In this post, EduShyster asks a question that more and more people are beginning to ask: Why don’t poor minority students get to have public schools?
There was much celebration and anticipation when the state announced it was building a new high-tech STEM school in the Boston neighborhood of Roxbury called The Dearborn STEM Academy.
She writes:
Now if by chance you’ve yet to watch any of this season of As the School Turns: $70 Million Dollar Listing, here’s what you’ve missed so far. Things got off to a rousing start with the news that, after seven long seasons, the Dearborn STEM Academy was FINALLY going to get a brand new building. That sound you hear is the studio audience applauding wildly. You see, this was to be the first new public school building in Boston in more than a decade and would feature all sorts of cool STEM stuff, like state-of-the-art science, technology and engineering labs. This wasn’t just a feel good story, viewer, it was a feel great story as the $70 million project symbolized a major investment in Roxbury and in the future scientists, engineers and STEM-sters who live and go to school there.
But then the authorities decided it would not be a neighborhood public school but a citywide charter school. When there was strong negative reaction from the public, the city determined that the school would not be a charter but would be run by a private operator. EduShyster was suddenly reminded of what happened in Chicago:
If by chance you happen to be viewing this show from, say, Chicago, you’re probably feeling like this is a repeat. You see, on Chicago’s South Side a very similar battle has been playing out over the future of Dyett High School, the last open-enrollment high school in Bronzeville. After the Chicago Public Schools announced plans to close the school, students, parents and community leaders fought back, putting forward their own story line: for a community-based plan to make Dyett a neighborhood STEM school. And just like in Boston, officials in Chicago blinked. Dyett can stay open, but there’s a catch: a private operator will be brought in to run the school. Community organizer Jitu Brown—take it away. *Why can’t we have public schools? Why do low-income minority students need to have their schools run by private contractors?* As Brown sees it, handing the school to a private operator isn’t much better than closing it. *We want this school to anchor the community for the next 75 years. We’re not interested in a short-term contract that can be broken.*
That was not the conversation in Boston. The city is going to pick one of two finalists to run the $70 million school, both private contractors. Did anyone mention the word “privatization”?

Diane,
Thank you. OY..another OMG.
LikeLike
Mayor Walsh, the new mayor was supposedly a ‘friend’ of teachers. This news sickens me.
LikeLike
Just less of an enemy of public education than the vanquished John Connolly brought (bought?) to us by Stand on Children $$$.
LikeLike
of course, you are on the money.
LikeLike
I think the implicit message to poor urban students is that they are not worth the investment and effort it would take to educate these students in public schools. It is a way for the powers that be to abrogate their responsibility to them. Many communities are already using the privatized prison model to do the same. Florida just privatized Medicaid and almost no doctors accept the insurance. In addition to making profits for a few, it allows the local authorities to “wash their hands” to the problem while they circumvent federal laws and requirements. It gives new meaning to the “war on poverty.”
Beware of any efforts to privatize. It often means that the group being privatized is being exploited by the 1% under the guise of smaller government. We must work to keep Paul Ryan from getting his hands on Social Security and Medicare. They are in the line of fire.
LikeLike
Given the overwhelmingly consistent evidence that Boston charter schools are doing a great job, the better question is why Boston-area kids should be deprived of improved schools (as the aptly-named Edushyster seems to want)?
LikeLike
I could get great results too if I could cherry-pick the students. Can I open a charter? Do you know any billionaires for me to contact?
LikeLike
Nice try, but no one is cherrypicking.
LikeLike
I’m impressed that you can type while laughing so hard.
LikeLike
Boston charters have to admit by lottery.
If you want to check out the Boston schools that quite explicitly cherrypick, you need to look at the PUBLIC high schools that admit students only if they test high enough: Boston Latin Academy, Boston Latin School, and the John D. O’Bryant School of Mathematics and Science
LikeLike
WT,
The public selective schools don’t make silly boasts about being better than neighborhood school. They acknowledge they are selective. Why don’t charters. They have few ELLs, fewer special education, and sky-high suspension rates.
LikeLike
thank you diane and christine for putting the lie to this mountebank.
LikeLike
This is a false comparison. Boston is a school district, not a school. Within a district, there are many types of schools. No child is turned away from a public school district because their number wasn’t chosen in a lottery or because their parents couldn’t agree to give 30 hours of volunteer time or because that child had an IEP or was an ELL and the school “doesn’t provide those services”, or because the child wasn’t likely to perform highly on a test.
LikeLike
It’s not silly for Boston charter schools to make claims that are supported by all the rigorous evidence and studies on Boston in particular.
LikeLike
Then, bring that what you call (in)consistent evidence–or is it called canard?
LikeLike
OH? You mean like Roxbury Prep, where the now infamous John King of NYSED, got his start? Where the suspension rate is 56.1%? Or the MATCH charter school, which graduated 6, the number 6, not a percent, males last year? Or City on a Hill, with 4 graduates and a suspension rate of 43.6%?
Public schools in Boston had a 5% suspension rate and a 4 year graduation rate of 66% (70% over five years) – including all those kids sent back to BPS by those excellent charters.
http://edushyster.com/?p=851
LikeLike
tsk, tsk, christine, facts will get you no place with the mountebank.
LikeLike
After eight fraud convictions, Philly charter execs won’t disclose info on financial controls
http://jackgrauer.com/after-six-fraud-convictions-philly-charter-execs-wont-disclose-info-on-financial-controls/
LikeLike