Civil right attorney Wendy Lecker chastises education leaders in Connecticut for their whole-hearted embrace of the Smarter Balanced Assessment. She contrasts her home state with the wisdom of Vermont.
Vermont’s State Board deminstrated independent judgement:
“Last week, Vermont’s State Board of Education unanimously approved a new resolution on the SBAC tests, which gives strong and informed guidance that Connecticut’s education leaders are unwilling to provide.
“Vermont’s resolution declares that while the SBAC tests “purport to measure progress towards `college and career readiness . . . the tests have not been externally validated as measuring these important attributes.”
“Accordingly, the state board resolved “until empirical studies confirm a sound relationship between performance on the SBAC and critical and valued life outcomes (“college and career-ready”), test results should not be used to make normative and consequential judgments about schools and students.”
“Vermont’s state board also resolved that until Vermont has more experience with evidence from the SBACs, “the results of the SBAC assessment will not support reliable and valid inferences about student performance, and thus should not be used as the basis for any consequential purpose.”
“Finally, honest education officials admit the SBACs have never been proven to measure “college readiness” or progress toward “college readiness,” and in fact are unreliable to measure student learning. In other words, the foundation upon which the Common Core rests is an artifice, and our children are being subjected to unproven tests. Connecticut districts have been diverting resources and time toward a testing regime without any proof that it would improve our children’s education.”
Conclusion: Vermont puts children first. Connecticut doesn’t.

How true. We have a cowardly, short-sighted, and probably bought-off legislature…
Poor Connecticut
LikeLike
Why aren’t civil rights lawyers getting involved to help parents get at this mess?!!!?
LikeLike
Didn’t Arne Duncan’s DOE threaten Vermont for putting children first?
LikeLike
I am I awr of the caring and dedication of teachers as a group. I worked with another group who exhibit these qualities when I was a firefighter. The advantage that firefighters have in this political climate is that the public recognizes that they didn’t start the fire. Teachers on the other hand are going to be rated for the outcomes of students who came to them from grinding poverty and dysfunction. What a world, what a world…
LikeLike
If only CT’s governor were as wise as Wendy Lecker we’d have the best school system in the world.
LikeLike
As usual, Wendy is right on the money!
Connecticut teachers will need to build a coalition of concerned parents, administrators and BOE members to implement change…and the sooner the better!
LikeLike
Lecker touches on something that isn’t given play often enough. “Despite the well-known limitations of standard tests, federal officials insist they be used to… impose real-life consequences… even DECISIONS REGARDING STUDENT PLACEMENT AND GRADUATION. (emphasis mine)
Parents in my neck of the woods may be letting things happen because the state gov has pushed off using scores to grade schools and teachers for a year or two. Perhaps OPT-OUT numbers in NJ will increase drastically when they read at the NJ edgov website, under into on PARCC, that the state plans to use PARCC to replace HSPA, the high school proficiency test. You have to pass that to get a diploma.
LikeLike
‘ “the results of the SBAC assessment will not support reliable and valid inferences about student performance, and thus should not be used as the basis for any consequential purpose.” ‘
I am getting confused. If we start back with a set of standards that were developed under very sketchy circumstances by a group of people who have no right to proclaim themselves the arbiters of national standards for college and career readiness, how can they claim that the tests they have commissioned measure such readiness?
I ran across a study that one district/middle school is proposing to do on their graduates. Mind you, participation would be totally voluntary and a student who chose to participate would be able to opt out at any time. The district would track how their graduates are doing socially and academically at a few select times in their lives ending with two years post college. (Note the assumption that all of their graduates will be college graduates.) Somehow, this survey is supposed to inform the district on how well their students are doing and they can improve practice. The study is to be designed by a university economics department, so you can imagine the highly useful data they will produce and the inferences that might be drawn. The district feeds into a highly competitive high school whose graduates almost all enroll in college. Of course the number crunchers will be able to isolate the district’s contribution to their graduates success. (tongue in cheek) I don’t know about you but I’m feeling uncomfortably “vammy’ right now.
LikeLike
cx: graduates’ success
LikeLike