A group of teachers in New York City wrote an impassioned plea against the market-based reforms of the Bush-Obama era. It has since been signed by parents and educators from across the nation. It takes a strong position against high-stakes testing and the standardization of the Common Core. Read this letter and consider signing it.
#############
This is the beginning:
“We have patiently taught under the policies of market-based education reforms and have long since concluded that they constitute a subversion of the democratic ideals of public education. Policymakers have adopted the reforms of business leaders and economists without consideration for the diverse stakeholders whose participation is necessary for true democratic reform. We have neglected an important debate on the purpose and promise of public education while students have been subjected to years of experimental and shifting high-stakes tests with no proven correlation between those tests and future academic success. The tests have been routinely flawed in design and scoring, and do not meaningfully inform classroom instruction. Test scores have also been misapplied to the evaluation of teachers and schools, creating a climate of sanctions that is misguided and unsupportive.
“In your first speech as Chancellor, you spoke of the importance of critical thinking, or a “thinking curriculum” in education. We know you to be a proponent of critical pedagogy, part of the progressive education tradition. As teachers, we hold critical thinking and critical literacies in highest regard. As professionals, we resolve to not be passive consumers of education marketing or unthinking implementers of unproven policy reforms. We believe critical thinking, artistry, and democracy to be among the cornerstones of public education. We want creative, “thinking” students who are equipped to be the problem solvers of today and tomorrow; equipped to tackle our most vexing public problems: racial and economic disparity, discrimination, homelessness, hunger, violence, environmental degradation, public health, and all other problems foreseen and unforeseen. We want students to love learning and to be insatiable in their inquiries. However, it is a basic truism of classroom life and sound pedagogy that institutional policies should reflect the values and habits of mind we intend to impart on our students. It becomes incongruous, therefore, to charge our students to think critically and question, while burdening our schools with policies that frustrate teachers’ efforts to implement a “thinking curriculum,” perpetuating historic inequalities in public education.
“The “Crisis of Education” and a Crisis of Pedagogy
“Business leaders and economists have used reductive arguments to identify a “crisis of education” while branding educational success words such as achievement, effectiveness, and performance as synonymous with standardized test scores. The majority of education policy decisions are now guided by test scores, making standardized tests an indispensable product. Market-based reforms have been an excellent model of corporate demand creation–branding the disease and selling the cure. Stanford education professor Linda-Darling Hammond described policymakers’ mistaken reliance on standardized tests when she wrote, “There is a saying that American students are the most tested, and the least examined, of any in the world. We test students in the U.S. far more than any other nation, in the mistaken belief that testing produces greater learning.”
“The narrow pursuit of test results has sidelined education issues of enduring importance such as poverty, equity in school funding, school segregation, health and physical education, science, the arts, access to early childhood education, class size, and curriculum development. We have witnessed the erosion of teachers’ professional autonomy, a narrowing of curriculum, and classrooms saturated with “test score-raising” instructional practices that betray our understandings of child development and our commitment to educating for artistry and critical thinking. And so now we are faced with “a crisis of pedagogy”–teaching in a system that no longer resembles the democratic ideals or tolerates the critical thinking and critical decision-making that we hope to impart on the students we teach.
“For-Profit Standardized Tests as Snake Oil
“The keystone of market-based reforms–highly dependent on the mining and misuse of quantifiable data–has been the outsourcing of standardized test production to for-profit education corporations. In New York State, a single British-based corporation, Pearson PLC, manages standardized testing for grades 3-8, gifted and talented testing, college-based exams for prospective teachers, and New York State teacher certification exams. Contracts currently held by Pearson include: $32.1 million five-year contract, which began in 2011, for the creation of English Language Arts and Math assessments; $6.2 million three-year contract in 2012 to create an online education data portal; $1 million five-year contract, which began in 2010, to create and administer field tests; $200,000 contract through the Office of General Services for books and materials.
“Pearson’s management of testing in New York has resulted in a series of high-profile errors. In 2012, questions pertaining to an 8th grade ELA passage about a pineapple and a hare had to be thrown out after they were found to be nonsensical. It was also discovered that test questions had been previously used by Pearson in other state exams. In total, 29 questions had to be eliminated from the tests that year, prompting New York State Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch to comment, “The mistakes that have been revealed are really disturbing. What happens here as a result of these mistakes is that it makes the public at large question the efficacy of the state testing system.” That same year, 7,000 elementary and middle school students were banned from their graduation ceremonies after they were mistakenly recorded as having failed their state tests…….

signed
LikeLike
I would distinguish between decentralizing the decision of which school a student attends by having choice schools and using standardized exams to evaluate student and teacher performance. The first has some aspects in common with markets, while the latter is not necessarily connected to allowing students to find the school that best fits their individual needs and desires.
LikeLike
But how is it defensible to continue to insist these are individual “choice” schools driven by “an individual needs” when that is demonstrably not true?
The charter schools that are most celebrated, most fawned over, are the large “high performing” multi-state chains. They just passed federal funding in the US House (so not the Senate, yet) that will be directed not to individual, innovative, local schools but to educational management organizations.
Further, the charter school organization in California hosted a national ed reform leader who stated his goal was to replace 90% of the public schools with charter schools.
At what point do we admit that the original way this was presented and sold to the public is no longer accurate?
LikeLike
The charter schools I celebrate are not chains. If you are concerned that charter school chains are the problem with charter schools, appropriate regulation could certainly eliminate the chains.
LikeLike
I should add that chain charter schools seem to be the minority of charter schools. The latest data I could find reports that a little over 2/3 of charter schools are free standing.
Here is my source:
http://dashboard.publiccharters.org/dashboard/schools/page/mgmt/year/2011
LikeLike
I don’t think your “magnet school/charter school” comparison is valid, either.
Magnet schools were established with the recognition that there needs to be a general public school system BEHIND the magnet school. That was recognized, and planned for. Magnet schools don’t replace public schools. There’s a recognition that magnet schools would not be able to exist without a general public school system. They weren’t established to drive public schools out of business. In fact, they would not have been established without a general public school system for everyone else.
In addition, there are no multi-state chains of public magnet schools. A Toledo magnet public high school can’t “scale up” and open an outlet in Pittsburgh. They’re also publicly-run.
LikeLike
I am not sure why you say that magnet schools “don’t replace” public schools. They certainly do replace traditional zoned public schools. If all schools in a district are magnet programs, wouldn’t that mean there are no traditional zoned public schools? If some schools in the district are magnet schools, doesn’t that cherry pick students away from the traditional schools? Doesn’t it destroy neighborhood cohesion?
LikeLike
I will tell you why.
Read Krugman on how ‘THEY’ invent failures and misrepresent the truth so real discussions cannot take place.
Just substitute the word ‘education’ or ‘public ‘schools’ for health REFORM:
” the constant harping on alleged failure works as innuendo even if each individual claim collapses in the face of evidence. A recent poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that a majority of Americans know that more than eight million people enrolled in health exchanges; but it also found a majority of respondents believing that this was below expectations, and that the law was working badly.
“So Republicans are SPREADING DISINFORMATION about health reform BECAUSE IT WORKS, and because they can — there is no sign that they pay any political price when their accusations are proved false.
“And that observation should scare you. What happens to the Congressional Budget Office if a party that has learned that lying about numbers works takes full control of Congress? What happens if it regains the White House, too? Nothing good, that’s for sure.”
Yeah ,it scares me when so little is understood.
I worked, by the way, for the last 8 years of my career in a magnet school on the East Side of Manhattan, and it WAS a public school, and a wonderful one.
What made it outstanding was that 50% of the kids came from the neighborhood and 50% from all over NYC, if they were accepted by the staff, based on observations and performance evaluations. After a week attending our classes, kids who wanted to learn, who were enthusiastic and prepared to learn and who could DO THE WORK, were accepted. We were NOT elitist, and took many students with low scores on city tests, if they showed promise. We then spent much time and effort raising their skills, so that they could read our textbooks and follow the difficult courses in math and science. We made learning interesting and enjoyable… and there were few standardized tests, and only a week of test-prep just before a test.
It was the WE, that made the difference there. We the teachers met and shared information, and planned together. It was a community of learning, and it worked until 1998 when Top-down administrators took over. Then our small magnet school became a big middle school run by the deformers. It is still a working school ( after all it gets kids from tony NYC.
LikeLike
In my kids’ district, we do indeed have schools within schools. These are alternative programs designed to appeal to students favoring constructivist, mastery, nontraditional approaches to learning. Some focus on STEM. Others on the arts and humanities. In the high school, there are no locks on the lockers. Students elect a government and solve issues in a forum. Courses are proposed and designed by students and teachers. The schools are part of the public system and staffed by experienced teachers. The schools do humor The Reformers by taking the tests, but Common Core and PARCC look ridiculous in this context. Oh, and there are long waiting lists.
LikeLike
As I have said many times, I think magnet programs are great. Allowing students to choose a program gives the programs the freedom to be different, so they can mirror the individuality of each student.
The fact that there are long waiting lists suggest that these programs should be expanded. Are there efforts currently underway to furnish the additional seats? Would these programs need to be doubled in size?
LikeLike
I don’t even know what’s “innovative” about charter schools. I read the President’s proclamation for charter schools week and he directs us all to adopt the methods of charter schools:
“And those that are successful can provide effective approaches for the broader public education system.”
The President is apparently unaware of any “innovative” approaches in public schools. For example, we’ve had a public program in this town for the last 40 years where we identify and congratulate kids who are accepted to college, and many of them of them are first generation college students. The US Department of Education apparently believes this idea was created in charter schools, last year.
What “approach” is my school supposed to adopt? Walking in a straight line down the hall? Weeks and weeks of test prep, like Success Academy? Constant staff turnover and lower wages for teachers? No transparency for the disbursement of public funds, and management by a private, appointed board?
No thanks. Maybe we’ll look at successful public schools and follow their lead.
LikeLike
Perhaps your local traditional school could become a language immersion school or a progressive school. Maybe a Waldorf school.
LikeLike
The Reformers are also mis-applying market principles. No sane CEO would roll out an untested product or service nationwide or their title would soon be ex-CEO. Stack ranking is falling out of favor because it inhibits collaboration and innovation plus encourages gaming and short-termed focus. In business, the dehumanizing Quants have gained the upper hand by taking advantage of the Great Recession. More organic, flexible, and decentralized management approaches are down, but not out. Many big companies in the U.S. are holding market share by law – Amazon by tax exemption is a good example. The harsh reforms they are imposing on education are not credible. The stale management ideas, like those of Taylor and the Gilbreths, are nonsensical when applied to teaching, if they even truly work anywhere long term.
LikeLike
None of it hangs together for me. It’s incoherent. They want schools to compete, but they’re constantly directing public schools to “collaborate” with charters, at the same time they’re planning “90% charters”.
They want less of a focus on standardized testing, but every single reform is wholly dependent on standardized testing.
They want better-trained teachers,, yet they hand out huge government subsidies to TFA, a 6 week program.
Charters were sold as “local” and “specialized” and “innovative” but they have national management organizations and they constantly use the phrases “replicable” and “scale up” and “economies of scale”.
It’s chaos. Every single ed reformer in the political coalition gets every single item on their wishlist, and ALL of that is dumped on public schools, at the same time.
The only people who don’t have any say in all this are those at public schools, which is pretty amazing, because they are the vast majority of people affected by ed reforms. That’s crazy. It makes no sense.
LikeLike
Of course it is incoherent… THAT is the plan. Cognitive science and the profession that USES it to enable and facilitate learning in the emergent brain, is COMPLEX. They count on this to bamboozle the public,http://www.opednews.com/articles/BAMBOOZLE-THEM-where-tea-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-110524-511.html and then they can offer the Magic Elixir http://www.opednews.com/articles/Magic-Elixir-No-Evidence-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-130312-433.html in the guise of CHOICE.
I think that Paul Krugman hit the nail on the head, when he explained how these mendacious politicians spread misinformation and invent failure so they can achieve their goals.http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/05/opinion/krugman-inventing-a-failure.html#story-continues-3
He uses the health ‘controversy’ but he could just as well have used climate change:
“.. the constant harping on alleged failure works as innuendo even if each individual claim collapses in the face of evidence. A recent poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that a majority of Americans know that more than eight million people enrolled in health exchanges; but it also found a majority of respondents believing that this was below expectations, and that the law was working badly.
“So Republicans are spreading disinformation about health reform because it works, and because they can — there is no sign that they pay any political price when their accusations are proved false.
“And that observation should scare you. What happens to the Congressional Budget Office if a party that has learned that lying about numbers works takes full control of Congress? What happens if it regains the White House, too? Nothing good, that’s for sure.’
Have you ever read “Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them?” by Al Franken. I listened to the audio version on a road trip, and realized that his was written long before Glenn Beck and Fox became the purveyors of lies. I am reading his book “Truth;” Franken and a Harvard team did the investigation of the facts he presents… this is no comedy routine, or political rhetoric. It makes me cry not laugh, for what we have lost,
When I write my first piece for my ‘SPEAKING AS A TEACHER” series at Oped, and here at WordPress, it will be about the mendacity that is overwhelming as stressed citizenry. When 80 to 90% of the people know something, but the powers that run the show ignore them, and the checks and balances are gone, then we have lost our country.
Those of us who fight for education are fighting for the crucial core of democracy.
LikeLike
Agreed-“No sane CEO would roll out untested products.” The tech world does it all of the time.
CEO’s aren’t judged by their performance. Their tenure and pay is based on their cozy relationships with their boards. G.E.’s CEO, hand-picked by Jack Welch, is an example.
LikeLike
Humane values, such as thinking, and “the market” are polar opposites. To paraphrase Rose, in The African Queen, “The market, Mr. Allnut, is what we are put in this world to rise above.”
I am not a teacher, but a child, grandchild and great grandchild of generations of teachers, and I wish I could sign this letter.
LikeLike
Could you elaborate on the incompatibilities you find between humane values and “the market”? My own view is that a decentralized market is one way that humans use to cooperate with each other, one that respects our individuality. I am curious about how you can reach such a different conclusion from mine.
LikeLike
You need to define what you think is meant by the term “the market” and what you mean by the term “decentralized market.” You can’t possibly have a productive discussion unless all parties agree on what is being discussed.
LikeLike
Indeed, that is why I asked. I take a market to be a place where individuals get together to make mutually advantages exchanges. I am interested in what other mean by this as I have gotten into trouble by thinking that folks used the term “public good” to mean what economists mean by “public good”.
Do you have any incite into what Harold means by “the market” and why it would be the polar opposite of humane values? Perhaps he means that transactions should not be mutually advantages, but should harm one side of the transaction to the advantage of the other side.
LikeLike
How do I sign this letter? I am a retired teacher.
LikeLike
I posted a link to this important statement by the consortium with the comment below
.http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Teachers-of-Conscience-Pos-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Conscience_Education_Freedom_Ideals-140507-324.html#comment487569
This is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH and it is crucial that it be shared, so pass it on because:
The narrative created by those who profit from destroying the public schools must END, because the institution of education ensures the road to opportunity and the intent of the Constitution to “promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity..”
This country needs and informed and skilled citizenry, and they are ending this!
It is not just the corporations that will profit if they can convince the public that charters schools and vouchers are real choice. It is the 1//10 of 1% the oligarchs who can only end democracy as we know it, by distorting history in the schools, and creating a public too ignorant to know that democracy depends on shared knowledge. The propaganda war they wage on television distorts reality and confuses Americans.
Paul Krugman http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/05/opinion/krugman-inventing-a-failure.html#story-continues-3 says: “…the constant harping on alleged failure works as innuendo even if each individual claim collapses in the face of evidence. A recent poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that a majority of Americans know that more than eight million people enrolled in health exchanges; but it also found a majority of respondents believing that this was below expectations, and that the law was working badly.
“So Republicans are spreading disinformation about health reform because it works, and because they can — there is no sign that they pay any political price when their accusations are proved false.
“And that observation should scare you. What happens to the Congressional Budget Office if a party that has learned that lying about numbers works takes full control of Congress? What happens if it regains the White House, too? Nothing good, that’s for sure.”
LikeLike
eachingeconomist
May 7, 2014 at 11:32 am
I am not sure why you say that magnet schools “don’t replace” public schools. They certainly do replace traditional zoned public schools. If all schools in a district are magnet programs, wouldn’t that mean there are no traditional zoned public schools? If some schools in the district are magnet schools, doesn’t that cherry pick students away from the traditional schools? Doesn’t it destroy neighborhood cohesion?
No. You couldn’t have a limited admission magnet school unless there was a public school system behind it. I still think you’re focusing on “a school” rather than “a system”.
Ed reformers are going to have to recognize that it doesn’t matter what they call it, public schools are a A SYSTEM.
How do magnet schools and charter schools operate within the public schools system?
They operate completely differently within the system, and again, it will BE a system. They can get rid of the dreaded “status quo” with the now-unfashionable neighborhood schools, but they are just then creating a NEW system, and that system will have shortcomings, too.
I don’t think you or they can continue to deny that what we’re doing here is creating a different publicly-funded school system. Charter schools don’t operate alone. Every single thing they do affects the entire system.
LikeLike
Chiara,
For my first point, I was referring to magnet programs in general, not just limited enrollment magnet schools. Consider MathVale’s comment https://dianeravitch.net/2014/05/07/teachers-of-conscience-speak-out-against-market-based-reforms/comment-page-1/#comment-1408324). The poster discusses magnet programs co-located in traditional neighborhood schools and closes by pointing out that “..there are long waiting lists.” Presumably the local school district is going to expand those programs in response to local desires by providing more classrooms, more teachers, and in general more funding. Those classrooms, those teachers, that funding will come from the traditional zoned schools that are losing students to the magnet programs.
Public schools are a system that can work at an amazing variety of scales. The largest public school district in the country (NYC) had 981,690 students (somewhat dated figure). The smallest public school district in my state has a little over 200 students (smaller for school districts that do not include a high school). The school “system” can be very small and still operate reasonably efficiently.
LikeLike
I worked for 8 years in a NYC Magnet school. Our students came from across the city, but 50% came from the neighborhood. The waiting list ws long, by the second year when my students rose to the top of citywide reading tests, and in the 8th year were 10th in the state on the new writing exams (ELA).
The reason for the success lay in the fact that we, the teachers, knew every single child. We met and planned the lessons so that together we ensured reading and writing BEST PRACTCE in every classroom. We identified kids who needed help, and worked together to ensure progress. Calling parents and involving them was part of this, and possible because we did not have a huge population. Class size matters! Middle school kids range from 12 to 14 years, and they need the connection to adults who they can trust. Teachers who connect with kids make the difference in their attitude to school and to DOING WORK. Our courses were not dumbed down. Hard work an accountable talk was the mantra, and because we knew every child, we could really affect outcomes with our participation beyond the classroom.
Little things like seeing Johnny in the halls after classes had begun,
“Hey John, having a problem getting to class?” says a friendly teacher who not only teaches the the child English language, but teaches the acting and art elective. IT WAS A COMMUNITY and THAT is why a small school works for that age group.
of course, our school got bigger and bigger. My classes went from 22 to 38, and eventually the little school was moved to a bigger facility and is now a big intermediate school. All the teachers who made it work are gone, the curricula is gone, and I am gone, despite the fact that my curricula brought the National Standards to the district, because it was unique an wildly successful… it is not GONE, and so am I… charged with incompetence, harassed into retirement… my reward at the end of a stellar career.
This is not about magnet schools, about teaching or learning.
It is about POWER and the dismantling of public education by those who have the money and the means to disrupt what works!
LikeLike
Did the long waiting list for you school encourage the school board to provide more opportunities for students to get the kind of education that your magnet school provided? Was there any concern that pulling the students from other neighborhoods would hurt the eduction of those students that stayed behind in those other neighborhoods or destroy the communities?
LikeLike