Mike Klonsky asks why the Chicago Board of Education intends to approve $50 million tonight to build three new Noble charter schools when the district supposedly has a huge budget deficit.
He posts a letter from a teacher at Kennedy High School, a public high school whose basic needs are not met even as the district finds money to build three shiny new charter schools.
The teacher contrasts the struggles and successes at Kennedy with the favoritism shown to Noble charters:
“We have had the highest growth on the ACT in 2012 in both Composite Gains and Meets/Exceeds Increases. We have been recognized by the Illinois State Board of Education for increases in Student Achievement by being placed on their Honor Roll. We have been authorized as an IB Diploma World School. What more can we do to prove that Kennedy is a great general public high school which services all students from low-incidence to IB, and everything in between.
“When Noble Charter students are asked to leave for minor discipline infractions and lack of academic achievement, they come to Kennedy and we educate them. We don’t have the ability to ask students to leave our school for discipline issues, while at the same time having the Student Code of Conduct rewritten to handcuff our abilities to truly discipline students and hold them accountable for their poor behavior.
“We have achieved the most impressive turnaround in student achievement for a general public high school in all of Chicago. We did not do it through a multi-million dollar school improvement grant. We even managed to work through this with a $1.9 million budget shortfall in 2013. We have done this through collaborative effort, blood, sweat and tears at times. When will be the moment when our voices are heard? We were never asked to submit an RFP for capital improvements at Kennedy. We don’t have the opportunity to request additional resources to improve our building.”
The Noble charter network is the favorite of the city’s power elite; it names each school for rich patrons.

Why? Because:
1) Certain people want to make (more) money
2) Racism/Classism
The reasons are not reasonable, but they sure are simple.
The sad part to me is the begging for scraps at the table: “we did what we thought you wanted, so why don’t you care about us yet?” Maybe boosting our school data points in hopes of approval isn’t the answer.
LikeLike
Amongst Noble charters’ elite patrons who have their own schools named after them are our billionaire equity investor governor Bruce Rauner and billionaire US Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker, who gained her fortune by inheriting her family’s Hyatt hotel empire.
In contrast, the tradition for naming public schools here has been a posthumous tribute to people whose actions during their lifetimes contributed to the betterment of our world. Naming charter schools for advantaged, mostly white, wealthy living people, basically because of the size of their bank accounts, is a rather insensitive choice, given those schools serve disadvantaged low income students of color. It also appears to be reflective of our history of pay to play politics.
LikeLike
Well, Chi-Town Res, Penny Pritzker showed personal responsibility in choosing her parents well, something the poor seem incapable of doing.
Isn’t that a clear sign of her merit?
LikeLike
This is the crux of the matter – turn public schools into “alternative schools” and starve them of resources.
LikeLike
The last line of your post, about naming schools as part of a system of patronage, reminds me of the classic story of Basho and the Fox:
http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-7614-5068-9
LikeLike
In a battle for resources between charter supporters and “agnostics” in government, charter supporters will win every single time.
If there’s an advocate on one side and a neutral on the the other, the result isn’t real hard to predict.
LikeLike
The term “agnostic,” when spoken by so-called education reformers, is used for rhetorical, not policy-making purposes. There’s nothing “neutral” about them, and talk of their being agnostic is a verbal mask for smashing and grabbing the public schools…
LikeLike
They’re for “great schools!”- it just so happens that all the schools they support are charter schools.
TOTALLY data-driven and objective 🙂
I think the public school should start higher. If they’re acting as the safety net school for the “choice” system, they shouldn’t beg for equal funding, they should demand more funding then the “choice” schools.
The “choice” school is wholly dependent on that back-up school being there.
LikeLike
“Nasticism”
Not agnostic
But antagonistic
Reformsters mask
Their nasty task
To privatize
With lovely lies
LikeLike
“In praise of greats”
Noble, so they say
Reformers posing, koan-like
It’s all about . . . them
LikeLike
“The Democratic speaker of the state House of Representatives accused Republican Gov. Paul LePage on Wednesday of blackmailing a charter school by threatening to withhold state funding from it to get him fired from a job there.
Rep. Mark Eves said LePage told school operator Good Will-Hinckley it had to remove Eves as president or lose $500,000 in state funds, resulting in a loss of an additional $2 million in private funds.”
Isn’t this why we had civil service protections for public employees in the first place? So political hacks couldn’t threaten people?
The charter school caved, BTW. They should expect more blackmail. This worked. Why not a demand for 100% political appointees from the governor?
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CHARTER_SCHOOL_LEPAGE?SITE=DCUSN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
LikeLike
Is this really the United States of America? Do we remember the lessons of the past? Are we aware that our government is up for sale to the highest bidder no matter who they are … citizen or not, criminal or a phony disguised with a charitable organization?
I find this country and its mainstream lies to be disgusting. Why aren’t we teaching our young PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES and why aren’t we helping parents understand PROPAGANDA?
LikeLike
No. No. No. I’m sorry that those are the answers to your questions–which I expect were rhetorical. Isn’t it awful?
LikeLike
Agreed – in spades. My view: the mainstream media, corporate controlled is one of the big reasons we have this horrendous attack on schools and democracy. They lambaste our schools and do a PATHETIC job of providing the real news.
following is my latest letter to the editor. I really doubt if if will get published but at least I tried.
……………………………….
Compare public school “failures” with corporate controlled media failures.
Educators: Truths best sought by scholarly, in depth research. Corporate media? Example: Climate change; 97% of world’s best scientific minds proclaim it human induced, major catastrophe. Media; promote carbon corporation views.
Media; political horse racing promoted, who‘s leading whom. Politicians assertions, printed factually unchecked.
Inadequate media research results: Iraq war; trillions tax payer money lost, death , misery, homelessness ad nauseum: unexamined bank problems; bank failures, depression: Gulf of Tonkin‘ Viet Nam war exploded.
Fundamentally critical problems? Constitutional freedom guarantees drastically diminish. Middle class disappearing, upper 1% siphons national largess. Perpetual war promoted, diplomacy questioned. Plutocracy supplants democracy. Peoples interests succumb, CEOs expand. Corporate media, push corporate agenda.
Profound chutzpa exemplified.
Public schools denigrated, castigated. Are public schools failures equated with societal problems, whipping boys for political failures? Are corporate school profound failures reported, taxpayers paying more for less favorable results ? Are our best schools successes or just poorer ones compared with other nation‘s?
Autocracy, top down; democratic idealism, bottom up. Which; corporations providing their “truths”, test materials; grading schools, teachers by students assimilation of, regurgitating their facts or scholarly in depth research of humankind’s best minds compiled by trained educators?
When in our nation’s history did public schools not innovate, search for better teaching methodology? Most fads quickly disappeared.
Have public schools helped build this nation’s greatness?
Are politicians always prescient? Sputnik, we must emulate the great Russian schools. Etc.
Are tests alone indicators of success? Are tests which virtually anyone can pass, can fail possible? Are honesty, integrity etc equally valid educative goals as test scores? Does inordinate testing promote, hinder these goals?
Are children humanoids for CEO exploitation or human beings, to be educated to their highest potential, nurtured for democracy?
Which, corporate mentality or in depth scholarship?
LikeLike