Kentucky is one of the few states in the nation that does not have charter schools. Marty Solomon, a retired professor at the University of Kentucky, wrote this column in the Lexington (Kentucky) Herald-Leader to urge the state’s leaders not to let them in. Some political leaders in Kentucky look longingly at the charter school proliferation in neighboring state, Tennessee, apparently forgetting that Kentucky has higher academic performance on NAEP than Tennessee. Why copy a state that has lower test scores?
Solomon is blunt. He writes:
Charter schools are a cancer on public education. Kentucky should continue to reject their creation.
This is because they suck scarce funds away from our public schools, thereby making quality public education more difficult. At the same time, the vast majority of charters fail to deliver on their hollow promise to provide a superior education.
Charter schools are essentially private schools, run by private operators, under private rules, with private teachers, operating with far less accountability than public schools, and are exempt from all state statutes and administrative regulations.
The state would have absolutely no control over them. Because they swipe public funds from public schools to operate, they misleadingly call themselves public schools to hide their private nature.
While they promise to save children from failing public schools, charter schools are notoriously incompetent.
The track record for charter schools is abysmal and shameful. But that is what you would expect since they can hire teachers without any teaching experience or training — not even one college course in education — and can hire administrators without even a high school education.
The nation’s report card, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is administered by the U.S. Department of Education every two years. It is given to children in every state to measure their academic ability.
On math and reading tests in grades 4, 8 and 12, over the last eight years, public schools outscored charter schools in every category every year….
The proposed charter-school legislation for Kentucky is a sweetheart deal for charter-school operators. In addition, everyone working for a charter would automatically become eligible for health care and retirement and the Kentucky system is already billions in debt.
Further, it would create a commission of charter-school advocates to uniquely monitor and approve new charter schools while having the ability to pay themselves lush salaries. Ever hear about the fox and chickens?
Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/01/05/3624393_charter-schools-would-be-unwise.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy

OY! This is horrid. KY is being ‘PLAYED’.
LikeLike
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.
Alexis de Tocqueville
LikeLike
Sorry, this is a bogus quote: “As political scientist John Pitney (a professor at Claremont McKenna College with a fine scholarly record and experience in Republican politics) notes, this quote is bogus. (Back in 1995, Pitney pointed out that another purported Tocqueville statement, that “America is great because she is good” is a fraud.)”
[snip]
“According to this faux quote, citizens not only should not be receiving money from the public coffers, but the action is quite wrong.
Yet it’s quite clear from the U.S. Constitution that monies are to be collected by government and distributed in order to serve the people and their needs.”
http://pollways.bangordailynews.com/2012/01/14/other/misquoting-tocqueville-disdaining-democracy/
LikeLike
Good newspaper series on Pennsylvania charters. Ohio and Michigan get all the attention for lax regulation on charter schools but Pennsylvania really deserves to be in the top tier of poorly regulated publicly-funded charter schools:
Too, I think the line between “for profit” and “non profit” will become so muddled and meaningless it becomes legalistic hair-splitting for politicians to continue to claim that they ONLY support non profit charters:
“In Pennsylvania, a charter school has to be set up as a non-profit. However, a charter-school company can get around that by setting up a foundation to file the application and then contracting with the foundation to run the school.
While not all charter schools in Pennsylvania are run by for-profit management organizations, many are.
Jessie Ramey, a historian of social policy based in Pittsburgh, said there’s little doubt that charter schools have become big business in Pennsylvania as they have in many states.
For both investors and charter-school managers, as the industry has become more valuable so too has protecting their interests.”
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2015/02/big_for-profit_schools_big_don.html
LikeLike
Which is exactly why those in the “business of education” don’t want all those “burdensome” and “onerous” regulations like those governing transparency and accountability and democracy.
Responsibility is just for the “little people” [a la Leona Helmsley, the Queen of Mean]. And just for public schools.
But then there are those “shrill” and “strident” voices that point out just what you have…
Can’t you just let them enjoy as much $tudent $ucce$$ as they can squeeze out of us?
I guess you just can’t leave well enough alone.
And more’s the better. Thank you for your comments.
😎
LikeLike
Bravo UK Professor Marty Solomon. Kentucky is well served by its PUBLIC schools. I lived in Louisville for 20 years and when our 3 children (educated in Louisville public schools) entered a public high school in Chappaqua NY, they were put in top classes and went on to schools like Yale and Vassar. Yes Chappaqua where Bill & Hillary live. Our kids were well prepared by Louisville’s teachers. Husband Paul was Exec Editor of the Courier Journal then and now is Prof Emeritus Journalism Quinnipiac U.
LikeLike
It is unfortunate that more states don’t have the “wisdom of Soloman.”
LikeLike