In the first appearance of Anthony Cody’s new, independent blog, Cody and Alan Aja write about the cynical effort to brand Common Core as part of “the civil rights movements.”
No “reform” built on standardized testing can advance civil rights, they show. Common Core proponents recognize that they are losing the battle but attribute it to their failure to appeal to the emotions of the public.
Nothing could be further from the truth. They are losing because their facts and claims are weak.
As Cody and Aja write,
“Thus we have proponents of civil rights bringing us a set of standards and tests that – so far – are having the effect of WIDENING the achievement gap, and putting GEDs and high school diplomas out of reach for many of our students. And their justification for this devastating reform is that otherwise students will need to take a remedial class in college?
“Once again, we have a lazy, irresponsible approach to reform. Make the tests harder, and pretend you have done something to “bring students into the mainstream.” But we are stuck in this mechanistic, punitive, test, punish and reward paradigm. Forget about the myriad challenges facing students due to poverty and wealth inequality; realities that disproportionately affect blacks and Latinos. Forget about addressing the funding inequities within the schools themselves. Forget about the reality of “stereotype threat,” whereas students viewed by society as “cognitively inferior” (read: blacks/Latinos) are more likely to be come self-fulfilling prophecies, consciously or subconsciously under-performing on these very culturally-biased tests already pre-designed to set them up for failure. Forget about the real curricular atrocity, which is a dual, segregated “ability grouped” curricula, whereas white children are more likely to be taught in an enriched, inter-disciplinary setting. Focus instead on setting a “higher bar” through more high stakes testing, and demand that everyone clear it.
“Education is and always has been a civil rights issue. Children of color deserve far better than they are getting now. There is no halcyon era in the past when our schools were doing just dandy in this regard. But there was a time when we had a societal awareness that poverty was a pervasive and pernicious source of educational problems. There was a time when federal funds were not awarded based on competition between states, but on the needs of their students. There was a time when the Federal government promoted – even mandated desegregation, rather than promoting semi-private charter schools that accelerate it.
“Our challenge is not to go back to 1975, however. Our challenge is to learn from the successes and failures of the past five decades, and chart reforms that address the opportunity gap, and build success, self determination and stability in our communities.”

Rhee now goes by Johnson. Guess she is reinventing herself.
She has been appointed to the Board of Miracle-Gro – now a product I will avoid. This thing is like a roach; she has 1000 lives. http://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2014/08/11/former-d-c-schools-chief-joins-scotts-board.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bizj_columbus+(Business+First+of+Columbus)
What in the world to people see in her? Ugh.
LikeLike
Ugh. Thanks, you’ve helped my diet today – I think I’m going to be ill.
Notice how the article says that “teachers unions” were not happy with her. Of course it wasn’t that teachers themselves were unhappy with her, just those big, bad unions. Again, ugh.
LikeLike
As far as what people $ee in her? I couldn’t gue$$.
LikeLike
It sounds like she is preparing an escape route from the education racket. Now that her name has become poison.
LikeLike
Today in the Los Angeles Times there is a story about a developer who was planning to build a housing complex in West Hollywood. Because the developer was obliged to include some affordable housing in this mix, his plan was to have a separate door for the poor people and prevent them from using the pool!!!! When city officials caught on to this outrage, they put a stop to it. Good for West Hollywood!
This story gets to the real civil rights issue in the United States: the segregation of the poor and the people of color into crowded, crime-ridden sections of the city. When a developer or a city is forced to provide housing for the poor, they usually find a way to circumvent or sabotage the law, as in the West Hollywood case.
Housing segregation hurts the children who are forced to go to neighborhood schools that have fewer resources than schools in affluent areas. Anyone who has access to a school in a poor area and one in a rich area can see the stark differences and it’s not only money. The affluent school will likely have beautiful buildings, lots of resources, educated parents who volunteer in the classrooms, and experienced teachers who are treated well by the district and the parents. The poor children will be in crowded classrooms where teachers struggle alone to meet the many needs. Teachers in these schools will often be told not to suggest services to the parents because “we’ll have to pay for them.” The research shows that children forced to attend schools with mostly poor children often have poor academic achievement and this holds true for Test Prep academies as well. This is the real civil rights issue.
“Reformers” know this and that is why 100% of their own children attend schools where parents are mostly affluent college graduates. One prominent “reformer” confessed to sending his son to a school in the suburbs instead of his own “miracle” charter. He said that his son didn’t “need” the type of education provided at his miracle academy. Well, might I be so presumptuous as to suggest that a school that benefits the rich kid will likely benefit the poor child as well?
It’s very easy to see who the authentic reformers are. They are the people who
are paying for poor kids to attend the same schools as their own children
advocating for open enrollment to all public schools
advocating for subsidized housing in EVERY community
advocating for equal resources and experienced teachers (no TFA, thank you) for all schools in impoverished neighborhoods
advocating for high-quality infant and toddler education to prevent the achievement gap from developing in the first five years of life
fostering, mentoring or adopting children in need.
We can help improve the educational outlook for our poorest children, but it can’t be done by siphoning off tax money into private pockets. Let’s put a stop to this unconscionable hustle NOW!
LikeLike
I think this may be the most critical area to attack – because arguing that “Common Core is necessary to fight poverty” is the unusual pitch that has caused the Democrats to turn off their brains. So sad that my lifetime party have become stupid on this issue.
Let’s keep up the pressure on the poverty issue. Here’s a quote from July New Yorker article about Atlanta’s test cheating scandal… ” David Berliner, the former dean of the school of education at Arizona State University, … said, “The people who say poverty is no excuse for low performance are now using teacher accountability as an excuse for doing nothing about poverty.” “
LikeLike
“School finance is, by far, the biggest priority the groups identified, and the report summary echoes a lot of what the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) has argued in its piece of the everlasting school finance lawsuit: that Texas’ school funding is based on what lawmakers want to spend, not what a quality education actually costs, and that cuts in school funding have meant scaling back bilingual education programs.”
from: http://www.texasobserver.org/latino-education-agenda-more-money-better-teachers/
That’s it in a nutshell, “funding is based on what lawmakers want to spend, not what a quality education actually costs” …
LikeLike