Paul Rosenberg writes on Salon about the well-honed Fox-News style tactic of “crying wolf,” “the sky is falling,” we are in an “unprecedented crisis” to achieve political ends, in the present case, the privatization and monetization of public education. In urban districts, the privatization is gobbling up public schools and turning them over to private corporations–both for-profit and non-profit. In suburban districts, which are not prepared to relinquish their community public schools to charter chains, the gold rush is on to panic these districts into buying edu-schlock and paying consultants to train teachers to meet the federal government’s latest mandate.
What Rosenberg describes is what I earlier called the deliberate use of FUD–fear, uncertainty, and doubt–by the well-paid PR machine of the Status Quo privatizers.
Here is a small sample of Rosenberg’s comprehensive review of scare tactics and whom they benefit:
“In September 2012, for example, economist Jeff Faux, principal founder of the Economic Policy Institute, wrote an article, “Education Profiteering; Wall Street’s Next Big Thing?” which first noted, “It is well known, although rarely acknowledged in the press, that the [education] reform movement has been financed and led by the corporate class,” but then went on to note a crucial change:
In recent years, hedge fund operators, leverage-buy-out artists and investment bankers have joined the crusade. They finance schools, sit on the boards of their associations and the management companies that run them, and — most important — have made support of charter schools one of the criteria for campaign giving in the post-Citizens United era. Since most Republicans are already on board for privatization, the political pressure has been mostly directed at Democrats….
“What’s more, Faux noted, there was less money for Wall Street to play with from the sources they had burned, but the money-making opportunities in education were proliferating like never before:
“You start to see entire ecosystems of investment opportunity lining up,” Rob Lytle, a business consultant, earlier this year told a meeting of private equity investors interested in for-profit education companies….
“This is the context in which Andrew Cuomo hooked up with Wall Street, as the New York Times reported in May 2010. Cuomo’s ticket to Wall Street came courtesy of Joe Williams, executive director of Democrats for Education Reform, a PAC that “advances what has become a favorite cause of many of the wealthy founders of New York hedge funds: charter schools.” Members who met with Cuomo included “the founders of funds like Anchorage Capital Partners, with $8 billion under management; Greenlight Capital, with $6.8 billion; and Pershing Square Capital Management, with $5.5 billion.” But in retrospect, 2010 was nothing. As already noted, Cuomo has raised $800,000 from Wall Street charter school supporters — roughly half that total from Moskowitz supporters alone.
“The Philanthropic Dimension
“Money may be all the motivation Wall Street needs, but there’s more. Philanthropy has always been a means for the wealthy to extend their influence over society beyond the marketplace, to serve a multitude of functions. Northern philanthropists spent an enormous amount of money bringing education to Southern blacks after the Civil War, for example. This brought them into prolonged and complex conflicts with both Southern elites, who resisted virtually all education efforts, and with blacks who resisted the Northern philanthropists’ focus on industrial education (epitomized by the Tuskegee model), as well as their broader pattern of trying to appease Southern white racism. (See, for example,”The Education of Blacks in the South, 1860-1935.”) Although highly conflicted and complicated, these efforts eventually synergized with blacks’ own broader civil rights struggles to bring about the integration of public education in the South — at which time, Southerners’ first response was the policy of massive resistance, including the creation of private academies, and the closing of public schools.
“Amazingly, three decades later, the education panic reform movement began the process of recycling the racist Southern resistance strategies as general solutions for the purported failure of public education. Another three decades further on, those very same anti-civil rights strategies are now being touted as the key to civil rights. The reasons are at least partly psychological. After the financial crises decimated the economy, Wall Street elites and their 1 percenter allies were profoundly defensive, as seen most shockingly in remarks comparing their critics to Nazi Germany. But the “productive” manifestation of this same acute status anxiety was arguably much more destructive — that is, the intense desire to re-create themselves as moral leaders, not lepers, by recasting public education as a locus of evil, and portraying its destruction as “the civil rights struggle of our time” — which they, of course, would be only too happy to lead.”

Yes, Paul Rosenberg provides an excellent historical analysis of the context of the Reform Movement and how it “manipulated” the definitions of what we were examining to serve its own ends.
From the piece:
“What Clinton got us to do, and Bush [Jr.] capitalized on it, was focus on the achievement gap,” both between whites and minorities, and between affluent and poor, Berliner told me. Superficially, that sounds like a good thing, but Berliner explained, “The achievement gap gets you away from thinking about equal educational opportunity, which was the [focus of] the Johnson years.” Johnson was a former teacher, Berliner pointed out, who “said that a lot of the problem with schools are that kids are poor, they don’t have good food, they don’t have security, there are drugs and crime, and broken families, and high mobility rates, and migration … That was all input-oriented.” Meaning you look at the kind of resources being provided in order for children to learn.
With Clinton, the focus shifted. “Once you start looking at the gap, you stop looking at the causes of school problems as being outside the school. You start looking for the causes of school problems as being inside the school,” Berliner told me. “I call it the ‘great switcheroo.’ They stopped looking for societal problems, the ‘Great Society’ that Johnson wanted, and started looking for teacher problems, school problems, and Bush capitalized on that, first in Texas, and then nationally.”
Stepping back a bit, Berliner explained the shift in focus like this: “If you see the wreck — you know, black kids score a year, two, three or four years lower than white kids — the people closest to the wreck get blamed. If you talk about equal educational opportunity, then we’re all responsible.”
This is completely the strategy of Arne Duncan, Bill Gates, Michelle Rhee and any number of Strong man Mayors and School Superintendents who have issued their fiats
about “failing” schools.
And now the terms of the debate must be thrown back on them. How we as a society have failed our kids…and KEEP FAILING THEM until the real reasons so many of our society’s true problems are addressed and there is some accountability from those at the TOP of the food chain who enjoy the privilege of making decisions for all the rest of us.
LikeLike
Exactly. This is what stood out for me, too. Very well-said!
Center-right Democrats starting with Clinton have done such a disservice to the poor and working class people of this country and now Democrats think it’s time for yet another neo-liberal Clinton at the helm? Oh dear God, help us!
LikeLike
What we really need is another FDR who will mobilize the working class, take on the robber barons and address poverty. See Harvey Kaye and “The Fight for the Four Freedoms” on Moyers and Company: http://billmoyers.com/
LikeLike
Today’s Times editorial about Cuomo is a must read. And read the comments posted to the Times editorial as well.
LikeLike
Think the charter investors were getting a little antsy?
LikeLike
It’s about Cuomo quashing investigations into political wrongdoing. Thank goodness Cuomo’s term is up this year!
LikeLike
I think that charter investors might have been one (of many) “donors” who were buying influence and were nervous about what an investigation into “political wrongdoing” might yield… but I might be wrong. Maybe the $$$ Cuomo got from the charter crowd had nothing to do with his decision to undercut deBlasio’s efforts to change Bloomberg’s friendly attitude toward charter schools.
LikeLike
This is analysis is on the mark. The achievement gap brought to light in the 1966 Coleman Report has been blamed on teachers and schools, not on the more ubiquitous and politically difficult issue of household poverty and social/economic policies that perpetuate what Johnathan Kozal called “savage inequities.”
LikeLike
Great article Paul
LikeLike
Rosenberg’s analysis- accurate and frightening
LikeLike
Indeed. A huge warning sign for all of us.
LikeLike