The Peabody School Committee unanimously passed a resolution calling for an investigation of whether State Commissioner Mitchell Chester has a conflict of interest as national chairman of the PARCC governing board.
Some people in the Bay State are still angry that school officials dropped the state’s successful standards and assessments in exchange for $75 million in Race to the Top funding. Some wondered why RTTT didn’t adopt Massachusetts as the national model.
The article says:
“Committee member Dave McGeney, an outspoken critic of Common Core, believes there is a major conflict and Chester should be booted out of office. He said he’s had it with Chester, who’s been “utterly” disingenuous during the rollout of the new Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) trial test, and who, in fact, has a vested interest in Massachusetts jumping aboard the Common Core bandwagon. McGeney also says there’s no evidence to back up many of Chester’s statements on the benefits of PARCC.
“Chester is the national chairman of the PARCC Governing Board for the third year and was instrumental in developing the standards.
“He’s been running around the state portraying the PARCC test as a two-year trial, and there’s all kinds of literature with his name attached to it and statements that it’s a trial … but his actions belie that,” McGeney told The Salem News prior to Tuesday’s committee vote.
McGeney said what “pushed him over the edge” was when he learned Chester was due to speak to executives in Washington, D.C., on “how to handle Common Core dissenters,” according to McGeney. “That’s what we are now; we’re labeled as ‘dissenters,’” he said. “The deck is stacked, the game is rigged, and I don’t like it. We have the least to gain and the most to lose.
“When we took the Race to the Top money … the federal government said, ‘We’ll give you this money, and you have to agree to adopt the Common Core standards’” McGeney said. “The standards hadn’t been written yet. It’s the same deal as Obamacare. We signed on to the deal and didn’t even know what it was.”
“The committee unanimously agreed on Tuesday to send a letter to Gov. Deval Patrick and other officials that says that the MCAS has led to “unprecedented improvement in student achievement in Massachusetts” since 1993, and to consider abandoning it in favor of a still “unproven and theoretical” test that may hold promise is a “monumental decision” that “demands objectivity, fairness and the impartial scrutiny of empirical data to determine the outcome.
“We believe that Mitchell Chester, by virtue of his role as National Chair of the PARCC Governing Board and other actions, represents a serious breach of trust, which is at odds with his primary duties and responsibilities, and at the very least gives the impression of bias towards PARCC and compromises the decision-making process,” the letter reads.
“There are some very intelligent people who think it’s (Common Core) great, and there are some very intelligent people who think it’s going to be lousy, but there are 90 percent of the people who don’t have a clue,” McGeney said.”

And since the standards in Mass are so successful, why weren’t they used as a model for the national standards?
Mass – remember – if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
LikeLike
Bravo to you people of Peabody! So when is this going to occur in Connecticut? When the commissioner, Stefan Pryor, is a founder of a charter group (Achievement First) to whom he has attempted to hand some schools over to, is connected to the lobbying group that cheerleads for them (ConnCAN), and has been shown via emails and the stonewalling of FOI filings to reveal more of those emails to have been in collusion with private groups outside of the legal process, it’s time for the AG to have a look. Unfortunately, our AG, Jepson, is in cahoots with these criminals.
LikeLike
He should be put in prison.
LikeLike
Agree! PRISON…
LikeLike
Put all of the guilty commissioners in prison and call it the CommonCAN!
LikeLike
Similar to other criminal acts by the 1% that have been documented in recent years.
LikeLike
Big conflict of interest!
LikeLike
Actually, the MCAS is a piece of dreck, foisted off as a great success because the teacher corps of Massachusetts was sound to begin with, and the education system worked overall. It was passed and praised because corrupt cronies at Pioneer Institute and Mass Insight paid off legislators, suborned public officials, and corrupted reporters. In short, Massachusetts wrote the playbook for the school accountability hoax.
The chickens that came home to roost were hatched by Chester’s former backers, who are now surprised that it’s not them, but Bill Gates who is going to have their cake, and eat it too.
End PARCC, end MCAS, and free our schools from the whole pack of infighting racketeers.
LikeLike
Yes! Exactly, thank you. I hate it when massachusetts gets so much education love when it’s really not doing anything much differently (or great for that matter). And yes, I happen to live in massachusetts…
LikeLike
Mass must have been doing something right before CC and PARCC to have been the leader in positive student outcomes and national test scores no? I’m pretty sure the facts speak for themselves. Why hate on Mass and not want to emulate that success?
LikeLike
Mike, I am “their” success, such as it is. I’ve taught chemistry in a Massachusetts Title I public high school for the past 18 years. I’m actually very good at it, and younger teachers (thank God) are indeed emulating many of the things I’ve learned over the years. So, here I am under continuous attack, and yet you want to emulate the MCAS hoax?
At first I was okay with the “standards and accountability” initiative because I thought they would finally give attention and resources to the wonderful kids in front of me every day. They abolished the general ed courses, and let me teach college prep chemistry to all comers. I was theirs to lose. They lost me, big time.
They pushed our MCAS “score supressor” students out of school against their will to leverage the MCAS scores. My girls came to me in tears to turn in their textbooks. Tens of thousands, as it turns out, all across the state, disappeared from the rosters. Corporate reformers are cheats, liars, frauds, racketeers.
We’ve been fighting daily battles against their data-driven boondoggles ever since, for a decade, while we’ve steadfastly delivered that world class education to a generation of Massachusetts children.
The teacher corps, as everywhere, continues to teach under a continuous assault by the very people who take credit for our work.
LikeLike
I should have been more clear about my position. If the state is going to mandate a test I would rather see MCAS over PARCC. I’ve administered MCAS and sat in on all the test prep in full inclusion classrooms and it’s no walk in the park for average students but boarder line abusive for SPED students even with accommodations. If we could get rid of all high stakes testing in MASS I’m all for it but knowing the pilitics of our state I doubt we will ever see that. Personally I’ve opted my kids out of testing and will do so until about 8th grade if MCAS stays so they can practice for 10th grade in order to get a diploma. Where I think we have done well is with the curriculum and as you say out teaching staff. Again, I take the Mass Framworks over Common Core as I understand we need some state standards but they must be state led and developed by local educators not Washington think tanks and their friends in corporate America backed by RTTT funds from the US DOE. Having worked in public schools I do recognize the stress the Framworks can create but I’m quite sure they will allow for more freedom for teachers than this current reform will allow for. The PARCC is MCAS on steroids and as you know most will be forced to teach to the test. So for now stick with MCAS and the MASS Framworks or improve on them but let’s not continue to buy into this mess that is CC and PARCC.
LikeLike
Wasn’t it about a dozen years ago that MA seriously focused on preschool accessibility and early child care? I have often thought that that was part of the reason for favorable results in recent years, as the kids have grown to high school age.
LikeLike
Yes, I agree that MCAS is not very good. After my daughter’s last one I was only able to see some of the test. Most of the problems that she lost points on are unreleased. This means that I can’t see what she did wrong so that I can help her to learn. The same goes for her teacher. She can’t see the problems or my daughter’s work either. Who is benefitting from this? Hint: not my daughter- or her teachers.
One of the worst things about PARCC is that we won’t get to see ANY of it. PARCC is a step backwards.
And I agree that Chester needs to go.
LikeLike
“PARCC is a step backwards.”
That may be but it is also CCRAP spelled backwards.
LikeLike
Ahhh, so this is the origin of testing fever. Well, whatever it started as, it has morphed into a vicious beast which threatens to devour our children. Assess-zilla
LikeLike
agreed
LikeLike
Love this guy and his fellow committee members! At least there are a few committees and elected officials standing up for our kids, parental rights and local control of education!
LikeLike
I love ’em too, mikewatson, but keep your eyes wide on the local control angle. I suspect they’ve been getting some big-league encouragement. It’s everywhere; I turn over at night, and find Heartland and Pioneer curled up on either side of me. Poor big things need allies.
There are some non-local powers moving into position for a confrontation between the original education privatizers and the empire of Gates, Murdoch, Pearson and Broad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjxBClx01jc
LikeLike
I have no problem with Pioneer and think they do good work. Not everyone will agree with all of their positions depending on ones politics but both Dems and Republicans on the Hill use them for research and cite their white papers very often. I’m glad we have a few different views in the state to keep everyone on their toes.
LikeLike
You have to drag the red dot back to the beginning.
LikeLike
Mike, I don’t think the people at Pioneer Institute meant to close our public schools and hand our children over to corporations under force of law, but they pioneered every corrupt mechanism the Gates/Pearson cabal has now used to freeze them out of the end game.
When they ruled this Commonwealth’s public education, and set out systematically privatize it. They sent their own people to New Schools Venture Fund, and built the public-to-private tax-money transfer machine. They put this woman in charge of their data-driven accountability machine, which used MCAS to systematically strip every low income community in the state of any democratic control of its public schools:
“Maura O. Banta is IBM’s East Coast Regional Manager for Corporate Citizenship and Corporate Affairs. She joined IBM in 1973 as a marketing representative and held positions in Sales, Insurance Industry Consulting and Marketing Management before joining the External Programs Department in 1989.”
Pioneer institute actually built the machine here in this state. I dearly wish I could actually talk to them, because I think some of them might be sorry now they did that. The libertarians who gleefully aligned with corporate racketeers against “government schools” now find they were played themselves. They’re nostalgic for democracy, and suddenly remember what “Commonwealth” means.
If they want to make it right, they have to come all the way out and examine their own role.
LikeLike
Let’s see if we can get you an answer. I’ll ask Jamie Gass and get back to you.
LikeLike
Give it a try, Mike.
LikeLike
Joe Klein (NYC) and Chris Cerf(NJ) former chancellor and commissioner now work for Rupert Murdoch at Amplify an education consulting firm. In other words put in places misguided policies and initiatives and the go make tons of cash. The people should be thrown in jail.
LikeLike
Agree 100%. Why would any parent allow Joel Klein and Rupert Murdoch to control classroom instruction via their bogus for-sale devices? Push back by registering concerns if local contracts are funneled to Amplify/Wireless Generation.
LikeLike
NJ already has millions of dollars in contracts with Amplify. What are you suggesting?
LikeLike
Billionaires will now actually just buy state lawmakers, directly:
“Charter school operators looking to open campuses in Texas may soon have new help making their case to the elected officials charged with overseeing their expansion into the state.
At its Austin meeting this week, the Texas State Board of Education is set to discuss whether to allow private foundations to pay for SBOE members to travel to out-of-state operators under review for approval in Texas.”
During the last application cycle, board members voted to deny one of the four charters recommended by the state’s education commissioner. That school, the Arizona-based Great Hearts Academy, is one of six out-of-state operators courted by Choose to Succeed, which aims to establish a minimum of 80,000 new seats in charter classrooms by 2026 — more than 20 percent of Bexar County’s public school population. Another out-of-state operator that Choose to Succeed hoped to bring to Texas, Rocketship Education, also failed to make it to the final application round last year.”
“But the arrangement drew criticism from Craig McDonald, the executive director of Texans for Public Justice, an Austin-based money-in-politics watchdog group. He said private funding should not pay for any part of a process used to evaluate whether entities should receive taxpayer money.
“There needs to be more independence in a fact-finding mission, and accepting private money to underwrite the travel threatens that,” he said.
The proposal also comes after complaints by some SBOE members about aggressive lobbying on behalf of charter operators during the most recent application process. At the time, Ruben Cortez, a Brownsville Democrat, reported that he had received phone calls from Gov. Rick Perry’s office asking why he was not voting in favor of certain applicants. ”
The plans for these charter are HUGE. 80,000 “seats”
Could Texas lose public education completely?
https://www.texastribune.org/2014/04/08/sboe-may-get-private-funds-see-out-state-charters/
LikeLike
Well wonked, Chiara. I have family and colleagues in Texas, though, and they are right there with you in the fight to uncover every gruesome detail of the collusion among lobbyists, the Texas State Board, bribed legislators, and Rick Perry.
I think that wind has shifted, too. Keep at it, you’re making headway!
LikeLike
Start by naming the names in Texas where the national disaster started.
Sandy Kress, Margaret Spellings, Beth Ann Bryan, and NY resident Larry Berger along with their cheerleader “business” flunky Bill Hammond. They have direct access to legislators, the corrupt UT Sytem and Gov. Perry with ZERO accountability. At the same time they cash-in on the “accountability-high stakes testing” propaganda – millions are funneled away from classrooms into contracts with percentages into their own bank accounts.
LikeLike
Well wonked
I love that expression
LikeLike
As politically rightist as well as influential as Texas tends to be, yes, they could lose public education, not only there but in the surrounding states of Louisiana, and Oklahoma. Louisiana already has a lot of charters and parents find their kids in overcrowded board run schools while the charters use up building space the publics need for a couple hundred kids
LikeLike
If the charters were forced to take serious numbers of special education students, they would shut down. That could be one of the best ways to resolve the problem. I am talking about kids who don’t do standardized testing and require small classes, alternate curricula, adapted facilities and extra assistance. A bonus would be that they also frequently have something the charters fear greatly, activist parents who know the law.
LikeLike
Yes, I just felt a distinct breeze out of Texas, Chiara. You got me interested, and I was scanning the Texas news coverage and tweeted out a couple of test resistance stories. The Texas Tribune turned around and followed me. To me, that indicates your wonkery is needed (and welcomed) to scaffold the rising popular resistance.
Texas peeps, the dam is about to break. I think that’s why the press is hungry to pick this story up, and y’all should go into hyperdrive on social media.
LikeLike
It’s a very good thing to see Superintendents starting to stand up to this stuff. And Massachusetts, of course, makes a solid claim to be the birthplace of a form of government conceived in liberty.
LikeLike
You out-of-staters need to appreciate how badly Mitchell Chester screwed up two weeks ago, when he came out on teevee mouthing support for an idiotic “study” Pearson pawns had released (at the Microsoft Research Center!). Please, please open the link and watch this side-splitting and career-killing video.
http://www.necn.com/03/24/14/Report-says-Mass-schools-are-not-prepari/landing_business.html?blockID=864205
“We’re going to sit down with a lot of people and talk about it, and listen to them,” said Dinger. “We’re going to prepare draft legislation, draft regulations, research as to what the governor can do.”
The race to become an education leader is on.”
And this little Dinger guy is on the video, explaining that MASS has to prepare students for jobs that don’t exist, except inside his fuzzy pink head. And then CHESTER IS ON THE VIDEO babbling along. You have to see it. He’s toast.
LikeLike
What’s the chief educational advisor to Person, Sir Michael Barber doing in Mass.? Follow the misadventures of Pearson’s Sandy Kress in Texas for the answer.
LikeLike
Reminds me of when school systems were bribed with lots of money to implement Abstinence Only in place of sex education during the Bush administration. Didn’t do a bit of good and kept a lot of kids from being properly educated.
LikeLike
Spellings INC. should have been toast 10 years ago. Watch the youtube video at the link below to hear her say “We were shooting in the dark when we designed NCLB because we didn’t have any data from anywhere . . . ” She can’t answer the question from a CPA who is also a school board trustee.
Start at the 53:00 mark to hear Spellings go off the rails. However, her body language registers her incompetence from the start.
Oh, I thought NCLB was “research-based! Ha!
LikeLike
Hopefully this Common Core support is falling apart in other states besides Louisiana where the dictator, Bobby Jindal (Remember that name so you won’t vote for him if he gets a spot on the Republican ticket in 2016) started out gung-ho supporting Common Core, but now opposes it, not because it is good or bad, but because the President supports it. Common Core has become nothing but a political tool and two important parishes–meaning that they have actual cities and are not primarily rural have lost 10% of their teachers this year. Those are East Baton Rouge and LaFayette. A guy who works for the Teacher Retirement office says they have been coming in in droves all year.
LikeLike
Not superintendents, Bob, the School Committee. We still do have some elected ones, though Boston’s has been appointed by the mayor for more than 20 years now.
The thing about Massachusetts is that a lot of the rheely bad rheeformy ideas got their start here. In 1995, John Silber was appointed state ed commissioner by William Weld, a patrician republican governor who view the office as a pastime. Silber had come north from (where else?) Texas and taken the helm as president of BU.
The headline of one report at that time was:”Educators prepare for Weld’s bitter tonic: John Silber”. Sibler had been president at Boston University beginning in 1971 in what the NYT described in his obit as a “volcanic” tenure. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/28/us/john-r-silber-who-led-boston-universitys-renaissance-dies-at-86.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
He alienated BU faculty to the extent that they attemped to unionize to protect themselves; a description of his treatment of Howard Zinn from Wikipedia explains “Silber was especially visible for confrontations with radical historian Howard Zinn. In one incident, Zinn arranged to take a sabbatical and teach in Paris, with Herbert Marcuse teaching at BU in the meantime. Silber vetoed the move. Silber also prevented Zinn from receiving pay raises and promotions over a number of years. In 1982, the AAUP intervened on Zinn’s behalf, eventually forcing Silber to compensate Zinn for back pay.” (Remember, too, that one of Mitch Daniels’ recent manoeuvers was to prevent Perdue University’s School of Ed from using Zinn’s book “A People’s History of the U.S.” and prevent “this material being taught to innocent school children” in all of Indiana.)
Sibler was instrumental in BU’s takeover of the Chelsea Public Schools in 1991, when this economically beleagured city just outside Boston was forced into receivership. BU was given great leeway in the running of the “reform” of the schools, yet its intervention – rigor, a longer school day, curtailment of teachers’ rights – was widely perceived as a failure for the low SES, ELL students in the district.
As Commissioner, Silber instituted a new exam for teachers seeking a state certificate. Prominent, and the target of wide-spread ridicule, was the requirement that would-be educators prove they were literate by transcribing a dictation from the Federalist Papers, No. 10. Points were deducted for failing to reproduce spelling and punctuation from the 1787 document, written by James Madison, which was replete with archaic sentence structures and 18th-century flourishes. One-third of the candidates “failed” this portion of the test. Many observers claimed a conflict of interest, as BU held an archive of the Federalist Papers and BU had a school of Ed, whose students presumably were trained in this requirement (like the NY schools which bought Pearson’s aligned curriculum).
In his heyday, Silber and his cronies at the Pioneer Institute were considered right-wing kooks. Jim Peyser, Silber’s successor as Ed Commissioner, left office to become a partner in New Schools Venture Fund. He’s since been on the board of directors for Achievement First, New Schools for New Orleans, Success Charter Network, and Uncommon Schools. He is also chairman of the board of the National Association of Charter School Authorizers (NACSA). He was succeeded by David Driscoll, now a board member for Teach Plus and chair of the Fordham Institute. Driscoll signed the MA “ed reform” act in 1993, which instituted the MCAS (modeled on Texas’ TAAS), ended principals’ rights to be members of a union and took from career licensed teachers their lifetime certification. Now teachers must be re-certified every 5 years, paying for PD or graduate courses to hold on to their licenses. Given these bloodlines, Chester’s antics are unsurprising.
Oh, and don’t forget the Harvard Graduate School of Ed and their unholy alliance with the B school.
Guess we were just unknowingly avante-garde here in MA! Apologies to all.
LikeLike
Here’s Harvard GSE sponsoring a chat between John King and Mitchell Chester on implementing the CCSS. On the page to the right, you’ll notice an ad for an upcoming forum on education: M. Night Shyamalan on “I got Schooled”!
http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news-impact/2014/02/common-core-perils-pitfalls-and-opportunities/
LikeLike
Yes, that’s it in a nutshell. What a long, strange trip it’s been.
LikeLike
Great summary Christine. I too shudder a bit whenever I hear such high praise for Massachusetts and anyone from the Pioneer Institute, having suffered through their “leadership” for 20+ years. I finally quit last summer after seven years as an urban principal.
One of my favorite Chesterisms, said in response to the excessive workload the new evaluation system would put on principals: tell your principals they just have to work harder. Harder than the 14-hour days I was already putting in? Are you serious?
Yes, we were the first to do all the “reforms” that everyone now has to do. Why do we have such high test scores? Could the fact that we have one of the highest average incomes and percent of parents with college degrees in the nation have anything to do with it? We are also blessed with a lot of great teachers in part because there is more competition to live and work here than in many places.
LikeLike
PLEASE tell me you are reading Edushyster’s latest post?? It is awesome! http://edushyster.com/?p=4678
LikeLike