Superintendent Mark Cross joins the honor roll for his willingness to stand up and be counted on the side of students.
Cross sent a letter home to parents in which he criticized high-stakes testing and Common Core. He spoke critically of federal and state initiatives whose purpose is to rank students rather than educate them. Many educators are fearful of saying what Mark Cross said because they are supposed to be docile and keep their professional ethics to themselves. A test score is like stepping on a bathroom scale, he said. It tells you something but not everything you need to know about your wellness. So, he told parents, we won’t be talking much about PARCC or Common Core. We will continue to focus on helping them become well-rounded people, with time to develop their creativity.
Read his letter. He makes clear that he and his staff take their responsibility to the children and the local community very seriously, and they will continue to do so.
If every school board, principal, and superintendent were equally willing to speak their convictions, there would be a genuine conversation about education, rather than the current top-down authoritarianism that typifies relationships between the federal government and everyone else.
The original letter can be seen here.
August 20th 2014
Dear Parents,
Today is the first day of the 2014-15 school year and I wanted to take the opportunity to share some personal thoughts regarding the current state of education at the national, state and, most importantly, local levels. I am very fortunate to serve as the superintendent of this great district and we are all very proud of the incredible progress we have made in recent years, building on previous years of excellence. At the end of the day, our kids and their safety and educational growth are all that matters to us. We work hard to keep anything from distracting us from these priorities.
Unfortunately, there are many federal and state education initiatives that can very much be a distraction from what matters most These initiatives are based on good intentions and are cloaked in the concept of accountability, but unfortunately most do little to actually improve teaching and teaming. Most are designed to assess, measure, rank and otherwise place some largely meaningless number on a child or a school or a teacher or a district. That is not to say that student growth data is not important, It is very critical, and it is exactly why we have our own local assessment system in place. It is what our principals and teachers use to help guide instruction and meet the needs of your kids on a daily basis. In other words, it is meaningful data to help us teach your child.
But no more than a number from a bathroom scale can give you a full assessment of your personal wetness, a test score cannot fully assess a student’s academic growth. Does stepping on the scale tell you something? Of course. But does it tell you everything? Absolutely not.
As one specific example, Peru Elementary District 124 puts great value on the fine arts. We believe that music and art enhances cognitive growth, creativity and problem solving. In fact we know this, and this is exactly why your children have access to an outstanding fine arts program with five music and art teachers from PreK through 8th grade. The state does not assess music or art or science or social studies for that matter. Only language arts and mathematics are assessed with the state’s new Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) assessment.
This is why I wanted to let you know that we will not be talking to you that much about the PARCC assessment or Common Core or other initiatives that have some importance, but they are not what matters most to us. YOUR CHILDREN are what matter most and we believe that kids should be well-rounded, with an emphasis on a solid foundation for learning across all subjects by the time they get to high school and later college. We believe that kids need to be creative and learn to solve problems. We believe that exposure to music and art science and social studies, physical education and technology and a wide variety of curricular and extracurricular activities will serve them very well as they grow into young adults.
We further believe that there is no replacement for high expectations, and we must expect our students to achieve to the best of their individual ability. We believe that all children can learn, but not all at the same pace or in the same way. We believe that reading and literacy are the foundations of learning. We believe that children are each unique and have a wide variety of talents and skills, very few of which can be measured on a state assessment
The state and federal government have failed epically in their misguided attempts at ‘reforming’ public education. Public education does not need reformed. It may need intervention in school districts that are not meeting the needs of students on a grand scale, but it needs to be accountable to and controlled by our citizens at the local level. And in Peru Schools, this will continue to be very much the case.
So, I wanted to let you know that we will not let these other things serve as a distraction from educating your children in Peru Schools. When appropriate, we will use these opportunities as a chance to improve but we will not let political nonsense distract us from our true mission, which is to keep your kids safe and to provide them with a world class education. One of my favorite quotes is,
*Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least’
And the ‘things- which matter most here are your kids and their education. Nothing you read or hear about will distract us from that effort.
Thank you for your support of our children and our schools and as always, please let me know if you have any questions or concerns at all as we start the new school year!
Sincerely,
Mark R. Cross Superintendent

So he’s made his position clear….but when families in his school system ask to opt out/refuse the tests, will he support them? Or are these just words? My own superintendent wrote a similar letter last year, but when my family pushed back, we not only got zero support from him and his Testing Office, but got pushback. And people here wonder why I’m cynical. LOL
Pretty words….talks a nice talk. Will he walk the walk?
LikeLike
cd,
Perhaps this will answer your question:
“That is not to say that student growth data is not important, It is very critical, and it is exactly why we have our own local assessment system in place. It is what our principals and teachers use to help guide instruction and meet the needs of your kids on a daily basis. In other words, it is meaningful data to help us teach your child.”
Pretty hard to do data without data and one gets that data by testing the children.
Or: “we will use these opportunities as a chance to improve but we will not let political nonsense distract us from our true mission, which is to keep your kids safe and to provide them with a world class education.”
Good ol “world class education”. Can’t administrators write/speak without using edudeformer language?
I share your skepticism and cynicism.
LikeLike
My feelings about teacher-created assessments are different from my feelings about, say, PARCC. Our school also does regular MAP testing in reading and math (mixed feelings there), so there is more than ample opportunity for any important data to be gathered about my kid(s).
There was NO reason for us to have taken the high-stakes state test last Spring. NONE. The scores weren’t even being used as part of teacher evaluations, the scores weren’t coming back until summer, and the tests were aligned to the old (pre-CCSS) curriculum. Waste of hours and hours and hours and of millions of dollars our state could have used on other things.
There weren’t that many parents in my district who wanted out of the tests, but we all got the same pushback, even after the letter telling parents how useless he thought the tests were. Simply allowing us to work with schools to avoid testing and makeup dates would have sufficed, but at one of my kids’ schools we weren’t even allowed that courtesy.
Cynical is the least of things I’m feeling about it all, even all these months later. I want an educational leader who walks the walk. I don’t appear to have one. 😦 I want to know, when push comes to shoe, if this guy will hang his families out to dry like our family was.
LikeLike
Crunchydeb,
Why do you call these “high stakes” exams when there were no stakes for anyone involved?
In any case the exams could be useful in giving folks an independent look at a student’s academic level. No stacks exams worked out that way for my middle son.
LikeLike
True, bad term – this year they really were “no-stakes” exams.
My younger daughter wanted to “sit and stare” but in the end she wasn’t able to; after about 2-1/2 to 3 hours of testing each session, she was wrung out; she came home from school an utter mess. This is a child who needs physical activity like most people need oxygen. I saw no reason to subject her to the test in the first place, and when we tried keeping her home one testing morning, the school simply pulled her from afternoon classes and gave her her own personal makeup exam….after which she came home a mess again: weepy, combative, hair-trigger sensitive, argumentative, VERY unlike herself. In a 2-week span, each grade has 4 testing days like this, and other grades are expected to be dead silent all morning so as not to disturb the test-takers. Schedules are upended as music and art and PE teachers are pulled in to proctor – so they’re not teaching much during those 2 weeks, either; some classes go the entire 2 weeks with no PE at all (in addition to having to sit for 10-11 hours).
The data they would have gathered about her was data that was aligned to a curriculum the school no longer uses now that we’re CCSS-aligned; all we get is a raw score, and that didn’t come until after school started THIS year. I see no benefit that was worth what my child ultimately went through – and conversations with other parents suggest that our experience was not unique. If this is supposed to be About The Children, that phrase that’s so often trotted out, then someone needs to redefine what that means. This had NOTHING to do with benefiting our kids. As I said before, there are other ways they’re already gathering information about her and what she’s learning and what she’s capable of doing (which could easily be the subject of another entire diatribe LOL); the ONLY reason this was given is because our state superintendent said so, and that was because Arne Said So.
And even though the superintendent *said* he wasn’t in favor of the tests and was frank about their lack of benefit, parents who wanted out got zero support from him or his office. Actions>words.
LikeLike
^It is a wonderful letter, we can only hope he means it and is prepared to take action.
LikeLike
Bravo for him but my belief is that in order to fight effectively against the insanity that permeates the “reform” movement it will take a concerted and well organized effort by many organizations. Some of that is happening already but more, much more, needs to be done in my opinion. The future of this nation depends on it.
LikeLike
http://education.ohio.gov/Media/Ed-Connection/Sept-3-2014/What%E2%80%99s-happening-with-Ohio%E2%80%99s-Graduation-Requiremen
Meanwhile, Ohio is creating new graduation requirements on the fly as they also out in the 11 other ed reform mandates. They are literally telling people to check in and see what new things they come up with.
As usual, every faction of the ed reform “movement” will get each and every one of their demands, and the result will be an incoherent, chaotic mess that no one could do WELL.
Is there anything else they’d like to pile on public schools and students this year? I’m not sure each and every ed reform lobbyist has gotten their ENTIRE wish list. Add 5 or 6 other initiatives. What the hell. It’s not like anyone could do all of them anyway.
LikeLike
The chairman of the Ohio House Education committee (Stebelton) and the chair of the Ohio senate Education committee (Lehner) are both ALEC members – as are several fellow committee members. No wonder every “reform” bill in Ohio gets passed. In the meantime, us public school teachers are dying a little each day despite our professionalism. I shudder when I think what this is doing to the kids.
Many superintendents care only about “compliance.” It keeps me up at night. I’m too stubborn to quit. My students mean the world to me. I rebel in any little way I can short of losing my job (which may happen). ^o^
LikeLike
I am certainly in favor of putting the students first. I hope that Mr. Cross will implement the recommendation of the American Academy of Pediatrics and begin middle and high schools to no earlier than 8:30 a.m.. The statement from the Academy is very clear:
“Chronic sleep loss in children and adolescents is one of the most common – and easily fixable – public health issues in the U.S. today,” said pediatrician Judith Owens, MD, FAAP, lead author of the policy statement, “School Start Times for Adolescents ,” published in the September 2014 issue of Pediatrics.
“The research is clear that adolescents who get enough sleep have a reduced risk of being overweight or suffering depression, are less likely to be involved in automobile accidents, and have better grades, higher standardized test scores and an overall better quality of life,” Dr. Owens said. “Studies have shown that delaying early school start times is one key factor that can help adolescents get the sleep they need to grow and learn.” –
See more at: http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/Let-Them-Sleep-AAP-Recommends-Delaying-Start-Times-of-Middle-and-High-Schools-to-Combat-Teen-Sleep-Deprivation.aspx#sthash.wS7q4qbQ.dpuf
Lets go for the low hanging fruit to provide a better education for all.
LikeLike
Makes sense.
LikeLike
FLERP!,
When I first posted about this a couple of years ago I thought it was obvious evidence that public schools were not, in fact, run in the best interest of the students. The interests of the adults play an important role as well. I hope that Supervisor Cross does put the best interests of the students first, but experience suggests that it is more rhetoric than anything else.
LikeLike
So, TE, what’s your opinion of all those charter schools with their “extended hours” that start at 7:30 in the morning? Actual public schools, in fact, tend to start later than charters – is that a bonus for public schools?
LikeLike
Dienne,
If those charter schools are middle or high schools, they should start later. My local public high school should start later (currently 8:00 a.m. for all students) and should certainly stop offering some classes (often music classes) exclusively to students who arrive at 7:00 a.m.
The best chance for an adolescent is to go to a school with the freedom to determine its own hours as implementing a later starting time district wide will face too much opposition from the adults. You send your children to private school so I think there is some hope for them. Does the private school your children attend have a middle and/or high school? Have you talked to them about the American Academy of Pediatric’s recommendation?
LikeLike
Oh, crunchydeb, but there WAS a reason to give those tests–KA-CHING for Pearson.
I’m assuming you’re in ILL-Annoy & gave the ISATs. Wonderful relationship between State Supt. of Ed., Chris Koch (pronounced Cook–so, no, NOT related to the Koch Bros.–at least, as far as we know) & Pearson. HOWEVER–talking about really brave people/educators–let’s give a cheer for those brave CPS teachers at Saucedo & Drummond who did, indeed, REFUSE to give the tests. Yep–the teachers–&, as I understand it, the entire faculty at both schools.
How about it, Illinois? Teachers AND administrators–at EVERY school in the state–refusing to give the tests/ And EACH & EVERY parent OPTING OUT. That’ll stop the gravy train, & the ONLY reason any of these tests are given…everywhere in the world.
LikeLike
I’m in Maryland, actually. And our district has a sort of symbiotic relationship with Pearson, too: supposedly, they’re paying us royalties for our Curriculum 2.0, which we designed to align with CCSS. (Whether that’s actually happening is another matter for debate; transparency seems to be in short supply here as well, and I haven’t been following that money trail, although other parents have been. :-\)
LikeLike