This is quite a remarkable admission. Nicholas Kristof writes today in the New York Times that the “reform” efforts have “peaked.” I read that and the rest of the column to mean that they have failed to make a difference. Think of it: Bill Gates, the Walton family, Eli Broad, Wendy Kopp, Michigan Governor Rick Snyder, Florida Governor Rick Scott, Ohio Governor John Kasich, Indiana Governor Mike Pence, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, President George W. Bush, President Barack Obama, Michelle Rhee, Campbell Brown, and a host of other luminaries have been singing the same song for the past 15 years: Our schools are broken, and we can fix them with charters, vouchers, high-stakes testing, merit pay, elimination of unions, elimination of tenure, and rigorous efforts to remove teachers who can’t produce ever-rising test scores.
Despite the billions of dollars that the federal government, the states, and philanthropies have poured into this formula, it hasn’t worked, says Kristof. It is time to admit it and to focus instead on the early years from birth to kindergarten.
He writes:
For the last dozen years, waves of idealistic Americans have campaigned to reform and improve K-12 education.
Armies of college graduates joined Teach for America. Zillionaires invested in charter schools. Liberals and conservatives, holding their noses and agreeing on nothing else, cooperated to proclaim education the civil rights issue of our time.
Yet I wonder if the education reform movement hasn’t peaked.
The zillionaires are bruised. The idealists are dispirited. The number of young people applying for Teach for America, after 15 years of growth, has droppedfor the last two years. The Common Core curriculum is now an orphan, with politicians vigorously denying paternity.
K-12 education is an exhausted, bloodsoaked battlefield. It’s Agincourt, the day after. So a suggestion: Refocus some reformist passions on early childhood.
Wow! That is exactly what I wrote in “Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools,” along with recommendations for reduced class sizes, a full curriculum, a de-emphasis on high-stakes testing, a revival of public policies to reduce poverty and segregation, and a recommitment to the importance of public education.
When I look at the Tea Party legislature in North Carolina or the hard-right politicians in the Midwest or the new for-profit education industry, I don’t think of them as idealistic but as ideologues. Aside from that, I think that Kristof gives hope to all those parents and teachers who have been working for years to stop these ideologues from destroying public education. Yes, it should be improved, it must be improved. There should be a good public school in every neighborhood, regardless of zip code. But that won’t happen unless our leaders dedicate themselves to changing the conditions in which families and children live so that all may have equal opportunity in education and in life.

Look at Michael Petrilli’s response to this on Twitter. Mind-boggling.
https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelPetrilli/status/591272918878965760?p=v
LikeLike
Why would anyone tweet something like that?
LikeLike
Who knows. I have a comeback, but it would be so inappropriate. I wonder what his Mom thinks?
LikeLike
” You… you said… what’d you say a minute ago? They had to wait and save their money before they even ought to think of a decent home. Wait? Wait for what? Until their children grow up and leave them? Until they’re so old and broken down that they… Do you know how long it takes a working man to save $5,000? Just remember this, Mr. Potter, that this rabble you’re talking about… they do most of the working and paying and living and dying in this community. Well, is it too much to have them work and pay and live and die in a couple of decent rooms and a bath? Anyway, my father didn’t think so. People were human beings to him. But to you, a warped, frustrated old man, they’re cattle. Well in my book, my father died a much richer man than you’ll ever be!” ~ George Bailey ( Jimmy Stewart) It’s a Wonderful Life.
LikeLike
Thanks for posting this. It seems to have a relationship to the free market economist and author, Steven Levitt’s view. At his Freakonomics blog, Levitt’s co-author reports on MIT economist Amy Finklestein’s conclusion, “…increases in Medicaid eligibility were associated with increases in smoking (What Happens When Poor Pregnant Women Are Given Medicaid Coverage)”.
IMO, its blaming the poor and its what bonds the right wing religious base with libertarians.
LikeLike
Petrilli has commented in the past that Chester Finn occasionally has to take him aside and remind him to think before he speaks.
I guess he’s the kind of person who never actually learns the lesson.
But it is nice that he keeps providing us with hard evidence of his real attitude about the poor people he claims he wants to “rescue” from failing schools.
LikeLike
I opened the NYTimes this morning and was about to pass over Kristof’s column as I ALWAYS do. He and the other elitist Times columnists (all except Krugman and Blow) are not worth my time. Nor are the Times’ cautious or wrong-headed education stories and editorials. But then I paused to read the opening lines of Kirstof’s column and promptly said the same thing Diane said — WOW!!! He’s throwing in the towel! How do they get THIS genie back in the bottle? All those Deformers like Tisch are being left out there to twist slowly in the wind. Will they simply cave? Or will they continue to try to punch their way out of the black hole they happily dug?
I’m pulling up a chair to watch. How about you?
LikeLike
NOPE!
“But early childhood is not a toxic space, the way K-12 education is now.”
Kristof can go suck eggs!
LikeLike
Señor Swacker –
Estoy en la conferencía de NPE. Me encantaría conocerte en vivo.
clanghoff@verizon.net
LikeLike
Espero que le conozca a Señor Swacker a la conferencia. Él no tuvo un teléfono pero estuvo aquí. Él es un hombre muy simpático.
I just wanted to practice my very limited Spanish vocabulary a little. Forgive me for butting in.
LikeLike
¡No es problema!
I did meet up with Duane, entirely by accident, just after breakfast and we had a nice “charla”. Wish I had met you, too!
I did send out a tweet looking for other “old heads” who might have been at the conference. I feel we retirees need to step it up, and had a talk with Anthony Cody about that. And Diane pointed it out in her call to action. Would you be in?
#EldersofNPE
LikeLike
Yes, although I still have to retain some degree of anonymity.
LikeLike
Good news with at least one little(??) point. Note how Kristol also stated that KIPP (charter school) has shown that schools can overcome issues of poverty. So what do you folks think about this? Comments???
LikeLike
KIPP schools, like New York’s Success Academy, also ejects the most challenging children. Public schools that work with high numbers of children who live in poverty could do the same thing. For instance, if the schools where I taught for thirty years got rid of the most challenging children—most difficult to teach—what was left would be children—even those that live in poverty—who would cooperate and work and scores would most probably climb just like they do for KIPP
Does Student Attrition Explain KIPP’s Success?
http://educationnext.org/student-attrition-explain-kipps-success/
LikeLike
I think it’s weird, but utterly predictable, that Mr. Kristoff couldn’t find a single public school worthy of complimentary mention.
I guess all public schools fail all poor children, according to the NYTimes. I’ll be sure and tell all the poor kids who are served quite well by our local public school that. They probably don’t know, not being “thought leaders” and all.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
It’s to bad that they didn’t spend billions on pre-k programs or housing, what a waste of money.
LikeLike
Billions spent – and all they have to show for it is a worthless pile of test scores. Not a single new science lab, or band room, no art supplies or theater sets, no trumpets or pianos, no new sports uniforms, and certainly not single class size reduction. Billions and billiions of taxpayer dollars and we are left with test scores that aren’t worth the paper they are printed on. Father, why would you ever forgive them, because they dam well knew what they were doing.
LikeLike
I suspect he’s just a rat scurrying off a sinking ship. You don’t need to be a visionary to see the steady shift in public opinion. Nothing like a well timed op ed in the NYT to absolve oneself of any culpability in helping to create the mess in the first place.
LikeLike
“I read that and the rest of the column to mean that they have failed to make a difference.”
He’s certainly not saying that. He’s saying the future returns from reform efforts may be diminishing enough to justify refocusing on early education.
LikeLike
Any “returns” from the edudeforms never materialized. It’s been all edudeformer debt (malpractices) that we’ll have to dig out from.
LikeLike
My take, fwiw: “No Market Left Unexploited.”
LikeLike
I didn’t read it that way at all. I thought it was a real love letter to ed reformers.
It reads to me like an “within the movement” discussion, honestly.
Lectures about how the debate has become “toxic” are hard for me to take. Now that’s there’s an actual debate on ed reform all of a sudden they need to move on to the next project. I remember watching Education Nation in 2009 (or thereabouts) and being shocked at how negative it was towards public schools. I was particularly surprised at how many lawmakers appeared and were gleefully piling on. Why wasn’t that “toxic”?
I can’t help but feel the calls for less toxicity and more civility only appeared where there was genuine resistance to some of this stuff.
LikeLike
“I didn’t read it that way at all.”
Exactly, see below.
LikeLike
I agree.
LikeLike
We have public pre-k here and I support it- it’s part of the public school system so we all “support” it – but I’m just really wary of anything coming out of this “movement”.
I just don’t think it’s a good fit for me temperamentally. My overall impression is one of recklessness and doing a million things, poorly, at once.
It took ten years to get pre-k here. My district was the last to adopt it- the smaller rural districts went first. I don’t think the ten years were “wasted”. Hopefully they learned something or other.
LikeLike
In Utah, Goldman Sachs and the Pritzer Foundation are using pre-K, as the market for social impact bonds.
LikeLike
Oh…and I would like to remind Nick Kristof that the TRUE idealists aren’t the poor bruised billionaires or the “just passing through” TFA Temps. It’s the folks who have made teaching in public schools their career, who have watched as they are demonized in the public square and had their voices muted, yet still manage to do the very best they can for students, who are the idealists.
LikeLike
From the article: “But early childhood is not a toxic space, the way K-12 education is now.”
Hey, Kristof: ESAD!
LikeLike
Maybe if some billionaires put enough money into it, early childhood can become a “toxic space” too!
There are new opportunities for educational entrepreneurs!
LikeLike
Ask the deformers, “Who is going to put Humpty Dumpty together again–and what will the costs be…for our nation?…for our educators…for our children? We are fifteen years into a failed reform agenda–and the deformers are still trying to blame teachers, parents, administrators and kids. They should be ashamed of themselves! They should be banished. The media is complicit…but despite the media willingly becoming corporate cheerleaders we have finally reached a point where most of the nation is seeing through this fiasco!
LikeLike
“. . . and the deformers are still trying to blame. . . ”
Come on now, M Louie, you forgot those greedy, lazy union thugs.
LikeLike
Exactly what you said. 1000%. Unfortunately they are shameless.
And if they are ever banished, they will leave us with pockets overflowing with stolen, taxpayer dollars, smirking all the way to their offshore accounts.
LikeLike
It seems to me I have heard that song before: Dr. Ravitch, in your book “The Rise and Fall of the … you said the same things
AND
they did not listen.
This seems to be a recurring theme in so much of politics today, those who are experts in their fields are cast aside by those with a “superior” philosophy.
We are paying and will continue to pay a humongous price for this ineptitude.
LikeLike
The information that Kristoff provides in his column has been around for so many years. Why did he and other smart journalists not know about it? Why did the “zillionaires” ignore the research on education, which provides a fairly clear road-map on how to educate the child? Why is he surprised that poor kids can succeed in the right environment when we’ve known this for years (e.g. See Catholic schools in urban areas.). Also, any teacher could have told him that even in the poorest schools, there are gifted children and high achievers. The challenge we face is how to provide an excellent education for ALL children and that is something KIPP, Success Academy, and other select population schools have definitely not accomplished.
For me, the immense irony of the education “reform” movement is the fact that the data- hungry moguls ignored the tremendous amount of information that we have in the field of education. What a terrible waste it all was!
LikeLike
It’s hard for me to take an adult who just discovered labor unions seriously:
“More broadly, I disdained unions as bringing corruption, nepotism and rigid work rules to the labor market, impeding the economic growth that ultimately makes a country strong.
I was wrong.”
I meet with working and middle class people all day every day in my practice. It’s Ohio and manufacturing, so about half of them still belong to labor unions.
The labor union members are better off. Every single time. The economic and security divide between the two groups is really profound and it ripples – the children of the labor union members are better off, too. This isn’t freaking rocket science. More economic security is better for families.
LikeLike
Kristof has always been clueless on this subject, and continues to prove it by referring to the so-called reformers as “idealists.”
Yes, there are some inexperienced and gullible young people whose idealism has been manipulated by so-called reform hype, but the overwhelming majority consist of parasites, predators, opportunists, greed-heads and will-to-power freaks.
As for Pre-K, God forbid these people get their lamprey-like feeding suckers onto the little ones.
LikeLike
I read Kristof’s column this morning, and had a similar reaction to his column of a month or so ago in which Kristof admitted that, why yes, there is a valid role for unions. Kristof is clueless. Did he honestly think, that everyone who applied for TFA was genuinely interested or invested in helping children? Did he actually believe that top-down corporate reform had anything to offer?
Now I’m waiting for his next admission that why, golly gee, poverty really does hurt people.
LikeLike
“As for Pre-K, God forbid these people get their lamprey-like feeding suckers onto the little ones.”
Amen.
LikeLike
I think this is more of a tactical retreat than anything like surrender. The opt out movement is threatening to grow explosively and they are desperately trying to prevent that from happening. (See Fordham’s recent apologia http://edexcellence.net/articles/a-test-of-education-reform) I think they sensed they were starting to lose control of the narrative that our public schools are failing; a story they must maintain or they lose. Note that Kristof doesn’t give an inch on this.
LikeLike
Here’s hoping they’ll move on. What an insulting and snotty bunch. To presume that we don’t care about our students and schools, and that they – they have some magical solution that those of us who have toiled away for 20-30-40 years in the classroom failed to discover is not only an afford to our intelligence but is also hogwash. (I like your blog since I get to use euphemisms) Refreshing to see that they are still clueless after all these years.
LikeLike
Just a note of caution about the significance of one op ed in the NYTimes that is aligned with the known errors in last several decades of “transformative disruption” in American public education.
1. The billionaires have funded a Super-Pac to promote charter schools in every forthcoming electoral venue, including the presidential elections. That was announced in Politico today
2. Billionaires have funded a major “messaging campaign,” aided by the National Governor’s Association. It is intended the shore up the Common Core and the associated PARCC and SBAC tests and embed the test results into higher education.. Under the banner of “Higher Ed for Higher Standards” the billionaires are promoting the use of those test scores for college admission, placements in programs and specific courses, and to “rethink” the content of teacher education programs. A bunch of administrators in higher education associations have signed on, and among the many supporters two teacher unions are listed. This campaign is one part of a much larger network organized like a Super-Pac. See what you get when you type in a search for “Collaborative for Student Success.”
3. The new darling of the billionaires is preschool education of the kind already in the works in Chicago and in Utah. The arrangements are complex and known as pay-for- success programs also “social impact bonds.” Investors are solicited to pay for the program and the programs are designed to be low risk for the investors. Among those involved in the marketing are Harvard, Goldman Sachs, McKinsey & Co. and the Obama Administration.
In these investment schemes, “payout children” are those who meet or exceed pre-determined targets for performance on specific measures. These investment products are marketed as if they save the government costs….so those “savings” can go to the investors. Both of these preschool programs are planned to reduce the need for special education by early “correction” of some of the issues that would otherwise put the children into special education programs. For every child included in the “payout cohort” an equal number must be excluded from the program in order to demonstrate to investors that the program was working as predicted. (The excluded children function as the control group). The providers of the program must submit to the requirements of the investors so that market “discipline” controls what they do. The investors return on investment is calculated to be at least 5% and can rise to 7%. You can see a summary of the Utah contract at http://socialventures.com.au/case-studies/utah-high-quality-preschool-sib/
These contracts are not unique to education. They are designed to transform much of the public sector into a large portfolio of investments offered by Goldman Sachs: McKinsey & Co, Bloomberg, Prizker, Third Sector Capital Partners, New Profits, and others.
According to Forbes Magazine, the US had at least one trillionaire hedge fund wizard, Wes Edens, and 536 billionaires with Bill Gates at the top of the list at $79,2 billion ( and continuously since 1987) followed by Warren Buffet ($72.7) who managed to make $14.5 billion in 2014. Relatively few of these billionaires inherited their wealth.
LikeLike
Laura, Thanks for your excellent comment. It certainly gives some needed perspective to Kristof’s bizarre post.
LikeLike
When they repealed Glass-Steagall in 1999, everyone said, ‘Katie bar the door’,
they’re coming after your tax dollar.
LikeLike
If we don’t face the facts of genetic limitations on achievement, we’ll keep pissing away money on useless reforms.
LikeLike
I came away with a slightly different interpretation.
He DOES think reform has worked (he wrote “…the low-hanging fruit has already been picked in the K-12 world” which means he thinks that “reform” has accomplished something).
He naively and sincerely believes the zillionaires are interested in the same high-minded aspirations he shares… though anyone who’s followed the privatization movement knows that they are motivated by the chance to make huge profits.
He naively and sincerely believes that taxpayers will pay higher taxes for more “government run” schools that will oversee the lives of children at an earlier age.
Finally, Kristof’s belief that pre-school education will be immune from “toxic” political pressures is akin to believing in unicorns.
LikeLike
Using “zillionaires” is a way to minimize the role of billionaires in ed reform.
It’s a dismissive choice of language – if you believe extremely wealthy have way too much influence over public schools you’re a conspiracy theorist. Just ignore the fact that extremely wealthy people have a huge role in ed reform and you’re golden 🙂
LikeLike
“I don’t think of them as idealistic but as ideologues.”
Me—I think of them as fools or power hungry, greedy narcissistic psychopaths
LikeLike
“I don’t think of them as idealistic but as ideologues.”
Me—I think of them as fools or power hungry, greedy narcissistic psychopaths
I’ll second that. All in favor…?
LikeLike
Please discourage anything that would encourage the “reformers” to get their slimy paws on Early Childhood programs. We are already seeing the effects on these programs because of the pressure they feel to prepare children for the “pushed down” curriculum they face in many kindergarten programs. Far too many preschool programs have caved to pressure from misguided parents, and NAEYC, the largest Early Childhood membership organization in the country has rolled over and played dead. More and more programs for very young children are touting their use of workbooks, phonics programs, and homework. There are fewer and fewer opportunities for meaningful play. If Gates and his cronies get even more involved the potential for serious harm will multiply.
LikeLike
Agree with jwgmom. In southwest Ohio, we have Learn to Earn, marketed as a philanthropy for pre-school education.
The website had photos of little children in suits and ties.
LikeLike
Toledo had to fight to get their public Head Start back. The US Department of Education outsourced it to a for-profit in Colorado.
If Marcy Kaptur hadn’t have intervened they never would have gotten it back.
Public entities will be the last in line to get any funding.
LikeLike
Toledo’s Headstart outsourcing, you couldn’t have found a more fitting example, Chiara. Thanks.
LikeLike
I agree. None of it will be public anyway. They’ll funnel all the funding to members of the club.
LikeLike
Michael Fiorillo said above, “As for Pre-K, God forbid these people get their lamprey-like feeding suckers onto the little ones.”
I agree with jwgmom. “They” already have their suckers on our little ones. Kristof doesn’t intend to help preschool and kindergarten kids for altruistic reasons. He sees the next frontier: More standardization of our already standardized early childhood education system.
LikeLike
Please read this piece about Teaching Strategies Gold by an experienced early childhood teacher. Note that this assessment is used in infant-toddler programs as well. http://www.pegwithpen.com/2013/09/do-not-go-for-gold-teaching-strategies.html
LikeLike
“Tea Party”,
UnKochmyCampus.org lists the AFT as a partner.
LikeLike
Yeah , but he inserts this into the article and blows his talking points! Here again he puts out the dogma that our schools are 2nd rate, and that the ‘reform’ of Charters schools is the way! What POOP!
“The second reason to focus on early interventions is that the low-hanging fruit has already been picked in the K-12 world. Charter schools like KIPPshowed that even in high-poverty environments, students can excel. In New York City, which under Michael Bloomberg became a center for education reform, high school graduation rates rose to 66 percent in 2013 from 47 percent in 2005.”
“I support education reform. Yet the brawls have left everyone battered and bloodied, from reformers to teachers unions. I’m not advising surrender. Education inequity is America’s original sin. A majority of American children in public schools are eligible for free or reduced price lunches, and they often get second-rate teachers in second-rate schools — even as privileged kids get superb teachers. This perpetuates class and racial inequity and arises in part from a failed system of local school financing.”
LikeLike
Exactly – he takes the opportunity to take a dig at the “second-rate teachers” in public schools who are the cause of poverty, racial inequality, etc? The same teachers who have had resources stripped from their schools to pay for testing and charter schools?
That is Kristof, don’t trust him for a minute. He’s softening us up for some kind of corporate pre-school scheme- it’s already happening in Chicago.
LikeLike
And in Utah with Goldman Sachs investors ready to make money from the “payout preschoolers”
LikeLike
A serious question: how is Common Core any different than the Iraq War?
Quasi private contracts and shizmo money?
Where really are the boundaries of war?
LikeLike
I like your thinking process!!
Most don’t see those connections.
LikeLike
Privatized, for-profit prisons…
Privatized, for-profit schools…
Privatized, for-profit wars…
LikeLike
He doesn’t concede anything; he just advocates refocusing reform efforts on the preschool crowd. What new credentials/insights are the zillionaires going to bring especially if the whole discussion is framed around the return on investment they will receive? I can already see the skill charts donning the walls of charter preschools.
LikeLike
Exactly, 2old. I didn’t take Kristof’s op ed to be good news in the least,especially not his chilling “refocus some reformist passions on early childhood.” WHAT?!
Ben Joravsky reported what this will entail in Chicago’s free weekly, The Reader, 12/4/14: “How Investment Bankers Are Set to Profit from Rahm’s Preschool Plan.” “If all goes according to plan, the lenders (Goldman Sachs, Northern Trust, & the J.B. & M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation) will receive more than $34 million for a preschool program that only cost $17 million. Even Tony Soprano would be impressed with that haul.” And–even worse–“”In a nutshell, the lenders get their money back if the kids in the pre-K program outscore their peers on standardized tests.” Wow–an extra added bonus–more $$$ for Pear$on (and more teaching-to-the-test for pre-k teachers, less playtime for little ones & less real creativity, spontaneity and learning–for TWO- or THREE- to- FIVE-YEAR-OLDS!!).
“Moreover, the kids in the ‘no pre-k comparison group’ have to be low-income, minority children who attend neighborhood schools. The contract specifically excludes kids who go to magnet or charter schools.” (BTW–5/42 alderman voted against this…and were recently re-elected. A number of new & progressive alderman have also just been elected, to add to the 5 who don’t “rubber stamp.” )
Kindergarteners should be blowing bubbles, not filling in bubbles.-sign held by a Chicago Public School Teacher
LikeLike
Every so often Nicholas Kristof writes a column that is sensible and indicates that he’s been engaged in some serious critical reflection.
This cited piece is not one of them.
LikeLike
Anyone else find Kristof’s reference to Agincourt odd? It wasn’t a bloody draw, it was a huge victory for the English. Huh? http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Agincourt
Also, see this wonderful riposte by 35 year teacher Peter Greene. http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2015/04/nicholas-kristofs-tourist-balls.html?spref=tw
LikeLike
Reformers betray themselves with their language, “human capital pipeline”, “low hanging fruit”.
Students are profit centers. Gate-keeping, politicians are easy buys. Taxing authority creates deep pockets. And, taxpayers are easy marks.
A promotional message about helping the poor is plastered on and, a target audience that “likes the lie” is made,…. viewers of Fox news, listeners of Rush Limbaugh and conservative judges.
LikeLike
“So a suggestion: Refocus some reformist passions on early childhood.”
God help us. What will be the money making scheme there? Since I am a quick learner, after a very brief 3 second brain storm, I came up with the following recipe:
1) Since daycare is not free in this country, let’s make it free. How? Pour $100 billion a year into it from the Tax Ocean. People will love this part: the money is barely more than what we payed yearly for the Iraq War, nobody gets killed, nobody has to pay extra, but everybody gets to save money. Free stuff.
2) Let this cook for 5 years—maybe 10 years in suspicious, more liberal areas. Write about it in the Post and NY Times—maybe even in Playboy. Give awards to governors and mayors for implementing the idea: “the US has finally caught up to the rest of the World”.
3) Start criticizing daycare performance: “international comparisons show that our 3 years olds are behind Asian kids since those in Singapore already know about DNA and annual interest rates while ours are just quoting Dr Suss and Big Bird.”
4) Show, with research, that daycare teachers are at fault: they became lazy as everybody on the Public’s payroll. They only teach kids how to have fun, without getting them ready for college using appropriate discipline and weekend homework load.
5) Start turning public daycares into charter daycare centers. People finally have a choice of daycares that provide the all important early childhood rigor that will help their kids to compete in this global free market.
6) Start accumulating the part of the $100 billion that’s pouring into your charter daycare chain.
7) Don’t rest, but think about the next scheme of getting tax dollars into your pocket ad infinitum.
LikeLike
Good one!
LikeLike