Catalyst reports that the teacher evaluation ratings for the public schools contained errors.
“Citing a computer coding error, district officials have acknowledged that they miscalculated last year’s REACH performance task scores for one out of every five educators.
“Only a tiny fraction of the 4,574 errors were significant enough to result in ratings changes, however. A total of 166 teachers were given corrected ratings earlier this year, and most moved up a category, CPS officials say. Teachers whose ratings dropped won’t be penalized.
“The coding error involved matching student rosters with scores on performance tasks, the subject- and grade-specific assessments that were developed by committees of CPS teachers.
“Though the problem was not extensive, the number of mistakes – and the possibility that there are still others – has renewed criticisms about the use of such a complex system to evaluate educators and put jobs on the line.”

OMG … what a mess.
LikeLike
EGI ∴ EGO (Erroneous Garbage In ∴ Erroneous Garbage Out)
LikeLike
If the model used to evaluate teachers is junk, it doesn’t matter how accurately it is coded.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are messing with people’s professional reputations; reputations many worked very hard to earn. Then just like that an error is made, and it’s suppose to be ok because they corrected it the next year, or it “only a tiny fraction”! This is madness, and it has to be stopped.
LikeLiked by 1 person
CPS didn’t even have the evaluations from last year completed until two months into THIS school year. AND they were done poorly. Combine this with all of the poor management decisions and needlessly risky investment strategies gone awry, and tell me who it is that deserves a pay cut…
LikeLike
If I may add:
“has renewed criticisms about the use of such a COMPLETELY INVALID complex system to evaluate educators”
LikeLiked by 1 person
In 2014, the School District of Philadelphia had to devote an afternoon of professional development to having teachers correct a clerical error on a previously administered evaluation document. Students were given an unscheduled afternoon off. I was more embarrassed than usual to work for the District that day. I’m so glad I quit.
LikeLike
Good for you.
If more people had your integrity, the districts administering this junk would have no one to administer it.
The real problem is that the economists and other fraudsters developing this stuff and software engineers coding it have no integrity whatsoever. They don’t care that teachers are being fired and otherwise penalized based on junk models. All they care about is getting paid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chicago and how many other places? But at least Chicago was forced to admit it.
LikeLike
In Maryland, specifically Anne Arundel County as well:
Anne Arundel school finds error in teacher effectiveness report
Officials at Edgewater Elementary School in Anne Arundel County say the record has been set straight.
In October, data collected for a new state teacher evaluation indicated that the school had the largest number of ineffective teachers in the county — 54.5 percent of Edgewater’s teachers were rated “highly effective,” 3 percent were rated “effective” and 42.4 percent were rated “ineffective.”
School system officials now say those figures were erroneous: The Maryland State Department of Education had received incomplete data for 11 teachers, and that skewed the outcome.
In a recent letter to parents, Principal Kellie Schell-Ramey said 94 percent of the teachers had actually rated “highly effective,” with 6 percent “effective.” None were found to be ineffective.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/sun-investigates/bs-md-sun-investigates-edgewater-testing-1218-20141228-story.html
LikeLike
The sound you hear is this veteran teacher screeching in frustration.
LikeLike