Jeannie Kaplan reports here on Jonathan Kozol’s recent visit to Denver. Denver is a city that has become totally devoted to corporate style “reform” for a decade. Now the corporate reformers own the entire school board plus they have a U.S. Senator Michael Bennett.
Kaplan shows how Kozol’s message explains corporate reform, now deeply embedded in Denver:
“THE SHAME OF THE NATION shows how the business model has become the blueprint for education “reform.” Education “reformers” use business jargon to describe their activities: “rewards and sanctions,” “return on investment,” “time management,” “college and career ready,” “maximizing proficiency,” “outcomes,” “rigorous,” “managers and officers,” “evaluation,” “accountability,” “portfolios of schools” (like a portfolio of stocks – get rid of the losers, keep the winners).
“Mr. Kozol describes the infiltration of business into education this way:
“Business leaders tell urban school officials…that what they need the schools to give them are “team players.”…Team players may well be of great importance to the operation of a business corporation and are obviously essential in the military services; but a healthy nation needs it future poets, prophets, ribald satirists, and maddening iconoclasts at least as much as it needs people who will file in a perfect line to an objective they are told they cannot question.” (p. 106)
“Here is how Denver Public Schools has adopted this business tenet. Every email sent by a DPS employee is signed and sent with the statement at the bottom, My name is Jeannie Kaplan, I’m from Youngstown, Ohio… and I play for DPS!
“Further business verbiage: In DPS principals are no longer principals but building CEOs or building managers. At the district level there is a chief executive officer, a chief financial officer, a chief operating officer, a chief academic officer, a chief strategic officer, and within the school buildings themselves there are managers for everything under the sun. You get the picture. And with all of these managers and officers DPS has witnessed increases in facility and resource imbalances and increases in segregation while academics have remained stagnant. Corporate reform is a failure in the United States. But politics, money and lies will not allow it to go quietly into the night, and Denver’s students and communities are paying the price.”
Kozol’s message is the opposite if corporate reform:
“We now have an apartheid curriculum . Because teachers and principals in the inner city are so test driven, inner city children who are mostly students of color are not allowed to have their voices heard through stories and questions, while white students are given that flexibility, opportunity and creativity.
“Test preparation is driving out child centered learning. Testing mania has become a national psychosis, driven by business.
“Racial isolation/segregation which does terrible damage to young people, is on the rise. In SHAME, education analyst Richard Rothstein points out how important it is for children of color to become comfortable in the majority culture and how devastating this new segregation is in the long term: “It is foolhardy to think black children can be taught no matter how well, in isolation and then have the skills and confidence as adults to succeed in a white world where they have no experience.” (p. 229). That Tuesday night Mr. Kozol referred to the new segregation as a “theological abomination.”
“And finally, of course, Mr. Kozol believes small class size, enriched curricula, and equitable resources and facilities would offer an equitable education for all children. This recent article in the Huffington Post clearly and disturbingly describes the safety and health hazards brought into Chicago public schools because business has invaded public schools. Bugs, moldy bread, trash left for days, leaks left unfixed. You can bet the East coast decision makers who are driving this “reform” did not attend schools under these conditions.”

Being a former employee from DPS, I can sadly say this is all true. They have gotten rid of many career teachers too. They have started their own alternative licensing program. Senator Bennett was (or did) try to get one of the colleges on board with it.
There are managers for everything including a pretty recent position of Site Assessment Leader (SAL) to take care of all the testing within separate buildings.
LikeLike
I forgot the teacher of the month parking spot.
LikeLike
Living in Los Angeles, what’s really infuriating about this is that corporate reform has lost at the ballot box over and over and over… but yet, we still have a corporate reformer as our superintendent, John Deasy—a veteran of not just Eli Broad’s Superintendent’s Academy, but also the Gates Foundation. No matter how badly he screws up—refusing a directive to lower class size, to the corruption regarding the I-pads, and on and on…
In four of the seven seats on the LAUSD board, the winners were teachers or former teachers with comparatively scant resources and funding, who defeated their corporate reform opponents, even though their corporate backers allowed them to outspend the teacher candidates many times over:
———————————————–
Spring 2011: Bennett Kayser’s (w/ just $500,000 total, including the independent expenditure) defeated the bureaucrat non-teacher Luis Sanchez, who spent $3,500,000
Spring 2013: Steve Zimmer (w/ about $1,000,000 total, including the i.e. campaign) defeated the non-teacher and political opportunist Kate Anderson who spent around $4,000,000.
Here’s an article about the funding of Anderson’s campaign against Zimmer:
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/billionaires-pouring-millions-lausd-school
Spring 2013: Monica Ratliff (w/ about $1,000,000 total, including the i.e. campaign) defeated yet another non-teacher Antonio Sanchez—corporate reformer & former mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s “body man” staff person—who spent around $4,000,000.
Summer 2014: George McKenna defeated the corporate reform candidate Alex Johnson, who made a name for himself as a lawyer in New York who helped fire teachers (Johnson outspent McKenna many times over… I don’t have the figures handy.
——————————————————–
The people have spoken again, and again, and again, AND AGAIN. When presented with the pitch:
“To whom do LAUSD schools belong…
you the citizens, taxpayers, and most importantly the parents, via democratically elected school board members?
OR
these corporate puppets / stooges who are bankrolled by, and will do the bidding of out-of-state billionaires 3,000 miles away whose for-profit businesses—charter school companies, digital & online learning—will benefit from those corporate candidates’ election, and also from the ultimate goal of privatizing most or all of our schools?
The L.A. voters voiced their preference for the latter loud and clear.
Unlike the corporate reform candidates, the teacher
candidates in the above elections had
no money to put up TV ads on local
network affiliates to set the record straight, but
could only counter with improvised, low-coast
messaging.
For example, someone did this amateur
YouTube video of Zimmer responding to
Anderson’s lies:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=De3Kvgf0s_Q ”
The corporate candidates’ goal—and the goal
of their corporate backers—is the eventual abolition of the
very office and democratic body—the LAUSD School
Board—for which their candidates were running (not right away,
but eventually).
“Once the system has been privatized, the parents
and citizen-taxpayers will no longer have any
democratic control of schools via a school board
responsive to the public via democratic elections.
The moneyed interests backing those candidates will
have ‘boards’ the meet in private, and made up of
non-educators and profiteers.
“The public will then have zero input or
decision-making power.
It’s all in the school privatizers’ playbook:
“Abolish all school boards.”
“Everyone backing those candidates… from Broad
to Rhee to Gates to Bloomberg to the Koch Brothers
to the Walton family… is on record as this being
their ultimate goal. That’s what they’ve done in
other cities. Since they can’t do that her, putting
in corporate puppets is the next best thing.)
“That is why the citizens voted to stop this.
At the time of the Zimmer campaign, I posted
to one of the corporate reformers:
“Do you really think that those out-of-state
billionaires who are kicking in $3 million dollars
to elect someone to a political post that pays
$46,000 / year are doing it out of the goodness
of their hearts, and because they care so much
about the education of middle and lower-income
children?
“Does that pass ‘the smell test’?
“No, they’re out to destroy the precious institution
of public education in order to profit from their
takeover of it. Everything that comes out of Ms.
Anderson’s mouth is straight from the school
privatizers’ playbook. She’s an Irish Michelle Rhee.”
Mike Bloomberg alone dumped $1 million dollars (!!!)
into Anderson’s campaign.
Thankfully, Jonathan Kozol—the subject of this
thread— weighed in and helped out Steve
Zimmer’s campaign with the following
open letter of support.
———————–
“The text of Jonathan Kozol’s endorsement of Steve:
“”March 3, 2013
“Dear Mr. Zimmer,
“I’ve been one of your strong admirers in the education
world for a good while now. I’m writing to tell you and
my many friends in Los Angeles that I think your
voice is terribly important in defense of public education
at a time when it is under fierce and irrational attack
from those who would replace it, as much as they
can, with charter schools and other private or
semi-private institutions.
“This issue is all the more important in light of the
fact that many, if not most, charter schools are
incapable or serving children with special needs —
or, in order to boost their test-scores artificially,
refuse to serve these children.
“I’m also glad you’ve courageously resisted the
political demand to judge the value of our teachers
according to their students’ grades on standardized
exams — a practice, as many members of the U.S.
Senate have belatedly observed, simply drives
beleaguered teachers to drill their students for the
tests instead of giving them a rich and broad curriculum
that incorporates those aspects of our culture that can
never be reduced to numbers.
“For these and other reasons, I thank you for your
loyalty to children. I whole-heartedly support you.
“Sincere Regards,
“Jonathan Kozol”
——————————————–
LikeLike
Kozol is great and he is right.
LikeLike
Jonathan Kozol has been fighting ‘the good fight’ for ever so long, going back to the 1964, when he worked in the Boston Public Schools and wrote “Death At An Early Age…”). His work has given a voice to poor and low income kids, parents and their schools and public schools and communities. He is a life time ally.
LikeLike
Good to hear that Kozol is still active and using his great skill as a writer to send a message that needs to be amplified and acted upon.
“Testing mania has become a national psychosis, driven by business.”
I call it a pathological desire to avoid responsibility for the “savage inequities” that Kozal named a long time ago.
Those inequities not only pose a serious threat to the well-being of our children but also to the longstanding desire of this nation to be respected as the home of “justice for all.”
LikeLike
“You can bet the East coast decision makers who are driving this “reform” did not attend schools under these conditions.”
It seems that preserving Public Schools in the “edu-corporate” environment is an insurmountable task. We are up against big money, powerful politicians and decision- makers who haven’t got a clue.
I often find inspiration from great literature. Right now, I am reading, “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee, for the tenth time. I always find additional insights with each reading.
In the following excerpt (p. 87) Atticus is explaining to his daughter, Scout, his odds of successfully defending a black man.
“Atticus, are we going to win it?”
“No honey.”
“Then why –”
“Simply because we were licked a hundred years before we started is
no reason for us not to try and win, ” Atticus said.
At every level, we all must continue to “try” regardless of the immediate outcome.
Eventually, we will win.
LikeLike
On Friday, I was “audited” on how I serve children their breakfast in the morning. The auditor was a server from the cafeteria. She instructed me on what I need to do because the PRIVATE company who provides the food will only be reimbursed by the feds if children take 2 of this and 1 of that, etc. I told her I did not care and would not police this procedure.
She said every child must take something even if they are not hungry or do not want it. That’s when I told her that in no way would I ever make children take food they did not want…especially food that lack nutritional value.
She told administration that I made her feel like she was not important. So now, I must have a “conversation” with my principal about my non-compliance due to the “audit” completed by the cafeteria worker. Apparently, I did not pass the audit and hurt someone’s feeling in the process!
This is a DPS school. It was the straw that broke the camel’s back for me.
Taxpayers will be thrilled to know that uneaten food is put in the dumpster. We are not talking fresh fruit and whole grains for breakfast…but rather sugar covered raisins and pastries. The items we serve are full of preservatives and have a very long shelf life!
I am a career teacher. I love teaching and feel this is what I was called to do. I love watching kids learn how to think critically. I now dread going to work. My students are awesome, and I feel as though I should keep fighting the powers that be for them. But after 11 years in Title 1 schools…I am afraid that I don’t have much fight left.
At this point, I wish each one of my lovely students (who happen to be minorities) could attend the same private schools that the policy makers children are privileged to attend. They are just as important as the wealthy and do not deserve sub-par anything…including breakfast!
LikeLike
KA,
I applaud your courage. We also have horrible breakfasts. Try to hold on. Your students need you. I am totally fed up myself.
LikeLike
KA: thank you for your heartfelt words.
And for all you do for your students.
Never forget that you have one thing all the $tudent $ucce$$ and MSM fawning and powerful political connections in the world can’t buy—
You can look in the mirror and know that the person looking back at you has decency and compassion.
😎
LikeLike
I was a career teacher in DPS, but it was this same treatment along with the tension in the halls that made me feel like I don’t belong in a place that is NOT kid friendly. I tried to stay and fight, but they turned my school around even though it was green leaving all staff to find another job. Now the school is in the bottom 10 as far as rating go. My students write me and I still tell them to speak up for what they need and do their best. It breaks my heart, but maybe for the better. ….not so sure I want to teach anymore under the conditions.
LikeLike
There are typos in my comment! Sorry.
LikeLike
Your story would be funny if it wasn’t true. I am surprised you could get the words out at all. I would like to say I haven’t heard similar ridiculous scenarios, but i would be lying. I’m sure someone will stick a letter in your file reprimanding you. Could they fire you for not force feeding your students garbage?
LikeLike
They did hand a social worker her walking papers because she raised the question of confidentiality on all the data forms. Plenty of reprimands going on in DPS. Made me feel like I was 5 although I never got one.
LikeLike
I shaped my thinking about poverty from reading Jonathan Kozol, and it is reassuring that he is still calling out our culture about overt and covert racism. Having taught poor Haitian and Hispanic ELLs in a white majority school district near NYC for many years, I couldn’t agree with his observations more. Everyone is healthier when we learn and play together! My language and ethnic minority students learned how to be better students from the middle class students, and they got to attend a clean, safe school with a great library and supplemental resources. The middle class students learned to appreciate diversity while making new friends that were somewhat different. My students earned respect in sports and later on academics, and many finished college including two doctors, teachers, social workers, business people and lawyers. My former students earned academic scholarships and athletic scholarships for American football, field and track and soccer. I know they made it because they came back to visit.
LikeLike
Happening in Utah, too. The State Board of Education just appointed a new state superintendent who was a lawyer, never a teacher or principal or anything in schools. He was on the board of an inner city district in the state, and when that superintendent retired, he convinced the rest of the board to appoint him as superintendent. He proceeded to cancel the district’s contract with the teachers, lower the salaries, and then forced EVERY teacher in the district to sign the contract or be fired. His dictatorial style has forced a lot of teachers in that district to flee to other districts. Now he controls the whole state. With some of the largest class sizes and the lowest per pupil expenditure in the nation, Utah has always been a tough place to teach. It’s going to be even harder now. http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/58509373-78/smith-board-ogden-state.html.csp
LikeLike
Colorado also has the New Schools Venture Fund, The Aspen Institute, Michael Johnston, the reform-loving editorial board of the Denver Post, and the notorious JeffCo School Board.
LikeLike
I read my first Jonathan Kozol book when I was in my early 20s and I was immediately in love. I credit him for convincing me to teach at risk youth in urban settings. I have read everything he has ever written. He is my hero. I’m grateful to see his voice here. Thank you Diane.
LikeLike
Something in the article that mentions what the Finns had to say when visiting Denver bears repeating here because it embodies Kozol’s ideas on equitable education.
1. Co-operation, not competition. Teachers have time to work together, have a lighter teaching load than teachers here, have time to really share ideas and best practices. (Think teacher evaluations and bonuses based on student scores and doing better than other teachers).
2.Creativity not standardization The more you standardize, the less creativity you have, the fewer new ideas you produce and the less risk-taking you see. In Finland, each school does its own thing. (Think Common Core of State Standards about to be implemented in the U.S. and the concomitant tests PARCC and Smarter Balance).
3. No test-based culture. There is no word for accountability in Finnish. Responsibility is the word Finns use, and it means an enhancement of trust between teachers and the rest of society. Mr. Sahlberg believes accountability is something that is left when you take responsibility away. Finnish students take one standardized test and that is given in the final year of high school. (Again, think CCSS, PARCC, Smarter Balance)..
4. Equity, not choice. More choice leads to more inequity. (Think 51 charters, choice, chaos, churn).
LikeLike
Would you believe we even have the word customer in teacher evaluations? yes, I am sure you would believe it.
LikeLike
The customer is always right!
LikeLike
When I see bankers and CEOs going to jail for a very long time rather than good families and neighbors in foreclosure or visiting our local food pantry, only then say capitalism is again working.
LikeLike