John Thompson, teacher and historian, explains here why teachers are beating up reformers. Shocking but true. Charters don’t outperform public schools unless they exclude low performers. Vouchers are sending kids to church schools that do not perform as well as public schools. Teacher evaluation by test scores is a disaster. The testing culture has demoralized teachers. The reformers have no idea how to “fix” schools.
He writes:
“During the high tide of corporate reform in 2010, their scorched earth public relations campaign against teachers and unions was doubly effective because they all sang from the same hymnal. Since then, however, reformers’ failures to improve schools have been accompanied by political defeat after defeat. Now they are on the same page with a kinder, gentler message.
“Now, the most public message is that a toxic testing culture has mysteriously appeared in schools. As the Center for American Progress, in Testing Overload in America’s Schools, recently admitted “a culture has arisen in some states and districts that places a premium on testing over learning.” So, the reformers who made that culture of test prep inevitable now want to listen to teachers, and create a humane testing culture.
“As Alexander Russo recently reported, in Why Think Tankers Hate the Vergara Strategy, some indicate that the Vergara campaign against teachers’ legal rights is a dubious approach. I’m also struck by the number of reformers, who complain about unions’ financial and political power, and who seem to by crying that We Reformers Are Being Beaten Up by Teachers.
“Yes! Reformers Are Being Beaten Up by Teachers!
“I communicate with a lot of individual reformers who agree that test-driven accountability has failed, but they can’t yet visualize an accountability system that could satisfy their reform coalition and teachers. I repeatedly hear the pained protest that, Testing Isn’t Going Away.
“So, what alternative do we have?
“Talk about Low Expectations! Are they saying that a democracy can’t prosper without test and punish imposed from on high? Do they believe that families and students are just as feckless as teachers, and none of us will teach and learn without reward and punish regimes that toughen us up for economic combat in the global marketplace?”

John Holt has been explaining how the reward and punishment culture destroys intrinsic interest in learning for several decades. It’s not rocket surgery…
LikeLike
Yes. So true. For many years I taught only history classes that had standardized exams. The exams were the be-all and end-all…. Regents exams here in New York State. Then, 13 years ago, I got a chance to teach psychology and sociology…classes that did not have any state exams. And, I was so excited and really threw myself into coming up with thoughtful, creative lessons. I remember the day I walked in and started teaching. I soon had the stark realization that these great classes were treated somewhat as a joke or an afterthought by many of the kids and some of the other teachers….because there was NO TEST. If it isn’t tested, it doesn’t really matter, I guess, for some people. What a sad comment. There’s a sentiment among some social studies teachers that we have to fight to get back our standardized tests. If only we still had our 5th grade and our 8th grade state exams. And, now the 10th grade test in New York State is being demoted, so to speak. So without a test, we can’t get students to care as much about their country, about their fellow citizens, about the rest of the world? What kind of message is this to be sending to our children? No wonder why more young people don’t vote There’s no test after you step out of the voting booth. Are these school “reform” plans just another cynical effort to suppress the vote? (Boy, that sounds paranoid but who would have thought we’d see so many states so actively trying to impede citizens who might go to the polls.) Wow. Using our schools to stop people from voting. Could anyone really be that sick? Your post got me thinking, fmindlin. I would be interested in looking at more of what John Holt has written if you have a specific link or title. Thanks.
LikeLike
John, sad to say, but you nailed it. And by the by, you’re not the only teacher out there who feels paranoid. I used to go so far as to call myself a paranoid conspiracy theorist, but I’m realizing there’s too many of us now that it’s real. 😦
LikeLike
“So, the reformers who made that culture of test prep inevitable now want to listen to teachers, and create a humane testing culture.”
This “kinder gentler talk” from reformers is nonsense.
The testing culture is too lucrative to go away, and it will not be humane unless tests are banished in favor of face-to-face conversations about teaching and learning.
Humane communication in nuanced. It implicates eye-contact, listening attentively, speaking with modulations suitable for the intended expression whether that is a matter of affirming trust or raising questions.
How about some freedom for non-verbal communication–a pat a shoulder or an high five, or pumping energy like a cheerleader to affirm something wonderful.
Humane evaluations draw forth and make visible the value of teaching and learning. That means tossing the reductive metrics, dumping all of the coded categories needed for the production and display of data on screens or on paper.
It means that we banish from conversations all reports generated by a computer and made possible by the wet dreams and inferential leaps of statisticians.
LikeLike
“Irony Reformed”
That teacher is a bully
He’s beating up on me
I only required
He must be fired
For VAMming low, you see
LikeLike
If the data are driving us, who’s actually behind the wheel? Schools need to give students lots of opportunity for low-stakes failure, so they’re never afraid to try, and rewards that they value for showing their learning with real works of art and scholarship they can be proud of. Impact on the real world is our evaluator.
LikeLike
That’s the ultimate question! What and who drives the data and the content leading to the data. All other questions come under this one; this one is the most important in terms of who we are as a country and what our schools should be.
Yes.
Also, the experience children have at school needs to be elevated in the dialogue. Experiencing the arts, PE, recreation impact the day the children have. Quantifying the quality of the experience comes from the smiles on their faces or the light bulbs clearly going off in their minds (you can see it in their eyes!!), or the fact that they are excited that it’s Wednesday and they have art, or that they go home singing a song they learned at school, or that they whip out their trumpet whenever they can to show off what they have learned.
LikeLike
I really can’t imagine reading anyone who dates our opposition to corporate “reform” to the 21st Century, especially when a lot of my friends were organizing against it during the 20th Century. Just as a reminder, we posted yesterday at Substance (substancenews.net) an article outlining the evils of corporate reform that was published in The Nation in late 1999. It was written by Susan Ohanian a few months after the Chicago Board of Education and Paul G. Vallas panicked and sued me (and Substance) for a million dollars for “copyright infringement” after we published in full the odious Chicago CASE (Chicago Academic Standards Examinations) tests in the pages of Substance. My reason for publishing is that there is no way to critique a test without having the whole test, and we published the CASE tests AFTER they had been administered to more than 90,000 Chicago high school students. The rest is a major fact of the history of resistance to corporate “school reform.” By the time certain critics caught up with our work during the past few years, all of the critiques had been long established, beginning with, at the latest, David Berliner’s “The Manufactured Crisis” and Susan Ohanian’s “One Size Fits Few.” Anyone who is unaware of those historical facts might take a bit of time to get the facts straight before adding to the words…
LikeLike
Beating up Reformers? Not us.
(Sing-a-long to the tune of Paul Simon’s Kodachrome)
When we look at
All the crap they taught in pre-school
It’s a wonder
Kids can think at all
This lack of rigor in education
Has hurt them some
Why can’t they close-read the writing on the wall
Common – Core- ore-ore
It ‘em gives questions full rigor
Marches to just one drummer
Makes them know all the world’s a gritty day
Got a Coleman standard
Love to give a Pearson test
So Ravitch don’t take our Common Core away
So Ravitch don’t take our Common Core away
So Ravitch don’t take our Common Core away
If you took all the teachers we knew
Back in high school
And brought them all together for one night
We know they’d couldn’t match
Arne’s weak imagination
Everything looks worse in black and white
LikeLike
Love it. I imagining the video images that could go with it.
LikeLike
Damn. Thank goodness all you clever people are on this side. Love it!
LikeLike
The reformers need to become a punch line.
LikeLike
Teachers are standing their ground.
(hee hee. . .there you go ALEC. . . put that in your reform pipe and smoke it)
LikeLike
David Coleman and Bill Gates walk into a bar filled with fellow reformers. They sit down to order a drink.
The bar tender says, “Hey aren’t you David Coleman the chief architect of the Common Core and the current president of the College Board?”
“Why yes, replies Coleman. I’m flattered that you recognized me.”
The bar keep asks, “Is it true that your decisions will affect the education of 75 million students a year, P to 20 – until the end of time?”
“As a matter of fact, it is true.” Coleman beams.
“Well is it also true that you haven’t taught a single day in your life and are self-admittedly unqualified for the job?”
“Yeah”(That’s punch line #1)
“And say, aren’t you Bill Gates, former CEO of Microsoft, self-made multi-billionaire?”
“Indeed” replies Gates
“And is it true that you spent $200 million dollars of your own pocket change to fund the implementation of Coleman’s Common Core?”
“At least that” answers Gates.
“And is it true that you do not subject your own children to this de-facto national curriculum that you paid for?”
“Shhhhhhhhh . . .” responds Gates (That’s puncline #2)
“Well what can I get you guys?”
“We’ll take two Kool-Aids” says Coleman. “just like everbody else”
LikeLike
“Hey look” exclaims the bar tender. “Its John King” Say are nent you the
“Yes I am” and “Yes I am the guy building an airplane in a tail spin”
LikeLike