Jeff Bryant, a sharp observer of education trends, points out that the well-funded corporate reform movement has hit a brick wall: they have lost the PR war against public schools and teachers, and they know it. It turns out that the public really does support their public schools, really does respect teachers, and thinks that their local public schools need more resources.
The evidence is everywhere, especially in their own publications. They write that they want a new conversation; they want a restart on accountability; they know that the public is rising up against their obsession with standardized testing. They surely know (although they don’t admit it) that charter schools do not outperform public schools unless they engage in skimming, and that many for-profit charter chains are frauds and scams that promise the moon but take public money away from public schools while providing a third-rate education to hapless children lured in by their advertising.
Do the reformers have any new ideas? No, it is the same old, same old. They will not give up their obsession with standardized testing; they will not give up their faith in test-based evaluation of teachers; they will not abandon their love of charters and other forms of privatization.
When you hear the reformers denouncing budget cuts or racial segregation or for-profit schools, when you hear them call for reduced class sizes and higher standards for new teachers, then you can believe in their sincere reformation. Until then, it is old wine in new bottles. Or old wine in old bottles, rebranded.

Thanks Diane! Great seeing you yesterday in Brooklyn. You inspire us all.
LikeLike
Jeff, on the subject of corporate
reformers losing the PR war, check
out these latest developments…
Well this weekend, the usually
pro-Deasy Los Angeles Times
put out three pieces—on the same
day—that were highly critical of
the corporate-reform-backed
LAUSD Schools Superintendent
John Deasy.
(Deasy is now in South Korea, on
a fact-finding tour to study that
country’s “superior” education
system for methods that he
wishes to import back to LAUSD.
Like what EXACTLY, I wonder? Their
tactics of institutionalized corporal
punishment?)
While he’s there, the usually pro-Deasy
L.A. Times ‘ put out these three
anti-Deasy pieces in one day.
Who’d’ve’ thunk it?
The L.A. Times seems to be turning
on John Deasy, and his most recent
actions.
Apparently, Deasy is upset that Jefferson
High School students are not able to take
all the courses they need and want… and
so he filed a lawsuit against the district for
this failure, which the LA. Times’ writers
correctly point out is actually HIS failure.
L.A. Times writers Sandy Banks and
Karin Klein take Deasy to task over this
in two separate articles:
There’s also a third article about the
disastrous MISIS system—brought in by
Deasy, and not phased in with any pilot
program, but dumped on the entire 800
school district in one fell swoop… a big
mistake—
This was written by Abby Sewell.
Here’s part of what Klein said:
——————————————-
KARIN KLEIN: “Los Angeles schools
Superintendent John Deasy weighed in
on behalf of a lawsuit against the state,
contending rightly that students were
unconstitutionally assigned to
do-nothing classes instead of the
academic courses they needed. His
action would be wholly appropriate if
the state ran the schools where this
was happening.
“But as it happens, Deasy runs those
schools. Or at least, he was supposed
to.
“ ‘I can’t think of a better gift to give
this school district than to expose this
indefensible practice,’ he said in a
declaration in support of the lawsuit.
“By ‘indefensible practice,’ was he was
referring to his not having taken
concrete steps to resolve the problem?
“Was this an admission of incompetence?
“A request for the state to take over
schools that he and the school board
could not manage properly?
“I called Deasy to ask these questions
last week before a judge ruled that the
state of California had to step in and g
et the situation ironed out at Jefferson
High School. A combination of a
shortage of teachers and the fouled-up
student tracking and scheduling system
that Deasy oversaw had led to an
educational crisis.”
——————————————-
Deasy then goes into multiple
rationalizations defending his
participation in this
lawsuit against … well…
against what Klein believes is the
result of Deasy’s own incompetence.
Klein seems unconvinced by Deasy’s
responses to her questions.
Read the whole Karin Klein opinion
piece:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-deasy-jefferson-classes-20141010-story.ht
(NOTE: Karin Klein is a parent of an
LAUSD student attending a school in
an upscale Los Angeles community).
Also, here’s the Sandy Banks article
covering the same thing, saying much
the same thing as Klein:
http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-1011-banks-deasy-lawsuit-20141011-column.html
Finally, there’s another article by Abby
Sewell condeming the disastrous MISIS
system, brought in by Deasy in one
ill-advised fell swoop—a big mistake—
and which Deasy insists on defending,
despite all evidence to the contrary:
“L.A.’s Student Information System Has
Become a Technological Disaster”
http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-lausd-software-20141012-story.html#page=1
LikeLike
whoops… bad link on the Karin Klein
piece above. Here’s a better one:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-deasy-jefferson-classes-20141010-story.html
LikeLike
Apropos of “same old, same old,” Motoko Rich’s fluff piece in the NY Times of October 10 seems to wonder about Aspire Public Schools’ discovery of apprentice teaching after all these decades. Where has she been? Except for the hefty fees, and the excess funds characteristic of the well-financed Aspire corporate world, the concept of apprentice teaching has been around for many, many years. They just charge extra for the experience, in the $$$ world of charters. Someone should (I have) email Ms Rich and enlighten her.
LikeLike
The scary part is that the public (hopefully) now understands that slick PR does not make for truth. There is much going on in the news right now outside of education where “experts” say one PR “thing” and reality reveals itself.
Sadly, the media should have been shouting yesterday’s education event FROM THE “MEDIA ROOFTOPS”. I admit yesterday had a lot of news between ISIS and Ebola… but the nation being held hostage to “corporate ed reform” is weakening the very fabric of our nation and this is a LONG-RUNNING CRISIS as we now have students “educated” under this top-down policy for many years. How will they fare as adults?
I was struck by a Sunday morning news commentary that our president has not been a very decisive president. The news moderator commented the evidence of this exists in his policy with ebola and with terrorism. I would wholeheartedly like to comment that Obama has been VERY DECISIVE in public education and that his policy has been to hire and support an education secretary who has no GENUINE education experience and it is destroying the lives of our most neediest and defenseless citizens – children living in poverty.
I still find myself asking WHAT WILL IT TAKE to bring the “public” back in public education? When will we have a secretary of education with REAL experience necessary to effect change “For The People”? When will we see the education problem within the larger scope so that our secretary of education teams up with other cabinet secretaries to figure out how to deal with the REAL problem – skyrocketing poverty resulting from a total lack of “checks and balances” in government. Corporate leaders under the corporate profit model are running the country (might add “into the ground” in the long-term) – representing the corporate world but ignoring the “We the People” who struggle in all facets of life from housing, education, health care… and no time for family life or leisure.
LikeLike
They’re finally looking at the property deals in Ohio:
“Imagine Columbus Primary Academy projects building-lease payments of $700,000, making rent the school’s top expense, eating up more than half its annual state revenue, according to a school financial report. The school expects to pay $614,000 on salaries and benefits this year.
Similar arrangements are in place for the other five Imagine Schools in Franklin County.
Who is charging the charter schools such high rent? A company called SchoolHouse Finance — which is a subsidiary of Imagine.”
I don’t know what took them so long. The one aspect of charter schools that is transparent are the real estate deals, because they have to be recorded and it’s a public record. Anyone can search property records in Ohio. They could have done this a decade ago.
Imagine charters are a huge company, so it will be difficult to use the “few bad apples” excuse. They have schools in 11 states and DC.
It’s a shame in a way, because the next state legislative session will once again be exclusively focused on charter schools, and public schools won’t get any support to deal with the huge new Common Core mandate and the 5000 other ed reform mandates. It’s all charters, all the time. I don’t know why I’m paying these people. They couldn’t be less interested in my local school.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2014/10/12/charters-lease-deals-scrutinized.html
LikeLike
I am glad to see this and glad people are seeing the hidden reality.
Now, what to do about it?
LikeLike
So, the ever-increasing number of parents who choose charter schools for their children are dupes, “lured in by their advertising”?
LikeLike
Here’s the brother of the Vice President of the United States selling a for-profit school management company to the good people of York, Pennsylvania.
Frank Biden (yes that Biden) steps up 2 #York PA mic 2 explain why he supports @CSUSAhq effort 2 improve the schools.
They’re completely privatizing York schools.
Ed reformers say New Orleans is the only completely privatized system, but that isn’t true. They privatized Muskegon Heights Michigan, but that didn’t go so well, so it’s never mentioned. You don’t read anything about the Detroit EAA anymore either, outside Michigan. It’s odd how these less fashionable places just disappear after the take-over.
https://twitter.com/JeanneAllen/media
LikeLike
The self-styled “education reform” crowd that considers itself the “new civil rights movement of our time” has a fundamental problem that even their billions and their political clout and their outsize MSM presence can’t fix:
They can’t take back what they’ve said and done, hence their increasingly inane* efforts to induce forced amnesia on the rest on the world.
*Remember: “inane” is just “insane” without the “s”!* **Although “insane” is just “inane” with an extra letter!**
😱
I just received Anthony Cody’s THE EDUCATOR AND THE OLIGARCH (2014, just published).
While it has received a very favorable review from the owner of this blog—and even sports a preface from her—the praise is understated.
A discussion of how the author eviscerates the pr and spin by the corporate ed deformers is a discussion for another day. However, he has done us all a favor by including more money quotes in a shorter/smaller amount of print than, to my knowledge, anyone yet to date.
From just three short years ago, Bill and Melinda Gates wrote the following:
[start quote]
It may surprise you — it was certainly surprising to us — but the field of education doesn’t know very much at all about effective teaching. We have all known terrific teachers. You watch them at work for 10 minutes and thou can tell how thoroughly they’ve mastered the craft. But nobody has been able to identify what, precisely, makes them so outstanding.
This ignorance has serious ramifications. We can’t give teachers the right kind of support because there’s no way to distinguish the right kind from the wrong kind. We can’t evaluate teaching because we are not consistent in what we’re looking for. We can’t spread best practices because we can’t capture them in the first place.
[end quote]
(pp. 52-53, appeared in the WALL STREET JOURNAL, 10-22-11, “Grading the Teachers.”)
Just those two paragraphs are so chock-full of choice in[s]anities that they could be the subject of a collaborative dissertation by “Dr.” John Deasy & “Dr.” Steve Perry and “Dr.” Terence Carter. [Sorry; bad example—although if you kept it to or under 9 pages/credits, it might be doable…]
For example, you know it when you see it, but you don’t know what you’re looking at. But you know that’s it right even though you don’t know if it’s right or wrong. And if you don’t know precisely what it is, than you can’t know it—although you do know it when you see, in spite of the fact that you don’t know what you’re looking at. And when you can consistently see that certain teachers are effective you can’t use the word consistent because when you use judgment and firsthand experience that doesn’t count when you can’t capture some elusive ‘essence of effectiveness’ that up to now hasn’t been captured in some consistently measurable way like, uh, high-stakes standardized scores. And if we can’t define and capture that elusive quality, well, ‘you can’t control what you can’t measure’…
If Bill and Melinda Gates weren’t billionaires, who would listen to anything they say?
Buy the book. Read. Reread.
And to mangle an old Marxist adage that fits this occasion, even though I know it’s right but I can’t measure precisely just how or why:
“Gates-style education is to education what military music is to music.”
And yes, the incomparably famous one, Groucho.
😎
LikeLike
The Obama Administration was forced to fund a new public high school because the one that was there was leveled by a tornado, so Arne Duncan used this opportunity to deliver another stern “public schools suck” lecture:
“It would have been much easier to build a high school that just built upon what was here in the past. This community decided that the children of Joplin deserved something much better. So they built a high school not for yesterday, not for today, but for tomorrow.”
Those other public schools aren’t building new state of the art schools just because they lack his transformational vision. Oh, and they didn’t receive federal disaster funding, because they weren’t hit by a tornado.
I can’t imagine what they’re thinking listening to him. “He knows there was a tornado, right?” 🙂
LikeLike
As Einstein said “Insane is just doing the same inane thing over and over and not expecting a different spelling when people describe you” (or something like that)
LikeLike
SomeDAM Poet: I think Einstein would approve of your version of his words.
😉
The difference between how the self-styled “education reform” massage and torture numbers & stats to guarantee ROI/MC [ReturnOnInvestment/Monetize Children] and the ethical and moral use of numbers?
For the former: 98% of teachers get a perfunctory “satisfactory” on their evals (thank you[?], Bill Gates!); a 2% graduation rate in LAUSD is touted as 12% when you leave out all those non-striving (thank you[?], Michael J Petrilli) at-risk students that John Deasy is supposedly so passionate about; Michelle Rhee takes “her” students from the 13th to the 90th percentile—and believes it but can’t prove it; and last but not least, self-less Eva Moskowitz of Success Academy pulls in 2.5 to 3 times what Carmen Fariña makes but that proves the former is a saint and the latter is a greedy money-grubbing sinner. *A few out of many many examples.*
For the latter, let’s go with someone who actually thought out of the rheephorm box:
“When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That’s relativity.” [Albert Einstein]
Of course, according to VAManiacal formulae the former add value at such a furious rate that it can’t be “captured” and measured whilst the latter is obviously an over-rated dunderhead that couldn’t ace a Pearson exam if his pineapple and his hare were at stake.
Go figure…
😎
LikeLike
They may have lost the PR wars, but they still buy members of Congress. The insanity continues!
LikeLike
Retired Teacher, the charter industry buys state legislatures too. See Ohio, Michigan, Florida, for a few prominent examples.
LikeLike
Don’t forget Connecticut…millions of taxpayer dollars thrown at charters with little to no oversight under a supposedly Democratic governor. Disgusting.
LikeLike
Diane, I’m sure you’re familiar with the execrable Florida State Senator Erik Fresen, who is essentially a lobbyist for the charter school company owned by his brother-in-law. The Miami Herald, which has frequently documented the distinguished senator’s ethical transgressions, has decided to endorse him for re-election:
http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/article2672447.html#/tabPane=tabs-2b852ffe-1
LikeLike
1kinbote, This is shocking that the Miami Herald would endorse Erik Fresent for re-election. The Herald has published numerous exposes of charter frauds in south Florida. And, as you say, Fresen protects the interests of his family charter chain, which is worth about $100 million. The Herald’s series was called “Cashing in on Kids.” Here are a couple of articles about Academica and Fresen: http://cashinginonkids.com/corporate-profiles/academica/
LikeLike