Laurel Sturt says that old-fashioned schoolyard bullying has evolved into Internet malice, protected by anonymity. She says bullying has become a national pastime for some political leaders. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has cultivated a reputation as a bully, jabbing his finger at lesser mortals.
And then bullying is built into education policy–federal, state, and local.
She writes:
“Though the psychopathic rush of inflicting pain on another human being is not one most of us would appreciate, we have only to look at the realm of education to see an acceleration of bullying, in multiple guises. Take, for example, the oppressive federal mandates sent down from on high, No Child Left Behind, and its successor, Race to the Top. Here we have, for all intents and purposes, sadistic edicts impossible to fulfill, the charge of NCLB, “proficiency” for all children by 2014, nothing short of an iron mask for teachers and kids alike; states were bullied to participate to get millions in federal school funding. One would think subjecting kids to the torture of test prep and testing while losing a decade of authentic education, tilting futilely at an arbitrary data windmill, would have been consigned to the mistakes file. Yet, showing that arm twisting through policy is an equal opportunity, bipartisan affront, through his Bully of Education Arne Duncan, the very premise of Obama’s RTTT has relied on the legalized notion of bullying, bribery and extortion: sign on to our agenda or you’ll starve for funds.
“Within the Race to the Top straitjacket, then, the bullying theme has continued with the individual mandates: bullying standards developed undemocratically by not educators but profit-motivated bullies; bullied instruction forced on teachers by these standards; and parents bullied to share their children’s private data, their rights to privacy stripped by education business lobbyist cum bullies. Then there’s the bullying of teachers through evaluations unfairly tied to the test scores of the bullied kids, victimized students who, subjected to impossible work and tests, are displaying symptoms of bullying–depression, anxiety, insomnia, nausea, hopelessness, with the added bonus of a PTSD scar for life.
“Move down to the next level of power, and state and local bullying is flourishing. Here in New York we have a governor and education officials stonily unmoved by the pain they’ve signed us onto with RTTT, with no movement in sight to end it, notwithstanding a coming fall election; their intransigent coercion in the face of hardship is bullying. New York City teachers and students recently endured a decade of bullying micromanagement under the dictator Michael Bloomberg, a mayor in control of the schools, a nationwide experiment which has yielded low achievement results but a much higher degree of yes, bullying.”
Bullying moves into the classroom, where teachers are compelled to violate their professional ethics by authoritarian principals.
The bullying will continue until teachers stand united and resist. Those who bully them, steal their reputations and their profession can and must be stopped. Resistance is the best defense against the bullies. Don’t stand alone. Stand together.

Creative and coordinated resistance is needed at each of these levels of bullying. The trick is to engage in this while keeping your job. That is why scholars like Diane, others with secure positions, retired teachers, parents and concerned citizens need to take up the cause. Teachers need to recognize that unions should not be parties to the corruption of education.
Check on your free speech rights beyond school hours. Resist the language that is becoming all too easy to parrot such as “growth” when the FEDERAL definition of that is nothing more than a gain in pre-to-posttest scores and year-to-year gains, calculated by a computer with formulas known to be a fraud. That is not an educational definition of growth. Stop administrators from using language about a “years worth of growth” as if that is a meaningful concept,. It is not. Resist the language of this reform. Deconstruct it,
Ask questions. You want me to teach to the test? You will put that in writing as part of my job description and contract? If not why not? Start interrogating every policy that strikes you as absurd.
LikeLike
The trick is to engage in this while keeping your job.
As is always the case under a Vichy regime, people are living with fear. That’s the climate that Ed Deform has created.
The deformers’ operational plan: the beatings will continue until morale improves.
LikeLike
In my state, apparently teachers have no free speech rights outside of school hours, at least if one is opposed to the deform movement. I recently saw a news report which extensively quoted a teacher about how wonderful the new CC tests are. However, teachers have been threatened that if we even suggest opting out of these tests, that discipline against our license will ensue. I assume that speaking out against other state education policies could bring similar judgements. A teacher in my state was recently fired when she refused to grade her own students’ essays for a district-mandated, thrice-yearly standardized test, as she felt it was improper to grade her own students.
LikeLike
Well, I’m one of the concerned citizens you referred to and I’m trying to line up as many other “soldiers” as possible to engage in this struggle to support our students and their teachers and defeat “The Privatizers”—the people who as I explain it to the friends of my grade school son “just can’t help themselves whenever they see a lot of money. They think it must belong to them and only them and instead of wanting to find ways in which it can be put to better use for ALL students—like smaller class sizes and more teachers—they instead just want to find ways to take it from our schools and use it to make a very small number of people who are already rich even richer.
So keep up the good work. We have your back and there’s more of us joining our ranks everyday!
LikeLike
The biggest bully in education?
My vote goes to the NCLB act.
The legislation was proposed by President George W. Bush on January 23, 2001. It was coauthored by Representatives John Boehner (R-OH), George Miller (D-CA), and Senators Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and Judd Gregg (R-NH). The United States House of Representatives passed the bill on May 23, 2001 (voting 384–45), and the United States Senate passed it on June 14, 2001 (voting 91–8). President Bush signed it into law on January 8, 2002.
This is the moment in time when the force of federal law combined standards based reform with punitive consequences. We’ve had hell to pay ever since.
LikeLike
NY teacher: you picked a strong candidate for the unenviable #1 spot.
I heartily recommend to viewers of this blog: Laurel M. Sturt, DAVONTE’S INFERNO: TEN YEARS IN THE NEW YORK PUBLIC SCHOOL GULAG (2013).
I refer back to a comment I posted yesterday on this blog that referenced W. Edwards Deming. Here is a single sentence that describes much of this post and the comments: “Management by fear would be a better name.”
Link: https://dianeravitch.net/2014/05/24/edushyster-what-happens-when-the-obama-administration-treats-medicine-like-education/
That was from decades ago, so “what was old is new again.”
Keep coming to this blog. Together we can kept a candle lit in the darkness and someday let the sunshine in to cleanse out all the creatures of the night.
Keep commenting. I’ll keep reading.
😎
LikeLike
KrazyTA: Management by fear is what this is all about and it doesn’t start or stop with education. It started about four decades ago when big business started buying its way into the political system to bring down wages for the working class to reduce costs and increase profits for those involved. To make this happen, manufacturing jobs went overseas and nothing was done to curb the flood of illegal immigration which forced American workers to compete with lower- wage workers. Many of the immigrants were forced to come here because of American foreign policy and laws such as NAFTA, but the effect was more workers for fewer jobs with wages plummeting while CEO’s went from earning about 35 times the worker on the floor to over 400 times. That in itself creates fear. On top of that the unions that protected workers’ rights and pay were systematically demonized (bullied) and the healthcare and healthcare insurance industries wanted big money for their people at the top just like other corporations so that cost got passed to the wage earner. You really get management by fear when millions of people are afraid to leave their low-paying jobs for fear of losing health insurance. Of course it got progressively worse with jobs offering part-time hours to avoid paying and health benefits at all. This has all worked out according to plan and the 1% are now richer than ever.
How did they do it? One way was by spending millions of dollars every year from people like the Koch brothers through groups like ALEC to fund the propaganda and buy the media and politicians. Another way is to reward the people in the middle carrying out the destruction. The top few percent aren’t the only ones turning a profit. Many smaller businesses are increasing their profits thanks to the cheaper labor and fear their employees are under. One study I saw last year said that in my area – upstate NY – the number of people categorized as wealthy rose since 2008 from 16% to almost 20% of the population while a similar percentage fell into poverty; thus, the squeezing out of the middle class. There are many examples of people willing to take advantage of this opportunity such as those ‘investing’ in charter schools.
The one thing that stuck me about having all students in the U.S. ‘college and career ready’ is the lack of any plan to have a career available to them once they graduate from college or career training. Upstate all they’re talking about is fracking and gambling! There’s no big investment in our sixty year old crumbling infrastructure that would create jobs. And what about the p-Techs funded by IBM, the company that made huge profits this year by using tax loop-holes? And didn’t they shut down a branch in NY to send overseas for cheaper labor? I think they will do a very good job of training SOME students to work for and be dependent on their industry, but I doubt they care about ALL students. What was so terrible about unions that sponsored career training in a diverse number of fields?
All the data collection and accountability is about micro-managing workers and future workers (students) to prevent revolt and manage through fear. There is no plan to create jobs because competition brings up wages and takes away the fear of walking away from an abusive employer. This brings us back to the reason for all the bullying in education. Why would the reformers adequately fund public education for all students to be college and career ready for jobs that will never exist?
LikeLike
Geri, if you haven’t, read Barbara Ehrenreich’s book, Nickeled and Dimed where she attempts to support herself on minimum wage job.
LikeLike
That book was the beginning of my education. At the time, I was going through chemotherapy, so I read it very slowly interspersed with lighter fare. If my parapro hadn’t given it to me, a young aspiring journalist, I would not have chosen it at the time, but we had many good, deep conversations over that year, and he was a real asset to my class. It should be required reading for anyone who has never had to live on the edge but maybe not when you are going through chemo.
LikeLike
I heard Barbara Ehrenreich speak at UB. She was calling for an increase in minimum wage at that time (about ten years ago). Of course, she heard the argument that the economy could not afford to increase the minimum wage. I’ll never forget her response – “I am a biologist, not an expert on the economy. And as a biologist, I tell you that the human body cannot be sustained on a minimum wage salary.” (Or something to that effect). She was incredible.
LikeLike
Shine on you Krazy TA.
NCLB has enabled every edu-bully ever since. And NCLB became the lever that lifted CCSS into nearly every school in the country.
“Give me a punitive test that’s strong enough, and a place to stand, and I could move 75 million students.”
– David Coleman
LikeLike
100% “proficiency” is an idiotic goal but this kind of thing comes more from sheer stupidity than sadism per se. Unfortunately our political system seems to generate an enormous amount of idiocy.
LikeLike
It can be very hard for public school teachers to know where the incompetence/idiocy ends and the malice/sadism begins…but rest assured, there’s way too much of the latter, as it is rewarded by the current system.
LikeLike
Yes, that’s true. But President Obama. favorite tool of the Rheephormer, has escalated the war against our public schools. He is a narcissistic bully,who did not attend attended a public school and is interested only in serving the hedge fund managers who will provide Obama with a cushy landing once he exits the White House.
The Obama/Duncan Rheephormer Death Star is killing public education.
LikeLike
Recently I have discovered that people at all levels of education (assistants on up) will often use whatever possible avenue they view it takes to achieve their vision of what something should look like, that is what ideas should dominate. For example, working conditions surveys are sometimes exaggerated to get the attention of higher ups or to paint a picture in a building that is a charicature of reality. And I have concluded that they do it out of fear of losing control. And I have concluded further that the economic downturn has created such a sense of national anxiety that bullies are popping up all over the place—not just at high and well-moneyed levels.
I have also recognized that “fiefdoms” in education are not something new brought about by the likes of TFA or the Broad Foundation. In fact, I would dare say that TFA and Broad are, on some levels, a reaction to some fiefdoms that have seemed impervious in previous decades. I don’t think any group should be held any more guilty than any other and I think that only by recognizing this fact will we be able to move forward on strengthening public schools in this country.
Whether it takes limits on service in certain capacities (for example limits on service as superintendent or even principal in one building), a balanced array of university backgrounds (now that teachers’ colleges are not the only part to the classroom I think districts would be well suited to be sure they don’t have too many teachers concentrated in one area from any one particular college or university). Only then can we be sure that public schools are not just perpetuating the fiefdom mentality. I have witnessed this phenomenon in my church also. It can be counterproductive to maintaining momentum and growth in methods of service to students.
Again, I think we have to come to the problem solving table as if no sin at running a school (so long as the children are treated fairly and safely) is no greater than any other IF we really want to solve problems and build a bridge over the trenchant reforms that have recently come to pass in so many states.
Bullies be gone. But all must recognize the latent bully within and not be so proud or presumptuous to assume they have no faults of their own.
LikeLike
“part” should read “path”
And “no” greater should read just “greater”
LikeLike
I agree with you, Joanna, that the bullying tactics are nothing new. In Jr. High there were cliques devoted to letting others know their unworthiness. I do disagree with your willingness to call all groups equally culpable. The forces arrayed against public education are much more powerful than a principal’s cabal or even a district’s rubber room. Yes, the mentality that drives these excesses has a common denominator of “My way or the highway,” but the national scope of this particular bully movement needs national attention. We have to fight on a local level, but we must always be aware of the bullies’ national agenda.
LikeLike
Sorry, Joanne, but I do not accept your characterization of “both sides” being equally to blame.
If we can’t move past false equivalence in our assessment of public policy—in education or anything else—we won’t have a way out of this morass.
One side is entirely wrong here: and that’s the side.that sees our tax dollars for our public schools as a “new market” with “completely predictable revenues guaranteed, by real estate taxes, as the law—opening up a massive new revenue stream with ‘delicious’ ROI for the fortunate few at the expense of the rest of us.
LikeLike
Regrettably teachers are allowing themselves to be bullied. They need to be much more involved in there unions and force the leadership of the unions to change course or vote them out like as Chicago teachers did. The wherewithal exists to fight back. Unfortunately the union leadership has ben bought off buy Gates money etc.
LikeLike
Bad behavior belongs to those who behave badly.
LikeLike
Bullying is all about having power and control over others. Leadership isn’t about forcing others, it’s about INVITING others to join you, with the option of saying “no. When people are coerced, it’s bullying.
LikeLike
Scratch a bully, find a punk.
Stand together against a sociopath, and watch them slink away to seek easier rewards elsewhere.
It’s time for teachers to fight back and save the schools from these bullies, opportunists and privateers. By doing so, we’ll find the exhilaration of refusing to cower, and of making the effort to take our destiny into our own hands.
LikeLike
This piece of writing gets to the kernel insight into what we face. Bullying is not merely a misguided behavior perpetrated by people of otherwise good will.Bullying is a pathology is at its heart a form of psychopathology: sadism.
The healthy, life affirming way to encounter this pathology is resistance—to bond together to fight the bully. When we fight, resist the bully we not only bolster our own sense of self worth, but we join with others in a common purpose to reestablish our own human agency and control over our own lives. We are no longer alone, we are united in common cause, in community, and alliance. We don’t have to stand alone as victims of bullying. We have a moral obligation to resist by whatever means necessary..
LikeLike
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
LikeLike
This comment always makes me chuckle!
LikeLike
As a school counselor working in a Title I school in a district with “zero tolerance” for bullying, one of my responsibilities was to teach elementary children to recognize the dynamics of bullying. Unfortunately, most of the bullying to these children came from their teachers and administrators who function in the punitive, authoritarian environment created by the Texas testing obsession. Even parents have been indoctrinated to hyper focus obsessively on their children’s performance, and many have unknowingly become task masters for long punishing hours of meaningless homework.
It is a paradox when we expect children to treat adults and each other with respect, yet the adults are modeling bullying behavior unknowingly. After attempting to point out to school administrators that what they were calling ‘positive discipline” was actually “punitive” methods of behaviorism that caused children to have chronic repressed feelings of victimization (shame, guilt, anger, self pity, need for revenge), same as from bullying, it was not well received.
Since our overall society has been functioning in chronic stress from fear and insecurity for several decades, it seems that bullying behavior has become too normal and often goes unrecognized. Everyone is on the spectrum for narcissistic behavior, which is not abnormal; however, when people function with increasing chronic stress over a period of time, they become increasinly desensitized, and more callous and self absorbed as a result of their survival defenses. This hierarchy of bullying from a more authoritarian system brought about by fear and distrust at all levels of society has caused children to become scapegoats. This scapegoating to children was well presented in the book Childism, by Elisabeth Young-Bruehl.
I agree with Young-Bruehl’s assessment that reform is possible only if we acknowledge this prejudice to children in its basic forms and address the motives and cultural forces that drive it, rather than dwell on the various categories of abuse and punishment.
It is my opinion that we need a national task force to educate the public on recognizing the dynamics of bullying behaviors in themselves and others, and to teach all adults the skills to validate children, since these skills apparently have become lost in the general population. President and Michelle Obama could have been a good resource for initiating a task force to protect children; however, it appears this is a lost opportunity?
LikeLike
Joyce Murdock Feilke: from the bottom of my heart—
Thank you for what you wrote and what you’ve done.
😎
LikeLike
Thank you KrazyTA. I share your opinion expressed earlier in this section:
“Together we can keep a candle lit in the darkness and someday let the sun shine in to cleanse out all the creatures of the night.”
And to that I add, “With enough candles we can make a Lighthouse!”
🙂
LikeLike
This is beautifully said, Joyce. Thank you.
President Obama has made himself into the bully in chief. His version of the presidential bully pulpit.
LikeLike
Remembering my own school days long ago I remember very little in the way of bullying.
LikeLike
Interesting concept – administrators (at all levels) as bullies.
Unfortunately, this is not as far fetched as one would hope.
And teachers are like abused spouses who grin and bear it.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Love it!
LikeLike
Thousands of Florida 11th Graders haven’t met online course requirements.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/features/education/os-online-graduation-requirements-20140525,0,4834805.story
“Some teenagers think they learn better with an in-person teacher, Spencer said, and some have found it a hassle to fit an online course into their schedule.
“Students who have avoided the online requirement cite a variety of reasons. Some don’t have computers or reliable Internet access at home. Some were late to learn about the rule, and some worried they wouldn’t do well without face-to-face interaction with teachers.
“Many seemed to dislike that completing an online course often meant doing it after school or during the summer.”
That’s what we have been saying all along.
LikeLike