Jeff Bryant reports here about the rapid expansion of charters in Nashville and Memphis, Tennessee, which seem to be ground zero for the “reform” movement, with a sympathetic conservative governor and conservative legislature.
Having been one of the first states to win a “Race to the Top” grant, Tennessee committed to hand low-performing schools over to private management.
Tennessee is also home to the “Achievement School District,” run by charter founder Chris Barbic, who has promised to turn the schools in the bottom 5% into high-performing schools in the top 25%. So far, the ASD has not met any of its goals, yet it is often cited as a national model, like New Orleans, despite Nola’s lack of success.
Bryant says: ““White kids get to go to a school with a Montessori approach while children of color get eye control.”
The far-right is in control of charter expansion, he writes:
For sure, charter schools have become a darling of conservative politicians, think tanks and advocates.
One of those powerful advocates, nationally and in Tennessee, is the influential Americans for Prosperity, the right-wing issue group started and funded by the billionaire Charles and David Koch brothers.
AFP state chapters have a history of advocating for charter schools, conducting petition campaigns and buying radio ads targeting state lawmakers to enact legislation that would increase the number of charter schools. In an AFP-sponsored policy paper from 2013, “A Nation Still at Risk: The Continuing Crisis of American Education and Its State Solution,” author Casey Given states: “The charter school movement has undoubtedly been the most successful education reform since the publication of A Nation at Risk.,” the Reagan-era document commonly cited as originating a “reform” argument that has dominated education policy discussion for over 30 years.
The Koch brothers themselves have been especially interested in public policy affairs in Tennessee generally and Nashville in particular. “Tennessee is a political test tube for the Koch brothers, ” the editors of The Tennessean news outlet write in a recent editorial. The editors cite as evidence the influence AFP had recently in convincing the Tennessee legislature to block a bus rapid transit system project in Nashville.
In July of last year, the Charles Koch Institute held an event in Nashville, “Education Opportunities: A Path Forward for Students in Tennessee,” to provide an “in-depth policy discussion” about public education and other issues.
As The Tennessean reported, the forum was advertised as “a panel talk with representatives of charter schools and conservative think tanks,” including outspoken and controversial charter school promoter Dr. Steve Perry.
Although the emphasis apparently was mostly on school vouchers, according to a different report in The Tennessean, the stage was thick with charter school advocates from Indianapolis-based Friedman Foundation for Education Choice, the Arizona-based Goldwater Institute and Nashville’s Beacon Center of Tennessee.
The reporter quotes Nashville parent T.C. Weber, “who questioned the ‘end game’ of diverting funding from public schools” and said, “‘Are you looking to destroy the public system that we already have and build a new one based on your ideas?’”
Weber writes about the event on his personal blogsite: ”One of the questions asked of the panelists was what do [you] feel is the biggest obstacle … to the accepting of your vision. The reply was, ‘educating parents.’”
The presence of influential conservatives from outside the city “educating” Nashville parents about what kind of schools their children need has created resentment and suspicion in many Nashville citizens’ minds. Many fear the drive to expand charters is powered more by powerful interests outside the city than by the desires of Nashville parents and citizens.

Thanks Diane. Please note the “White kids get…” comment was a direct quote from Nashville parent Ruth Stewart, not my own observation. Nashville parents see what is happening to their neighborhood schools and need to have their voices amplified so others get what is happening not only in that community but also increasingly across the country.
LikeLike
Thanks, Jeff. Headlines require short lines. Glad to credit Nashville parents, who are wise to what is being imposed on their children, “for the kids.”
LikeLike
Jeff, nice work! Have you written other articles on Education? It is so difficult to write about the personal impact of education policies that cross federal, state and local boundaries. But, you did an excellent job touching the main conflicts in current reform efforts. I was a school counselor at a “priority school” in Oklahoma and fortunately our Race to the Top Grant failed. And we also dumped common core so the PARCC tests went away. But, we still have much to battle. Your writing pieces about education reform in America is critical to helping us preserve the democratic purposes of public education vs. the economic ones promoted by the dominate voices in the reform efforts. Thank you! so much!
LikeLike
There’s a lot going on in that article – I’d suggest reading it in its entirety. This part jumped out at me:
“The debate pits parents against parents, schools against schools, and communities against communities. School board meetings have turned into raucous events that sometimes descend into boisterous demonstrations. And public officials swipe at each other in social media and opinion columns, accusing one another of having ulterior motives.”
LikeLike
Thanks Mary. You can subscribe to my weekly newsletter at educationopportunitynetwork.org
LikeLike
Woah, that went in the wrong place. Will try again.
LikeLike
Here in Nevada our governor has proposed a tax hike, not to support our existing schools, but rather, to support charter schools, vouchers, and best of all, a new statewide achievement district. The proposed achievement district comes with all the latest reformy goodness; freedom from collective bargaining, the ability to fully utilize TFA instead of fully trained teachers, and, the highest paid administrator in the state, a man rejected by two districts, who by law can not evaluate any educator or administrator, Pedro Martinez. Because such goodness is brought to us by near one percent millionaires of Hispanic descent, Messrs Sandoval and Martinez surely have the best interests of minorities at heart. The fact that Mr. Martinez is an accountant and has been trained by the Broad academy guarantees the success of this venture. The only saving grace of this proposed fiasco is that Nevada’s nut wing legislature will not likely approve taxes for anything, even their own brand of graft. The schools will continue to suffer here, but the vultures won’t get to start early either. They will have to wait until our slow agonizing death ends.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A few years back Nissan NoAm moved their entire shop whole-hog to Nashville (from Long Beach, CA). http://articles.latimes.com/2005/nov/11/business/fi-nissan11 I believe several other corporate entities were enticed in a similar manner, presumably by tax incentives, but also due to QOL issues for execs, etc.
There was a huge population influx as a result of this, and it is not a random population that would up and move a whole life like that. It is, by and large non-families with relatively high income. There would surely have been quite a disproportionate influence on the political scene there. How precisely, I do not know. But it is a very important part of the economic and social climate there in N’ville at the moment.
Please recall that influential change can be “concurrent” — that is not causal, but happening alongside of something else that’s happening, possibly driven by similar underlying issues rather than one causing another. (Of course no association whatsoever is also possible!)
Bottom line: I know some people part of this exodus and what is reported here is completely consistent with my expectation: I am not in the slightest surprised to learn of a bi-partitite education system in N’ville, nor social discord either. Until everyone’s child sits next to another irrespective of social class, privilege will always be in the business of protecting itself.
By hook or by crook.
LikeLiked by 1 person
While so-called education reform, which is in fact the hostile takeover of public education, may have emerged from the wet dreams of the political Right, it would have never, ever had the traction it’s had without the support of captive Democrats who share the same assumptions and premises, and it will not have a stake driven through its putrid heart until those same Democrats are taught a harsh political lesson by an educated and engaged public.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Brilliant! I agree 100%.
Voting for the lesser of two evils is making a sheep of yourself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michael Fiorillo and Galton: someone on this blog put it well—
Framing voting choices as deciding who is the lesser evil is not very helpful or useful when the “lesser evil” turns out to be the “more effective” evil.
Case in point: Obama with Duncan as point man was able to get away with pernicious education policies and initiatives [e.g., RacetotheTop aka DashfortheCash] in great part because so many didn’t think he would be so wholeheartedly devoted to the charter/privatization agenda and so wholeheartedly devoted to attacking public education. After the elections of 2008 and 2012 many didn’t even want to consider what was actually happening on the ground because it went so much against their expectations and hopes.
That is why I think everyone’s feet should be held to the fire. Period. No exceptions. No excuses. And fine-sounding words should be matched by fine-looking deeds.
Just my dos centavitos worth…
😎
LikeLiked by 1 person
Metro Nashville School Board (MNSB) member Pinkston said, “That’s not turning around a school. That’s turning your back on it”
Precisely. And this is actually the whole point of Duncan’s RttT/Dash for the Cash “turnaround” model. The state, city and district have been given permission to throw their arms up in the air and just give away community schools to privatizers, along with tax payer dollars to run them.
This involves ignoring poverty, including the research indicating that there are achievement gaps between low income and higher income students in ALL nations (See: “International tests show achievement gaps in all countries…” http://www.epi.org/blog/international-tests-achievement-gaps-gains-american-students/ ) Discounting the truth about poverty and its impacts on learning has enabled our politicians, billionaires, entrepreneurs and pundits to proclaim this issue to be a strictly American problem, so they can blame schools, scapegoat teachers and administrators and effectively declare poor children of color to be incorrigible and in need of “eye control,” just to justify the handover of their community schools to privatizers, and with free money to boot. This also fulfills the dreams of rightwing ideologues, like the Koch brothers and their followers, who are still fighting the Civil War, since charter schools result in increased segregation.
MNSB member and charter supporter Mary Pierce stated, “We have people making accusations that charters are just out to make money … We can’t seem to get past that money issue…”
People have always been able to establish private schools as alternatives to public education, but there was never a rush to do so when people had to do it on their own dime. Unless you remove the public money that is diverted from neighborhood schools to charters and which allows non-educators to get-rich-quick off privatizing public schools, then NO, Ms. Pierce, we absolutely cannot stop talking about the money because it is, in fact, driving all of this mayhem and destroying public education across our country.
Meanwhile, ignoring poverty and throwing money at privatizers has done nothing to ameliorate poverty or to prevent poverty from increasing, since so many of the same people who support privatization are against labor unions and do nothing to promote jobs programs and increasing the number of jobs with livable wages. No matter. Kids who have learned to comply with ongoing eye control demands in charter schools will be best suited for low wage jobs at Walmart.
LikeLike
Chi-Town. I agree that we ignore poverty and this reveals much about the motives of those who are offering help. Colonizing poor peoples neighborhood schools with corporate outsiders doesn’t build the social capital and build upon the strengths within the community. Instead, it overlooks the strengths in poor families and communities, and replaces it with something that is designed to leave when the money dries up.
LikeLike
Great to see someone who really gets it running for school board in OK, while you still have elected school boards!
Best of luck to you, Mary!
LikeLike