Many bloggers have commented on the pretentiousness and vacuousness of the gaggle of politicians, entrepreneurs, and hedge funders who have gathered in the Adirondacks of New York and audaciously dubbed themselves the “thought leaders” of our time. They called their meeting “Camp Philos,” to claim association with such intellectual giants as Ralph Waldo Emerson. Their goal, they said, was to discuss “education reform,” but it is now generally understood that this term refers to the privatization and monetization of public education. They no doubt spoke of getting the nation’s children workforce-ready, prepared for global competition, primed to ace the next round of standardized tests.
What would Ralph Waldo Emerson say? Would he write about the convergence of crass values, of minds trained for profit making, of souls so devoid of ideals that they confuse commerce with philosophy?
Of everything I have read, whether humorous or serious yet, the best is the musings of a teacher named Patrick Walsh who writes the RagingHorse blog. I can give you but a sample of his critique of this circus of self-celebration and vulgar commercialism.
He writes:
“Needless to say, anyone who can convince themselves that they could place the words “Philosopher’s Camp “ before the words, “education reform” in the same breath they are comparing themselves with the likes of Ralph Waldo Emerson is well nigh in need of a good teacher, a course in philosophy 101, or at the very least, a dictionary.
“On the other hand the event – which achieves a kind of horrible sublimity in its sheer vulgarity — is perfectly consistent with the tactics of the long stealth campaign to privatize the school system that built America. Of the privatizers many repugnant tactics, none is more more consistent, intrinsic nor effective than the conscious manipulation of language and images. In the way does a half assed experiment, hatched up in secret by shills and testing companies and financed by a billionaire come to be known as the miraculous Common Core State Standards, the are the answer to all that ills us, the solution to all problems. In this way does the almost Biblical struggle for Civil Rights come to be employed by the privatizer’s public relations department, as a tool to strip teachers of the right to due process and undermine unions. In this way does the word “philosophy”, one of the most transcendent and spiritually charged words in any language, come to be used in Lake Placid, as a fig leaf for yet the latest episode in most rapacious campaign against a public system in American history. The privatizers know little or nothing of education but they do know, as Orwell knew ( see “Politics and the English Language” ) that those who control the language control reality.
“Cuomo, coming off orchestrating what is surely the most egregiously unfair education law in the history of New York state, is the “honorary chairman” of the philosophical retreat. It troubles the philosophical Chairman Governor not at all that no educator was invited to Camp Philos, nor even that those who attempted to attend were summarily rejected, one and all.
“Still, even as I find the privatizers among the most cynical, ignorant and narcissistic people on the face of the earth, I must admit there is one place in which I agree with them, even as I radically disagree with their methods and ends.”
Walsh agrees that American education has failed in its duty to teach generations of students to appreciate the meaning of philosophy.
He writes:
“I would define the failure as philosophical in both nature and cause. Allow me to elaborate. Education is, in its essence, a philosophical endeavor. Yes, of course we need to insure that our citizens acquire enough practical skills so that they can navigate the always unknown road ahead. Yes, of course, it means that schools must do all they can to insure our students have the requisite skills to gain employment in an ever more frighteningly competitive world in which jobs are now routinely “out-sourced” or mechanized out of existence altogether. That said, education is not job training. Job training is a wonderful thing and a necessity but education serves a much larger, deeper, and more vital role, and that is where the philosophical element, directly or indirectly, enters into the picture.
“Accordingly, in the front and center of our education system should be some variations of the following questions:
“What, as a society, do we value ?
What kind of a people are we ?
What do we really believe in ?
Do we live our beliefs ?
What kind of citizens do we wish to produce ?
What does it mean to be educated ?
What, if anything, are our responsibilities to each other ?
How are we to live together ?
“Were it within my power to do so, I would immediately and unapologetically do all I could do to introduce the study of philosophy on some level beginning in the third grade, the age of my daughter as of this writing. And I would make it an essential part of the curriculum in every grade until high school graduation. Implicit with this undertaking would be the understanding that some may not grasp the meaning of the study for years if at all but all would benefit from the exposure.
“Children would begin with a study of the word: “philo,” which means “love. “Sophia,” which means “wisdom.” Let them spend a week, a month, a year — whatever it takes – discussing and attempting to grasp those two words alone and the concept of those together, and you cannot help but have a child with an imagination larger because it is more unleashed than before. Help a child understand that this thing called “wisdom” exists and is real and has been honored and revered by the civilized since the beginning of civilization, that it has nothing to do with the accumulation of material wealth, nothing to do with power over others, nothing to do with competition or control, and you have opened the portals of the mind. And you have done something else: you have given a child a way of seeing that affords he or she some mode of mental protection against a corporate assault that, for many, begins at the moment of consciousness. Worse, the assault is designed to wed that struggling to be formed identity with a product, now and forevermore.”
He writes:
“The study of philosophy would not merely make our children “college and career ready” ( whatever those weasel words actually mean), it would help them to understand this mystery called Life in all of its paradoxical, tragic and wondrous nature.
“We now live in a nation where most citizens seem to believe that the word “philosophy” is synonymous with “opinion.” We have all heard vulgar examples in statements such as “My philosophy is to hit a guy before he hits you” or some such foolishness. It is, I would argue, the absence of philosophical knowledge that has contributed to much of America’s horrible and dangerous confusion of technology with science, data with knowledge and knowledge with wisdom. Most of all has led to the groutesques idea that knowedge is power rather than liberation from the need for power.
“This is worse than sad.. No decent society, never mind democracy, can exist in this kind of mass confusion.
And, yes, many of these same people are products of the public school system and yes, that school system failed them. And it continues to fail them.
“When I have asked my students why they go to school and why they study, overwhelmingly they reply with some variation of “ to do well on the test.” This is sick but it is hardly an accident. But why should they think differently? It is, however, a crime. It is the crime of starving the imaginations of millions of children by sheer neglect. And it is a crime that the miraculous Common Core will not only not correct but will, in fact, perpetuate.
“I do not believe in magical thinking. (I leave that for the proponents of the Common Core) I am well aware that the study of philosophy will not automatically and magically open the doors of the imagination. Pre-Nazi Germany had the most rigorous school curriculum but it did little to stop millions from embracing Hitler. Something more is needed. That said, I know this: the absence of something as immense as philosophy can only diminish this nation. As I see it, the problem is ecological. By this I mean if you deprive a child of philosophical awareness you do not get child minus philosophy. You get someone radically different and radically weaker. You get a person whose imagination, the key to all, has been severely diminished.
“The purpose of education is not to be found in the vulgar slogan, “knowledge is power” but the absence of philosophy is one reason why that slogan is so readily swallowed in our increasingly competitive, miserable, punitive land. As philosophers and artists and spiritual geniuses have known for thousands of years, education is the emacipation of the human imagination. The purpose of education is freedom.”
I will not lift all the words of this brilliant blog. I want you to open the link and read it all yourself. These are not the words of a college professor or an eminent theologian, but a classroom teacher in one of the toughest neighborhoods of New York City.
Patrick Walsh is a teacher. He can pass the tests the politicians mandate. Can we say the same of the politicians whose forte is self-promotion?

Exactly.
LikeLike
Wonderful.
The French, BTW, long ago placed philosophy at the center of their curricula. Their qualifying exams for entrance to university are open-ended essay exams that require students to demonstrate critical thought and wide-ranging familiarity with subject matter but that do not expect that every person sitting for the exam will have precisely the same training and show precisely the same skill set. And the scoring of those exams–by human readers–leans heavily on how much KNOWLEDGE the candidate demonstrates.
In sharp contrast, our exams are primarily
invariant
bubble tests
of abstractly formulated skills
No ability to think deeply, or philosophically, required. Just lots of training in test taking.
LikeLike
What a fantastic letter! The spirit and wisdom of Robert Maynard Hutchins lives on!
Frankly, the best way to teach “critical thinking” is to learn philosophy, for only through the painful, frustrating,and beautiful effort to “love wisdom” can anyone really hope to cultivate an open mind, an open heart, a keen attention to detail, an understanding of one’s limits, all of which are at the heart of “critical thinking”.
Critical thinking can’t be taught directly like arithmetic or the names of the state capitals; it can’t be tested like spelling. Critical thinking is really a combination of intellectual traits and attitudes that include those I mentioned above a still more. But these are developed indirectly by reading great literature, both fiction and non-fiction, and discussing the ideas in those works and how those ideas are expressed by their authors.
Modern thinking, with its obsession on “technique” and “efficiency”, can’t grasp that sort of truth. Instead, modern thinkers believe that actitivies built on the concept of efficiency through the maximization of monetary profit, are the true solutions to all problems and goals. The ideas are antithetical to democracy and humanity. The only way we can really stop this is to recognize this tectonic shift in our society and stop catering to these insane ideas. We have to start questioning and fighting the very foundations of our technique-driven culture. Returning to the Great Books and the ideas of classical education is an excellent start.
LikeLike
The best way to examine technique and efficiency is to play a musical instrument reading music. And doing so will inevitably lead a person to consider philosophical notions. More music, less testing!,
LikeLike
More music, less testing!
Yes, and add in a healthy does of the visual and other performing arts, too!
LikeLike
The way to examine proficiency and”critical thinking” might be to play a musical instrument WITHOUT reading music. More creativity, less testing!
LikeLike
It is common place for proponents of “proper education” to require teachers and others to specify what students should know and be able to do. These specifications are ,of course, designed to by-pass the need to ask: who says so, why, toward what ends-in-view and other questions of the kind offered in this post.
USDE wants proposals to state “a theory of action,” a version of full steam ahead without even a hint of reasoning about the larger questions.
In K-12 education, there have been excursions into teaching philosophy and the ability of children to engage in philosophical thinking via the frame of big questions or big ideas and programs based on Socratic dialogue. Needless to say, these have not taken root.
I think it is also true that studies in philosophy have been a casualty in the quest for greater inclusion of traditions of thinking and belief outside of the narrative associated with Western/European philosophy.
My own education as a teacher, about mid-century last included coursework in the history and philosophy of education. As an academic, I also taught such courses to prospective teachers of art. They grasped the importance of the conversations only because several of the major traditions of thought were connected to the diverse forms schooling in that era. They were also required to construct and perform a satire that illustrated the prospects for any philosophical position to become an ideology –a ridiculous straight jacket.
LikeLike
This reminds me somewhat of the recent Atlantic article on “Teaching Plato to Plumbers”:
http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/04/plato-to-plumbers/361373/
LikeLike
Hee, hee.
LikeLike
Reading Patrick’s suggestion about his 3rd grade daughter reminds me of something I read perhaps half a century ago. The late Clifton Fadiman argued that the principles of philosophy should be introduced by 2nd grade. Certainly students are capable of grasping basic concepts, and beginning to realize issues of conflicting thoughts, underlying principles, organization of ideas and information.
It is also worth remembering that psychology, of which one can argue that education is either a sub- or super- set, is categorized under the Dewey Decimal System as a subset of Philosophy.
LikeLike
Kids have always talked about philosophic issues, just in their own terms and on their own level. Of course, I must admit that before reading this post by Patrick Walsh and your response, I can’t see myself voicing this particular thought. Thank you. You make me think.
LikeLike
I love this voice, as I do Peter Green’s and Bob Shepherd’s. I am so glad to be reading such voices. I put it up at Oped:
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/A-Teacher-s-Thoughts-Inspi-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Children_Competition_Education_Goal-140507-201.html#comment487582
Of course. I have no illusions about changing the discourse there so that it looks at the effect on democracy of the demise of education in the same way it looks at the NSA, and other ‘sexy’ subjects. But I do get hundreds of views (160,000 at the moment) so maybe the general public that reads at this site, is getting some insight into the dominate narrative. It would be great if some of the teachers here, at least add some comments to my link there, so the publisher will get the message that if he is as concerned with TRUTH, as his mission statement describes, then the dominant narrative being disseminated by the Billionaire’s Club and their spokesmen like Duncan and Rhee, needs to be silenced.
The voice of the teacher needs to tell this tail, and we were silenced. We need to speak to the people, not merely among ourselves.
Sigh.
LikeLike
In this age of inventions and technical solutions I’ve always believed that our problems are moral not technical. People and humanity make poor choices, either based on bad beliefs/axioms, or having right beliefs but hypocritical practices. Our problems and dilemmas are based on not using the current information and truths we have in a wise way. The problem is not technical (the need for more information or the invention of the next/newest App), but moral (the failure of correct actions based on current knowledge).
Do students need more ed-tech, so that they will learn better, or are prior technologies (ex. books, pen and paper) sufficient, but the problem is student motivation and will, not the need for better ed-tech?
Philosophy should be a required class, for maybe students would find out the Naziism is a logical consequence (at least in theory) to evolutionary sociobiology. Either people are made in God’s image and have equal rights, privileges and responsibilities, or they are just highly evolved animals, that can become property of the State, or subgroups have the “right” to seek the economic (and therefore practical) extinction of “less fit” entities. If resource acquisition is all that matters to atheists and materialists, then the practice of corporate “might makes right” is inevitable and “desired”. The Bible never lets one lose their rights and property, just for the greater “good” of some supposed economic gain; “those that encroach on the field of the poor and move ancient boundary stones show contempt for their Maker”!!!
LikeLike
Holy cow! I almost choked on my rice and beans! What passionate and clarity. As a former teacher and Texan, my fear is the cancer of corporate involvement and takeover will be the death of education in my state as well. More parrots and fewer eagles. God help us…
LikeLike
Beautiful!!! Our town once had science coordinators who taught critical thinking. Both got their doctorates and went on to collegiate teaching. They had students perform an experiment and then asked them what THEY saw, the essence of science. Our school board could not wait to get rid of them and get back to text book teaching. Ignorance rushing in where angels would fear to tread.
LikeLike
Been following Mr. Walsh since the days of his Washington Post pieces.
So glad he continues his thoughtful articulation of these issues. I teach a Philosophy class in my inner city high school and it is extraordinarily gratifying as it often is electrifying. The class is always oversubscribed. Kids clamor for this sort of meaningful experience and dialogue where they interpret ideas through the prism of their own experience without a higher authority TELLING them what is the right answer.
It is ALWAYS trial and error (all throughout life), and the joy they experience in their own exploration of how their inner self comes to “understand” the world around them is a powerful human experience. When kids are placed in school situations where they can investigate “meaning” and “values” and societal definitions, then EVERY subject they take can be a mind-blowing experience. Asking WHAT and HOW and WHY is the true purpose of education and often, the answer is what they discover, not a correct bubble response.
Why aren’t there more Philosophy classes nationwide? Why is it usually only privileged kids are offered such courses and opportunities?
Well, we all know why.
I guarantee you this subject will not be discussed at Camp Philos.
A man of Mr. Walsh’s intelligence and insight would not be welcome in that “education” environment that only a Kafka could understand–and weep over.
LikeLike
Geronimo, I think that Patrick Walsh is not the same asPatrick Welsh.
LikeLike
Noted!
LikeLike
This piece is fantastic.
LikeLike
Alan, YES!
LikeLike
This article stokes fire and makes me want to build a protest sign and have it ready. It will read: “They took OUR houses and OUR retirement now they want OUR children. Keep Wall Street out of OUR public schools.”
Ownership of other human beings and their futures is how this situation can be distilled. Owning the minds of youth and their teachers, controlling every drip of intellect and imagination available to be poured out and sponged up. There is nothing wrong with oversight but we are so far off from presenting students subject matter in a healthy way, mindful of developmental readiness and minimization of fear-induced performance that it is very disturbing. It is no longer a joy to teach to find ways to inspire, to go beyond your limitations and stretch yourself to meet every child in the class. The teaching profession is being usurped as are the impressionable minds of the students. For what? To become a loyal Apple customer someday? It’s akin to Coke machines and Pizza hut in school. Teaching children to be walking barcodes? But I digress.
Every time I pass a water “reclamation” center near my local monstrosity of a dam, I scoff at the implied meaning. The water never belonged to humans to begin with, but as commerce and population increases, it becomes usurped, now it’s an economic asset. The new owners divert and measure out the flow of funds to the Cronies, first watering their bright green golf courses of vast “philos” and assume by some measure of junk science that the fertilizer and herbicide-laden [conditional] monies somehow trickle down to our nation’s children and their teachers, the true authors of their education. I’d like to dwell on this metaphor because there is something truly abusive about this practice in education. The more controlled the teachers and children are the more they are owned by the administration. This practice is not sustainable and frankly inhumane.
LikeLike
I like very much the call of Mr. Walsh for philosophy in the schools, for reexamination of basic ideas for the purpose of freedom [of the mind].
Let me propose a question, therefore: “Is democracy a means to an end or an end in itself?” If a means, what is the end?
LikeLike