Julian Vasquez Heilig, Professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at California State University in Sacramento, here assembles the statistical data about the so-called “Florida Miracle.” This “miracle,” like the purported “Texas Miracle” that propelled George W. Bush into the White House, is the foundation of Jeb Bush’s claim to being the real deal as an education reformer.
Do we want more Bush-style reform? George W. Bush brought No Child Left Behind to the nation; Jeb Bush imposed an even tougher accountability and choice program in Florida. Schools receive an A-F letter grade. Teachers’ evaluation, compensation, and tenure are tied to their students’ test scores. There are more than 600 charters, including a thriving for-profit charter industry. Jeb pushed for vouchers, but only vouchers for special education students survived court scrutiny; Florida courts declared Jeb’s voucher proposal for low-income students violated the state constitution. In 2012, Jeb and his allies got a proposition on the ballot to change the state constitution to permit vouchers, but voters rejected it by 58%-42%. Jeb is a true believer in choice and accountability.
But how about that “Florida Miracle”?
Heilig shows with data from 2000-2009 that Florida students made impressive gains on the fourth grade NAEP reading test. He notes that critics wondered whether the gains were elevated by the policy of holding back third-grade students with low reading scores; those low-scoring students were about 10% of third graders.
But moving right along, the scores in 8th grade are good but not all that impressive. In reading, Florida ranked 30th in the nation, and in math, it ranked 34th. Some small gains, but nothing that looks like a miracle.
What about graduation rates? Florida made the smallest gains of any of the most populous states and was 44th in the nation in the proportion of students who graduated from high school in four years.
What about ACT scores? Heilig writes: Does the news get better on the ACT? Um. No. Florida’s overall composite ACT scores decreased between 2000 and 2010. They were the lowest of the most populous states. They were ranked 49th in the nation.
And SAT scores?
Florida’s overall composite scores SAT scores also decreased. They outperform Texas and New York, but lagged behind California. Florida ranked 41st in the nation in composite SAT scores. (I know someone lurking out there is thinking that the SAT and ACT scores are dependent on composition of the sample, of course it does. But the data is the data)
Heilig concludes:
In sum, NAEP scores seemed positive (with caveats). However, do NAEP scores determine the future of Florida’s students? When we consider the measures that actually matter for many kids’ lives: Graduation rates, ACT and SAT… It is only a peek— but you be the judge of the Florida miracle.

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
“They were the lowest of the most populous states.”
Without a definition of “most populous states” that statement is too ambiguous to be worthy of including in the debate.
LikeLike
It makes me cringe when they call Jeb Bush, the “education governor.” He is an opportunist, surrounded by dark money and special interests. The “Florida miracle” is as big a lie and the “New Orleans miracle.”
LikeLike
It’s a mircale that depends upon magical thinking to be believable.
LikeLike
Off topic but important: The Illinois State Board of Education has removed the section on Code 15 from their website. Didn’t work, looking forward to the egg on their face. As you will see in the link, Code 15 is the guidance for how schools are to proceed when kids refuse the test. ISBE is running scared as they have ZERO recourse against parents and kids who opt out or otherwise refuse the CCRAP test. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_nlHFyqG0IOUJmMlUxeE1OdTQ/view
LikeLike
Good piece on how charter schools changed their message from the superiority of charters to the inferiority of public schools:
“It’s a classic negative advertising campaign,” said David Bloomfield, a professor of education at CUNY’s Graduate Center and Brooklyn College.”
“The city’s most influential charter groups have been ratcheting up their “failing schools” rhetoric since the summer.”
So much for “we want to IMPROVE existing public schools!” from ed reform politicians. Voters should call them on it. This was NOT sold as privatizing public schools, and there was a reason for that. They never would have gotten elected on a “privatizing public schools platform”. Obama surely wasn’t.
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/city-hall/2015/03/8563250/rally-day-charter-sector-keeping-focus-worst-city-schools
LikeLike
MS State Senator Nancy Collins has introduced a voucher bill right out of this Florida Miracle! Ha. She aims to destroy public education in MS with this. She spoke at Excellence in Education’s conference last year too. She wants to be in cahoots with Bush. Coincidentally, she is about to run to replace Alan Nunnelee in the US House.
I wish Mississippians would wake up! She has an agenda! It is not about service or children.
The Clarion-Ledger out of Jackson, MS has endorsed this voucher bill. Here’s the article: http://www.clarionledger.com/story/opinion/2015/03/05/view-year-later-special-needs-bill-still-needed/24448741/.
The article calls MS’s special needs public Education “inadequate,” yet doesn’t even mention the Mississippi Adequate Education Program. MAEP is law that sets the basis for ADEQUATE funding for public education. The legislature, including/especially Collins, won’t vote to fund it. So, excuse me, but how are schools supposed to meet the needs of students, especially those with special needs.
This is yet ANOTHER case of politicians starving public schools to make them fail. That way they can line their pockets via privatization.
Now, what could be the motive behind the Clarion-Ledger’s endorsement?
I’m just so disgusted.
LikeLike
The only reliable data here are found in the NAEP scores and they show a remarkable improvement in reading (and probably math) but how that effects outcome eight years later is anyone’s guess. SAT and ACT scores depend on who in the population takes the test and grad rate is unreliable. We need to be objective, here. See my comments on grades and what they mean. mack-hicks.com/blog/
LikeLike
Mack Hicks,
The NAEP scores do not reflect two important factors: one, the 3rd grade retention policy for the lowest performing students; two, the class size reduction policy endorsed and imposed by voters (and opposed by Jeb Bush).
LikeLike