonable as saying that “all public schools are failures,” or public education suffers from “the soft bigotry of low expectations.” In fact, maybe we should use the slavery analogy to draw attention to what is happening. It is a shocking sound byte.
LikeLike
Can’t agree with you on this one rt.
Hyperbole masquerading as analogy in this case would seem to me to give too much ammunition to the edudeformers and privatizers to outright dismiss your concern saying something to the effect of “look, what a crazy comparison ‘charter schools as slavery'” even though that is not what you mean.
LikeLike
Stop and think this all the way through, Duane, everybody. The crimonalization of black autonomy starts young in no excuses discipline, and ends in an incarcerated people.
The elaborate myth of racial difference that was created to sustain American slavery persists today. Slavery did not end in 1865, it evolved.
LikeLike
Bravo! Well done!
Finally, groups that haven’t been bought by Gates/Broad money are starting to stand up and speak up and this is FAR MORE powerful than the “more testing!” letter from the other civil rights groups!
LikeLike
This is the best news I’ve heard all year!!! It needs to be proven that the current reform is not helping minority children. As someone who has advocated for ELL parents and students I can assure all your readers that the new reform is perplexing for many of the families. The parents feel overwhelmed. Furthermore the emphasis on technology is providing several schools an excuse to sit ELL children in front of computers rather than teach them in person. It is a disturbing trend.
LikeLike
Good! I am still holding my breath, though.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
Enforcing educational conformity by test-and-punish, and by closing schools and firing teachers, is not the way to make education more equitable.
Here are grassroots civil rights organizations that understand this, despite the big organizations attachment to test-and-punish. It’s good to see some state-level NAACP organizations signing, despite the national NAACP’s opposed view. A shout out to VOICE Buffalo!
As far as I understand the Murray-Alexander ESEA bill, States would still be required to test students. This should satisfy the big civil rights organizations demand for data on inequities, which is important to know.
The real disagreement, as I understand it, is whether the federal government is to be allowed to prescribe crude remedies that do not really help improve education.
LikeLike
So happy to hear this. It’s long overdue!
LikeLike
Now we needs to hear the same message from disability rights groups. It is ridiculous that they want this destructive and abusive agenda just because they insist that all students be treated the same. I have not heard one parent of a student with disabilities say that they think Common Core and its assessments are good for their children
LikeLike
The only message you’re listening to is Gates money. Every disability group that signed their statement is taking it, and its not that many groups now. Many groups dropped out since last year, ashamed of what they’s sold out for.
LikeLike
International Dyslexia Association shamelessly supports the Common Core standards. They conveniently ignore PARCC/SBAC testing, with the exception of this line:
“For the [dyslexic] student to succeed with the rigorous common core standards, the instruction must be specialized and more intensive.”
LikeLike
Link ti IDA:
http://eida.org/Common-Core-State-Standards-and-Students-with-Disabilities/
LikeLike
The statement is well-crafted, but it is a late entry. Better late than never.
LikeLike
Dear God, this is not a “late entry”, Laura! Schott Foundation has been building and discussing the Opportunity to Learn project for years, and I’ve been posting about it, and people have been dismissing it on the claim they had to support “grade span accountability” because we had no other choice or something.
It could still be the basis of a powerful new Elementary and Secondary Education Act, if we can stop the atrocity being perpetrated today in congress.
LikeLike
I caught a part of the debate on education on C-span. It was NOT pretty. Sorry but Republicans did to education what the House did to the EPA.
What is happening and what is reality makes no difference. I am convinced that either they are so abysmally ignorant as to defy description or they are just pandering to the most ignorant of their constituency, covering their “posteriors” to keep their plush jobs. A GREAT way to run a country – into the ground, literally.
LikeLike
Here is a good review of the movement that NEA, AFT, NPE, SOS, and other accomodators have been working to marginalize. It takes no seat whatsoever at the corporate reform table. It takes no money whatsoever from entities funded by entities funded by Gates, Waltons, Broads, and Kochs.
Progressive experts in education make their points about the role of structural racism and violence in corporate reform’s theory and practice throughout this well sourced review, in a series of embedded radio clips. Real teachers and activist academic leaders focus on the intrusion of a violently abusive racial narrative into the lives of real children, and discuss examples that point toward a way out.
It includes audio clips from Wayne Au, Edward Brockenbrough, Aisha Daniels, Michelle Fine, Brian Jones, Jonathan Kozol, Kevin Kumashiro, Pauline Lipman, David Love, Erica Meiners, Nancy Carlsson Paige, David Stovall, Faya Rose Touré and William Watkins.
Catch up, if you’ve been spending your time hanging out with Randi Weingarten or Linda Darling Hammond, especially if you’ve been taking their money. It is dirty.
U.S. Education Reform and the Maintenance of White Supremacy through Structural Violence
LikeLike