2015 marks the 10-year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, which devastated the city of Néw Orleans and destroyed many public schools. This was the event that Secretary of Education Arne Duncan memorably called “the best thing” that ever happened to the schools of Néw Orleans.
So now it is time for a research conference about 10 years of education “reform” in Néw Orleans, which will be hosted by a new research group, funded by the pro-charter Arnold Foundation.
Mercedes Schneider, researcher and teacher in Louisiana, describes the conference here, as well as the origins of the all-charter Recovery School District. The media like to portray the Nola reforms as a great success. Schneider says the claims of a “miracle district” are false. Thus, one would expect the conference to feature strong voices on both sides of the issue, to debate the evidence.
Unfortunately, the best-informed local critics were not invited to speak. The strongest academic critic of the reform narrative—Kristen Buras–was not invited to speak. Buras published a scholarly study of the reforms earlier this year. She wrote it from the perspective of the “grassroots,” the students, communities, teachers, and local traditions. She started her in-depth analysis of the reforms in 2005. She was invited to sit in the audience.
This is Schneider at her best, drawing links among the players and assessing the overall significance of the event.

Why doesn’t Arne Duncan ever visit the other all-privatized district? It’s in the unfashionable and media-scarce city of Muskegon Heights, MI but I don’t know why he isn’t singing their praises. He promotes New Orleans charters at least once a week.
They’re not leaders that the rest of the country should be following? Why or why not? It’s 100% non-public! It meets his federal requirements for awesomeness!
LikeLike
Shame on Tulane Universtity for continuing this farse of the Cowen Institute, which has inflicted the NOLA miracle of lies on our nation. What is most amazing to me is the deafening silence of our mainstream media who continue allow these lies to be repeated as of it were Truth. Where are our civil rights leaders who should be calling B.S. on the lies perpetuated by these faux reformers? How is it that Bill Gates can announce (see video at 15:55 on Mercedes Schneider’s blog) that we have found no correlation to explain the difference between effective and ineffective schools? Anyone who cares to know can easily correlate SES to student achievement. Yet no one questions Sir Gates assertions that using technology to “personalize” education is actually the most “un-personal” way to educate a child. Could it be that he is complicit in advancing his own business/profit agenda? Our so-called mainstream media continue to remain silent while Duncan and Obama, and all of the elite Ed-Deformers spout nonsense and lies about the non-existent miracles. They pretend that inflicting this edu-experiment on “other people’s children” is a moral imperative, when their own children go to schools that look nothing like these New Orleans RSD schools. What a joke it is that this is a research conference that has no research to back up its agenda! But then again, we would expect nothing less from our charter school advocates. Come on Cowen Institute, it’s time to come clean.
LikeLike
It’s strictly “closed to the public” and we “are not invited” so we can “hear it firsthand” because it’s by “invitation only.” [see posting by deutsch29]
Alas, alack and woe is me, we’ll be missing out on the glories of a “balanced and comprehensive look” at the miracles wrought by creative disruption in education.
😱
If I may be so presumptuous, this is exactly what Chiara was getting at some time ago when she wrote that the “choice” mantra of the charterite/privatizer crowd actually means “choice but no voice.”
😡
Literally, not figuratively.
Let’s imagine, for moment, that this North Korean-style event, er, Celebration of EduExcellence, goes on as planned.
What to do? What to do?
😒
Ok. When NPE has it big meeting next year, how about a NOLA RSD panel in which there are folks like Mercedes Schneider and Kristen Buras—with an equal number of chairs assigned to the “thought leaders” who will be touting the successes of the RSD? With no “stack” chairing: the seats are staggered so everyone has to sit next to someone of a different POV. No separating the valued opinions by putting them on the panel from the devalued ones by sticking them in the audience. Mix it up. Even steven.
Each chair will have a name on it in big letters. Everyone gets the same amount of time to present their case. Everyone accepts the responsibility of fielding questions and comments from the audience.
Oh… and the public is invited, live and online.
Can I call this “A Modest Proposal”?
😳
Oops. Sorry, Jonathan Swift. After all, it’s not right to plagiarize and misuse and abuse what others do and say in order to pursue narrow selfish ends, now is it? Or present the results of discussions in such a way that “your” side comes out a winner? We should all hold ourselves to the highest moral and ethical standards, I assume…
“I reject that mind-set.” [Michelle Rhee]
Even if she meant it in a Johnsonally sort of way, how did I know she would say that?
😎
P.S. Since RheeFlees are common amongst the “thought leaders” of the self-proclaimed “education reform” movement, howzabout every scheduled speaker has one minute to start her/his presentation. If nothing is said, due to failure to occupy said chair, then the moderator goes on to the next speaker. Besides giving the next [actual] speaker an extra minute to compose her/his thoughts, the one-minute of silence could be considered mute testimony, nay, tribute to some ancient wisdom:
“Words empty as the wind are best left unsaid.”
Be honest. Bet nobody thought I could work a very old and very dead and very Greek guy into this foray into 21st century cage busting achievement gap crushing derring do, now did you?
😏
P.P.S. Homer? That’s not informational text?
Rheeally?
😕
P.P.P.S. Nothing in the above should be taken as a swipe at Pedro Noguera and Charles Payne.
LikeLike
Yet again: do not confuse me with facts. My mind is already made up. AND what difference does it really make as long as the head honchos make exorbitant amounts of money. Short term monetary gains is what it is about. If the nation, our planet, the 99% of people face catastrophe those 99% will have their pile of gold. Talk about worshiping the golden calf.
Still, as someone once said, of what possible use is a bag of gold in the middle of a desert?
LikeLike